Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Plane Down in Hudson River - NYC

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Plane Down in Hudson River - NYC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th January 2010 | 16:30
  #1941 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
How is the airline to blame for conspiring to put some birds in the path of one of its aeroplanes? It was more an 'act of God', and I'm sure that even the most fervant of US lawyers would have difficulty getting success there. Considering their god-fearing society, they might think twice, otherwise they might have a direct hit from the next bolt of Bejamin Franklin. Surely the pax should be donating something to the airline cadet training scheme and thanking their lucky stars to have had more than 4000hrs total time at the sharp end.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2010 | 17:52
  #1942 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
You should see the case against the Geese, though.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2010 | 02:31
  #1943 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 260
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut, USA
Quote:
SLF query: Is the ditched plane a hull loss, or will it fly again?

Edmund
short answer, I don' know and I don't want to know

Longer answer:

Depends on several factors.

Most operators would rather have the insurance value and invest the money in a newer or better product for their routes (like many of us would do with our cars after an accident).

The inusurance valuation considers repairability including costs.

Sometimes the above factors conflict ex: the operator doesn't want to keep a ghost ship in their fleet as it could put their passengers off from flyng it. It's like who won, the geese or the plane?
I'm thinking there are plenty of folks who would pay extra to fly on that particular plane.

IIRC, there was a case where various parts of a plane that went down in the Everglades were recovered and reused, and there were rumors of the recovered parts being haunted. Given the positive results and the hero status of all involved, I think this is a very different situation.
jugofpropwash is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2010 | 16:54
  #1944 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: SLF, living somewhere East in the West
Mayday call

If you look at the CVR transcript a mayday call was made if I remember correct;y but was not transmitted, probably secondary to high work load button not pressed.
grimmrad is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2010 | 21:21
  #1945 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: london
Does any one have any info about the speed at the time of the impact and what flap setting was used?
Not Gulfair CEO is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2010 | 22:03
  #1946 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Zulu-8
Gulfair - FDR airspeed around 120kt IAS; flaps position 2 (about 15 degrees)
SouthpawSLF is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2010 | 22:31
  #1947 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 10
From: EU
Does any one have any info about the speed at the time of the impact and what flap setting was used?
NTSB animation on Youtube including ATC tape and CVR transcript
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2010 | 23:35
  #1948 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: MA
It is appropriate that at the reunion ceremony on the one year anniversary, the toasts were made with Grey Goose vodka.
RobertS975 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2010 | 05:43
  #1949 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: london
thank you fellows
Not Gulfair CEO is offline  
Reply
Old 18th January 2010 | 15:12
  #1950 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: DORSET
Nice footage of plane recovery:

New footage: Hudson plane crash - Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG
sharksandwich is offline  
Reply
Old 18th January 2010 | 15:28
  #1951 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Surely if there was to be any successful form of litigation in this case it ought to be by either the airline and/or some of the crew and/or passengers on the aircraft against the airport or its owners for failing to adequately address the longstanding bird control issues in the airspace immediately surrounding the airport and in particular on the approach and departure paths to the airport.

If there was any obvious area of clear cut negligence that led to this accident taking place then that was surely it.

I really don't see how either the airline or the aircraft manufacturers can be held to blame in any shape or form for this particular incident.
Capvermell is offline  
Reply
Old 18th January 2010 | 16:01
  #1952 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
It's been written-off

Sunk in brackish water for days?!? No fixin' that - you'd have to replace, well, everything. It has indeed been officially Written-Off.
(Though it would have looked cool sitting in the old boneyard at MIA with the aging Connies, etc., back-in-the-day...gosh, I'm 'misting').

Great job Skully! Oh, and the most profound lesson he taught the general public, IMHO? - decisiveness in his decision making. Skill, experience, and Command Presence all rolled into one: "We'll be in the Hudson."
Bravo.
SK8TRBOI is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2010 | 03:11
  #1953 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
From: W of 30W
Originally Posted by barit1
The NTSB powerplant group report is online. No surprises as far as I'm concerned.
Was it merely understandable confusion under such a tremendous amount of pressure that a relight attempt was performed on both engines … By continuously exploiting maximum of the still available thrust, would it have minimized enough the rate of descent for Captain Sullenberger to reconsider his ultimate decision making ?
CONF iture is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2010 | 13:42
  #1954 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC USA
Want to buy an A320?
AIG Aviation.com - International Information

C2j
Cubs2jets is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2010 | 16:37
  #1955 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 9
From: Switzerland, Singapore
Was it merely understandable confusion under such a tremendous amount of pressure that a relight attempt was performed on both engines
The relight checklist on Airbusses is somewhat confusing, it says in the first part that you should try to relight one by one, then both together. The only difference in the checklist is one letter: first they talk about "Engine Master" then "Engine Masters". I had trouble to find the difference myself several times in a simulator.

I guess considering the time available Jeff Skiles had no choice than to try everything he could. I would have done the same.

There wasn't much thrust there anyway. The only thing the engine delivered was electricity and hydraulic pressure.

hth,
Dani
Dani is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2010 | 23:17
  #1956 (permalink)  
bearfoil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, Airbus Vertical Stabilizers are a dime a dozen, but the Fuselage would make a spiff diner here ont'a Interstate. I say give it to Sully for his new classroom.
 
Reply
Old 20th January 2010 | 23:41
  #1957 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
CONF iture:

Was it merely understandable confusion under such a tremendous amount of pressure that a relight attempt was performed on both engines … By continuously exploiting maximum of the still available thrust, would it have minimized enough the rate of descent for Captain Sullenberger to reconsider his ultimate decision making ?
Looking at the "corncobbed" HP compressors, I am frankly amazed the engines ran at all. The first-stage blades are amputated at the mid-span shrouds, and virtually every airfoil has some damage.

Sully & Skiles were lucky to have what little they had by way of electrical and hydraulics.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2010 | 00:05
  #1958 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
I think the RAT/PTU was probably more helpful
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd January 2010 | 18:17
  #1959 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Ok so now the aircraft is for auction but what would a company do with it? The cost of repairs could be more than the cost of a used A320 right?
st7860 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd January 2010 | 20:26
  #1960 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Uh... Where was I?
Was there ENG FAIL ecam warnings or there was just a loss of thrust?

Anyway, it's clear that not every specific case and its many ramifications is covered in the FCOMs. Pilots are still needed!
Microburst2002 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.