Airbus A320 crashed in Southern France
Quote:
Departure was delayed by half hour.The spokeswoman VP couldnt account for why it did when interrogated by a journalist.
Departure was delayed by half hour.The spokeswoman VP couldnt account for why it did when interrogated by a journalist.
Potentially a cause of delay?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London
Age: 56
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
58000FH is hardly "old". Well within the A320 design life.
Some information can be found here.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Derby, UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Timing
Apologies if it has already been answered but why is there an apparent discrepancy in timings from the FR24 information and the timings that the media and Germanwings are saying was last contact?
FR24 had last contact at 09.41 yet Germanwings says it was 09.53?
FR24 had last contact at 09.41 yet Germanwings says it was 09.53?
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if the A320 had a decompression then the 'procedural thing' to do is descend to 10000' PDQ, squawk 7700 and tell ATC what is happening and what you need in terms of airspace - is that so?
- Get on Oxygen
- Establish comms between the 2 pilots, confirm who is flying.
- That pilot states "Emergency Descent" and actions this via MCP (Autopilot selections)
- This will involve essentially a random lower Altitude and Pull to start the descent, turn & Pull Hdg to turn according to SOP (varies), select an appropriate speed
- Ensure Idle thrust (autothrust, or manually if required), and select speedbrake as required by type of descent
- Now refine the Autopilot settings - sensible Altitude, Hdg, Speed etc.
- Now call for drill and check what you have done from ECAM drill, or QRH
- In that drill will come R/T, Squawk
It should not be difficult to see that if the "get on Oxy" goes wrong, life is not looking good (and not saying that happened here). It is far more important than starting the descent.
There is no passport control flying between BCN and DUS.
Interflug is online now Report Post Reply
Interflug is online now Report Post Reply
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably not relevant, but this airframe sustained a bit of flap damage back in 2002.
http://www.fss.aero/accident-reports...2-07-09-UK.pdf
http://www.fss.aero/accident-reports...2-07-09-UK.pdf
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: EU
Age: 53
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Australian journalist in London says that one of the school kids had lost/misplaced their passport and that at one point there was concern that they would not make the flight.
Potentially a cause of delay?
Potentially a cause of delay?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berlin
Age: 55
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is more of a sign how bad a magazine "Der Spiegel" has become. They just cannot imagine that such an accident and the loss of colleagues you possibly personally know can make you unfit to fly.
I have written to "Der Spiegel" and asked them to substantiate their claim or to drop this wild speculation.
I have written to "Der Spiegel" and asked them to substantiate their claim or to drop this wild speculation.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Gone Flying...
Age: 63
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An explosive decompression would be more in line with a lower ROD as well as with the theory of the crew being unconscious until impact.
Pure speculation, but I would incline to the theory of an uncontained structural damage leading to sudden decompression and to the crew to initiate an emergency descent (with a lower rate due to the need to not increase speed) having made the initial procedures, but failing to fine tune them, due to having lost consciousness.
Thence the lack of communication with ATC...
Pure speculation, but I would incline to the theory of an uncontained structural damage leading to sudden decompression and to the crew to initiate an emergency descent (with a lower rate due to the need to not increase speed) having made the initial procedures, but failing to fine tune them, due to having lost consciousness.
Thence the lack of communication with ATC...
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you had a depressurisation, an engine failure, a cabin fire or
say a windscreen blown out (is that poss?) a high level birdstrike into the
windscreen (how likely could that be?) would you still stay on track and descend into the mountains?
say a windscreen blown out (is that poss?) a high level birdstrike into the
windscreen (how likely could that be?) would you still stay on track and descend into the mountains?
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Age: 63
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no passport control flying between BCN and DUS
In which case a pax with missing ID might be a problem, albeit solvable.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: btw SAMAR and TOSPA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So like a UK domestic flight? ID still needed which is likely to be a passport, national identity card or driving license.
In which case a pax with missing ID might be a problem, albeit solvable.
In which case a pax with missing ID might be a problem, albeit solvable.
You can get past security and to the gate without ID everywhere in Europe, though, if your destination is in the Schengen area.
This combination makes it dangerous to miss your return flight just at the gate as one does not notice the missing ID on the flight ex Germany (happened to me in France and was resolved by my airline ID card after a lot of discussions only)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The (reported) total lack of communications from the crew for the entire duration of the descent is strongly suggestive of crew incapacitation.
It appears from what we know thus far that the crew have commanded the descent, and the average rate would appear to be consistent (I would imagine) with speed brakes out, or at least a speed of close to Mmo/Vmo.
I can only speak for the 737, and am led to believe A320 family is similar in the drills, so imagine (via the AFS) a random lower altitude would be initially set (just to start the descent ) with one of the follow up actions being to come back to it to set 10,000 or MSA (whichever higher) implying that, if you lost consciousness after commencing the descent, you may continue down to . . . . well, whatever altitude was set by default on the panel (could be as low as 0000)
I have heard reliable reports of a 737 flying around for a significant amount of time (lets say more than 1 day ) with the crew 02 turned off down at the bottle due to a maintenance error. It appears that the 02 expended during the mandated crew 02 tests done during this period, was not significant compared to what was left in the line between bottle/mask.
God knows how the crew(s) who flew it 2 ? 4 ? or however many sectors for however many days must have felt when they heard they operated it, with but a few seconds worth, of 02 available in the lines . . . personally, I think I would feel quite sick.
Very short odds indeed for an aircraft with a similar maintenance whoopsy to coincidentally have a decompression requiring the use of crew 02, but, that's what Murphy is for. . . . . . .
It appears from what we know thus far that the crew have commanded the descent, and the average rate would appear to be consistent (I would imagine) with speed brakes out, or at least a speed of close to Mmo/Vmo.
I can only speak for the 737, and am led to believe A320 family is similar in the drills, so imagine (via the AFS) a random lower altitude would be initially set (just to start the descent ) with one of the follow up actions being to come back to it to set 10,000 or MSA (whichever higher) implying that, if you lost consciousness after commencing the descent, you may continue down to . . . . well, whatever altitude was set by default on the panel (could be as low as 0000)
I have heard reliable reports of a 737 flying around for a significant amount of time (lets say more than 1 day ) with the crew 02 turned off down at the bottle due to a maintenance error. It appears that the 02 expended during the mandated crew 02 tests done during this period, was not significant compared to what was left in the line between bottle/mask.
God knows how the crew(s) who flew it 2 ? 4 ? or however many sectors for however many days must have felt when they heard they operated it, with but a few seconds worth, of 02 available in the lines . . . personally, I think I would feel quite sick.
Very short odds indeed for an aircraft with a similar maintenance whoopsy to coincidentally have a decompression requiring the use of crew 02, but, that's what Murphy is for. . . . . . .
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wengen
Age: 53
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apologies if this point has already been covered but do commercial pilots undergo training to experience the effects of depressurisation and hypoxia? I see from my logbook that in a seven year flying period in the RAF I underwent depressurisation training on four occasions, two by means of a simulated explosive decompression (quite dramatic) and two from the more insidious form of slow loss of oxygen. One thing that struck me was how quickly you recovered when oxygen was restored. I appreciate that loss of pressurisation drills are carried out in the Flight Sim, etc, but these dont give you the experience of what happens to your body in the event a real depressurisation