Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airport Security (Merged) - Effects on Crew/Staff

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airport Security (Merged) - Effects on Crew/Staff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2006, 08:26
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: southampton
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EGLL has a zero flow rate inbound TFN this is due to lack of stands etc. Inbounds with a greater than 3hr flying time are being allowed to land and have been catered for. EGCC, EGKK and EGSS have reduced rates and all airports have MDI's.
1985 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 08:28
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LHR close put back further:

Latest EGLL notam:

A2024/06 - HEATHROW AIRPORT IS CLOSED TO ALL SHORTHAUL FLIGHTS WITH SECTORS OF 3 HOURS OR LESS. A REVIEW WILL BE UNDERTAKEN AT 1400Z. 10 AUG 07:42 UNTIL 10 AUG 14:00
luoto is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 08:53
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London & Edinburgh
Age: 38
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update on post #31 from me: BBC News now reports that AF have cancelled only Paris-LHR flights whilst the backlog clears, and that IB have cancelled all flights. Also reporting that Tel Aviv-London flights are cancelled (BBC Article)

How this sits with the current NOTAM (which is also reported), I don't know.

Jordan

Last edited by Jordan D; 10th Aug 2006 at 09:05.
Jordan D is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:04
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard reports of traffic delays leading to UK airports now. Stansted mentioned specifically. Allow more time if your flight is running
cwatters is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:05
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest is that it is closed to flights not in the air already until 1500z now!!
The scene at LHR with many planes on the ground is a bit like how it was last August, I don't need to remind people what happened then!!
Completely different now though!
Worrying situation, hope this won;t have too many long term effects on the industry.
747-436 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:11
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scotland
Age: 52
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight crew restrictions

I fly regional t/prop out of Glasgow. I've just been told by ops, that we are not allowed flight cases. Only the bare minimum to be taken onto flight deck. No mobiles. So basically your plog, headset, and pens. Don't know about calculator.

This is terrible......where am I going to keep my sandwiches!!!!!

JF
Jockflyer is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:23
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: huddersfield
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by luoto
LHR close put back further:

Latest EGLL notam:

A2024/06 - HEATHROW AIRPORT IS CLOSED TO ALL SHORTHAUL FLIGHTS WITH SECTORS OF 3 HOURS OR LESS. A REVIEW WILL BE UNDERTAKEN AT 1400Z. 10 AUG 07:42 UNTIL 10 AUG 14:00
do you have a link for the NOTAMS,i couldn't find anything on the AIP ..
UNDERTHEROSUN1F is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:30
  #48 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SXB
BA are offering to rebook passengers, without penalty, who don't want to travel today or tomorrow onto flights over the next few weeks regardless of whether their ticket is changeable. I haven't heard if any of the lo-cos are doing this, though their customer service engine isn't really designed to deal with several thousand passengers over a short space of time.
Ryanair have stated that they have no 'immediate' spare capacity, and those unable to fly today will be looking towards NEXT WEEK for seats.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:32
  #49 (permalink)  

I Have Control
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North-West England
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Official Guidelines?

What are the "authorities" instructing Flight Deck and Cabin Crew as acceptable to bring to work? I have heard nothing, except my company advises to bring only what is necessary for the job.

Like Jockflyer, that means my butties. Crew food is highly dodgy, always has been!
RoyHudd is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:36
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,965
Received 68 Likes on 26 Posts
The one thing the CAPTAIN needs today is a mobile phone so that he can maintain contact with Ops at all times and actually try and salvage the day for passengers, crew and airline alike.
beamer is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:42
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Age: 67
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mobiles were being allowed through at EGNT earlier, not sure whether they have now stopped this.
martinidoc is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:45
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: chances are, not at home
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite so - Refusal to allow flight crew to carry on bags will not work; My bag contains things I actually need, including a phone and a laptop. There has to be a distinction between the crew and passengers at security checks, and if they cant take it from our ID passes that we are the pilots that we say we are, then they shouldn't be letting us through at all.

Kudos to the UK security services for preventing murderers from taking many lives, and from severely damaging the airline industry.
Joe le Taxi is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:47
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not far from the airport
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The news is reporting that possessions brought by passengers are being transferred into the hold.

Apart from the fact that this prevents hand luggage from being in the cabin - is there a real safety reason why everything should go in the 'belly' of the plane?

i.e. should a device be smuggled into the hold that could be detonated - is there more chance of the crew being able to land an aircraft rather than it occurring in the cabin? (i.e. is the hold designed to withstand an explosion to a greater degree than where the pax sit?)
Boing7117 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:47
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Underthesun:

ais.org.uk is a disjointed p.i.t.a so I went West

https://www.notams.jcs.mil/

slap in egll and it is currently no 3.
luoto is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:50
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Personally, what is most interesting in all this is the ban on all liquids. This includes prescribed medicines that are unable to be verified to be medicines.

They are specifically identified in the list of prohibited substances on the BA website.

It appears to this casual observer that these potential terrorists have access to some form of explosive in liquid form - presumably in multiple component parts hence the hold carriage requirement - that can be used to bring down an aircraft.

It will be interesting to see if this is indeed the case and what the outcome with respect to future security measures turns out to be.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:53
  #56 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish Instructions to crew

Our co emailed the regs of which the following extract refers to crews:

Airline Crew

4. Any crew, whether operational or positioning, using passenger search areas must be subjected to the same security measures as passengers.

5. Crew accessing the Restricted Zone through staff search areas must carry only those items they require to perform their duties (including personal hand baggage meeting that description). All such items must be x-rayed where possible and hand searched where not. All crew must be hand searched.

6. However, no liquids of any type are permitted other than those mentioned above as able to be taken into the Restricted Zone by passengers.
[for those travelling with an infant: baby food, milk (the contents of each bottle must be tasted by the accompanying passenger)]

7. At airports where there is no specific staff search facility, airports should make special arrangements for crew to be screened away from passengers.

Temporary Passes

8. Temporary passes must not be issued without the express permission of the Airport Security Manager.

Company Mobile Phone
It has been agreed with the Security authorities that the Captain ONLY may retain his issued company phone as it forms part of the normal operation
So it seems, jockflier will have no sandwiches to worry about, so no bag required.

I am very concernes, as a loco pilot, how I am going to feed myself at all. Can't take anything on board, so does that mean I'm living on one of two varieties of sandwich, and cheapo orange juice for the forseeable future. That is unaceptable.

edit to avoid controversy and offending wilting violets

Last edited by Arkroyal; 10th Aug 2006 at 10:21.
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 09:54
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apart from the fact that this prevents hand luggage from being in the cabin - is there a real safety reason why everything should go in the 'belly' of the plane?

News reports are that the devices were to be assembled on board, hence the move of the components to the hold.
egbt is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 10:00
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scotland
Age: 52
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arkroyal, not sure your last comment is particularily sensible.
Jockflyer is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 10:01
  #59 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jock, it might not be polite, but it is eminently sensible
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 10:07
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just been speaking with friends who work at an airport in the North East of England.
The response at the non-terminal security gate (i.e. the workers' entrance) has been interesting. A fireman was told he couldn't bring his electronic car key in and would have to leave it IN his car and leave the car unlocked in the car park. Mobile phones are similarly banned - although a member of the oncoming HEMS crew managed to persuade the security person that the work-issued phone was essential on the scene of an accident.
The cleared working people at the said airport regularly get the full nine yards at the security gate while there are regular incursions from the seemingly unguarded south fence of the perimeter, so no real surprises here.
wallsend is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.