Poor Mixture Control = Fire? I Think So
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Poor Mixture Control = Fire? I Think So
While attending a fly-in this weekend, a number of us witnessed a Piper Warrior taxi out, do a rather long runup (with some backfiring during the mag check by selecting OFF). Whether it was a bad mag or leaded/fouled plugs, I don't know, but I suspect fouled plugs.
Rather than takeoff, the pilot, with instructor in the right seat, taxies back, shuts down and confers with someone rather experienced to determine what to do. The pilot and instructor re-enter the Warrior and attempt a hot start (Lycoming, carbureted four-banger). A fire in the cowling ensues after repeated cranking. Even though I am 100 yds away, I am the first to arrive with a fire extinguisher and successfully extinguish the fire after running by zombie on lookers.
You can imagine all the why's and how's like me, but I feel it all started by taxiing out with mixture full rich, causing the plugs to foul, which resulted in the excessive mag drop and the taxi back. The CFI didn't know to lean during taxi, how to clear the plugs during the runup, nor how to do a successful hot start. shame all around.
Learn from this...and carry a fire extinguisher.
FYI...
Rather than takeoff, the pilot, with instructor in the right seat, taxies back, shuts down and confers with someone rather experienced to determine what to do. The pilot and instructor re-enter the Warrior and attempt a hot start (Lycoming, carbureted four-banger). A fire in the cowling ensues after repeated cranking. Even though I am 100 yds away, I am the first to arrive with a fire extinguisher and successfully extinguish the fire after running by zombie on lookers.
You can imagine all the why's and how's like me, but I feel it all started by taxiing out with mixture full rich, causing the plugs to foul, which resulted in the excessive mag drop and the taxi back. The CFI didn't know to lean during taxi, how to clear the plugs during the runup, nor how to do a successful hot start. shame all around.
Learn from this...and carry a fire extinguisher.
FYI...
Last edited by Desert185; 20th Oct 2013 at 18:10.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say they didn't follow the hot start procedure.
Over Primed it and managed to get fuel into the air filter.
More than likely 5 squirts with full mixture then waggle the throttle while cranking it.
The initial taxi will have been other issues.
But your right clueless instructor that doesn't have a clue what they are teaching or how to operate the aircraft. The won't be an airline op for starting a piston engine any more.
Over Primed it and managed to get fuel into the air filter.
More than likely 5 squirts with full mixture then waggle the throttle while cranking it.
The initial taxi will have been other issues.
But your right clueless instructor that doesn't have a clue what they are teaching or how to operate the aircraft. The won't be an airline op for starting a piston engine any more.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 62
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly what is the link between mixture control and the engine fire that seems to be caused by overpriming? Other than that both can be classified as some sort of engine mismanagement?
So the pilot did not try to stop the fire by simply keep on cranking to pull the carb-fire back into the engine (with the throttle fully open and the fuel cut off)? That is the procedure for all carburetted PA-28s I know.
So the pilot did not try to stop the fire by simply keep on cranking to pull the carb-fire back into the engine (with the throttle fully open and the fuel cut off)? That is the procedure for all carburetted PA-28s I know.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Desert185
Even though I am 100 yds away, I am the first to arrive with a fire extinguisher and successfully extinguish the fire after running by zombie on lookers.
Fair play to you for stepping up to the mark, but do you really have to come on here and snipe at the misgivings of the CFI? I'm pretty sure you were that experience level at one stage.
Thanks for sharing the incident, as we can all learn from it I'm sure, but a little more modesty would make you a much more like hero.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, they say "Ignorance is bliss" ! I'd expect ANY person professing to be a tutor, to have a PROFESSIONAL level of understanding of their subject.
Unfortunately, it seems too easy ,nowadays , for some halfwit to jump through a few hoops and become "qualified"
I'm buggered if I'd trust my life to someone who didn't understand the fundamentals of operating an internal-combustion engine on which our continued good health depended.
Unfortunately, it seems too easy ,nowadays , for some halfwit to jump through a few hoops and become "qualified"
I'm buggered if I'd trust my life to someone who didn't understand the fundamentals of operating an internal-combustion engine on which our continued good health depended.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,578
Received 435 Likes
on
229 Posts
Seems to me that the aviation industry is all back to front.
The folks with the knowledge won't teach because the pay is rubbish.
Those with no experience are more or less obliged to teach because it's just about the only way to build their own experience.
So when something like this happens it's easy to say "Ah, but they should have known!"
But they obviously don't and in many cases it's hardly their fault. Why did no-one else teach them?
But in any case, "Lessons will have been learned", no doubt.
The folks with the knowledge won't teach because the pay is rubbish.
Those with no experience are more or less obliged to teach because it's just about the only way to build their own experience.
So when something like this happens it's easy to say "Ah, but they should have known!"
But they obviously don't and in many cases it's hardly their fault. Why did no-one else teach them?
But in any case, "Lessons will have been learned", no doubt.
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The frozen north....
Age: 49
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From what I'm seeing nowadays its pretty much as you've already observed.
Little Johnny gets his PPL then CPL/ IR and comes out with just over 200hrs having spent all his flying life in a supervised 'school' environment. If an aircraft has an issue, he signs it tech and goes off and flys another.
Unable to get an airline job, he then goes on and gets an FI ticket to build hours out of necessity rather than a deisre to instruct. He then starts teaching the next 'Little Johnny' still having never left the supervised school environment himself and so the cycle continues.
I personally learned a heck of a lot about 'operating' an aircraft from the older more experienced members when I first joined a group and flew with them. Some of these chaps had 30years+ flying with well over 1000 GA hours behind them and knew all sorts of practical tips and tricks you'll never get from a 200hr FI.
I then learned a whole load more once I went on to own my own aircaft and had to start maintaining it myself!
In principle I think LAA pilot coaches could have a lot to offer a freshly qualified PPL but with only 2 in the whole of Scotland I'm not surprised not many people use their services!
Regards
UA
Little Johnny gets his PPL then CPL/ IR and comes out with just over 200hrs having spent all his flying life in a supervised 'school' environment. If an aircraft has an issue, he signs it tech and goes off and flys another.
Unable to get an airline job, he then goes on and gets an FI ticket to build hours out of necessity rather than a deisre to instruct. He then starts teaching the next 'Little Johnny' still having never left the supervised school environment himself and so the cycle continues.
I personally learned a heck of a lot about 'operating' an aircraft from the older more experienced members when I first joined a group and flew with them. Some of these chaps had 30years+ flying with well over 1000 GA hours behind them and knew all sorts of practical tips and tricks you'll never get from a 200hr FI.
I then learned a whole load more once I went on to own my own aircaft and had to start maintaining it myself!
In principle I think LAA pilot coaches could have a lot to offer a freshly qualified PPL but with only 2 in the whole of Scotland I'm not surprised not many people use their services!
Regards
UA
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Grafity
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert185
Even though I am 100 yds away, I am the first to arrive with a fire extinguisher and successfully extinguish the fire after running by zombie on lookers.
Was this playing in the back of your mind as you ran to save the day?
Originally Posted by Desert185
Even though I am 100 yds away, I am the first to arrive with a fire extinguisher and successfully extinguish the fire after running by zombie on lookers.
Was this playing in the back of your mind as you ran to save the day?
Fair play to you for stepping up to the mark, but do you really have to come on here and snipe at the misgivings of the CFI? I'm pretty sure you were that experience level at one stage.
An interesting side story is that another CFI ground-looped her aircraft, which is why she was in a Warrior at this fly-in.
BTW, I never had that experience as a CFI or as a small aircraft operator. Must have had good instruction and paid attention. Now that we have computers and the internet, the acquisition of knowledge should be easier...provided one isn't concerned about criticism for contributing to that knowledge. [/quote]
Thanks for sharing the incident, as we can all learn from it I'm sure, but a little more modesty would make you a much more like hero.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
huv
Exactly what is the link between mixture control and the engine fire that seems to be caused by overpriming? Other than that both can be classified as some sort of engine mismanagement?
They apparently taxi with the mixture full rich causing the plugs to foul (mixture error one). During the runup there was the resulting out of limit mag drop. The pilot and CFI, also apparently, didn't know how to clear the plugs by leaning the mixture at a higher RPM (mixture error two). It was a 2100' MSL airport, but leaning during taxi should also be done at sea level.
One could argue that if they had adjusted the mixture properly during the taxi out, they wouldn't have had to do a hot start, which resulted in an unresolved induction fire.
So the pilot did not try to stop the fire by simply keep on cranking to pull the carb-fire back into the engine (with the throttle fully open and the fuel cut off)? That is the procedure for all carburetted PA-28s I know.
Control of mixture during hot start (mixture error three). No induction fire resolution attempt (mixture error four).
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
grafity, you have just been added to my 'ignore' list.
Desert185, thanks for sharing. I does show stunning ignorance on the part of the CFI.
Desert185, thanks for sharing. I does show stunning ignorance on the part of the CFI.
Last edited by 172driver; 21st Oct 2013 at 15:22. Reason: typo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cows...etc
Every place I worked as a CFI in the early days of my career, I can't remember when the Chief Flight Instructor would sit down with new CFI's and talk shop on how to manage engines and airplanes. I did learn a lot from a crusty, old airplane salesman who took me under his wing. I was a CFI and he wasn't, but thankfully I was smart enough to listen and absorb his experience and wisdom. He was my go-to guy.
RIP, John. You did good.
RIP, John. You did good.
Last edited by Desert185; 21st Oct 2013 at 15:25.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They apparently taxi with the mixture full rich causing the plugs to foul (mixture error one).
The pilot and CFI, also apparently, didn't know how to clear the plugs by leaning the mixture at a higher RPM (mixture error two).
Control of mixture during hot start (mixture error three).
I agree with Mad Jock that the cause is most likely overpriming, NOT incorrect use of the mixture - at least not "incorrect" according to the POH. Furthermore you don't give sufficient evidence that they executed the "induction fire" emergency procedure incorrectly. So I wouldn't be so quick to pile all the blame on the CFI or the education system that he/she grew up in. I'd rather wait for the results of a formal investigation of this incident - one that gives the CFI and the pilot a chance to comment as well, and incorporates the results of a technical survey of the aircraft.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Desert, agreed. That's why I would have fired him for wasting fuel despite being taught how not to! I suppose there is a possibility that a fuel line let go resulting in the incident but my betting is on the over priming theory.
I also had an instructor who managed to flatten three batteries in a week, again not learning despite extended briefings and demonstrations. I don't believe he instructs any more.
I also had an instructor who managed to flatten three batteries in a week, again not learning despite extended briefings and demonstrations. I don't believe he instructs any more.
Last edited by Cows getting bigger; 21st Oct 2013 at 15:49.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Backpacker
As you expand your experience, you will realize there is more to flying than what is described in the POH.
It wasn't a fuel line and there will be no formal investigation.
It is accepted practice to lean during taxi to prevent plug fouling, particularly at high density altitudes in the mountains. There is more to life than flying from sea level airports, and pilot-induced plug fouling is avoidable...sea level or otherwise.
Live by the POH; die by the POH.
It wasn't a fuel line and there will be no formal investigation.
It is accepted practice to lean during taxi to prevent plug fouling, particularly at high density altitudes in the mountains. There is more to life than flying from sea level airports, and pilot-induced plug fouling is avoidable...sea level or otherwise.
Live by the POH; die by the POH.
Last edited by Desert185; 21st Oct 2013 at 16:29.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Desert185
The CFI didn't know to lean during taxi, how to clear the plugs during the runup, nor how to do a successful hot start. shame all around.
I agree with a previous poster, the whole flight school industry is back to front. I also find it irritating when those with decades of experience seem to revel in newbies screwing up. This is neither the first, nor last instructor, to not have a clue about the workings of an engine. With that many of them out there, it's not the individuals fault, but a problem with the system.
I do respect the fact that you helped in the situation, the song was only meant as a joke. Sorry if you took it to heart, but your whole post came across to me as; I'm a hero and I share the world with idiots.
Originally Posted by Desert185
Every place I worked as a CFI in the early days of my career, I can't remember when the Chief Flight Instructor would sit down with new CFI's and talk shop on how to manage engines and airplanes. I did learn a lot from a crusty, old airplane salesman who took me under his wing. I was a CFI and he wasn't, but thankfully I was smart enough to listen and absorb his experience and wisdom. He was my go-to guy.
RIP, John. You did good.
RIP, John. You did good.
Maybe a better way you could have remembered his legacy, would have been to pull the CFI aside and try to impart some of your experience and knowledge on them, as he did for you. Rather than assume them an idiot, due to their lack of experience.
Sorry to hear that 172driver. Have a nice life none the less.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As you expand your experience, you will realize there is more to flying than what is described in the POH.
It is accepted practice to lean during taxi to prevent plug fouling, particularly at high density altitudes in the mountains.
The same applies to taxi. Depending on the length of the taxi, the ambient temperature, the altitude, the RPM required to taxi and a few other factors, I might or I might not lean the mixture. And if I do, how much I lean is done purely by gut feeling - it's usually about 1/4 to 1/5th of the full mixture travel. At the very least what you call "accepted practice" is ambiguous (how much do you lean in the first place?) and not universally applicable. And not prescribed in this particular POH.
Live by the POH; die by the POH.
I've said it earlier, and I'll say it again: Based on the limited information given, I feel that the cause of the fire was overpriming. And that's something that the POH warns against indeed.
When the runup failed due to rough running during the magneto check, the occupants did exactly what they were supposed to do, according to the POH: Abort the flight. But the plug fouling, not leaning the mixture during taxi, and not knowing the procedure for clearing fouled plugs - most of which is not described in the POH - did not cause the fire.
The fact that a few things happened at the same time does not mean that there is a direct causal relationship between them.
Last edited by BackPacker; 21st Oct 2013 at 22:14.
1) The instructor allowed the engine to be grossly overprimed
2) The POH procedure for an engine fire at start up was not followed
Fact 1 speaks to a poor appreciation of good practices in the operation of a pretty simple piston engine which is pretty sad, but fact 2 speaks to a wholly unacceptable lack of skill and knowledge by the instructor.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Backpacker
You're misconstruing what I said. Read it again. I think I made the chain of events and the causal factors pretty clear.
There much more to leaning and mixture control than what the POH outlines. I would guess that you aren't an advocate of flying lean of peak.
There much more to leaning and mixture control than what the POH outlines. I would guess that you aren't an advocate of flying lean of peak.
Last edited by Desert185; 22nd Oct 2013 at 00:59.