Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737-400 ferry to EGBP - Kemble

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737-400 ferry to EGBP - Kemble

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 07:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737-400 ferry to EGBP - Kemble

Is there anybody who cares to share some info obout EGBP - Kemble from pilot perspective
How to reach it, navaids, atc etc.

Thanks in advance
737incognito is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 08:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Call me old fashioned, but perhaps you might start by looking at the relevant charts.

Here's a hint: England is the big island north a bit from France.
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 08:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did all that, no instrument procedures, one NDB off the runway...
I'm looking for pilots perspective, not something you can read from the chart, since I need to put an B737 there.

And I do not appreciate your tone.
737incognito is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 09:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 50+ north
Posts: 1,253
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Try this

NATS | AIS - Home
TCAS FAN is online now  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 09:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm glad you don't appreciate my tone, because I find it gobsmackingly unbelievable that anyone ferrying a medium sized jet would rely on information gleaned from an internet forum.

Just so we are clear, I'm calling you unsafe.

And since I live pretty close to Kemble I'd appreciate it if you stayed well clear rather than blundering into my back garden.

pb
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 09:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Age: 75
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow! I can understand why you called yourself Captain Pit Bull. I believe they are illegal now, perhaps you should take note of that before somebody smacks you
hawker750 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 09:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Age: 75
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote: Here's a hint: England is the big island north a bit from France.

You may be old fashioned but you were crap at geography, How can England be an island when it has Scotland and Wales attached to it??? Should check your fact before being extremely rude to people.
hawker750 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 10:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much as I'd love to indulge in a discussion about the nature of Britain versus england versus the UK etc, Hawker you are of course quite correct.

And frankly I don't care, because it is not germane to the point of this thread. Neither do I care if you consider it rude; the fact remains that we have an entire infrastructure dedicated to providing flight planning information and a guy that doesn't seem know how to use it. (I mean if it was his first trip to somewhere like Chambery, fair enough, although the question then would be why isn't the operator providing you with a Cat C brief/training).

And we are not talking about a new PPL here, this is someone who intends to fly a complex airliner. An aircraft that is (or can be ) certified for P-RNAV approaches, in a pretty benign part of the world. Now of course if there are no published approachs then you need to make a visual approach not make up your own RNAV one, but my point is if you can't get into the right part of the sky to do that in a 737-400, even if the local aid is only an NDB, then there is something seriously wrong.

And if there is an unresolved question, go to the horses mouth! Get on the phone and ask the relevant authority (in this case calling Kemble Ops would be a good place to start)

But using a set of anonymous forums instead? COME ON.

And people wonder why the perception of our profession is going down hill.

God forbid this guy has an incident. Can you imagine the subsequent day in court? Could you really rely on information gathered here to show that you'd discharged your planing obligations as the commander?

pb
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 11:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,775
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
Capt Pit Bull,

How do you know that 737 hasn't done all of those things? For all you know he may be prepared to learn as much as possible by seeking any local knowledge from those who have done it. For example, who will tell him to be careful about not confusing Kemble with some of the other local airfields which tend to stand out more than Kemble when approaching from the West.

In my opinion you are a dangerous sort of person to have around aviation because you discourage people from asking questions in case someone thinks they are stupid. You may have had a long and safe career yourself but I wonder how many others have got into trouble because of your attitude.
pulse1 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 11:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And if there is an unresolved question, go to the horses mouth! Get on the phone and ask the relevant authority (in this case calling Kemble Ops would be a good place to start)
Let's hope he doesn't get the same chilly response.

This is a profession pilots' forum. Perhaps he was expecting some qualified answers. Experience tells you things that manuals and people in stuffy offices might not.

I think it's admirable that he's going that extra mile.
NSEU is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 11:16
  #11 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,888
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
who will tell him to be careful about not confusing Kemble with some of the other local airfields
Really? Shouldn't we always be careful about where we are landing?

Look at the chart, it'll show those airfields. Then you can say to yourself, hmmm better keep my wits about me here.

How do you know that 737 hasn't done all of those things?
If he had. And I mean really had, would he need to be here asking questions.
Chesty Morgan is online now  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 12:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 45
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really don't know if the original poster is on a wind-up, but if not I'd suggest him to go onto the CAA website (Ok, technically NATS ), download the AIP information and probably also the VFR charts of the area.

I've been into Kemble, but in nothing as big as a 734, not the hardest airfield in the world to do an NPA into.
Ex Cargo Clown is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 14:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MAN
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The original poster is on another thread asking about RFF cover, guess he is using pprune as source for his preflight, what's next how to file a CA48?
cldrvr is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 14:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do you know that 737 hasn't done all of those things? For all you know he may be prepared to learn as much as possible by seeking any local knowledge from those who have done it. For example, who will tell him to be careful about not confusing Kemble with some of the other local airfields which tend to stand out more than Kemble when approaching from the West.

In my opinion you are a dangerous sort of person to have around aviation because you discourage people from asking questions in case someone thinks they are stupid. You may have had a long and safe career yourself but I wonder how many others have got into trouble because of your attitude.
You see, this is supposed to be a forum for "The very best in practical technical discussion on the web" yet apparently it's actually the "free, might be accurate if you're lucky, preflight briefing service".

It's not my intention to disuade anyone from asking a question, but I do believe people should ask the question in a manner that is likely to yield accurate information. And for specific operational information this is NOT the place and I'm really surprised a professional pilot would think so given the well established methods we have within the industry.

As per Chesty's comments.

Anyway, I sense I'm repeating myself. I have nothing more to say on the matter other than I hope the OP has a safe flight.

For myself, I'm off to find some red meat.

pb
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2010, 10:52
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to be clear:

I was in a contact with Kemble Ops and got all the charts and info from AIP but since we don't normaly do flights to VFR airports without ATC I was trying to get as much info as possible. Last time I did it was in pilot school some 20 years ago, and it was not in UK.
Ofcourse this info is not official but I would try to confirm it and use only confirmed data.
And I didn't force anyone to respond to my question. I was counting on people's good will to share what they know (if they feel like it), just like I do sometimes on this forum.

Regarding some open questions: I'm acting on behalf of the operator, derogation is being asked from lokal CAA regarding cat C training on the basis that there is no Keble in any simulator data base and probably nobody ever flew 737 there before. I'm also guilty of posting an RFF question on Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning part of this forum.
737incognito is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 16:04
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney NSW
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
plenty 737's

I think quite a few B737 classics have landed at Kemble. Rather fewer of them would have taken off afterwards though. Some call it parting-out, some call it recycling but it is scrapping nonetheless. I suspect that is the fate that awaits this 737-400.
enicalyth is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2010, 20:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm not sure at all how it's done correctly there,..but in the US you'd get the AWOS/ASOS self announce on CTAF [10 miles out entering downwind, base, final clear rwy...etc.... a teardrop overflight for collision avoidance survey.set up your jet pattern [1200' - 1500'agl usually].using 45 degree entry to the downwind leg [I guess] trying to use designated calm wind runway, be mindful of the traffic pattern indicator

flaps, gear configuration and airspeeds as applicable/detailed in the AFM..
I understand that this is no C-172, hence why you would ask; but it's right back around to the basics..as applicable
Pugilistic Animus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.