AF447 wreckage found
Mark in CA writes...
"Has anyone read anything yet about how deep the wreckage is? The BBC report stated only that they had been searching as deep as 4000 meters, but didn't specify where the wreckage was found. Just curious."
Yes the wreck was located at roughly 3900 meters (12,800') of depth and they disclosed its position but with a 10 nm fudge factor.
"Has anyone read anything yet about how deep the wreckage is? The BBC report stated only that they had been searching as deep as 4000 meters, but didn't specify where the wreckage was found. Just curious."
Yes the wreck was located at roughly 3900 meters (12,800') of depth and they disclosed its position but with a 10 nm fudge factor.
no GPS? or sonar trianguarization?
Originally Posted by WillDAQ
So you're suggesting that Airbus has already discovered the site and removed anything incriminating before then allowing a search that it funded to find the wreckage.... fine example of Occam's Razor there.
While I am elated to hear that they have found what eluded them for so long, I worry that in the past year and a half, the tail section/CVR/FDR have had ample opportunity to get a little covered up with "stuff" and thus elude search. I hope I am wrong, as finding out the "why" is of interest to the air traveling public, as well as to professional aircrews who travel those long transoceanic routes.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 67
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now I understand why the Tech Log is the place where serious people debate the same subject, rather than look for ghosts, some of the above posts are appropriate for the rumour section....
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EGSS
Age: 61
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is good news folks...If I had a catastrophic failure in the cruise and plummeted with my crew and pax to 120 under the ocean, I would hope they would search for my FDR no matter how long it took.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: us
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
vanHorck, precisely. The first AF 447 thread in rumours and news was closed because all manner of esoteric theories and explanations drifted into that thread. The techlog thread is now nearing 3,000 posts, most of them substantive, and many of them very informative postings by very knowledgeable people.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am no conspiracy theorist but when I hear "Airbus" and "black box" spoken in the same sentence, this incident springs to mind: Air France Flight 296 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited by Stu666; 4th Apr 2011 at 21:48. Reason: Link not working
Wasn't the fact that many C/Bs were pulled effecting some systems on the aircraft play a role in the crash.
In any case any pilot that takes a fully loaded plane down to 30 feet above a runway in an "airshow" in a high alpha low speed pass deserves to be hung!
In any case any pilot that takes a fully loaded plane down to 30 feet above a runway in an "airshow" in a high alpha low speed pass deserves to be hung!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With Airbus and Gov. Co. funding the opps. Any data recovered will be dubious to say the least. IMHO this debris field has already been picked clean,
"evidence" replaced and official findings written.
Call me a cynic if you will...but I AM.
"evidence" replaced and official findings written.
Call me a cynic if you will...but I AM.
I for one am happy about the discovery, and optimistic that helpful information will be found. Although the pictures remind me of what a beautiful machine it was.
Last edited by Jetdriver; 5th Apr 2011 at 01:05.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Color me cynical, but I still can not believe that NATO/French subs could not find pinging boxes for 30 days.
But I have no doubt that this time the paint on the FDR/CVR will be consistent.
But I have no doubt that this time the paint on the FDR/CVR will be consistent.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AF296 has nothing to do with this, and the conspiracy theories over that are best left to run on by themselves. The assertion that a crash site at this depth can be tampered with, especially when world-leading authorities on deep oceanographic exploration are closely involved, is frankly ludicrous.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California Central Coast
Age: 74
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wreckage and sonar images
http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol....ges.du.site.ph
I don't think anybody posted this yet apologies if I missed it. Don't know much about aircraft but a bit about sonar - that's a very flat seabed.
I don't think anybody posted this yet apologies if I missed it. Don't know much about aircraft but a bit about sonar - that's a very flat seabed.
Gamekeeper
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: South East
Age: 60
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anywhere where photo's of the A/F elements of the a/c found on the sea floor have been posted? All I've seen is the video details running in the background of the CNN report.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 67
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I take it that they don't wish to disclose the exact location as they don't want every tom dick and harry in the atlantic turning up there.
Bravo for finding the wreckage though. This will hopefully give the relatives and loved ones of those that perished some kind of closeure.
