Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Plane Down in Hudson River - NYC

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Plane Down in Hudson River - NYC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2009, 20:33
  #1901 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess he wanted to write up the snag?
BOAC is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2009, 21:13
  #1902 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: US
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Using a bullhorn to tell the people to wait for the ferry might not have accomplished much. Maybe the logbook while he was waiting would verify the aircraft was legal for that departure. Once they are standing on the wing I don't know what the captain could do to help them before boarding the boats. Did Sully know at that time he was a hero, not someone who would have to defend himself?
p51guy is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2009, 00:19
  #1903 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the bullhorn wouldhave been used to communicate and coordinate with the rescuers...indeed, sully stated he was trying to communicate with the boats to ''get the people on the wings first''.

the last thing I would worry about is whether the paperwork was right
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2009, 05:50
  #1904 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nottingham
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hornet

I accept your superior personal hygiene routine! Professionals should think "what if" all the time. I've flown all over the world (including over 3 years based in the US) and I recognize Capt Sully as a true professional. I was merely observing that, from an airport with limited options he chose the right one, stuck to his decision and pulled off an amazing feat of airmanship. Perhaps he had considered his course of action in the shower!
twentygrand is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2009, 07:54
  #1905 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 89
Posts: 31
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
I guess he wanted to write up the snag?
or more to the point, ensure that someone else didn't - with a different Agenda ?

Having left the aeroplane after a major event, the first question I was asked by management, was where was the Voyage Report - in the Medias' hands ?

Ye canna be too carrrreful.

Good thinking, Hoskins.
ExSp33db1rd is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 15:43
  #1906 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THE BLUEBIRD CAFE
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
and I recognize Capt Sully as a true professional
How chuffed will he be to know that!
Fantome is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 10:37
  #1907 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The sky mainly
Posts: 352
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Just seen the flight sim reconstruction.......amazing. Shows the benefit of sticking to the plan.
Sky Sports is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 16:54
  #1908 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
Sully: 'Rock-star sex' life after Hudson landing - San Jose Mercury News

How to spice up your marriage....
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2009, 12:36
  #1909 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back in 1977 when a Southern Airways DC-9 had a dual flameout from hail and landed on a road - within gliding distance of at least one airport - glide ratios and best glide speeds of twinjets were never even discussed, as they were too improbable. Many pilots had no real idea of their mounts' glide potential. Some even became testy when I asked.

Further, Atlanta ATC assumed they had lost two of their three engines, and continued routine handling of their flight.

GB
Graybeard is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2009, 12:45
  #1910 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back in 1977 when a Southern Airways DC-9 had a dual flameout from hail ............ Atlanta ATC assumed they had lost two of their three engines, and continued routine handling of their flight.
Was that an STC?
forget is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2009, 13:01
  #1911 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No STC; no third engine. That was back when Boeing Tri-Motors were more prevalent on domestic routes, and losing all thrust was unheard of.

GB
Graybeard is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2009, 16:13
  #1912 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Further, Atlanta ATC assumed they had lost two of their three engines, and continued routine handling of their flight.
Do you have a source for that?

The CVR does not confirm this and I don't recall this coming up in the Public hearing.

arguably the ATC handling sounded routine although helpful to all requests. "you've got our squawk on emergency?... I'm not receiving it but radar contact position is ..."

"allright listen we have lost both engines and I can't tell you the implications of this we've only got two engines and how far is Dobins ...."
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2009, 04:22
  #1913 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you have a source for that?
Secondhand, 30 years ago.

Although engines are arguably more reliable now, total loss of thrust is more believable.

GB
Graybeard is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2009, 19:39
  #1914 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Graybeard
Back in 1977 when a Southern Airways DC-9 had a dual flameout from hail and landed on a road - within gliding distance of at least one airport - glide ratios and best glide speeds of twinjets were never even discussed, as they were too improbable. Many pilots had no real idea of their mounts' glide potential. Some even became testy when I asked.
Further, Atlanta ATC assumed they had lost two of their three engines, and continued routine handling of their flight.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that I just cannot imagine an air traffic controller, even in 1977, learning or hearing that a B-727 had just lost 2 of its 3 engines would continue "routine handling of the flight." I don't recall the specifics of that particular incident, but I would strongly suspect that if the controllers didn't "get exicited" it was because they weren't advised of anything over which they would get exicited. Being advised of one of the airplanes he was working that lost 2 of 3 engines would, I think, cause any controller to have to go change his shorts! In fact, losing 1 of 3 engines would have at least caused him to stand up and get some attention from others with whom he was working at the time!
AirRabbit is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2009, 20:44
  #1915 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If anyone has access to complete NTSB reports, the document for the Southern DC-9 (New Hope, GA, 1977) is DCA77AA015.
barit1 is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2010, 03:47
  #1916 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI, TLC (The Learning Channel) had a show on tonight (they'll probably run it again) called "Brace for Impact" talking about the crash - showed Sully looking at the remains of the plane wherever it is in storage. All things considered, the damage really doesn't appear that bad, especially considering some of that damage was probably done getting it out of the water and transporting it.
jugofpropwash is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2010, 05:56
  #1917 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Age: 52
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote "I guess he wanted to write up the snag?"

Now that's funny :-)
bodypilot is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2010, 06:47
  #1918 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,757
Received 156 Likes on 78 Posts
How would you write that up?

"Engines won't run- Maybe flooded"
albatross is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2010, 18:54
  #1919 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The program is available online:

Brace for Impact: Brace For Impact : Video : TLC

It is one hour long, and most of it was fluff. Captain Sully says he made a "mayday" call in the program. Hard to remeber and I do not feel like pouring through this thread, but didn't we give a lot of discussion to the fact that there was no formal mayday call? (Maybe I have this wrong!?)
RobertS975 is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2010, 19:39
  #1920 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 65
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
darn, was looking forward to watching it later too. (couldn't find it here in the hotel)

I'm so tired of these programs that dumb everything down like we're all a bunch of idiots. And then recap everything they just said previously after the last commercial break. No wonder I channel surf!

BTW, couldn't find anything but the trailer online.

Cheers
pmemrick is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.