Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:25
  #3141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok but even the US CIA and Whitehouse have said its a possibility they can't rule out......
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:27
  #3142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bali, Indonesia
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A report says the Americans said that the engines continued to tx data for several hours. Surely Rolls can officially confirm or deny this?
There are two separate issues which are being confused. That engine data continued to be transmitted has been denied by all, including now, apparently, RR.

The latest, and separate, issue relates to satellite data. According to US sources, although MH did not subscribe to Boeing's ACARS satellite monitoring system, the aircraft was fitted with the necessary devices which, although not getting connected, would still Ping the satellite every 30 minutes. According to the same US sources, they have access to GPS data altitude and track. Perhaps this was possible as a result of triangulation with multiple satellites, including "Spook" satellites, which may be why specifics are not forthcoming.

If true, we should soon know because, if the pings are every 30 minutes, it should be on the same heading and within 250 nm of the last ping?
philipat is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:29
  #3143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: US/EU
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rolls-Royce concurs with Malaysia on missing jet's engine data

Rolls-Royce concurs with Malaysia on missing jet's engine data
Mark in CA is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:30
  #3144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both pilots were fully qualified to be sat in that cockpit. Or at the very least, both held an ATPL. What makes you think they needed a "Home flight sim" to do anything untoward that their professional training and experience hadn't already furnished them with the required skills and knowledge for?

Hit your head of the wall all you like Dress, but your demands they check the home flight sim is just and ridiculous and unwarranted and others suggesting they search China for the plane.

Up to know, the only certain truth is a plane is missing. It's transponder stopped transmitting and it's not been seen or heard from since. All else is conjecture.
So no need to look for any evidence of wrong doing then!
Oh hang on, outside of the cockpit (when he is always accompanied) where else can a "Fully qualified" pilot route plan, check fuel consumption, practice disabling equipment?

I'm not alleging anything. I'm saying this should have been investigated by now to dismiss the possibility. Thats what investigations do!
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:35
  #3145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LivesinaField:

I believe the circuit breakers for the CVR and FDR on the 777 are not in the cockpit.
Orestes is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:38
  #3146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: btw SAMAR and TOSPA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is where the drama started

Post 1389 of this thread

http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5...ml#post8364395

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v...type=2&theater

What do you see? I see an alarm go off and almost no search, with jackets on. Big bags going through xray.

After Egyptair, Silkair, LAM and the like, would be worth to know if MH 777 flight deck doors can be opened from outside by keycode.

Last edited by threemiles; 14th Mar 2014 at 10:51. Reason: Facebook link added for easier access
threemiles is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:42
  #3147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should imagine there is a key code access to the flight deck. If the FAS type it in, the door alarm goes off and the door will temporarily unlock for a few seconds then re lock so long as the door is in normal mode. If it is in lock mode then the door will not open period.
fa2fi is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:42
  #3148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pprune Expertise

I second GvonSprout's praise of the Pprune community's expertise. Pprune members are putting their collective noodle together to prune down the potential range of incredible scenarios for MH370's disappearance.

While there have been other plane disappearance mysteries, they are only a handful and most have yielded at least a few clues quickly.

The dearth of apparent clues is remarkable here, but Pprune is finding that there certainly are some: a possible radar tracking, ACARS pinging, perhaps cell phone pinging and so forth.

Perhaps the most interesting clue is the stonewalling, obfuscation, contradiction and reversals of stakeholders with access to such information. Certainly they have their military, political, economic and engineering--and possible other--reasons.

Traditionally, the world has come to expect nations to put aside such concerns in the face of disaster. And how much can any of them really be hiding?

The range of their primary radar? If the NSA has everyone's phone records, I'd be surprised if it didn't know what parts of the world are radar covered--or not.

ACARS subscription contracts? Surely pointless bureaucratic fears are mangling the truth here.

And so on. So once again, tip o' the hat to Pprune for doing the aviation community a solid in its role as Sherlock Holmes.
comcomtech is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:44
  #3149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Captain Moody

It would seem Eric Moody's suspicion on a smoke screen may have some substance... speaking on Skynews the other day.
gonetech is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:45
  #3150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Age: 64
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bsieker,

Thanks, I did not know that. The antenna destruction and slow decompression theory, worked for me. Because every possible scenario I had considered. There was always some issue that negated it.

Now the four hours of engine activity have been denied.

However there was a loss of communication. Apparently of all types.

The primary radar information of a change of course is uncertain. There is obviously quite a bit of pressure to find the aircraft. Hence the nervous reaction from the Malaysians.

Needle in a haystack time.
Stuffy is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:45
  #3151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a hold
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sky news onboard Malaysian Air Force aircraft report

Sky news just had a report from onboard one of the search aircraft, if any of his details where accurate and true he claims they do not have any equipment onboard to detect anything (pings etc) , so it's just visual looking out either side of the aircraft at low level. Also it quoted as a new search area, so I'm not sure this is good enough to find anything at this stage if any things to be found.
Fly26 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:48
  #3152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: btw SAMAR and TOSPA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should imagine there is a key code access to the flight deck. If the FAS type it in, the door alarm goes off and the door will temporarily unlock for a few seconds then re lock so long as the door is in normal mode. If it is in lock mode then the door will not open period.
All airlines have different equipment. It would need a source that KNOWS the MH 777, to rule out the loo theory (as it happened on LAM E190 a few months ago = deliberate CFIT).
threemiles is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:51
  #3153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So this captain spent all that time building this "sim" who knows how long he had it in a post he mentions FS9 (FS2004) some posts are back from 2011, and now people are assuming he built it for the purpose of training to land on unfamiliar airfields to possibly carry out this "attack"

This is in the same category as "they put it down on a Jungle strip" BS
Livesinafield is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:51
  #3154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand. However there must be a way of denying access to the FD regardless of the airline setting.
fa2fi is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:54
  #3155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,359
Received 96 Likes on 38 Posts
Waypoint IGARI is just 94nm from the Malaysian AFB at Gong Kedak (WMGK). Based there are SU-30 Flanker fighters - I would have though such aircraft would need sophisticated air defence radar to direct them and detect threats.

Are the Malaysians saying that the equipment there couldn't track a 777 flying right past this base and it's movements past IGARI?
ETOPS is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:59
  #3156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh hang on, outside of the cockpit (when he is always accompanied) where else can a "Fully qualified" pilot route plan, check fuel consumption, practice disabling equipment?
You DO know how many hours this captain has/d, don't you?
Speed of Sound is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:00
  #3157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SFO/KCH
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by threemiles
Post 1389 of this thread

http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5...ml#post8364395

What do you see? I see an alarm go off and almost no search, with jackets on. Big bags going through xray.

After Egyptair, Silkair, LAM and the like, would be worth to know if MH 777 flight deck doors can be opened from outside by keycode.
If you're wondering about the hypothetical difficulty of getting a weapon past security - yes, that's definitely possible (but obviously not recommended). The pat-down in Malaysian (and similarly Indonesian [and others]) airports is basically a formality and no where near as extensive or rigorous as the US. It seems like the majority of people set off the scanner - even with the obvious things removed (belt, lighters, phone, etc) so there's quite a few people getting routine pat downs and, as we all know, anything routine results in short-cuts and inattention. I could imagine that if one were ballsy and serious about it, they'd just pack a gun in their crotch or shoes - as the guards don't spend a lot of time on those areas. I cannot remember the last time I've even seen a hand scanner in the airports - it's always a pat down. IMO, security in SEA airports is mostly about the appearance of security with just adequate usage of the normal stuff (scanners), but definite swiss cheese.

That being said, I find US airport security to be a PITA/chip-on-shoulder/police-state in comparison but let's save that discussion for another time.

Personally, I'm still in the "no foul play" camp on this one. I also find the excessive paranoia over the captain's sim hobby to be firmly within the realm of "the terrorists have won."

People just want a dramatic outcome rather than the more likely sad reality.

Last edited by clayne; 14th Mar 2014 at 11:19.
clayne is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:00
  #3158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: melbourne
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the bird flies.

If reports about the likely (destination according to radar plots) is to be believed, and subsequently proved as being the Andaman Islands and we accept that someone set up a very deliberate flight path using recognised way points.

Why didn't 'they' set a direct course across the Thai peninsula.

That would have saved time and fuel.

Thoughts on why 'they' decided to fly over Malaysia first and then changed the heading?

Obviously this was not spur of the moment stuff.

Why that route?
mrbigbird is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:00
  #3159 (permalink)  
Supercalifragilistic
expialidocious
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warning - hacker's exploiting this story

Be wary of following up news items on this story.

Cyber criminals are already using the interest generated by this event to lure people into malware laden sites.

BEWARE of new Facebook Malware Claims, 'Malaysia Plane MH370 Has Been Spotted' - The Hacker News
Memetic is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:08
  #3160 (permalink)  
ekw
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, if there was a second change of heading that pretty much negates the hypoxia theory - although depressurisation could still have been used as a weapon to incapacitate everyone else. Hijacking is far fetched, the logistics are too great and the risk of failure too high. So if there was a change of course, odds on it was towards deeper water. No change in heading and hypoxia is back as number one suspect. In the absence of confirmation, the lack of transponder signal still increases the odds that this was a deliberate act. Inmarsat or whoever it is that has the logs must have about 10 pings. That will allow calculation of direction and speed and hence any navigational changes. Even if there was no change in HDG murderous intentions are not completely ruled out, as any culprit might prefer self induced hypoxia to violent concussion. In every investigation like this innocent people who may have crossed the scene will be looked at. There can be no squeamishness about doing this.
ekw is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.