Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK F-35B Lost

Old 25th Nov 2021, 10:44
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chicago or Cheshire
Posts: 646
There was a news report yesterday of some minister recommending that carriers be fitted with the gear required to recover jets that crash in the sea. I kid you not.
Fonsini is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 12:16
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 381
LB - I trust no Leading Hand is going to be made to carry the can; those placed in authority over him or her should take the blame. If (and until all investigations and SIs/BOIs are finished it's a big if) the loss was caused by negligence on the flightdeck, then I think most of us know where the buck stops. The MAA is pretty clear on the subject:

Transfer of Custody of Air Systems
2301(1) Custody of, and responsibility for, an Air System shall transfer to the Aircraft Commander from the time the acceptance certificate is signed until the after-flight declaration is completed.

Transfer of Custody of Air Systems (Acceptable Means of Compliance)

1. The Aircraft Commander should ensure that they are satisfied with the declared condition of the Air System when the acceptance certificate is signed. If they are not satisfied, they should declare the Air System unserviceable.
2. Once custody of the Air System has been accepted, the Aircraft Commander should authorize and monitor any subsequent Maintenance activity that may be required prior to, or during flight.
3. The Aircraft Commander should ensure that the technical log (MOD Form 700 or equivalent) has been updated to reflect the condition of the Air System when the after-flight declaration is completed and that the symptoms of any new Air System faults have been adequately briefed to the receiving Maintenance organization.
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 12:20
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09 View Post
For what it's worth, someone posted this on ARRSE:

"Work mate of mine is ex sea harrier maintainer and still has a lot of contacts on the F35 circuit, apparently there are inner and outer intake blanks and its common for the blank to be used as a knee pad while inspecting the first stage compressor disc."

I couldn't see how a properly fitted intake blank could be missed by the aircraft start groundcrew, pilot on walk round, flight deck marshallers, Flight Deck Officer and those in FLYCO.

However, if the malpractice described has been going on, I can see how a folded blank laying in the intake might get missed, particularly if at night, and then not get sucked in until powered right up just prior to the take off roll. I'm still surprised anything laying folded in the intake wasn't sucked in immediately on start.
That's the most plausible theory so far IMO. I recall a case where an intake blank on a military helicopter (not UK) was missed by the tow team, maintainer and pilot, then subsequently realised on engine start. All at night.

Despite the described commonality of the malpractice, and there'll be more to this story but given the cost of the loss, I suspect the ORG will arrive at 'reckless' in record time on this one.
Ridger is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 12:52
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 350/3 Compton
Age: 73
Posts: 420
In 1982, our maintainers came up with a great wheeze for stopping SHAR engine wear from windmilling engines on deck (inflatable blanks would blow out in the wind). They gently inserted a broom handle through the LP fan, which locked it very effectively. This was annotated in the F700 with an entry stating “Broom handle inserted to stop engine rotation” and was cleared with another one stating “Broom handle removed”, before flight.

On one occasion, I went to sign an aircraft out and found the following entry; “Intake inspected - no broom handle found. Uckers pieces removed from underneath cold nozzles”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uckers

Not only brilliant maintainers, also a great sense of humour!

Swing the lamp,

Mog
Mogwi is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 15:32
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,270
I'm struggling to see why you would need an 'inner and outer' intake blank - you only have 2 intakes so one either side on the front would achieve the desired result as it does with numerous other types of aircraft. I can see that you might have a blank for the top of the Lift Fan if you park up and leave the top door open but is that really normal practice?.

Jet II is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 19:17
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,644
Originally Posted by SLXOwft View Post
If (and until all investigations and SIs/BOIs are finished it's a big if) the loss was caused by negligence on the flightdeck, then I think most of us know where the buck stops. The MAA is pretty clear on the subject:
It's massively complicated by the fact that not all of the F35 intake duct is visible from outside. And I'm led to believe that F35 has some covers which are not visible from outside even when properly fitted. So the crucial question in relation to culpability is whether there is a procedure in place to show all blanks and covers to the commander, to prove they aren't lying somewhere hidden from sight. If there is no such procedure, then the commander is reliant on the word of the flight deck crew that all covers have been removed. (I assume the flight deck crew don't sign the tech log to that effect, as the covers would be off for too long a time). The commander doesn't become responsible for other 'invisible' faults, like loose hydraulic joints or wiring errors, simply by signing for the jet. And crawling down the intake wearing flying kit is not going to do much good for the surface finish!
Easy Street is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 19:22
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 767
Easily done I suppose, assuming someone else had removed it.

I remember an incident mid 70s where the blank went down the intake of an RAF Phantom on an exercise scramble start at night. Funny enough the pilot was a RN exchange. They made a flight safety film of the events that followed.
Saintsman is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 19:39
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 199
Originally Posted by Easy Street View Post
It's massively complicated by the fact that not all of the F35 intake duct is visible from outside. And I'm led to believe that F35 has some covers which are not visible from outside even when properly fitted. So the crucial question in relation to culpability is whether there is a procedure in place to show all blanks and covers to the commander, to prove they aren't lying somewhere hidden from sight. If there is no such procedure, then the commander is reliant on the word of the flight deck crew that all covers have been removed. (I assume the flight deck crew don't sign the tech log to that effect, as the covers would be off for too long a time). The commander doesn't become responsible for other 'invisible' faults, like loose hydraulic joints or wiring errors, simply by signing for the jet. And crawling down the intake wearing flying kit is not going to do much good for the surface finish!
Assuming these reports are somewhere close to the truth, the fact that they have resumed normal flying operations suggests that measures to prevent it from happening again have already been implemented.
Video Mixdown is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 19:49
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Alles Über
Posts: 156
Originally Posted by Video Mixdown View Post
Assuming these reports are somewhere close to the truth, the fact that they have resumed normal flying operations suggests that measures to prevent it from happening again have already been implemented.
New entry in Pilots To See:

"All aircrew are to ensure they remove all blanks on pre-flt walkround.

Any issues are to be directed to the undersigned.

Sqn QFI"

Nipped.
trim it out is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 19:52
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 20,940
Probably lobbed the rest of the blanks over the side, problem sorted.

It reminds me of the stupidity of putting Silica Gel in the intakes of a Vulcan instead of the jetpipe.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 20:04
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Age: 65
Posts: 403
So on the basis of a single report from 'a reputable source' published by the Sun and repeated subsequently by a number of other media outlets, an overlooked intake blank has been established in some minds as the definitive cause, leading to a discussion of an anticipated cover-up (no pun intended) by a Navy investigation (they are joint investigations, it will not be a Navy inquiry), a suggestion that a Leading Hand will be found blameworthy (even though there is no indication RN personnel other than the pilot were involved) and an assumption that those above said Leading Hand are actually at fault. As for 'negligence on the flight deck', there is a big difference between someone making a mistake and negligence - is there no room for fatigue, distractions, expectation or confirmation bias, or other human factor mechanisms any more?

Fortissimo is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 20:15
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,082
Originally Posted by Fortissimo View Post
- is there no room for fatigue, distractions, expectation or confirmation bias, or other human factor mechanisms any more?
This is JB. Certainly not!

CG
charliegolf is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 20:16
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 1,996
Not at the price of losing (as in not being able to recover) such an expensive asset.
langleybaston is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 20:34
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In an ever changing place
Posts: 1,038
Originally Posted by SLXOwft View Post
LB - I trust no Leading Hand is going to be made to carry the can; those placed in authority over him or her should take the blame. If (and until all investigations and SIs/BOIs are finished it's a big if) the loss was caused by negligence on the flightdeck, then I think most of us know where the buck stops. The MAA is pretty clear on the subject:

Transfer of Custody of Air Systems
2301(1) Custody of, and responsibility for, an Air System shall transfer to the Aircraft Commander from the time the acceptance certificate is signed until the after-flight declaration is completed.

Transfer of Custody of Air Systems (Acceptable Means of Compliance)

1. The Aircraft Commander should ensure that they are satisfied with the declared condition of the Air System when the acceptance certificate is signed. If they are not satisfied, they should declare the Air System unserviceable.
2. Once custody of the Air System has been accepted, the Aircraft Commander should authorize and monitor any subsequent Maintenance activity that may be required prior to, or during flight.
3. The Aircraft Commander should ensure that the technical log (MOD Form 700 or equivalent) has been updated to reflect the condition of the Air System when the after-flight declaration is completed and that the symptoms of any new Air System faults have been adequately briefed to the receiving Maintenance organization.
Well thats a load of [email protected]@ks ^^^^^, I know from the past that there will be a very slippery shaft from the aircraft commander right down to the leading hand which is the cheapest easier option to place the blame regardless what the Form 700 says.
Above The Clouds is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2021, 20:45
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Mostly South of England
Posts: 887
For what it's worth - a couple of mates in Derby have confirmed it wasn't the bits that they made.

osa - a reptile, a new line;
Hello World.
Auxtank is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 13:24
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England
Posts: 29
What bits are made in Derby?
Gadget freak is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 13:43
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 55
Posts: 5,080
Originally Posted by Gadget freak View Post
What bits are made in Derby?
The 'Lift System'
212man is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 14:10
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 213
Out of interest, where are all the "remove before flight" items including engine blanks stored? Is there a requirement for ground crew to show them to the pilot prior to taxi ?
silverelise is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 14:16
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Mostly South of England
Posts: 887
Originally Posted by Gadget freak View Post
What bits are made in Derby?
Oh, a few bits and pieces. . .



Auxtank is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2021, 14:45
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 171
Originally Posted by NutLoose View Post
Probably lobbed the rest of the blanks over the side, problem sorted.
That was the one seen floating. The one that went through the engine is powder and gone forever.
golder is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.