Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Merged: Mid-air collision at Moorabbin

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Merged: Mid-air collision at Moorabbin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Aug 2008, 23:32
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
PlankBlender

I disagree on your view.
What you are suggesting is like sending a learner driver on an open strech of quiet country road to do his driving test where there is nothing to SEE AND AVOID. Like Sunfish said i am also sure that the poor bugger done all his training in the most busiest of environments with all confidence that he can do it on his own.
Otherwise his instructor would not have sent him on his first solo now... would he/she?
sms777 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2008, 23:42
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Please stop assuming that both aircraft were actually "in the circuit".

Please also stop quoting the BS in the Herald Sun which can't even get the Club Presidents name correct, let alone any other details.

Condolences to the family and my sympathies to staff, instructors and ATC at YMMB.

.....and there is a special place in Hell for people like Mr. Tom Uren of the "residents committee" who should know enough to shut his trap at a time like this.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2008, 23:49
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Please stop speculating
Please stop assuming
Please also stop quoting

Sunfish. Please stop!
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 27th Aug 2008, 23:49
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: YMML
Posts: 288
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airport will also be having an interesting time dealing with the inevitable public kneejerk-backlash.
Might be timely to remember the airport was there long before almost all of the residents surrounding it.
Oh yes, the NIMBY crowd are already out saying the airport should be moved.

From today's 'Age' newspaper:

Locals fear more deaths if airport does not move | theage.com.au

Dandenong councillor Peter Brown said the airport should move to the city fringes. "If nothing has provided … evidence that there is chronic mismanagement of air traffic over the residential area, then this should," he wrote in an email to councillors at Kingston Council yesterday.
They always conveniently forget that when all these airports were built, there were no houses within cooee of the area. Same at Essendon, and its starting to happen out Tullamarine way too. In the meantime, local councils are happy to be the beneficiary of the economic benefits that have flowed and continue to flow from the aviation activity.

Condolences to all concerned.

Last edited by Teal; 28th Aug 2008 at 13:37.
Teal is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2008, 23:50
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
SMS 777

It is all about risk mitigation and I think Plank Bender has a valid point.

I am not saying that the Instructor concerned made any error at all - I have sent over 50 studes solo and I still pace and fidget until the student returns. I can only imagine the anguish of the stude's instructor now - and I am sure he wouldn't have sent him solo unless 100% satisfied that all was right.

But let us discuss 777's point.

Many many years ago Col Pay approved me to send students solo and I think his only advice was never send them first solo within 30 mins of last light or within 30 mins of fixed reserve.

This is the most simple form of risk mitigation stragetgy, and it works. Every flying school I have worked for has had some simple criteria for student solo.

It is human nature to discount the risk involved in things we all do every day - my mate the Ag pilot tells me he'd never fly IFR in a single... and I tell him I'd never fly at 6' AGL at night. We each assess the level of risk in our own operations as acceptable.

After sending god-only knows how many students solo in a busy environment maybe it's easier to discount the risk of a slightly-busier-than-normal stretch.

Last edited by Horatio Leafblower; 28th Aug 2008 at 00:02.
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 00:13
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUS
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would never let my kids learn and solo at a GAAP. That is risk mitigation.
Spotlight is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 00:27
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to hear from one of MB pilots that the ATC there is 'first-class', and then from the residents committee that they are 'mis-managed'. It goes to show you have to ask the opinions of the ppl that count.

Since the city has grown up around the airport, there have been numerous changes to operations in order to 'please' the residents, ie circuit ops restricted to daylight hours (excluding tues and wed) and limiting asymmetric circuits for twins.

I personally think the MB ATC are a top-notch group of guys who are 100% dedicated to the safety of all their pilots, and are genuinely concerned about 1st solo-ers. How many times have I heard them say congratulations after a safe landing?


PS to the lady in the age article saying the circuits make her house shake - do you live in a cardboard box? they're cessnas, not 747s!
onelittlepilot is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 01:31
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to hear from one of MB pilots that the ATC there is 'first-class', and then from the residents committee that they are 'mis-managed'.
How would the residents committee know how the ATC is managed? What would give them any credibility to comment on ATC management anyway?

Residents just hate the buzzing sound of small aircraft engines and changes in engine note which implies (to them) an aircraft is in trouble.

What's the solution to avoid a similar occurrence in the future - TCAS in GA?
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 01:55
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm thinking that normally circuits are conducted on runway right (31 & 35). Are first solos conducted on 31 Left due to less intense traffic? Airport management is saying they had both recently taken off, which points to circuits but could just have easily have been the Warrior re-joining. If it was circuits you'd think the Warrior would have out performed the 150 and been ahead of it.

I'm just suggesting that if they were doing circuits they were very unlucky based on the performance of their respective aircraft types.

Reminds me of the recent crash at Latrobe Valley where a very low time Indian solo student ran into the back of another aircraft and killed the pilot of the preceeding aircraft.

Whist we always say Aviate, Navigate and then Communicate, both these incidents are having the finger pointed at Communication breakdowns.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 03:15
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Direct no speed – this is a ‘Rumour’ network and despite your assertion that this ‘helps no one’ it is actually very useful for pilots to talk about events like this. Particularly from psychological perspective, and yes, I have the qualifications to make that claim.
Will964 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 03:27
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most of it is speculation.
I agree with you 100% in relation to the above comment direct.no.speed. Otherwise I agree with Will964.

Some facts:

The Piper was in process of landing and was on down wind leg - not taking off as media suggests.

HeraldSun.com.au has a graphic of the collision and whilst it is reversed it shows the likely impact sequence
LH wing of Cessna struck LH U/C and then LH tail of Cessna. Herald Sun graphic is way off.

why would anyone send out a student for his first solo


It wasn't his first solo in any event.

Di

Diatryma is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 03:58
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speculation is good for a numer of reasons.

If someone posts that it hit the other because you can't see up in a Cessna and can't see down in a Piper, I'd read that (as a qualified pilot) and think to myself, "mental note, keep a good lookout next time I'm climbing and turning onto downwind" or similar. Same goes for a numer of other scenarios that sometimes appear here.


On a side note - from news in the USA, a homebuilt Velocity with 5 hours on the taco has crashed into a house in Las Vegas Nevada killing its' 2 elderly occupants who were home at the time. Lets home the near miss in Perth is the third occurence as they say these things often happen in 3's.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 04:12
  #73 (permalink)  
2b2
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 87
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
The Piper was in process of landing and was on down wind leg - not taking off as media suggests.
It wasn't his first solo in any event.

surprise - the media has it wrong? Lets wait for the facts.
2b2 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 04:16
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How is it you have all this good factual info Di?

Seems you have the inside scoop on every incident in Oz.

Just wondering!

J

Last edited by Jabawocky; 28th Aug 2008 at 04:40.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 05:20
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Darraweit Guim, Victoria
Age: 64
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...a homebuilt Velocity with 5 hours on the taco...
Must be from southern Nevada if it is equipped with a taco...


Don't you just love how the pollies' first priority is to blame somebody else? Brumby on 774 this morning obviously considered he had done all he could by indicating decisions about operations at the airport are the responsibility of the Feds.

Horrible news, but a typical lack of perspective by the media. It is the airborne equivalent of a p-plater writing himself and his Gemini off in the side of a house, yet when that really happens is there any strident call to ban learner drivers from urban areas?

Ballistic parachute anybody?
Spodman is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 07:12
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mentone
Age: 69
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the many seperate articles in today's "The Age" quotes a friend of the pilot saying he first went solo last weekend, whereas all the other articles still say "first solo".

I suspect that the "first solo" may be the result of some misreporting.

We will soon know.
gezza182 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 07:16
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mentone
Age: 69
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"PS to the lady in the age article saying the circuits make her house shake - do you live in a cardboard box? they're cessnas, not 747s!"

I have lived most of my life within MMB's circuit area, and some of the helicopters do make your house shake. Thats why the circuit area for helicopters was altered a few years ago to try and take them away from the surrounding houses.
gezza182 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 07:26
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: sydney
Age: 43
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
first solo...

His first solo was reported (Ch9 I believe) to have been last Friday. He and his mates went out to celebrate that same night.

It's a real shame, and my heart goes out to the family and friends of this poor chap, and to the student and Instructor of the Warrior.
elche is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 07:46
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Learnt to fly at RVAC in '89, good school and some great instructors. Even back then it could get very hairy in the circuit or coming back in form the TA. ATC did their best but sometimes it all got too much, remember being asked by the then duty controller...XXX your position?......i'm number 3 on finals behind XXX....rodger....Cheiftan XXX climb to 8500 contact Centre good day....XXX..no....XXX clear to land runway blah blah blah.

Think even back then with the airship parked in the corner that things seemed a bit too busy for the resorses at hand.

Feel for the Controllers and staff at RVAC, thoughts to family.

And of course, the nightmare last seconds of the pilots life. RIP.

For the #$%^ THAT WORK IN THE MEDIA.....nothing to say can express my disgust and dislike of what you free loaders do. I shall boycott your paper and your company's other 'products' as only a consmuer can.

Burn.
Flyingblind is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2008, 08:00
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm right behind you!!!
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/avi...ssociation.pdf

Yep, same old same old. Blah blah noisy unrestrained blah blah proprty values blah blah can't hear 60 minutes when they fly over.

To all those trying to use this terrible tragedy to grandstand and complain about the airport, do us a favour and save your whining for a more appropriate time
Cap'n Arrr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.