Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Potential Amish Hasidic Hijack foiled by alert nervous pax not saying anything

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Potential Amish Hasidic Hijack foiled by alert nervous pax not saying anything

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jun 2009, 17:56
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is why I used the Cambridge online dictionary definition, in order to provide a fair arbiter. I think you are probably wise, since regardless as the axis for all these perceived worlds, they all seem to reside near the odd black hole, where enlightenment is but a futile struggle.
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2009, 09:25
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Durham/UK
Age: 66
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow -two Mods on my case - I was not even going to dignify the defensive replys with a response, however, as "the world awaits", I will make a final response (as requested) and hopefully we will agree to disagree.

After many many years of flying and traveling the world, I can easily stereotype for example New York Jews, high caste Indians, Brazilian Transvestites, Norwegian oil rig workers, members of the extended Saudi Royal family and many other different groups of people for you though.

Thats fine, but as I alluded to in my previous posting, it would be advisable to keep your own counsel and not post potentially insulting and patronising comment on this forum - especially in your capacity as a Moderator. I would suggest it would be difficult for you to remove similar postings when it seems you cannot control your own! I suspect you would find the stereotypical description of 'Trolly Dolly' lacking in humour - maybe your Japanese passengers feel the same.

If we have a chuckle once in a while because a pax behaves EXACTLY according to what we have come to expect, I see no wrong in that.


Fine - but laugh WITH them not AT them! And certainly don't make disparaging comments on forums about them. Yes we all have our own traits whether it is indiginous to a certain nationality or indeed an individual affliction, habit or nature.

As to Muslims and Jews. Unlike 'Japanese', neither of your examples is a nationality.


Irrespective of religion OR nationality, these are PEOPLE. I suppose the link which directed the forum user to a fully regaled Jew was just for indicitave puposes only then? I used the religious examples as to suggest you would not ridicule them in the same manner as your Japanese tourists, however, there were religious undertones in your posting.

But you couldn't know all that.

Assumptions often lead to misunderstandings - your words - not mine - and patronising drivel. You do not know me, therefore how can you assume what I do and do not know - you would be surprised!

Rant over and that is the end of it as far as I am concerned, and as I indicated earlier in this post, I hope we can agree to disagree.


Passy

Last edited by passy777; 5th Jun 2009 at 10:08.
passy777 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2009, 10:03
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Land of Beer and Chocolate
Age: 56
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Passy

Can you keep my council too or will I send it to FF because they're a bunch of useless ?

(Unless you meant COUNSEL, of course)

Assumptions often lead to misunderstandings - your words - not mine - and patronising drivel
Never a truer word spoken, especially when we read your posts
hellsbrink is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2009, 10:13
  #44 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do you seriously expect airline staff to suspend the human rights of their customers by forcing them to pray in a toilet, or by preventing them from praying at all?
I was not going to coment on this thread, but be very careful before making such simplistic statements.

Article 9 of the ECHR legislation says

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;
this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom,
either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to
manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and
observance.

Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to
such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a
democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of
public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and
freedoms of others.
I would put it to you that if a group of Hasidic Jews decide to worship opposite of a group of Muslims, or vice versa, it would easily fall foul of laws involving inciting religious hatred and therefore the airline crew should consider stopping it.

In fact, should a mini riot develop, the airline crew or even another passenger would be lawfully entitled to kill a rioter, without denying a basic human right, per article 2, para 2.

Article 2 – Right to life
1 Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be
deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a
court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided
by law.
2 Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of
this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than
absolutely necessary:
a in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
b in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person
lawfully detained;
c in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or
insurrection.
So please, in future, be a little more careful when quoting 'human rights' as a catch all.

Personally, I find any type of overt religious worship in front of a captive audience to be distasteful, regardless of the religion, whereas I quite happily helped a muslim sitting next to me to comply with Ramadan by looking out for the first evidence of sunrise, so that he could eat his meal without worrying. as it was a privilege to assist someone of deveout faith, who was also kind and considerate in his behaviour.
 
Old 5th Jun 2009, 10:14
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Durham/UK
Age: 66
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems like the Grammar Police are out in force again!
passy777 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2009, 10:16
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paper Tiger - I'm with you on this issue!

It is high time that we followed the lead of the Netherlands and forbade the outward wearing of religious clothing or symbols in public places. If someone so chooses, their religious books can be read and prayers can be silently recited in the comfort of one's own seat.

My opinion is not having a go at anyone's beliefs - it is to prevent others' faiths from being intrusive to those of other faiths, non-believers or "non-understanders" such as the Original Poster.
bealine is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2009, 10:18
  #47 (permalink)  

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The South of France ... Not
Age: 74
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, this has been entertaining.

Many (30 or more) years ago I was on a transatlantic flight when suddenly three or four bearded and ringleted gentlemen stood up, unbuttoned their black frock coats, extracted one arm, buttoned the coats up again, rolled up the shirtsleeve on the aforementioned arm, and went through their prayer ritual.

It didn’t alarm me then but I suspect it might alarm me now, and certainly alarm some other passengers. Whether or not the original question was well expressed or well written, I think it was probably worth asking.
The SSK is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2009, 15:38
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for stereotyping; that is possibly a discussion which falls outside the remit of this forum, but it is an interesting little diversion, (to me anyway) so if TightSlot allows it, we can have it. If he feels this forum is the wrong place, I am happy for him to delete everything after this.

Ms. Slot, my little intro was an attempt to deflect ad hominem attempts to tell me what a really, really bad person I am. Again.



More dyslexia?


Shack37 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2009, 16:53
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shack37
More dyslexia?
If you mean my confusing the gender of a certain mod., I confess I made an assumption based on the username.

See, I'm sexist as well
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2009, 16:56
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bealine
I'm with you on this issue!
Good to know , but we'll get shouted down as usual.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2009, 04:42
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good to know , but we'll get shouted down as usual.
I don't see why we should. The Forum is open to debate from all points of view and I think one's religion is a private matter between themselves and their Deity.

Tolerance and Respect means that if you allow one group of people to stand or make obeisance, in the aisle, you must also allow atheists to mock or scorn their actions, devil worshippers would have to be allowed to sacrifice new-born babies, boil up essence of toad or whatever else they get up to!

The only way to properly enjoy a culturally diverse society, and for minorities to integrate properly, is for everybody to leave their religious and cultural trappings in their dwelling-place and to stand equal with their peers in public places. That is exactly the lefislation introduced by the Netherlands and their ministers were lambasted for it!

FWIW, I am Presbyterian (Church of Ireland). I do pray quite often, and many a time in public, but it is done so quietly and discreetly, no one need ever know except the Great Architect of the Universe and myself.
bealine is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2009, 09:01
  #52 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To hell with religious tolerance! It's grammar tolerance that is important. I am an atheist, but if anyone wants to pray around me in public, that's fine- do what you like! To whatever 'God' you think is out there, but I have to say I do feel like tapping people on the shoulder and actually asking 'do you think there is anybody out there listening, and why?' I have sent Jehovah's Witnesses packing with their ears ringing to 'you're wasting your life- there is no God!'- they're fair game because they are trying to ram their nonsense down my throat. But I am a little demanding- all I ask is that these believers in their own particular religion don't decide to blow themselves up and take others with them, or decide that it somehow benefits their religion if a planeload of people get incinerated. I don't think Amish are so inclined. Too busy making candles and harvesting and minding their own business!

From that perspective, this thread does appear to have lost any sense of humour from perfectly reasonable, sensible and humorous moderation. People take religion so deadly seriously! Why? There's nothing there!
Rainboe is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2009, 09:21
  #53 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,270
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
majority of Japanese tourists travelling in groups dresses

Oooo, Flappy. Travelling? and is it in group's dresses, or groups, dresses?


Sorry, I've been to the Rainbow school of post correction.


Anyway, nobody's mentioned the folk, who, having been lucky enough to gain the extra legroom of an Exit space, find it full of people doing their gyrations. I don't even like people gathering there and standing still and mute. I don't go to their row and look out of the window, why should they think it's okay to stand in mine just because I've got a little extra space?

There's only one seat on that aircraft that I feel happy in, and they won't let me sit in it...they wont even let me into the little room that it's in. And that's despite having a big watch.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2009, 09:25
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Paper Tiger

If you mean my confusing the gender of a certain mod., I confess I made an assumption based on the username.

So did I but I'd never admit it
Shack37 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.