![]() |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11607771)
But, was this really an Anti-"Ship" missile or was it something looking for fertiliser or the local outhouse? That would explain why it struck Russia. |
From Beamr above: Video from a Russian training site, training language with foreign fighters is English.
Just possibly, could these new recruits be some of the impressed students and foreign workers swept up around Russia over recent months? |
The Telegraph is reporting that it appears North Korea has ceased sending artillery rounds to Russia after the 3 million were delivered.
|
|
Russians trying to destroy the above abandoned mentioned Abrams.
|
There were two of them knocked out, one appears to have thrown a track.
|
Originally Posted by Sue Vêtements
(Post 11607737)
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=GDCS&u...00000~601954ad https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=GDCS&u...00000~8929c1d1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold...22_for_fascism And a 2011 article about the Daily Mail's long ended 1930s fascist phase: https://www.theguardian.com/media/gr...-oswald-mosley |
They also took out an M1150 The Assault Breacher Vehicle or ‘ABV’ is (as of 2018) the United States’ latest Combat Engineering Vehicle or ‘CEV’. It is built on the hull of the US Military’s currently serving Main Battle Tank (MBT), the M1 Abrams. CEVs were a concept made famous by the British in the Second World War with the AVRE (Armored Vehicle Royal Engineers), and since then, similar vehicles have been a part of every major army. The ABV is the first of such vehicles to see service with the US military since the M60 based M728 CEV was retired from service in the mid-to-late 1990s, and this vehicle’s direct predecessor, the remotely operated M1 Abrams-based M1 Panther II, was retired from service in the late 2000s. |
Jesus, A Bradley takes on a BTR82A, talk about nowhere to run or hide.
|
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11608635)
Jesus, A Bradley takes on a BTR82A, talk about nowhere to run or hide.
https://twitter.com/front_ukrainian/...81049413959829
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11607943)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...e-interception
Germany to investigate Russia’s apparent interception of military talks on Ukraine For far too long requests from the army to the Defnce Ministry to buy the necessary systems have been refused with comments such as " Just how do you expect to buy and pay for such equipment in peace-time " ? This striking episode about the hypothetical delivery of Taurus cruise-missiles to Ukraine is a painful example of how this policy has now backfired. Viel zu lang seien entsprechende Anforderungen zur Materialbeschaffung aus der Truppe an Verteidigungsministerium und Bundesregierung mit Kommentaren abgetan worden wie: „Wer bitte in Friedenszeiten denn so etwas kaufen und bezahlen?“. Der pikante Vorfall um eine theoretische Lieferung von deutschen Taurus-Marschflugkörpern an die Ukraine zeige auf schmerzhafte Weise, wie sehr sich diese Politik nun räche. https://www.focus.de/politik/ausland...259724364.html |
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
(Post 11608729)
I absolutely don't understand why the Russians initially all group aroundthe BTR for cover: that's the aiming-point for the bradley.
|
Somehow i think they are being short with the facts.
|
|
|
An Alcoholic in a Russian shell suit talking nonsense.
|
T-14 Armatas will not be used in Ukraine because they are too expensive LOL. what about all the missile complexes, fighters and the rest of the megga expensive kit that cost more than the tanks then?
|
He just does not get it, they are the problem, and if they f*ck off home to Russia, the solution.
|
|
“Latest package from sweden included “underwater weapons”, torpedo 47 from SAAB weights 340kg. USV would need some modifications, but probably doable with some Ukrainian ingenuity.”
I’m sure Humphrey Bogart could help here, they just need to resurrect the African Queen! |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:22. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.