Virgin Atlantic flight from London to NY returns after pilot hurt in laser incident
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you have something tangible to back up your last assertion that these are incredibly brief flashes Tourist? I would expect that my experience is fairly typical and I have been hit multiple times. It is difficult to judge how long the exposure to the [email protected] has been. My immediate reaction is to look away. But the events are highly distracting particularly high powered green [email protected] which I have experienced many times (6-8) in the middle east and the Balkans. On glancing back the [email protected] has still been there, which suggests something other than that which you are saying. Switching off lights also helps, which again indicates that the [email protected] is being actively targetted.
My first concern is to assess if there has been any damage, which takes a moment. As these events (at least the ones I have been aware of) happen at night, it is not always easy to assess whether blurring was there before as a result of tired eyes or due to damage. So far touch wood there does not seem to have been any permanent damage, but I have definitely been aware of some blurred vision the next day. It is reassuring to hear your suggestion that nothing can possibly happen, but some scientific references would be even better.
My first concern is to assess if there has been any damage, which takes a moment. As these events (at least the ones I have been aware of) happen at night, it is not always easy to assess whether blurring was there before as a result of tired eyes or due to damage. So far touch wood there does not seem to have been any permanent damage, but I have definitely been aware of some blurred vision the next day. It is reassuring to hear your suggestion that nothing can possibly happen, but some scientific references would be even better.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Age: 63
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could someone explain the use of the ampersand symbol in the "L" word please?
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@PDR1
For prosecutions - try this......
Three jailed for using [email protected] pens at East Midlands Airport - BBC News
or this.......
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...ngham-29648440
For prosecutions - try this......
Three jailed for using [email protected] pens at East Midlands Airport - BBC News
or this.......
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...ngham-29648440
Then consider what an aeroplane at 8,000 feet and a couple of miles distance actually looks like to a ground-based observer. Mostly it's a blob - a grey/black silhouette. How would said observer know that his/her [email protected] was even HITTING the aeroplane, let alone the cockpit window? The [email protected] target designators which you reference in support of your point have telescopic optics for this, without which (I suggest) these claimed acts of marksmanship are simply impossible for normal humans.
So either
1. You are implying those making the reports on being illuminated by [email protected] are lying or
2.You are overestimating the level of marksmanship required.
Which is it?
Yesterday people turned on Gouli and tried to bulkly him into silence because (not being an ATPL) he wasn't allowed to have an opinion on a subject which they felt he knew nothing about.
Perhaps its time for those bullies to withdraw their abuse or consider adopting a similar silence on the technical nature of [email protected] devices. Who knows, you might actually learn something!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You were temporarily blinded but not temporarily incapacitated?
I stand corrected! Yes temporarily incapacitated which wasn't a major problem at altitude but would be on the latter stages of the approach.
The vast majority of over the counter [email protected] devices are low powered and should be regulated to even lower power fit for purpose which is usually as pointers in a classroom environment.
There are far more powerful devices available on the internet and these could cause serious damage including damage to the Retina so the government need to regulate these out of use of the general public.
The over the counter variety which are low powered should be regulated to lower power still to a minima for using as a classroom pointer.
These things are not toys to be used by bored kids getting a thrill
A ban on the devices other than the very lowest power is the only way as catching the culprits is almost impossible from a position of a jet travelling at high speed
Pace
Gender Faculty Specialist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's my turn
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Ok PDR as you're the resident [email protected] expert why don't you tell us what the beam diameter of a typical [email protected] would be at that distance?
Gender Faculty Specialist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's my turn
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Let me help you out.
A typical beam divergence of a green [email protected] is between 1.2 and 1.5 mRad.
With a beam width of 1mm at 1 foot the beam width at 15000 feet would be approximately 5500mm, or 18 feet.
I think it would be fairly easy to hit a 1 foot target with an 18 foot [email protected]
A typical beam divergence of a green [email protected] is between 1.2 and 1.5 mRad.
With a beam width of 1mm at 1 foot the beam width at 15000 feet would be approximately 5500mm, or 18 feet.
I think it would be fairly easy to hit a 1 foot target with an 18 foot [email protected]
PDR
If you would like to turn to the second page of this forum you will find an ongoing thread about [email protected] attacks and prosecutions of offenders. This alone shows your lack of experience of the subject.
As for the accuracy of [email protected] sighting, no-one has suggested that it is easy to hit an aircraft. That is probably part of the attraction for those who attempt it. The Virgin aircraft in this case was flying a standard departure route from Heathrow, and the [email protected] user may have targeted many aircraft on this and possibly previous days before achieving a hit.
You clearly know a great deal about [email protected], but you do not understand their effect on the pilot of an aircraft full of passengers.
yesterday I challenged someone to provide cites for claims made - a claim that someone had been caught and prosecuted for using a [email protected] against an airliner. It shouldn't have been that hard because such an arrest (never mind a prosecution) would have made it into the news.
As for the accuracy of [email protected] sighting, no-one has suggested that it is easy to hit an aircraft. That is probably part of the attraction for those who attempt it. The Virgin aircraft in this case was flying a standard departure route from Heathrow, and the [email protected] user may have targeted many aircraft on this and possibly previous days before achieving a hit.
You clearly know a great deal about [email protected], but you do not understand their effect on the pilot of an aircraft full of passengers.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ijatta
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Once the report was made to Flight Control, the decision to continue or RTB was, for the most part, out of the Captain's hands.
Last edited by wanabee777; 16th Feb 2016 at 14:52.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PDR1 it is good to see some numbers and your post triggered a couple of minutes search which found a green [email protected] with a beam diameter of 2x7 mm and a divergence of 2 mRad. Apparently their advertised use is for pointing out stars which would be a bit difficult if they wave around as you suggest. But I imagine that gets a bit slow and aiming at planes might be tempting. The beam diameter therefore at the distances we are talking about seems to be over five meters and my real life rather than theoretical input is that they can definitely hit you.
My nephew is an electronics nerd of sorts.
He raised a disturbing point about the recent proliferation of youTube videos detailing:
- how to get the [email protected] diode out of a laptop DVD burner
- how to turn a 5mw [email protected] into a 100mw [email protected]
- and so on.
The vids he showed me each had several million views
Of course, any one smart enough to do these hacks isnt going to test it out on the nearest jet, right?
@Wirbelsturm - wise words, sir
He raised a disturbing point about the recent proliferation of youTube videos detailing:
- how to get the [email protected] diode out of a laptop DVD burner
- how to turn a 5mw [email protected] into a 100mw [email protected]
- and so on.
The vids he showed me each had several million views
Of course, any one smart enough to do these hacks isnt going to test it out on the nearest jet, right?
Go with what you know.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The one I found in a very short period of time says min 900mW, how does that tie in with your numbers? How low would you have to be and how long an exposure for this to be dangerous in your opinion?
The difference seems to be that Chesty and I have experienced this in real life and it was unpleasant....hopefully nothing more. I would be delighted if what PDR1 is saying is correct and there is no risk. But so far I am not convinced, particularly about the exposure time and the difficulty in aiming, which frankly does not tie in with my experience.
The difference seems to be that Chesty and I have experienced this in real life and it was unpleasant....hopefully nothing more. I would be delighted if what PDR1 is saying is correct and there is no risk. But so far I am not convinced, particularly about the exposure time and the difficulty in aiming, which frankly does not tie in with my experience.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PDR1
I disagree entirely with your comments about Gouli.
The reason that there are few [email protected]/airliner prosecutions relative to the number of incidents is that, unless the conduct is persistent, it is difficult to trace the perpetrators.
Some prosecutions from the US -
2014, Stephen Bukucs, 6 months prison & 3 years Supervised Release.
Airliners on approach to Portland International.
Admitted 25 incidents over several months.
Arrested after intense air and ground surveillance by FBI agents and police officers.
2013, Adam Gardenhire, 30 months prison.
Corporate jet on approach to Burbank.
Further charge relating to police helicopter which traced him dropped in plea bargain.
(Sentence reduced following a successful appeal on a point of law.)
2012, Glenn Hansen, 6 months prison & $10,000 fine.
Airliners departing Orlando International on at least 23 occasions.
2012, Michael Smith, 2 years prison & 3 years Supervised Release.
Airliner on approach to Omaha and Police helicopter which traced him.
Whether you believe it or not, the use of [email protected] against aircraft is a serious problem worldwide.
Laser attacks on aeroplanes occur predominantly near airports.
Helicopters (predominantly emergency services) predominantly over cities.
I don't have the latest figures to hand but, in the year ending March 2015, the UK CAA received some 1400 reports - an increase of 3.5% from 2014.
What percentage of those reports do you suggest were false?
ie Made by pilots jumping on the 'bandwagon', as you suggest.
I disagree entirely with your comments about Gouli.
yesterday I challenged someone to provide cites for claims made - a claim that someone had been caught and prosecuted for using a [email protected] against an airliner. It shouldn't have been that hard because such an arrest (never mind a prosecution) would have made it into the news. Unless and until I see that cite I will regard many of these claims with a degree of scepticism.
Some prosecutions from the US -
2014, Stephen Bukucs, 6 months prison & 3 years Supervised Release.
Airliners on approach to Portland International.
Admitted 25 incidents over several months.
Arrested after intense air and ground surveillance by FBI agents and police officers.
2013, Adam Gardenhire, 30 months prison.
Corporate jet on approach to Burbank.
Further charge relating to police helicopter which traced him dropped in plea bargain.
(Sentence reduced following a successful appeal on a point of law.)
2012, Glenn Hansen, 6 months prison & $10,000 fine.
Airliners departing Orlando International on at least 23 occasions.
2012, Michael Smith, 2 years prison & 3 years Supervised Release.
Airliner on approach to Omaha and Police helicopter which traced him.
Whether you believe it or not, the use of [email protected] against aircraft is a serious problem worldwide.
Laser attacks on aeroplanes occur predominantly near airports.
Helicopters (predominantly emergency services) predominantly over cities.
I don't have the latest figures to hand but, in the year ending March 2015, the UK CAA received some 1400 reports - an increase of 3.5% from 2014.
What percentage of those reports do you suggest were false?
ie Made by pilots jumping on the 'bandwagon', as you suggest.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I posted an analysis with the power density numbers showing that the problem was unlikely to be as significant as suggested, but someone has deleted it. Why?
PDR
Edit: in fact BOTH of my posts analysing the numbers have been deleted. Why??
PDR
Edit: in fact BOTH of my posts analysing the numbers have been deleted. Why??
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by andytug
By that logic it would also be impossible to take a photogragh of said aircraft with a high-magnification zoom lens camera handheld.....but that can be done easily also.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I, like many others who more likely post on the rotary forum have a reasonable amount of experience when it comes to using a hand held [email protected] pointer called an LPL30.
The hand is certainly not steady enough to maintain lock on an aircraft thousands of feet away, even when the beam is visible through NVG.
The idea that a chav could do anything other than catch the aircraft with a momentary flick doesn't hold water.
I am surprised/disappointed that PDR1s posts are being removed, because I don't see anything in them that could possibly help the people shining [email protected], and the are factually correct.
The hand is certainly not steady enough to maintain lock on an aircraft thousands of feet away, even when the beam is visible through NVG.
The idea that a chav could do anything other than catch the aircraft with a momentary flick doesn't hold water.
I am surprised/disappointed that PDR1s posts are being removed, because I don't see anything in them that could possibly help the people shining [email protected], and the are factually correct.
