ATPL(H)
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: swedish lapland
ATPL(H)
Trying to figure out when a ATPL(H) is required in commercial air transport and HEMS.
Is it based on helicopter weight more than 3175 kg?
Is it passenger related more than 9 passengers?
Is it multi crew related, i.e if you want to operate a helicopter in multi pilot operation, does the commander require an atpl(h)?
I am just getting more and more confused and would appreciate some answers and where I can find the EASA ruling itself.
Is it based on helicopter weight more than 3175 kg?
Is it passenger related more than 9 passengers?
Is it multi crew related, i.e if you want to operate a helicopter in multi pilot operation, does the commander require an atpl(h)?
I am just getting more and more confused and would appreciate some answers and where I can find the EASA ruling itself.
Guest
Posts: n/a
FCL.305 CPL — Privileges and conditions
(a) Privileges. The privileges of the holder of a CPL are, within the appropriate aircraft category, to:
(1) exercise all the privileges of the holder of an LAPL and a PPL;
(2) act as PIC or co-pilot of any aircraft engaged in operations other than commercial air
transport;
(3) act as PIC in commercial air transport of any single-pilot aircraft subject to the restrictions
specified in FCL.060 and in this Subpart;
(4) act as co-pilot in commercial air transport subject to the restrictions specified in FCL.060
(a) Privileges. The privileges of the holder of a CPL are, within the appropriate aircraft category, to:
(1) exercise all the privileges of the holder of an LAPL and a PPL;
(2) act as PIC or co-pilot of any aircraft engaged in operations other than commercial air
transport;
(3) act as PIC in commercial air transport of any single-pilot aircraft subject to the restrictions
specified in FCL.060 and in this Subpart;
(4) act as co-pilot in commercial air transport subject to the restrictions specified in FCL.060
FCL.505 ATPL — Privileges
(a) The privileges of the holder of an ATPL are, within the appropriate aircraft category, to:
(1) exercise all the privileges of the holder of an LAPL, a PPL and a CPL;
(2) act as PIC of aircraft engaged in commercial air transport.
(a) The privileges of the holder of an ATPL are, within the appropriate aircraft category, to:
(1) exercise all the privileges of the holder of an LAPL, a PPL and a CPL;
(2) act as PIC of aircraft engaged in commercial air transport.
The key word here is "Commercial Air Transport".
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: swedish lapland
So if a Commercial Air Transport is carried out single pilot in lets say an Airbus 145 T2 it would be enough with a CPL(H) but if it it is operated multi pilot the commander would have to have an ATPL(H)?
And if the operation is carried out as HEMS both above flights would be fine with only a CPL(H)?
And if the operation is carried out as HEMS both above flights would be fine with only a CPL(H)?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 4
From: HLS map - http://goo.gl/maps/3ymt
So if a Commercial Air Transport is carried out single pilot in lets say an Airbus 145 T2 it would be enough with a CPL(H) but if it it is operated multi pilot the commander would have to have an ATPL(H)?
And if the operation is carried out as HEMS both above flights would be fine with only a CPL(H)?
And if the operation is carried out as HEMS both above flights would be fine with only a CPL(H)?

Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 11
From: Bar to Bar
Happy to be corrected, just because the Operator uses two crew doesn't mean an ATPL(H) is required, it us only if the Manufacturer declares that two crew are required to operate the aircraft, an ATPL(H) is required. No?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 4
From: HLS map - http://goo.gl/maps/3ymt
https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33...uly%2013v1.pdf
Quoting the above IN "Choosing to operate a single pilot helicopter with 2 pilots as a policy of the owner/operator of the helicopter does not make it a multi-pilot operation; as flying the aircraft multi-pilot is not required by the operating rules in such a case"

Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 11
From: Bar to Bar
Now I think on it, you can only get an ATPL(H) initial award on a multi-crew aircraft as defined by the Manufacturer, not the Operator else, as has been posted earlier, we would all be getting an ATPL(H) awarded on a AB206.....actually, that wouldn't happen because it is a single, it would be have to be an AS355 or similar. I'm certain in CAP804 (is that still valid?) there is a list of acceptable types.

Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 11
From: Bar to Bar
No it doesn't. CPL(H) is sufficient. EC145 is SP and that is what it says on your ticket (confusingly BK117), HEMS just decide to operate twin pilot.....but not in all locations.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: swedish lapland
So is the conclusion that I can operate as a commander in a multi pilot operation on a 145 with only a CPL?
Providing that I have SP/MP on my license.
HEMS in some location in Sweden are Single Pilot Operations by the way.
Providing that I have SP/MP on my license.
HEMS in some location in Sweden are Single Pilot Operations by the way.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: LOS
only if the Manufacturer declares that two crew are required to operate the aircraft,
Guest
Posts: n/a
So is the conclusion that I can operate as a commander in a multi pilot operation on a 145 with only a CPL?
See above in my previous post......
With a CPL, you can only act as PIC in CAT on SINGLE PILOT Helicopter!
Flying "Multi Pilot" on a "Single Pilot Helicopter" does not make it "Multi Pilot"!
Either the Operations Manual, or the RFM MUST indicate that the minimum crew for this helicopter is more than one pilot-or the "second pilot" can not log the hours!!!
But if the Ops Manual or the RFM indicate that the Minimum crew is more than one pilot, both pilots will need ATPL-theory, MCC, and a Multi-Pilot type rating...

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 4
From: HLS map - http://goo.gl/maps/3ymt
Yorkshire Air Ambulance operate single-pilot so CPL is all that's required.
Perra - In EASA land: CAT/HEMS can be operated single-pilot or multi-pilot. HEMS units that operate multi-pilot generally choose to for safety when flying NVG etc - although some countries I'm not aware of may mandate it for certain operations.
If operated single-pilot (135/145/902/169) the holder only needs a CPL with SP privileges in their licence I.e. EC145/SP.
IF operated multi-pilot, both pilots must have MP type privileges for that type I.e. EC145/SP/MP in their licence (in accordance with FCL.720.H these privileges require MCC & ATPL theory), the ops manual must specify approved multi-pilot procedures, and the commander must hold an ATPL. HEMS attracts no alleviations over CAT in this respect. It is a passenger carrying commercial flight.
However, standby for change in this area
Perra - In EASA land: CAT/HEMS can be operated single-pilot or multi-pilot. HEMS units that operate multi-pilot generally choose to for safety when flying NVG etc - although some countries I'm not aware of may mandate it for certain operations.
If operated single-pilot (135/145/902/169) the holder only needs a CPL with SP privileges in their licence I.e. EC145/SP.
IF operated multi-pilot, both pilots must have MP type privileges for that type I.e. EC145/SP/MP in their licence (in accordance with FCL.720.H these privileges require MCC & ATPL theory), the ops manual must specify approved multi-pilot procedures, and the commander must hold an ATPL. HEMS attracts no alleviations over CAT in this respect. It is a passenger carrying commercial flight.
However, standby for change in this area




