Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Tracey Curtis-Taylor (Merged threads)

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Tracey Curtis-Taylor (Merged threads)

Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:03
  #2341 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Do I come here often?
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This was in today's Telegraph obituries.

Molly Rose, Spitfire pilot ? obituary

Interesting connection with the Marshall family, but what an amazing lady! The only award she got was the ATA Veterans Badge in 2008 when she was 88 years old.

T C-T if you are reading this, or anyone from your team, this was a woman who really did things for both aviation and her country. A true aviatrix and adventuress. By your behaviour you defile the memory of this lady and so many others like her.

Frankly; you are a disgrace.

SND
Sir Niall Dementia is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:10
  #2342 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: dorset
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is EG claiming so many P2 hours in the Stearman on the incident form?
vintagewizard is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:14
  #2343 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: outernet
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Note that TCT medical has lapsed to a LAPL at the time of the accident. And doubt that her instructor rating is/was current.
twothree is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:22
  #2344 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,504
Received 317 Likes on 168 Posts
Originally Posted by Above The Clouds
Ewald is listed on the form as a crew member, not a passenger.
As I mentioned earlier, if you hold a valid pilot's licence and sit in a pilot's seat, you are generally regarded as a crew member by the relevant aviation authority.

Seems they have shot themselves in the foot by claiming those flight hours. They declared in writing that she wasn't solo. Both of them couldn't claim to be PIC/P1 at the same time so presumably one of them claimed P2 or P1/US.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:30
  #2345 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 1,141
Received 55 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by deefer dog
Well spotted megan!

Wake up you lot, anything else?
How has Ewald logged more hours than TCT?
I would have expected those figures to be the other way around.
SATCOS WHIPPING BOY is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:35
  #2346 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 909
Received 194 Likes on 109 Posts
Ewald having more hours is to be expected if they were for air tests following reassembly of the aircraft. He does however appear to have logged every hour on the trip.
B Fraser is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:41
  #2347 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,770
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
I see that TCT gives her principal occupation as "pilot". (Wot no CPL?)
pulse1 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 20:44
  #2348 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 682
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by twothree
Note that TCT medical has lapsed to a LAPL at the time of the accident. And doubt that her instructor rating is/was current.
Would that be valid for a 61.75 FAA certificate, then? Presumably she would no longer have an ICAO compliant licence/medical combination.

Returning to this, her previous Class 2 Medical was on 5 May 2015, so it would not have expired until the end of the month 1 year later. That is, the end of the month of the accident.

Further Edit: As deefer dog points out below, EASA Class 2 medicals do expire on the day the anniversary of the medical exam falls, not the end of the month as I wrongly thought.

Oops for me; a bigger oops for someone else.

Last edited by hoodie; 2nd Nov 2016 at 21:51. Reason: Error correction
hoodie is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 21:02
  #2349 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Not a million miles from EGTF
Age: 68
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still says she's an SEP instructor. Can anyone confirm that it is still valid? And how many instructional flights ha she done? Are they all with a certain 20000hr CPL?
robin is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 21:37
  #2350 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,825
Received 346 Likes on 184 Posts
As I mentioned earlier, if you hold a valid pilot's licence and sit in a pilot's seat, you are generally regarded as a crew member by the relevant aviation authority.
I'd sure like to see where that's written.
megan is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 21:42
  #2351 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The accident report tells us quite a bit:

Both logging same flight time (sorry I credited megan, but it was B.Fraser who spotted this), completely counters what TCT stated publicly recently.

In the aircraft information section TCT ticks she confirms that the aircraft has two seats, of which BOTH are “Flight Crew Seats.” Again this shows that her claim published most recently in The Times is incorrect.

Both TCT and Ewald listed as crew.


As noted by twothree TCT’s last medical was on 5th May 2015. I was not able to find any record of her having taken an FAA medical, so I assume that she renewed her EASA one. As she is over 50 any medical she had must therefore be an expired Class 2, which would only have been good to 4th or 5th May 2016, ie it expired before the accident flight. This is notable because her FAA licence is a “Foreign Based” one, and is only valid if the licence it is based on (her UK issued EASA PPL) is valid. This needs to be checked, but it may be the case that she had no medical and no licence when conducting the accident flight. (Her PPL dropping down to a LAPL is irrelevant – she may only fly an N in the USA if her EASA PPL (not LAPL) is valid).

Surely not AGAIN??
deefer dog is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 22:10
  #2352 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 909
Received 194 Likes on 109 Posts
I think Megan and I were typing at the same time.
B Fraser is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 22:13
  #2353 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 62
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding is that a medical exam for revalidation of an EASA medical certificate can be taken up to 45 days before the expiry date, so potentially if the actual exam was on 5 May 2015 the expiry date of the existing certificate could be anything up 19 June 2015 and the new certificate would then be valid to a date between 5 May 2016 and 19 June 2016.

Last edited by zimbo565; 2nd Nov 2016 at 22:28. Reason: 18 June changed to 19 June (can't count!)
zimbo565 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 22:40
  #2354 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Zimbo, yes that's true, and that may well be the case. Maybe I jumped the gun there. I'll look into it though. Thanks
deefer dog is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2016, 08:10
  #2355 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,182
Received 41 Likes on 20 Posts
I agree with Noflymore - I flew as a test pilot on a PPL quite extensively - but was employed as an airworthiness engineer.

I did do a CPL, as much as anything before anybody asked the sort of questions being asked here about TCT, about me. I've certainly been glad of the CPL, which opened other doors, and gave me additional knowledge and skills I've used extensively, but it's not clear that I ever strictly needed it.

And, frankly, there's quite enough already to criticise about TCT's integrity, it's not a useful addition.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2016, 10:12
  #2356 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LSZH, oder in der Nähe
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by deefer dog
Anyone else notice anything strange?
Well, now I have sight of official documents, one of Weejeem's Niggles is immediately answered.


Document 1, "Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report", page 2, first section "Registered Aircraft Owner" clearly states...
Name:_________________________3G Classic Aviation Inc.
Fractional Ownership Aircraft:__No
and appears to be signed - just after the declaration "I hereby certify that the above information is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge" - by Tracey Curtis-Taylor.
but another document, STATEMENT OF EWALD GRITSCH, clearly states...
Yes, this Boeing Stearman airplane is owned by Tracey Curtis-Taylor, who commissioned the restoration in 2012.
so at least one of them is lying.
.
.
Attached Files
WeeJeem is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2016, 10:25
  #2357 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weejeem

I'm afraid that it's entirely normal for the registered owner of an N-reg aircraft to be a US corporation if the beneficial owner is not a US citizen. My own aircraft is owned using exactly this mechanism.
Jonzarno is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2016, 10:41
  #2358 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LSZH, oder in der Nähe
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jonzarno
Weejeem

I'm afraid that it's entirely normal for the registered owner of an N-reg aircraft to be a US corporation if the beneficial owner is not a US citizen. My own aircraft is owned using exactly this mechanism.
Jonzarno, I am indeed aware of this - my point is that Gritsch did not use the term "beneficial owner", only the phrase "is owned by", and the registered owner is very clearly a legal entity in its own right.

But I do take your and airpolice's point - perhaps there is/was no lying, rather just yet another terminological inexactitude.
WeeJeem is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2016, 11:11
  #2359 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although I carry no torch for Miss Curtis-Taylor (and I'm still waiting for an answer to the three questions I posted earlier in this thread!) I don't think this particular case is a conscious attempt to deceive.

As I said earlier, my own aircraft ownership is structured in exactly the same way and anyone would describe it as being mine without mentioning the corporation that is the registered owner.

Last edited by Jonzarno; 3rd Nov 2016 at 11:16. Reason: Typo
Jonzarno is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2016, 11:48
  #2360 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight instructors may log any flight time as PIC whenever they are providing flight instruction, whether or not they are acting as PIC (FAR 61.51). This mainly applies to FAR Part 91 operations! An instructor may not give flight instruction during a FAR 135 or 121 operation unless he/she is a designated flight instructor as stated in the carrier's approved operations manual.
So, Ewald, as an FAA CFI could legally log PIC time under the FAR's even if not the nominated PIC as long as he was instructing. Interesting...

Wasn't there an FAA rule saying an ATP could log any flight time in an aircraft they were qualified in at one point, even if not the handling pilot? Maybe that was a possibility?

https://www.aopa.org/training-and-sa...mmand-pic-time
Hawker 800 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.