Airplane With The Nicest Handling
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: pluto
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Hawk: like a toy. A chimp could fly it, though not necessarily as the military would like. Every pilot should be given a whizz in one just for the joy of it: to experience almost perfect control harmony and a sufficient amount of grunt.
Bigger: 747-300 - less ground effect, less flying wing on the runway than the 400.
Least satisfying handling, least involving: Airbus. Would they do it that way if they had the choice again?
Most satisfying rather than nicest handling would probably be the most demanding.
Bigger: 747-300 - less ground effect, less flying wing on the runway than the 400.
Least satisfying handling, least involving: Airbus. Would they do it that way if they had the choice again?
Most satisfying rather than nicest handling would probably be the most demanding.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Transient
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gazelle then Chipmunk, last airliners. Nothing could beat the agility and power to weight ratio of the mighty chicken leg. A true delight. No real military use though.
Those who have not had the opportunity to fly a helicopter without a stability augmentation system have missed out.
Those who have not had the opportunity to fly a helicopter without a stability augmentation system have missed out.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the lower end: Piper J3. As simple and pure as it gets. Reveals pilot skill in a split of a second.
In the middle: Twin Bonanza. The most stable IFR Trainer and its wing became the blueprint for the beautiful Queen and King Air
On the high end: DC-10. The intuitive CWS beats all the newer FBW. The Rolls Royce of airliners.
In the middle: Twin Bonanza. The most stable IFR Trainer and its wing became the blueprint for the beautiful Queen and King Air
On the high end: DC-10. The intuitive CWS beats all the newer FBW. The Rolls Royce of airliners.
Surprised no mention of the Falco and its’ big brother the SF260. Feels like powered controls, really light. Aerobatic, but still stable. Fast enough, maybe 150 - 160 kts depending on engine. Just watch Vne if you let the nose down. Only difficulty is slowing for circuit. My preference was the old “buzz & break”. Cruise speed low over threshold, close throttle and pull up into a pattern that puts you at circuit height and speed for downwind, flap and gear, continue a turning base/final, level the wings just before the flare. Most satisfying when you get it right, don’t do it in front of a flying school, some instructors fear it may give students ideas. You can always say you were doing a runway check,
Obviously room for the Chippy and Turbulent, both great fun. For day to day liveability I have a soft spot for the much derided Aztec. Our C model, much modified and turboed for mapping photo had a ceiling above 30,000’, they will carry ridiculous loads in and out of ridiculous places.
There will always be differing opinions, depending on personal taste and experience. The C185 is a great bush plane, but you will work hard & use full control travel for serious work. The advent of the C206 changed the game in PNG, practically eliminated the ground-loop problem for new hires,but it doesn’t rate handling for mine
Obviously room for the Chippy and Turbulent, both great fun. For day to day liveability I have a soft spot for the much derided Aztec. Our C model, much modified and turboed for mapping photo had a ceiling above 30,000’, they will carry ridiculous loads in and out of ridiculous places.
There will always be differing opinions, depending on personal taste and experience. The C185 is a great bush plane, but you will work hard & use full control travel for serious work. The advent of the C206 changed the game in PNG, practically eliminated the ground-loop problem for new hires,but it doesn’t rate handling for mine
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: First tin shed on the left,,,
Posts: 180
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There has been a few that liked the Beech wing which is great, but I don't see the little Beech Debonair mentioned, it is a delightful airplane to fly, extremely well balanced. [even if it was near 50 years ago] !
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back again in the Land of the Rising Sun to do some more Glider towing, eating great Japanese food, drinking Japanese Beer, perving on Japanese Women and naturally also continuing that search for a bad bottle of Red
Age: 68
Posts: 2,890
Received 22 Likes
on
16 Posts
Singles; Robin DR400; Fy it as a Glider tug in Japan, and, whilst underpowered when towing ASK 21's or a heavyish Single, the handling is superb. Only use a thumb and two fingers on the stick!
Multi: The Seminole is a goody. Don't mind the Chieftain either.
Car RAMROD; You haven't been taking your Medication again now, have you?
Multi: The Seminole is a goody. Don't mind the Chieftain either.
(followed by the bongo 
)
)
I've only flown gliders; the best was the Ka6cr. Standard Libelle was pleasant enough, although somewhat cramped. No complaints about the L-13 Blanik either. There were a few which I thought were awful, but that's somewhat outside of the terms of reference ...
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chippie for sure, B200, but where is the Pup 150 ??
And as for "I was waiting for someone to mention the BAe146. I have heard others say the same. I found it horrendous!!! Unresponsive, lazy, trim dependant." .... probably best you disengage the autopilot next time
You didn't mention the roll rate for starters .. it's a very honest beauty to fly with a few neat tricks up it's sleeve.
And as for "I was waiting for someone to mention the BAe146. I have heard others say the same. I found it horrendous!!! Unresponsive, lazy, trim dependant." .... probably best you disengage the autopilot next time
You didn't mention the roll rate for starters .. it's a very honest beauty to fly with a few neat tricks up it's sleeve.
