Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Flaperon washes up on Reunion Island

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Flaperon washes up on Reunion Island

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Aug 2015, 22:02
  #421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The description of the "other aircraft debris found" is "pieces of windows, seat cushions and aluminum". Sounds a lot like the sewing machine piece and tea kettle, and the seat cushion the beachcomber said he burned. In other words, he's just repeating stuff from the news.
PrivtPilotRadarTech is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 22:13
  #422 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montgomery, NY, USA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, someone please explain this article which just appeared. How would the discovery of the flaperon validate a beacon from one of the black boxes? I am sure that either Boeing and/or Malaysia Air would have know the make and model of both black boxes prior to this weeks discovery. And if by some crazy point this article is accurate, does that mean the search goes back to where these signals were first heard????

Wreckage from Malaysian jet validates signals from Redmond-built black box - Puget Sound Business Journal
patrickal is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 22:30
  #423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
igs942,
You're assuming the fuselage's pressure hull was not breached on impact? If so, it would be unlikely to sink. But, if it did, the figures of diff. pressure you are using are positive values, i.e., the cabin is designed to withstand a higher pressure than the exterior (opposite of a submarine). So a/c have inward relief valves that open at about -0.5 psi to stop the hull being squashed by negative differential AIR pressure if the a/c descends too rapidly. If, for whatever reason, the cabin was intact but sinking rapidly, the inward relief valves would probably be inadequate. So the end result might be as you said. But such a scenario seems incredible.

As has been said, Réunion is remote and about 30 n.m. in diameter, so the chances of any one piece of floating debris making a landfall there after travelling thousands are similarly remote. If a flaperon from MH370 has indeed achieved that, it’s likely that it was not alone. On this evening’s news there was an item showing an airborne search of the Mauritian coastline. Fair enough, but I’d put my money firstly on the eastern coast of Madagascar; secondly the African coast; and then maybe the Seychelles group.

[EDIT]
Slats11,
My limited experience of night flying in the pax cabin in recent years suggests that (sadly) nobody ever looks out of the windows, and the blinds are generally closed. By the time dinner was over and the cabin lights were dimmed, any lone eccentric looking outside would have been unlikely to realise that the gibbous moon was on the wrong side of the a/c. Nowadays, curiosity and observation of the skies are a rarity, not to mention understanding. Portable electronics are more enticing...

Last edited by Chris Scott; 6th Aug 2015 at 22:52.
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 22:55
  #424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wales
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sober Lark
Agree with Severe Clear. I have heard the French have not confirmed this piece is from the Malaysian aircraft. They have a high suspicion but at this point in time they are not certain. The Malaysian's took it upon themselves to make the announcement.

There still seems to be discussion over what the french did or did not say,yesterday I posted a transcript of the announcement , have now converted the recording, hear for yourselves, the French DID NOT CONFIRM part from MH370, all though most of us reckon it is 99.9% certain to be so.


http://v8.tinypic.com/player.swf?file=ruodxt&s=8 sorry about quality due to file size had to turn it into flash to get it to upload

Last edited by oldoberon; 6th Aug 2015 at 23:03. Reason: add explanation for url
oldoberon is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 23:01
  #425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Malaysian government announcements

Any announcements made by the Malaysian government should probably be considered in the context of the current political atmosphere, including the 1MDB contro
InfrequentFlier511 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 23:02
  #426 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This is the best contemporaneous report I have fund about the co-pilots phone. Statement to CNN by an unnamed US official, although the information came from Malaysian investigators.

Appears phone was on and made transient automatic contact with the network - there was no actual message or voice call. The phone just came into range of that cell tower at that time.


Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Co-pilot's cell on, U.S. official says - CNN.com
slats11 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 23:20
  #427 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can understand families of those on board might be clinging on to the hope of the piece of the aircraft not having been confirmed by the French but it's surely only a matter of time, isn't it? It was reported yesterday that they were unable to confirm officially due to legal reasons...whatever that means.

It does seem incredibly stupid, to the point of questioning his integrity, that the Malaysian PM might make an announcement but if you look at what he said he didn't even reference the French. He said a team of international experts. It really does look like he has other agendas for whatever reasons. Quite possibly his international experts are merely interviewees or 'experts' on international news.

I found it very odd that he would specifically reference, with a date stamp and all, the confirmation he made about the flight ending in the southern Indian Ocean. As if he were publicly demonstrating an attitude of "I told you so"...

He made several speech errors as well during the speech. I would love to see what a decent psychologist thought of his body language and speech patterns.

Maybe I'm going too far but from the beginning they have made weird statements and I ask myself if that consistent behaviour is through being inadequate to deal with a crisis or if it has been a deliberate game of shadows and fog all along.
dmba is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 23:52
  #428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My recollection is CNN on air reported that the phone was not logged into the cellular network when the plane took off. They speculated that something must have caused him or someone to switch it on. They also said they were attempting to clarify an ambiguity in that their source confirmed that no phone call was made but would not or could not confirm or deny if a text was sent or attempted to be sent. No further information seems to have come to light.
Undertow is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2015, 23:59
  #429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My recollection is CNN on air reported that the phone was not logged into the cellular network when the plane took off. They speculated that something must have caused him or someone to switch it on. They also said they were attempting to clarify an ambiguity in that their source confirmed that no phone call was made but would not or could not confirm or deny if a text was sent or attempted to be sent. No further information seems to have come to light.
That fits with my recollection. Can't find anything more definitive about this. One of many oddities that seems to have quietly disappeared from the public domain.
slats11 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 00:25
  #430 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Age: 45
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheers Chris,


Initially, I was posting thinking that the integrity of the pressure hull had been compromised (but I did have the Ethiopian hijacking in mind at the time of posting). It would seem that with or without an intact fuselage, debris would probable be omitted and make its way to the surface (I don't think 60ft is deep enough to compress seat cushions enough to overcome their natural buoyancy).


A question for those in the know: What does the RAT power? Would deployment of the RAT have initiated the partial, final handshake? It seems to be accepted that the final partial handshake was initiated by the a/c in boot up mode.
igs942 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 00:29
  #431 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: N. California
Age: 80
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Igs942

The Satcom unit gets its power from the left AC bus.
The RAT does not supply power to that bus.
Propduffer is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 00:31
  #432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Age: 45
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, and regarding the window, aluminium, seat cushion 'finds'......


I reckon they have found sod all. Up until now, every find, from kettle to ladder to sewing machine, has resulted in a photo in the media in record time. We have had nothing today.....
igs942 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 01:26
  #433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think that sequence is the best fit.

The Dixie cups won't keep you conscious at higher flight levels. Hence the advice to quickly put yours on before helping others. The Dixie cups will reduce the risk of permanent brain damage and will speed up restoration of consciousness at lower levels. But you need to put them on quickly and the system is predicated on an emergency descent. They are a safety measure for technical problems, not terrorism.

Higher flow rates for pilots will prevent / delay loss of consciousness.
slats11 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 04:47
  #434 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: France
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if the 'legal reasons' why the French 'procureur adjoint' only went as far as to say that there were 'strong presumptions' the flaperon belonged to the Malaysia Airlines plane were to slow down any legal grounds for Malaysia to take the piece for themselves to investigate....if it is 100% certain then could Malaysia have grounds to take it?
gmorton is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 06:48
  #435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: bangko
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

gmorton

I wonder if the 'legal reasons' why the French 'procureur adjoint' only went as far as to say that there were 'strong presumptions' the flaperon belonged to the Malaysia Airlines plane were to slow down any legal grounds for Malaysia to take the piece for themselves to investigate....if it is 100% certain then could Malaysia have grounds to take it?
Seeing Malaysia Govt lies in the first week - this is plausible
skippybangkok is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 10:43
  #436 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,501
Received 169 Likes on 91 Posts
Deployed or not?

I'm waiting to see if the DGA lab can determine anything about the deployment state of this flap. Deployed might mean that the flight crew was in control of the aircraft at the point of ditching. On the other hand, if it was deployed earlier, it could mean that the plane was traveling slower and in a higher drag and fuel consumption configuration and that the range and calculated ditching point are incorrect.
My understanding of the flaperon operation is that deployed with flaps down is the same as full scale aileron deflection down on that wing.
Therefore if proved that the flaperon was down at the time of impact, it could equally be assumed that the aileron's on that wing were deflected full down, irrespective of flap position.
TURIN is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 12:43
  #437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 59
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by slats11
Yep that Chinese ship heard the underwater beacon of the recorder. Just like the Chinese satellite that earlier found that debris in the South China Sea.

From the outset, this incident has been politicised and subject to disinformation.

I sometimes wonder if recent events in the SCS are somehow connected with MH370.
In part, it may be quite possible.
Several Asian countries are pissed at Malaysia because of the way it handled this.
A couple of old articles:

How MH370 episode has affected balance of politics in SE Asia - Oneindia

MH370 and its political repercussions, SE Asia News & Top Stories - The Straits Times
DirtyProp is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 16:13
  #438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, someone please explain this article which just appeared. How would the discovery of the flaperon validate a beacon from one of the black boxes? I am sure that either Boeing and/or Malaysia Air would have know the make and model of both black boxes prior to this weeks discovery. And if by some crazy point this article is accurate, does that mean the search goes back to where these signals were first heard????
Shameless local boosterism, I suspect.
There is definitely shameless local boosterism in that article, but I believe that the basis of the claim has something to do with the (suspected) black box pings that were heard in April '14. These were heard in the sea off of NW Australia. Some of the analysis of current and wind patterns have indicated that the flaperon would have gone in the water off NW Australia in order to end up at Reunion.

The maps that I found show the area around the northern of the two pings was searched and larger areas to the west were searched, but I have not seen any maps showing that the area between the pings, along the 7th satellite ping ring, has been searched. Does anyone here know if it has?

Last edited by tipo158; 8th Aug 2015 at 18:37.
tipo158 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 19:21
  #439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NZ
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Potential finding in the Maldives
https://twitter.com/mohamedrajih13/s...86821492576260

However a follow up tweet from that user mentions it was found 45 days ago, and was thrown away!
tiger9999187 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2015, 19:41
  #440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ventura, California
Age: 65
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I can tell, the Réunion flaperon is the only piece of debris discovered so far that has a reasonable probability of coming from the plane.
thcrozier is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.