MH17 down near Donetsk
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: East of Eden
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@AreOut
I agree - which is part of the point I was trying to make that such half-assed proxy wars not treated seriously can be a bigger problem than serious wars.
What if one of the aeroflot planes crashed for whatever reason. Of course the issue would become instantly political and could be used as an excuse for Russia to "bring order" to Kiev. Some crazy people now think NATO can be brought in to fight Russia - which is either very unrealistic or very crazy.
they were (and still are) flying to Dnepropetrovsk that is some 50 miles from a warzone which is a bit crazy because they are now practically at war
What if one of the aeroflot planes crashed for whatever reason. Of course the issue would become instantly political and could be used as an excuse for Russia to "bring order" to Kiev. Some crazy people now think NATO can be brought in to fight Russia - which is either very unrealistic or very crazy.
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Mayalsians, if they have any sense, will ask for blackbox help from Australia, who they already have arrangements with because of MH370, and not let the US get their hands on them either.
British air accident investigators will retrieve data from the black boxes of crashed flight MH17, UK Prime Minister David Cameron has said.
This follows a request by authorities in the Netherlands, where the Malaysia Airlines plane flew from before crashing in Ukraine.
The experts, based at Farnborough, will download data from the flight recorders for "international analysis".
This follows a request by authorities in the Netherlands, where the Malaysia Airlines plane flew from before crashing in Ukraine.
The experts, based at Farnborough, will download data from the flight recorders for "international analysis".
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: NC
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Been reading more about the sa-11 operating in standalone mode. According to multiple web sites (such as Engagement and Fire Control Radars (S-Band, X-band) ) the 9S35 Fire Dome radar mounted to the Telar in the Buk M1 system DOES have standalone IFF capabilities. Anyone have any first hand knowledge about how the standalone IFF works ?
. The 9S35 Fire Dome provides a limited search and acquisition capability, a tracking capability and CW illumination for terminal guidance of the semi-active homing SAM seekers. It incorporates an IFF interrogator, optical tracker, datalink, and is powered by the TELAR's gas turbine generator. A shared antenna is employed for two X-band transmit/receive channels. These respectively provide a pulsed mode for search and track functions, with linear chirp for compression, and a CW mode for illumination. Monopulse angle tracking is employed for jam resistance. For target tracking the antenna and feed system provide a mainlobe with 2.5° width in azimuth and 1.3° in elevation. For CW illumination the antenna and feed system provide a mainlobe with 1.4° width in azimuth and 2.65° in elevation.
Operating autonomously, the 9S35 will take 4 seconds to sweep a 120° sector, with an elevation of 6° to 7°. When cued to acquire and track, with will take 2 seconds to sweep a 10° x 7° az/elev solid angle. Average power output in pulsed tracking modes varies between 0.5 and 1 kiloWatt, with CW illumination at 2 kiloWatts. The search and monopulse angle tracking receivers are both rated at a Noise Figure of NF=10 dB. The range error is cited at 175 metres, the angular error at less than 1°. The radar can switch from standby mode to combat operation in twenty seconds.
Operating autonomously, the 9S35 will take 4 seconds to sweep a 120° sector, with an elevation of 6° to 7°. When cued to acquire and track, with will take 2 seconds to sweep a 10° x 7° az/elev solid angle. Average power output in pulsed tracking modes varies between 0.5 and 1 kiloWatt, with CW illumination at 2 kiloWatts. The search and monopulse angle tracking receivers are both rated at a Noise Figure of NF=10 dB. The range error is cited at 175 metres, the angular error at less than 1°. The radar can switch from standby mode to combat operation in twenty seconds.
"According to multiple web sites (such as Engagement and Fire Control Radars (S-Band, X-band) ) the 9S35 Fire Dome radar mounted to the Telar in the Buk M1 system DOES have standalone IFF capabilities."
it does but its usage requires properly trained squad, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if rebels only knew how to acquire target and shoot and used their "spies" some hundreds miles to the west to alarm them about incoming military aircraft
it does but its usage requires properly trained squad, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if rebels only knew how to acquire target and shoot and used their "spies" some hundreds miles to the west to alarm them about incoming military aircraft
"Buk M1 system DOES have standalone IFF capabilities."
and what chance is there for a (basically) Soviet-spec IFF to identify a 777 as a 'friend'? (remember - in military, 'no marker' - NEVER a friend)
and what chance is there for a (basically) Soviet-spec IFF to identify a 777 as a 'friend'? (remember - in military, 'no marker' - NEVER a friend)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wales
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TEEEJ
nice explanatory image, doesn't look as if the pilot would have known a thing, if the angle of entry was slightly front to rear co might have had chance to say say a brief something .
Hope they have that piece secure, any idea how far from the main crash site it is.
nice explanatory image, doesn't look as if the pilot would have known a thing, if the angle of entry was slightly front to rear co might have had chance to say say a brief something .
Hope they have that piece secure, any idea how far from the main crash site it is.
Oldoberon,
No problem. I found it on another forum. See following for where it was recovered from.
MH17 crash: FT photo shows signs of damage from missile strike - FT.com
No problem. I found it on another forum. See following for where it was recovered from.
The wreckage was recovered by the people of Petropavlovka from a villager’s back yard last Thursday and moved to the roadside because it was believed to be important.
The various recovered panels can be used to work out shrapnel density and vector at each panel location.
Any structure with both entrance and exit holes will yield a shrapnel particle path.
Integration of the paths will produce the position of detonation relative to the T7.
It takes more work to determine the missile vector. It will be somewhat like working out which way a shotgun was pointed from the shot pattern on an oblique target.
Any structure with both entrance and exit holes will yield a shrapnel particle path.
Integration of the paths will produce the position of detonation relative to the T7.
It takes more work to determine the missile vector. It will be somewhat like working out which way a shotgun was pointed from the shot pattern on an oblique target.
About Robert Parry's article:
He does a thing called "cherry picking" and uses a bit of bias himself, and some filling in of the blanks where facts are not available (a point he gets at early, in terms of whatever facts US DoS have, or the intel folks, it isn't all shared right away. ) There's a reason for that, and I don't think he's being honest about understanding what it is.
That criticism considered, I don't disagree with his indictment of the press corps (of which he is a member) in general.
What I’ve been told by one source, who has provided accurate information on similar matters in the past, is that U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms.
The source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops were actually eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers involved were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said.
The source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops were actually eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers involved were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said.
That criticism considered, I don't disagree with his indictment of the press corps (of which he is a member) in general.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We could perhaps find a certain degree of reconciliation in this awful tragedy, if it was accidental, in the sense that a civilian transport was not the intended target. But what if it was not and the aircraft was deliberately targeted in an attempt to further isolate the Ukraine from the West. Then it can only be described as barbaric, the very worse of war crimes, acts which ocurred during the Balkan Wars. Violations of every rule in the book about how to conduct warfare. It had happened before and was happing again, somewhere else. In the West, the fact that the so called unrest in Eastern Ukraine had escalated to a major internal conflict,conducted not in strict observance of the Queensberry Rules must have been known and if not, should have been known to those who were tasked with the burden of responsibility for the safe conduct of passangers in all designated airspace. We are of course only too well acquainted with the precept that all air accidents involve a causal chain of factors, which when combined result in disaster. In this instance the major factor in this chain is the failure of proper and timely action to ban all civilian overflights in the region. Earlier in this thread someone had said it was the penny pinching bean counters to blame. I don`t think so. I would be inclined to question the faceless armies of bureaucrats, their painfully slow digestion and their highly developed skills of passing the buck.
Papapapahotel - truck carrying sam vehicle is same in pictures 6 and 8,
Yes the Buk on the trailer picture is confirmed as being taken in Torez. See following link for large image.
https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMi...7d36994c08.jpg
From (Note video in following post for confirmation of location in Torez)
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/cla...-3#post-117428
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/cla...-ukraine.3977/
As you can see that truck/trailer has history. Truck cab has what appears to be same stripe/decal.
The video of the truck/trailer with Buk on was highlighted in the Russian military brief on MH17.
It appears that the Russian military have done no work on this other than repeat what was on social media
and claiming it to be in Krasnoarmeysk which is in Ukrainian Government hands.
Yes the Buk on the trailer picture is confirmed as being taken in Torez. See following link for large image.
https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMi...7d36994c08.jpg
From (Note video in following post for confirmation of location in Torez)
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/cla...-3#post-117428
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/cla...-ukraine.3977/
As you can see that truck/trailer has history. Truck cab has what appears to be same stripe/decal.
The video of the truck/trailer with Buk on was highlighted in the Russian military brief on MH17.
It appears that the Russian military have done no work on this other than repeat what was on social media
and claiming it to be in Krasnoarmeysk which is in Ukrainian Government hands.
Last edited by TEEEJ; 22nd Jul 2014 at 22:10. Reason: Images resized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We could perhaps find a certain degree of reconciliation in this awful tragedy, if it was accidental, in the sense that a civilian transport was not the intended target. But what if it was not and the aircraft was deliberately targeted in an attempt to further isolate the Ukraine from the West. Then it can only be described as barbaric, the very worse of war crimes, acts which ocurred during the Balkan Wars. Violations of every rule in the book about how to conduct warfare. It had happened before and was happing again, somewhere else. In the West, the fact that the so called unrest in Eastern Ukraine had escalated to a major internal conflict,conducted not in strict observance of the Queensberry Rules must have been known and if not, should have been known to those who were tasked with the burden of responsibility for the safe conduct of passangers in all designated airspace. We are of course only too well acquainted with the precept that all air accidents involve a causal chain of factors, which when combined result in disaster. In this instance the major factor in this chain is the failure of proper and timely action to ban all civilian overflights in the region. Earlier in this thread someone had said it was the penny pinching bean counters to blame. I don`t think so. I would be inclined to question the faceless armies of bureaucrats, their painfully slow digestion and their highly developed skills of passing the buck.
I would have thought the beneficiaries of such an act would actually be the Ukranians, especially as they have been losing in the East.
Nevertheless, I believe it was an accident.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Sydney (Aust)
Age: 78
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The missile truck
Teej posting images of the SAM being moved
Apparently the motor dealership whose billboard is visible in the third image is in Krasnoarmeysk. Sorry, can't recall where I read that. This is no way proves the billboard is also there. Maybe someone who knows hows to get EXIF informaton from youtube images can tell where it was really taken.
BTW it is useful to read the "other side" websites too. And believe none of them.
claiming it to be in Krasnoarmeysk which is in Ukrainian Government hands.
BTW it is useful to read the "other side" websites too. And believe none of them.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lost in EU
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"But what if it was not and the aircraft was deliberately targeted in an attempt to further isolate the Ukraine from the West."
That doesn't make sense, actually it has pushed Ukraine closer to the West than it has ever been.
Also it provided "breathing room" for ukrainian aircraft and they are now pounding rebel cities fiercely without fear from their SAMs (as rebels can't risk anymore with SAMs) and without any care for civilian casualties as media is now interested solely in MH17(we can also add Gaza to that).
That doesn't make sense, actually it has pushed Ukraine closer to the West than it has ever been.
Also it provided "breathing room" for ukrainian aircraft and they are now pounding rebel cities fiercely without fear from their SAMs (as rebels can't risk anymore with SAMs) and without any care for civilian casualties as media is now interested solely in MH17(we can also add Gaza to that).