Airbus A320 crashed in Southern France
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Universe
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Structural failure fits the accident scenario quite well but I would be really surprised by both crew being incapacitated to this extreme.
It started out decending at 2300ft/min, then it went to 3050ft/min all the way down to 4225ft/min and then back up the scale to the point of impact. Is this normal if the aircraft was on autopilot?
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ALandDownUnder
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it is structural failure of some sort, could the noise that was assumed to come from the nose wheel door actually have been a symptom of something else, some distortion?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All these decompression/pressurisation ideas are all well and good.
However, they do not explain why an experienced flight crew would then go and select a FL below 10,000ft when they know they are over the Alps and make no course alteration whatsoever before then becoming incapacitated.
This makes no sense to me.
However, they do not explain why an experienced flight crew would then go and select a FL below 10,000ft when they know they are over the Alps and make no course alteration whatsoever before then becoming incapacitated.
This makes no sense to me.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 71
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
O2 in the lavatories
This seems a suitable occasion to re-float a question that I tabled about one month ago (and subsequently modded out) - Garuda domestic are currently issuing instructions in their safety briefings that in-toilet O2 systems have been removed from their aircraft (738) and "in the event of cabin depressurisation, please return to your seat and use the overhead O2 mask".
These systems were removed apparently as the result of an NTSB(?) directive a couple of years ago, that directive since reversed - but not by Garuda.
I wonder how many other operators removed those systems world-wide?
As for the concept of the crew member in the toilet at the time of de-compression returning to the flight deck with the O2 bottle and mask, I doubt that would be possible even if the aircraft does still have the system installed.
Not unless he has oven gloves available.
However, back to my unanswered question. What is the likelihood that a person could actually make it back to their seat (or back to the flight deck) from a lavatory with or without O2 system installed.
We will presume that said crew member was in a fully-clothed condition when the de-pressurisation occurred.
These systems were removed apparently as the result of an NTSB(?) directive a couple of years ago, that directive since reversed - but not by Garuda.
I wonder how many other operators removed those systems world-wide?
As for the concept of the crew member in the toilet at the time of de-compression returning to the flight deck with the O2 bottle and mask, I doubt that would be possible even if the aircraft does still have the system installed.
Not unless he has oven gloves available.
However, back to my unanswered question. What is the likelihood that a person could actually make it back to their seat (or back to the flight deck) from a lavatory with or without O2 system installed.
We will presume that said crew member was in a fully-clothed condition when the de-pressurisation occurred.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Thirty West
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
However, back to my unanswered question. What is the likelihood that a person could actually make it back to their seat (or back to the flight deck) from a lavatory with or without O2 system installed.
However, they do not explain why an experienced flight crew would then go and select a FL below 10,000ft when they know they are over the Alps and make no course alteration whatsoever before then becoming incapacitated
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 54
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@Liveryman
The AB procedure is to initiate the descent first and then when established in the descent set the appropriate altitude.
If on oxygen this should work but if not.......
The AB procedure is to initiate the descent first and then when established in the descent set the appropriate altitude.
If on oxygen this should work but if not.......
Join Date: May 2008
Location: El Paso, Texas
Age: 72
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
last a/c I flew was b767. before starting engines ck list we always checked emer o2 set 100 per cent and push to test while watching bottle pressure. first flight of day, don and restow.
o2 is a very important emergency system and very much respected by professional pilots.
many rules re o2.
o2 is a very important emergency system and very much respected by professional pilots.
many rules re o2.
I would not be surprised to hear that a recommendation would be made for one flight crew member to be on Oxygen at all times above 10000". Following the AirAsia and MH370 it wouldn't be just airbus a/c.
Pretty uncomfortable for LH and I guess more O2 required.
Pretty uncomfortable for LH and I guess more O2 required.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never understood why you wouldn't just set FL100/MEA in the window straight away instead of setting something to come back and fine tune later. A few extra clicks is adding fractions of a second and by that time you should be on oxygen having completed the most vital and time critical memory actions anyway.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London
Age: 56
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unlikely, I would venture, since the everyday impact on SA and crew comms would create more issues than it would resolve.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Age: 61
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope, not similar in europe. There is no such rule since JAR OPS came around, up to FL410 nobody needs to sniff oxygen if the other leaves the flightdeck.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Thirty West
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never understood why you wouldn't just set FL100/MEA in the window straight away instead of setting something to come back and fine tune later. A few extra clicks is adding fractions of a second and by that time you should be on oxygen having completed the most vital and time critical memory actions anyway.
I regard the current procedure as dangerous...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cirr737
Yep - I my daily work I decided for myself to discard that piece of the procedure and always set a safe target on the first loop for exactly the same reason. Usually its FL100 but before entering higher terrain I will brief my "first target" to the chap next to me...
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: back of beyond
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can anyone with Airbus experience let us know how many "clicks" the alt knob gives you in say half a turn - a quick flip? Even on 1000ft/click, I find it strange that you'd get 30 or more, as some seem to be implying. How on earth would you be able to set an accurate altitude?
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Universe
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the "Window replacement" speculation: Windows are plug-fit - so unlikely they are lost suddenly.
Leaves NWD speculation re. structural damage... Hope facts surface soon (and specifically the FDR in readable shape).
Leaves NWD speculation re. structural damage... Hope facts surface soon (and specifically the FDR in readable shape).
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: btw SAMAR and TOSPA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At the high rate of descent and with the many mountains around it is likely that the GPWS alarm went off around FL100.
What would it do?
Disengage autopilot?
Pullup?
What would it do?
Disengage autopilot?
Pullup?
