Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Manchester crash reported BBC

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Manchester crash reported BBC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2011, 22:03
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dublin
Age: 34
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I sincerely hope Ravenair woulnt be careless enough to let a cert of airworthiness lapse.

Let alone then let someone hire it out.
WILCO.XMG is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2011, 22:14
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 35
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does it matter this is out of date?
CofA / Permit EASA Certificate of Airworthiness Validity Expiry: 28/07/2011
I've noticed that G-INFO isn't updated very quickly, it usually takes about a month, so I wouldn't read too much into this.

Thoughts with the pilots, hope they both make a full recovery. It always seems a bit closer to home when it's an aircraft you've flown in the past.
gg190 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 00:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: gone surfin'
Age: 58
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
09 at Barton leaves few options.

Wythenshawe are relatively new with burns, but have a good reputation.

Hope that they are doing ok.
gingernut is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 07:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chorley - Lancashire
Age: 41
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have completly the wrong aircraft. It is not the one that is shown in Media Photos So please do not speculate and give the 'press' who read these articles new ideas. Thankyou.
Deadside is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 12:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deadside

Well said...

Although let them print duff defamatory ill-informed rubbish....would be nice to see them get another kicking in the courts.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 15:48
  #26 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ginge,

I had a GF who was a nurse at Wythy burns unit. In 1982 !

SGC
 
Old 30th Jul 2011, 18:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: gone surfin'
Age: 58
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could 've bin me mum Sir George. Have you got ginger hair.
gingernut is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 19:41
  #28 (permalink)  
jxc
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 51
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How is sir Cayly going to take that one ? maybe you can get some backdated child maintenance
jxc is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 22:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between a Rock & A Hard Place
Age: 53
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is not the first time, and sadly probably not the last time, that I find myself commenting on ill informed press specualtion, so to help out any reporters hovering here trying to get a new "angle" on this story let me make it simple for you....
The pilot did not have to wrestle bravely with the controls
He did not narrowly avoid an orphanage/school/hospital etc
Light aircraft are NOT dangerous
As private pilots we are not trained in how to land on a rooftop for obvoius reasons !

For any you left please repect the fact that 2 guys are in hospital in a very serious state indeed, as the flying community our thoughts and prayers are with them and thier families at this time, and we wish them a speedy recovery. Please do not speculate about these things, let the proper investigation take place and comment on that, in the mean time leave those guys in particular, and general avaition (that is what little planes are called) alone!!!

Thank You
Cumulogranite is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 22:22
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
ONE thing we can speculate on is...why the hell hasn't the airfield been SAFEGUARDED? I'm reasonably sure that these houses, less than 1000ft from the runway, were not there whenn Barton was first opened.

If I am correct, and the poor occupants do not pull through, then those in the planning department should be culpable. Time and again I see planning permission granted for housing developments close to arfields - this is why SAFEGUARDING was invented; for the safety of all.

Drunken rant over...

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 22:42
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
then those in the planning department should be culpable
I suspect it's not any of their business. A planning application must be granted unless there is a good reason in planning law to refuse, and a planning officer saying "well, I don't really know anything about aeroplanes, but isn't that a bit close to an airport?" is not, I'm afraid, going to survive appeal or judicial review.

Any "safeguarding" process (yes, I've seen some such maps, but only in relation to CAT, not SEP GA) must surely be the responsibility of aviation professionals, not town planners?
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 08:04
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
The CAA transferred safeguarding responsibilities to aerodromes in 2003. Revised legislation for England and Wales and for Scotland came into effect on 10 Feb 03 resulting in all licensed aerodromes now having to safeguard themselves. Furthermore, it is the advice of HM Government within that legislation that all aerodromes, licensed and unlicensed, should be safeguarded. Note that Northern Ireland has separate legislation

For those that are uncertain of the meaning of safeguarding or how it could affect them, we offer the following short definition. It is the control of land use in order to protect the airspace over and around an aerodrome against developments that could adversely affect safe operations. A fuller explanation can be found in the appropriate legislation.
Planning departments have paid lip service to this for way too long, in my opinion. I would love to see this accident act as precedent to a toughening of safeguarding legislation - after all there is plenty of other space left in the UK to build on. Building near airports is easy for developers as normally it is only the airfield that objects!

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 08:39
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just been informed that one of the pilots has died. The airfield is closed for the day.

R.I.P
Treadstone1 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 10:36
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Planning departments have paid lip service to this for way too long, in my opinion.
But the text you quote say that it was the CAA's job and they've devolved it to airfields, so not the planning department. This makes sense, as only an aviation professional can have a clue what's needed.

I am however checking with my head of planning (I'm the portfolio holder) re our local airport.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 10:50
  #35 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest News Report

Manchester plane crash pilot has died > National News > News | Click Manchester
Exascot is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 10:55
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Job Centre
Age: 74
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dreadful news .... really strikes home

So the airfield/port is responsible for safeguarding.
Here's how I interpret this ...
  • The airfield has the job of doing it
  • The airfield is responsible if it's not done effectively
So, in a practical world,
  • What power does the airfield have to implement its safeguarding plans?
  • How does this compare with the power of an individual to appeal against the airfield's safeguarding plans?
  • What responsibility does the local authority planning department have to support the airfield's safeguarding plans?
I suspect everyone above will give the same answer - "er ... never thought of that one ..."
In the event of an accident where safeguarding is an issue, does the airfield carry the can despite having their hands tied behind their back?

SD

Last edited by sunday driver; 31st Jul 2011 at 11:01. Reason: incomprehensibility reduction
sunday driver is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 11:49
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talk about safe guarding around established airfields who already have housing around them is going to be a spectacular own goal to GA airfields.

Realisatically to get the safe guarding back would mean the removal of several hundreds of millions worth of housing stock which there isn't enough of anyway.

It doesn't matter that the airfield was there first if the point is argued and the nimbys get hold of it that its unsafe having singles operating with out safe guarding you will be stuffed. The airfields will be deemed pref A airfields only and that will mean they will be shut for GA users. And then quite quickly afterwards be shut as uneconomic.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 12:44
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does a "single" have to do with this?

The stats suggest that most twin piston pilots are flying hardware with poor SE performance and are nowhere near current enough to implement the required very critical procedure with the required haste, and will still crash if they get a total engine stoppage on takeoff.

Thankfully this kind of accident is extremely rare. If it were otherwise, perhaps 50% of GA airfields in Europe would close immediately, with Gertrude's one being one of the first.
IO540 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 12:53
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly which is why I said Perf A ie known performance on a EFTO.

And that the issue that most GA airports arn't safeguarded, if there is a fuss kicked up about this fact there is only going to be one outcome and it isn't that houses will be demolished
mad_jock is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 13:15
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas and UK
Age: 66
Posts: 2,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good example of why we should type posts with caution

Quote from Manchester news paper:
It is thought the pilot may have been attempting to land his aircraft on the road when it collided with the two homes which belong to a mother and daughter.

One expert on a respected professional pilot's website wrote: "Sounds like the pilot attempted to land in the street after looking at the road. Looks wide and long."

Neighbour Vivian Fletcher, 72, lives in Newlands Avenue described her shock after hearing a bang as the plane came down.

She said: "I had just returned from the shops and was putting my shopping away when I heard a big bang.

"The plane came down on two houses, a woman lives in one of them and her daughter lived next door.

"I ran out when I heard the noise, there was black smoke everywhere, before we knew it the street was swarming with police and fire and rescue officers. Everyone is still in a state of shock I think.


The quote is from the post of stewmath, post #3 on this thread,

Manchester light plane crash update > National News > News | Click Manchester

goldeneaglepilot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.