More on UK Pilot Imports
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More on UK Pilot Imports
Get this, Air 2000 are taking a Canadian B757 aircraft on wet lease next year. Are you UK pilots going to let this happen ?
Air 2000 asked Canada 3000 to do this wet lease in March 2001. Get this, fourteen months notice for a wet lease !
If you let the CAA and Air 2000 white wash you into believing that "it is good for UK aviation" and "we didnt have time to prepare", then you deserve to see a C reg go over you on its way to Manchester while you're in the dole queue !
BRITISH PILOTS NEED TO DO SOMETHING !!!!!
Air 2000 asked Canada 3000 to do this wet lease in March 2001. Get this, fourteen months notice for a wet lease !
If you let the CAA and Air 2000 white wash you into believing that "it is good for UK aviation" and "we didnt have time to prepare", then you deserve to see a C reg go over you on its way to Manchester while you're in the dole queue !
BRITISH PILOTS NEED TO DO SOMETHING !!!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hey Skibeagle1 - I see you're in the States. Well, there's one major difference between the States and Canada - British airlines can wetlease their aircraft to Canadian airlines; so there's no problem with Canadian airlines leasing theirs to UK airlines.
Reciprocity, you see?
Now, in the case of the US, foreign airlines are prohibited from wetleasing to US operators - but US operators can wetlease theirs to foreign operators. A tad unfair, don't you think?
And that's why sanctions should be imposed against US operators and crews until the US decides to play fair! As you rightly say - British pilots need to do something about it!
Reciprocity, you see?
Now, in the case of the US, foreign airlines are prohibited from wetleasing to US operators - but US operators can wetlease theirs to foreign operators. A tad unfair, don't you think?
And that's why sanctions should be imposed against US operators and crews until the US decides to play fair! As you rightly say - British pilots need to do something about it!
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If history is anything to go by, the CAA and our so called pilots reps, BALPA, will do nothing to prevent such a pilot incursion.
The UK is a very soft touch. We still have many committed, aspiring local pilots, at many different levels, trying to get noticed and maybe picked up by airlines. Air 2000 will say, like all the others, that there is a lack of experienced pilots and have no choice....catch 22 and tough for the wannabes.
A similar situation happened a few years ago with the prospect of US Air operating with its crews in the UK when BA were tied up with them. BALPA again took our money and did nothing. Then the IPA, an independant pilot union for the BALPA disaffected, highlighted the issue and for various reasons it didn't go ahead.
I have to admit being very sensitive to this issue. I was once directly effected by the influx of Australian pilots in the early 90s. Whilst I had sympathy with their plight, they took away any chance of an airline job for many years as they added to the aready crowded pool of qualified pilots swelled by Air Europe and Dan Air. Even then, there was no priority given to the UK pilots in the pool.
It took over 5 years to get an airline interview, during which time I was one of the lucky ones who just about found enough work in GA to keep going.
I now have a proper job but know that there are still quite a few pilots still looking for thier big break. They generally have a much harder time getting work overseas and have to rely on UK airlines. But, as we will no doubt see again and again, UK operators will be allowed to seek the cheaper options and import aircraft and labour from overseas. It is not just Air 2000. Virgin have Air Atlanta as well as other Gatwick based operators with their Icelandic registered imposters.
In the long term it effects us all. It will be allowed to happen again and again and we will just keep on whinging about it while our terms and conditions are eroded. We are our own worst enemies; too self interested and dis-united as a pilot work force to do anything about it. Like it or not, the US and other countries protect themselves much better than we do and we 'should' do the same.....sadly, I do not see how we will be able to do this and that makes me part of the problem.
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: Tom East ]
The UK is a very soft touch. We still have many committed, aspiring local pilots, at many different levels, trying to get noticed and maybe picked up by airlines. Air 2000 will say, like all the others, that there is a lack of experienced pilots and have no choice....catch 22 and tough for the wannabes.
A similar situation happened a few years ago with the prospect of US Air operating with its crews in the UK when BA were tied up with them. BALPA again took our money and did nothing. Then the IPA, an independant pilot union for the BALPA disaffected, highlighted the issue and for various reasons it didn't go ahead.
I have to admit being very sensitive to this issue. I was once directly effected by the influx of Australian pilots in the early 90s. Whilst I had sympathy with their plight, they took away any chance of an airline job for many years as they added to the aready crowded pool of qualified pilots swelled by Air Europe and Dan Air. Even then, there was no priority given to the UK pilots in the pool.
It took over 5 years to get an airline interview, during which time I was one of the lucky ones who just about found enough work in GA to keep going.
I now have a proper job but know that there are still quite a few pilots still looking for thier big break. They generally have a much harder time getting work overseas and have to rely on UK airlines. But, as we will no doubt see again and again, UK operators will be allowed to seek the cheaper options and import aircraft and labour from overseas. It is not just Air 2000. Virgin have Air Atlanta as well as other Gatwick based operators with their Icelandic registered imposters.
In the long term it effects us all. It will be allowed to happen again and again and we will just keep on whinging about it while our terms and conditions are eroded. We are our own worst enemies; too self interested and dis-united as a pilot work force to do anything about it. Like it or not, the US and other countries protect themselves much better than we do and we 'should' do the same.....sadly, I do not see how we will be able to do this and that makes me part of the problem.
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: Tom East ]
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A slip trench near you !
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, anybody got an idea what to do. We're all agreed Balpa won't say a word, so what should we as individuals do ? I'd love to see the same level of protection for UK pilots over here as other people receive in their countries.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Jivebomber - as Tom East correctly says, the IPA is the only organisation to take a proactive stance against flagging out, so the simple answer is join the IPA!
I do, however, feel strongly that a distinction should be drawn between those countries that permit UK pilots to operate there (whether individually or on wet leases) and those that don't.
The latter category seems to be composed primarily of one country - the USA - and I would suggest that action initially be taken against US aircraft and crews on wet leases to EU companies.
If no technical or other assistance is provided to them - ie they are embargoed - then the managements of the companies that have leased in the aircraft will realise that it wasn't so good a deal for them in the first place; they then cancel the lease with the US operator and the US operator then hopefully puts pressure on the US government to make a level playing field.
As for other (especially Icelandic) operators - that's a slightly more thorny issue and one which is going to get thornier with the EU expanding to incorporate a number of Eastern European countries. There, you have people like the Czechs who are good pilots but who are prepared to work hard for a pittance - as Ryanair discovered to their delight. Of course, one of the benefits of EU membership is free movement of labour.
Air Atlanta of course employs a large proportion of Americans because the Icelandic aviation authority accepts FAA licences unlike most other JAA countries.
This time, I suggest that some action is taken regarding this issue rather than just talking about it - what do you say, people?
I do, however, feel strongly that a distinction should be drawn between those countries that permit UK pilots to operate there (whether individually or on wet leases) and those that don't.
The latter category seems to be composed primarily of one country - the USA - and I would suggest that action initially be taken against US aircraft and crews on wet leases to EU companies.
If no technical or other assistance is provided to them - ie they are embargoed - then the managements of the companies that have leased in the aircraft will realise that it wasn't so good a deal for them in the first place; they then cancel the lease with the US operator and the US operator then hopefully puts pressure on the US government to make a level playing field.
As for other (especially Icelandic) operators - that's a slightly more thorny issue and one which is going to get thornier with the EU expanding to incorporate a number of Eastern European countries. There, you have people like the Czechs who are good pilots but who are prepared to work hard for a pittance - as Ryanair discovered to their delight. Of course, one of the benefits of EU membership is free movement of labour.
Air Atlanta of course employs a large proportion of Americans because the Icelandic aviation authority accepts FAA licences unlike most other JAA countries.
This time, I suggest that some action is taken regarding this issue rather than just talking about it - what do you say, people?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is pathetic. If the legislation allows it then go talk to your MP about getting the legislation changed! It has nothing to do with BALPA, and naturally the knockers of BALPA have got in and volunteered their time to do something about that as well haven't they? Not. In the meantime how about inviting the Canadian's around for a beer?
Tom East
I was once directly affected by the influx of Australian pilots in the early 90s. Whilst I had sympathy with their plight, they took away any chance of an airline job for many years
I wonder why they were in the UK Tom? Anything to do with UK passport holders in Australia having a "paid holiday in the summer of 89" perhaps?
I seem to recall that this river has been crossed before as well. Everybody at Britannia complained about Air NZ pilots coming over to fly a summer until it was pointed out that Britannia had just been down under for a couple of seasons on a wet lease to Air NZ.
Doesn't seem unreasonable to me given the historical precedence and legislation.
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: Timber ]
Tom East
I was once directly affected by the influx of Australian pilots in the early 90s. Whilst I had sympathy with their plight, they took away any chance of an airline job for many years
I wonder why they were in the UK Tom? Anything to do with UK passport holders in Australia having a "paid holiday in the summer of 89" perhaps?
I seem to recall that this river has been crossed before as well. Everybody at Britannia complained about Air NZ pilots coming over to fly a summer until it was pointed out that Britannia had just been down under for a couple of seasons on a wet lease to Air NZ.
Doesn't seem unreasonable to me given the historical precedence and legislation.
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: Timber ]
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Crawley, Sussex, UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a quick pennys-worth to throw in the pot.......I think that it would be true to say that most UK charter airlines send a number of aircraft away in the winter on wet lease to Canada, South America, Far East, etc etc etc. This is just about the only way that any sizeable charter airline can survive the UK winter. Are we saying that this is a one way street - and that we should only push everyone to take our capacity in the Winter and that we should not entertain the idea of them helping us out in the Summer??
If we could dry lease the aircraft in the Summer without paying the extortionate reg/dereg costs plus any mandatory mods perhaps we could crew them with UK crews - fact is that the Campaign Against Aviation (UK Branch) makes it just about impossible to do this!
Now I am not saying it should be ok to bring any tom, dick & harry in with their ageing equipment, but rather when a 767 operator is bringing in another 767 etc etc - surely this is common sense.....not the piracy or conspiracy that you chaps are reckoning on!
(Stepping off soap-box....and running for cover!)
If we could dry lease the aircraft in the Summer without paying the extortionate reg/dereg costs plus any mandatory mods perhaps we could crew them with UK crews - fact is that the Campaign Against Aviation (UK Branch) makes it just about impossible to do this!
Now I am not saying it should be ok to bring any tom, dick & harry in with their ageing equipment, but rather when a 767 operator is bringing in another 767 etc etc - surely this is common sense.....not the piracy or conspiracy that you chaps are reckoning on!
(Stepping off soap-box....and running for cover!)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: U K
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BALPA has been working extremely hard on the issue of flagging out as readers of Airwaves will know.
As Timber has alluded to, the problem is two pieces of legislation.
The first is section 8 of the 1971 Immigration Act which BALPA tried to get amended when the recent Asylum Bill passed through Parliament. Now the OLS has been transferred to the Home Office, we hope that further lobbying will produce results.
The second is EC 2407/92 which covers wet leasing in the EEA and its interpretation. BALPA has been active in Brussels with the ECA in getting the commission to review the regulation and tighten up the wording. This will have to be done soon with the expansion of the common aviation area in Europe.
BALPA is doing the work.
As Timber has alluded to, the problem is two pieces of legislation.
The first is section 8 of the 1971 Immigration Act which BALPA tried to get amended when the recent Asylum Bill passed through Parliament. Now the OLS has been transferred to the Home Office, we hope that further lobbying will produce results.
The second is EC 2407/92 which covers wet leasing in the EEA and its interpretation. BALPA has been active in Brussels with the ECA in getting the commission to review the regulation and tighten up the wording. This will have to be done soon with the expansion of the common aviation area in Europe.
BALPA is doing the work.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Timber and Flugpants you're both right - that's why I said that we need to make a distinction between those countries such as New Zealand, Australia, Canada, points in South America etc where we can freely send our aircraft and crews to cover their peak seasons and in return we get theirs to help cover our peaks - and those such as the United States for whom it's a one way street.
However, in terms of legislation, this is one of the bargaining chips being used by the British government as part of the Bermuda II talks. Rather more direct action needs to be taken in the meantime, in my opinion.
Next, when it comes to BALPA it's a fact that they have done very little on the flagging out issue. Could this be because BA have told them to wind their necks in as they are using the ATLAS 747s??
And yes, Timber, unlike BALPA the IPA has done something about it!!
Finally, Flugpants - it's not so much the registration costs (£100 for your average airliner); it's the certification/C of A costs that are the expensive bit! I seem to remember that Air 2000/Canada 3000 used to swap 757s back and forth every year on the UK and Canadian registers without problem, though.
I should add that if anyone wants to see who is operating foreign aircraft in the UK; or using foreign aircraft on charters from the UK, you just have to look in the CAA's Official Record Series 2 which is available here: Official Record Series 2
and go to Part 5. Note that it's updated on a wekly basis.
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: The Guvnor ]
However, in terms of legislation, this is one of the bargaining chips being used by the British government as part of the Bermuda II talks. Rather more direct action needs to be taken in the meantime, in my opinion.
Next, when it comes to BALPA it's a fact that they have done very little on the flagging out issue. Could this be because BA have told them to wind their necks in as they are using the ATLAS 747s??
And yes, Timber, unlike BALPA the IPA has done something about it!!Finally, Flugpants - it's not so much the registration costs (£100 for your average airliner); it's the certification/C of A costs that are the expensive bit! I seem to remember that Air 2000/Canada 3000 used to swap 757s back and forth every year on the UK and Canadian registers without problem, though.
I should add that if anyone wants to see who is operating foreign aircraft in the UK; or using foreign aircraft on charters from the UK, you just have to look in the CAA's Official Record Series 2 which is available here: Official Record Series 2
and go to Part 5. Note that it's updated on a wekly basis.
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: The Guvnor ]
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: LHR and beyond
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Over the last year or so I have seen an airtours A320 in MME with a C registration
and it is Canadian flight crew judgeing by their accents over the RT, so what the hells going in especially for the wannabies!!!!
and it is Canadian flight crew judgeing by their accents over the RT, so what the hells going in especially for the wannabies!!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Air 2000 have been bringing in wet leased Canadian a/c for years. They have been doing so because the law allows it and they also had an interest in the companies they leased the a/c from. They were also allowed to send their a/c to Canada for the quiet winter season although only for one of these years was the a/c allowed to go as a 'wet' lease with flight crew.
It never ceases to suprise me how many gullible types suddenly become all hgh and mighty as soon as they hear about wet leases. For those of you who may not be au fait with the links between Air 2000 and Canada 3000, they used to have identical livery as Air 2000s owners, First Choice, used to have large share in Signature Vacations, the Canadian company that was linked with Canada 3000.
Due to the cyclical nature of the IT industry here in the UK it has always been necessary to find extra work for the a/c during the quieter winter season. The companies have to strike a balance between having just enough a/c to cover the busy summer schedules and not to have a/c sitting idly during the winter. Air 2000 have always wet leased a/c during the summer period, mainly from Canada 3000 until a few years ago and then from Royal and also from an Egyptian company that First Choice own. They also wet lease a/c from bmi althought he record with their A321's have been a bit disappointing with many delays due to the poor level of dispatch reliability this year.
Watch out for people like the Guvnor who suddenly have another opinion on another pilot matter such as unions. Although only a wannabe airline executive, he absolutely loathes the idea of any pilots he dreams about employing belonging to BALPA which is why is so ready to advise everyone to join the IPA. A classic 'divide and rule' tactic used by management these days.
Any pilot with a reasonable level of intelligence knows that the IPA are not a union and have absolutely nowhere near the level of influence that BALPA has, both as an association of airline pilots and behind the scenes with the many organisations and lobbying to government. Unfortunately for BALPA, they do not blow their own trumpet in the right places because the tremendous amount of work that goes on behind the scenes is what is the real power of this union.
The IPA are not a union and do not have the influence but they certainly know how to make themselves known. What they are reknown for though is an excellent newsletter and advice for those seeking employment, but a union? Nowhere near that yet. I would be very worried as an IPA member if someone like the Guvnor, who is not even an airline pilot, was recommending the IPA.
Back to the topic though, whilst we all want to see less wet leasing of foreign a/c there is no way that for Air 2000 and many of the other UK IT operators it is used to avoid employing more pilots. It comes down to trying to balance the work available for the a/c on the register and the cyclical, seasonal nature of the industry. Air 2000 have been employing 40-50 pilots a year without any advertising and are also actively recruiting cadet pilots on a partial sponsorship scheme.
For the last few years and this coming winter too, Air 2000 will have at least one a/c if not more BASED in the US operating on behalf of a US holiday company WITH UK pilots so there is another little nugget that the Guvnor has not got quite right! They will also have three a/c kitted out in all first class operating round the world air cruises as well as a/c based in Argentina and possibly Canada with crews for the winter.
During the summer when the reqirement is for more a/c they will continue to wet lease foreign a/c if they can't get UK or European ones. The pilots are not too happy about this either but they realise that the company has to operate and make an overall profit and this seasonal transfer of a/c and crews one way or another is a fact of life in this industry.
As quoted above in an earlier post, the UK law has some giant loopholes in it and the Campaign Against Aviation have not the faintest idea how to deal with it except to bend to the demands of their real paymasters, the airlines themselves. At least Air 2000 have reciprocal agreements in place unlike some other airlines that only bring in wet leased a/c from the likes of Air Atlanta purely as a way of avoiding the investment in training enough of their own crews and using older, second rate a/c.
It never ceases to suprise me how many gullible types suddenly become all hgh and mighty as soon as they hear about wet leases. For those of you who may not be au fait with the links between Air 2000 and Canada 3000, they used to have identical livery as Air 2000s owners, First Choice, used to have large share in Signature Vacations, the Canadian company that was linked with Canada 3000.
Due to the cyclical nature of the IT industry here in the UK it has always been necessary to find extra work for the a/c during the quieter winter season. The companies have to strike a balance between having just enough a/c to cover the busy summer schedules and not to have a/c sitting idly during the winter. Air 2000 have always wet leased a/c during the summer period, mainly from Canada 3000 until a few years ago and then from Royal and also from an Egyptian company that First Choice own. They also wet lease a/c from bmi althought he record with their A321's have been a bit disappointing with many delays due to the poor level of dispatch reliability this year.
Watch out for people like the Guvnor who suddenly have another opinion on another pilot matter such as unions. Although only a wannabe airline executive, he absolutely loathes the idea of any pilots he dreams about employing belonging to BALPA which is why is so ready to advise everyone to join the IPA. A classic 'divide and rule' tactic used by management these days.
Any pilot with a reasonable level of intelligence knows that the IPA are not a union and have absolutely nowhere near the level of influence that BALPA has, both as an association of airline pilots and behind the scenes with the many organisations and lobbying to government. Unfortunately for BALPA, they do not blow their own trumpet in the right places because the tremendous amount of work that goes on behind the scenes is what is the real power of this union.
The IPA are not a union and do not have the influence but they certainly know how to make themselves known. What they are reknown for though is an excellent newsletter and advice for those seeking employment, but a union? Nowhere near that yet. I would be very worried as an IPA member if someone like the Guvnor, who is not even an airline pilot, was recommending the IPA.
Back to the topic though, whilst we all want to see less wet leasing of foreign a/c there is no way that for Air 2000 and many of the other UK IT operators it is used to avoid employing more pilots. It comes down to trying to balance the work available for the a/c on the register and the cyclical, seasonal nature of the industry. Air 2000 have been employing 40-50 pilots a year without any advertising and are also actively recruiting cadet pilots on a partial sponsorship scheme.
For the last few years and this coming winter too, Air 2000 will have at least one a/c if not more BASED in the US operating on behalf of a US holiday company WITH UK pilots so there is another little nugget that the Guvnor has not got quite right! They will also have three a/c kitted out in all first class operating round the world air cruises as well as a/c based in Argentina and possibly Canada with crews for the winter.
During the summer when the reqirement is for more a/c they will continue to wet lease foreign a/c if they can't get UK or European ones. The pilots are not too happy about this either but they realise that the company has to operate and make an overall profit and this seasonal transfer of a/c and crews one way or another is a fact of life in this industry.
As quoted above in an earlier post, the UK law has some giant loopholes in it and the Campaign Against Aviation have not the faintest idea how to deal with it except to bend to the demands of their real paymasters, the airlines themselves. At least Air 2000 have reciprocal agreements in place unlike some other airlines that only bring in wet leased a/c from the likes of Air Atlanta purely as a way of avoiding the investment in training enough of their own crews and using older, second rate a/c.
Guest
Posts: n/a
You obviously haven't been taking your daily PPRuNe, OzDude or you'd know that the IPA has set up an offshoot which is a union - the IPF. (see IPA Post 1 for more information and contact numbers.
Why do I support them? Simple. They actually seem to be doing something for pilots that don't work for BA - unlike the British Airways Line Pilots Association.
The aircraft that Air 2000 will have based in the US this winter will only be able to operate to destinations outside the USA; and all of the crew members are required to have US citizenship or green cards. Right?
The problem with the IT market is this - do you equip yourself for the peak of peak season - which only spans a period of three months - in order not to have to lease in aircraft but which will leave you with a vast amount of excess capacity in the troughs; or do you equip for the troughs which means that you'll always be fully utilised but you'll see most of your peak season profits disappear into someone else's pockets as you have to wet lease in to cover the demand. Most airlines go for the middle ground.
Why do I support them? Simple. They actually seem to be doing something for pilots that don't work for BA - unlike the British Airways Line Pilots Association.
The aircraft that Air 2000 will have based in the US this winter will only be able to operate to destinations outside the USA; and all of the crew members are required to have US citizenship or green cards. Right?
The problem with the IT market is this - do you equip yourself for the peak of peak season - which only spans a period of three months - in order not to have to lease in aircraft but which will leave you with a vast amount of excess capacity in the troughs; or do you equip for the troughs which means that you'll always be fully utilised but you'll see most of your peak season profits disappear into someone else's pockets as you have to wet lease in to cover the demand. Most airlines go for the middle ground.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hate to sound negative about someone who gets my money but BALPA are not doing as much as they should. I read both The Log and Skypointer and the IPA are much more vocal about flagging out than BALPA. Lets see if they change after the IPF is formed?
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: alterego ]
[ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: alterego ]
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Behind the firewall
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Guvnor it is correct that the Icelandic aviation authority accepts FAA licences for Air Atlanta, but only because Air Atlanta pays(B****S) for it and for the ICAA to look in the other direction of a variety of other operational matters!!!
In other cases the ICAA does not accept FAA licences
Seeya
In other cases the ICAA does not accept FAA licences
Seeya
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: EU
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fast cruiser,
It's been up in MME for the last 5 summers that I know of. There is also one at LBA. Some of the pilots are qualified to fly their Airbus 330 that arrived in MAN last winter (and returns this), so are resident in the UK year round.
Next summer two additional C reg A320's arrive in NCL, displacing the NCL based Airtours A320 pilots, who will now spend next summer in the back of taxi's covering other bases.
Since Roots, a schedule airline based in Canada that is an affiliate company to Skyservice who own the A320 you saw in MME, is no longer in operation, they now have 3 x A320, 2 x A330 and 1 x B727 surplus to their requirements.
Expect to see more C reg in the UK in future.
It's been up in MME for the last 5 summers that I know of. There is also one at LBA. Some of the pilots are qualified to fly their Airbus 330 that arrived in MAN last winter (and returns this), so are resident in the UK year round.
Next summer two additional C reg A320's arrive in NCL, displacing the NCL based Airtours A320 pilots, who will now spend next summer in the back of taxi's covering other bases.
Since Roots, a schedule airline based in Canada that is an affiliate company to Skyservice who own the A320 you saw in MME, is no longer in operation, they now have 3 x A320, 2 x A330 and 1 x B727 surplus to their requirements.
Expect to see more C reg in the UK in future.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: London U.K
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, I will try this again because it matters, at Excel we are taking US pilots from Miami Air by the truckload (relatively speaking). We have one of their A/C this summer and they will have at least two of ours to cover their winter. Fine, that makes sense for everyone in the company, and other UK charter companys in the SHORT term, providing previous issues raised on this thread are resolved.
However, we were told earlier this year that we would be allowed to go to the US this winter. Things have gone awfully quiet since then, and I get the feeling that this promise (I use the term loosely) will not materialise. Various rumors are circulating about possible problems like immigration and training costs.
Why is it that a US pilot (and guys I have absolutely nothing against you) are issued a validation to fly in the UK, and yet this is not the case in the US for a Brit. I was told the other day that in order to fly for Miami Air this winter we would have to undergo a full B37 course, and the cost could be too high to justify sending pilots out to the US.
I have been told that immigration will not be a problem as the routes are international. However, the training costs are still a mystery to me. Can anyone enlighten me as to why a full course is required by the FAA ?.
Best rgds
However, we were told earlier this year that we would be allowed to go to the US this winter. Things have gone awfully quiet since then, and I get the feeling that this promise (I use the term loosely) will not materialise. Various rumors are circulating about possible problems like immigration and training costs.
Why is it that a US pilot (and guys I have absolutely nothing against you) are issued a validation to fly in the UK, and yet this is not the case in the US for a Brit. I was told the other day that in order to fly for Miami Air this winter we would have to undergo a full B37 course, and the cost could be too high to justify sending pilots out to the US.
I have been told that immigration will not be a problem as the routes are international. However, the training costs are still a mystery to me. Can anyone enlighten me as to why a full course is required by the FAA ?.
Best rgds
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yes, Slick - it's one of the (many) ways in which the US government through the FAA tries to deter foreign airlines from leasing aircraft to US carriers.
As you rightly say, the CAA hands out validations to FAA licence holders like sweeties (as long as they are flying US registered aircraft - its a different story if they want to fly UK ones) - whereas the FAA seemingly makes the process as hard as it can.
Dig around here FAA Website and I'm sure you can find all you need to know - along with all the answers to their exams!!
As you rightly say, the CAA hands out validations to FAA licence holders like sweeties (as long as they are flying US registered aircraft - its a different story if they want to fly UK ones) - whereas the FAA seemingly makes the process as hard as it can.
Dig around here FAA Website and I'm sure you can find all you need to know - along with all the answers to their exams!!