Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Plane Down in Hudson River - NYC

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Plane Down in Hudson River - NYC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2010, 16:30
  #1941 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How is the airline to blame for conspiring to put some birds in the path of one of its aeroplanes? It was more an 'act of God', and I'm sure that even the most fervant of US lawyers would have difficulty getting success there. Considering their god-fearing society, they might think twice, otherwise they might have a direct hit from the next bolt of Bejamin Franklin. Surely the pax should be donating something to the airline cadet training scheme and thanking their lucky stars to have had more than 4000hrs total time at the sharp end.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 17:52
  #1942 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should see the case against the Geese, though.
BOAC is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 02:31
  #1943 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
SLF query: Is the ditched plane a hull loss, or will it fly again?

Edmund
short answer, I don' know and I don't want to know

Longer answer:

Depends on several factors.

Most operators would rather have the insurance value and invest the money in a newer or better product for their routes (like many of us would do with our cars after an accident).

The inusurance valuation considers repairability including costs.

Sometimes the above factors conflict ex: the operator doesn't want to keep a ghost ship in their fleet as it could put their passengers off from flyng it. It's like who won, the geese or the plane?
I'm thinking there are plenty of folks who would pay extra to fly on that particular plane.

IIRC, there was a case where various parts of a plane that went down in the Everglades were recovered and reused, and there were rumors of the recovered parts being haunted. Given the positive results and the hero status of all involved, I think this is a very different situation.
jugofpropwash is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 16:54
  #1944 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SLF, living somewhere East in the West
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mayday call

If you look at the CVR transcript a mayday call was made if I remember correct;y but was not transmitted, probably secondary to high work load button not pressed.
grimmrad is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:21
  #1945 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: london
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does any one have any info about the speed at the time of the impact and what flap setting was used?
Not Gulfair CEO is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 22:03
  #1946 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Zulu-8
Age: 62
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gulfair - FDR airspeed around 120kt IAS; flaps position 2 (about 15 degrees)
SouthpawSLF is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 22:31
  #1947 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does any one have any info about the speed at the time of the impact and what flap setting was used?
NTSB animation on Youtube including ATC tape and CVR transcript
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 23:35
  #1948 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is appropriate that at the reunion ceremony on the one year anniversary, the toasts were made with Grey Goose vodka.
RobertS975 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 05:43
  #1949 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: london
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thank you fellows
Not Gulfair CEO is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 15:12
  #1950 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DORSET
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice footage of plane recovery:

New footage: Hudson plane crash - Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG
sharksandwich is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 15:28
  #1951 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely if there was to be any successful form of litigation in this case it ought to be by either the airline and/or some of the crew and/or passengers on the aircraft against the airport or its owners for failing to adequately address the longstanding bird control issues in the airspace immediately surrounding the airport and in particular on the approach and departure paths to the airport.

If there was any obvious area of clear cut negligence that led to this accident taking place then that was surely it.

I really don't see how either the airline or the aircraft manufacturers can be held to blame in any shape or form for this particular incident.
Capvermell is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 16:01
  #1952 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North Carolina
Age: 63
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's been written-off

Sunk in brackish water for days?!? No fixin' that - you'd have to replace, well, everything. It has indeed been officially Written-Off.
(Though it would have looked cool sitting in the old boneyard at MIA with the aging Connies, etc., back-in-the-day...gosh, I'm 'misting').

Great job Skully! Oh, and the most profound lesson he taught the general public, IMHO? - decisiveness in his decision making. Skill, experience, and Command Presence all rolled into one: "We'll be in the Hudson."
Bravo.
SK8TRBOI is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 03:11
  #1953 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: W of 30W
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by barit1
The NTSB powerplant group report is online. No surprises as far as I'm concerned.
Was it merely understandable confusion under such a tremendous amount of pressure that a relight attempt was performed on both engines … By continuously exploiting maximum of the still available thrust, would it have minimized enough the rate of descent for Captain Sullenberger to reconsider his ultimate decision making ?
CONF iture is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 13:42
  #1954 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Age: 64
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Want to buy an A320?
AIG Aviation.com - International Information

C2j
Cubs2jets is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 16:37
  #1955 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it merely understandable confusion under such a tremendous amount of pressure that a relight attempt was performed on both engines
The relight checklist on Airbusses is somewhat confusing, it says in the first part that you should try to relight one by one, then both together. The only difference in the checklist is one letter: first they talk about "Engine Master" then "Engine Masters". I had trouble to find the difference myself several times in a simulator.

I guess considering the time available Jeff Skiles had no choice than to try everything he could. I would have done the same.

There wasn't much thrust there anyway. The only thing the engine delivered was electricity and hydraulic pressure.

hth,
Dani
Dani is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 23:17
  #1956 (permalink)  
bearfoil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, Airbus Vertical Stabilizers are a dime a dozen, but the Fuselage would make a spiff diner here ont'a Interstate. I say give it to Sully for his new classroom.
 
Old 20th Jan 2010, 23:41
  #1957 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CONF iture:

Was it merely understandable confusion under such a tremendous amount of pressure that a relight attempt was performed on both engines … By continuously exploiting maximum of the still available thrust, would it have minimized enough the rate of descent for Captain Sullenberger to reconsider his ultimate decision making ?
Looking at the "corncobbed" HP compressors, I am frankly amazed the engines ran at all. The first-stage blades are amputated at the mid-span shrouds, and virtually every airfoil has some damage.

Sully & Skiles were lucky to have what little they had by way of electrical and hydraulics.
barit1 is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2010, 00:05
  #1958 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I think the RAT/PTU was probably more helpful
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2010, 18:17
  #1959 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok so now the aircraft is for auction but what would a company do with it? The cost of repairs could be more than the cost of a used A320 right?
st7860 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2010, 20:26
  #1960 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there ENG FAIL ecam warnings or there was just a loss of thrust?

Anyway, it's clear that not every specific case and its many ramifications is covered in the FCOMs. Pilots are still needed!
Microburst2002 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.