UK F-35B Lost
Originally Posted by the_flying_cop
Absolutely believe this is a big part of the problem, based purely on my Joe Public's perspective.
One thing I have noticed and this is only from the original video clip posted on Twitter. The Nozzle position seems to move from 1/2 down at the start, to fully rear on the roll, then to full down as it goes up the ramp. Is this normal for it to change positions on a take off roll, or is this potentially due to the loss of thrust?
One thing I have noticed and this is only from the original video clip posted on Twitter. The Nozzle position seems to move from 1/2 down at the start, to fully rear on the roll, then to full down as it goes up the ramp. Is this normal for it to change positions on a take off roll, or is this potentially due to the loss of thrust?
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cat Techie
Was not on a RAF airfield. I doubt that video was leaked by anyone from the RAF. Ships crew released that. The Captain has a problem with his company.
Originally Posted by the_flying_cop
Absolutely believe this is a big part of the problem, based purely on my Joe Public's perspective.
One thing I have noticed and this is only from the original video clip posted on Twitter. The Nozzle position seems to move from 1/2 down at the start, to fully rear on the roll, then to full down as it goes up the ramp. Is this normal for it to change positions on a take off roll, or is this potentially due to the loss of thrust?
One thing I have noticed and this is only from the original video clip posted on Twitter. The Nozzle position seems to move from 1/2 down at the start, to fully rear on the roll, then to full down as it goes up the ramp. Is this normal for it to change positions on a take off roll, or is this potentially due to the loss of thrust?
But I wonder whether the software also caters for ski-jump takeoffs? Ski-jump takeoffs were not part of the original USMC requirement, and I believe were only added fairly late in the development programme as an RN/RAF requirement.
Originally Posted by Cat Techie
Was not on a RAF airfield. I doubt that video was leaked by anyone from the RAF. Ships crew released that. The Captain has a problem with his company. I work for a civvy company that has good leaders and doesn't have the problem of a rogue person throwing rubbish out. It also has a secure paperwork proceedure for removal of blanks in a tech log. From a lesson learned I wager. More problems that the RAF or RN have as well! Faye Turney's I Phone is alive and well.
No particular reason to believe the video was leaked by anyone on board. By this stage it's likely been shared quite legitimately with multiple organisations, civilian contractors etc; the leak could have originated from any of them
Flying machines are called aircraft, not planes.Sort your use of the English language out
I know one element of the auto eject is based on pitch rate, example being loss of the fan in the hover, pitch rate is such that a pilot can not react in sufficient time to save him/herself.
Last edited by megan; 30th Nov 2021 at 12:14.
Originally Posted by Timelord
Is there ever any possibility of aborting a ski jump launch once the brakes are off?
Talking SHAR here: If you got full power (c2.4 secs after wheel-drag) you were going off the front one way or the other. If the brakes failed to release, it made no difference, you just got flat wheels. Average deck run was only in the region of 4 seconds, so not much time for faffing about.
I have no info on the Dave but I guess it is similar.
BZ M-B!
Mog
Clearly I have no idea what happened here, but.........
During my time on HERMES in 82, a fellow GR3 mate was due to take off and was lined up at a distance from the front end which he thought was too short based on his VSTOL calculations and the given wind over deck. He said "that is too short", but was told no, that is the correct distance. After a minor discussion, he did what was required by the RN - "do as you are told" - confirmed that his "Master Arm" was on, visually checked for the "Clear Aircraft" bar, and "did as he was told".
Of no surprise when he left the front end, he was not climbing away to fly, but sinking towards the oggin - so he pressed the "Clear Aircraft" bar, which reduced his weight sufficiently to fly away.
Well done him - but I don't think he got a "BZ" from the RN - or the RAF - for saving the aircraft - or even an acknowledgment that he was correct, and the RN was wrong.
Obviously no prospect of a repeat error in the current climate!!
During my time on HERMES in 82, a fellow GR3 mate was due to take off and was lined up at a distance from the front end which he thought was too short based on his VSTOL calculations and the given wind over deck. He said "that is too short", but was told no, that is the correct distance. After a minor discussion, he did what was required by the RN - "do as you are told" - confirmed that his "Master Arm" was on, visually checked for the "Clear Aircraft" bar, and "did as he was told".
Of no surprise when he left the front end, he was not climbing away to fly, but sinking towards the oggin - so he pressed the "Clear Aircraft" bar, which reduced his weight sufficiently to fly away.
Well done him - but I don't think he got a "BZ" from the RN - or the RAF - for saving the aircraft - or even an acknowledgment that he was correct, and the RN was wrong.
Obviously no prospect of a repeat error in the current climate!!
Thanks Mog and EFJ. So I suppose that, even if the pilot senses or is informed of a loss of thrust, the only thing he/she can do is sit with it and hope that it flies and be ready to eject.
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Narfalk
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
This is 2021. That will have been shared almost immediately with Whitehall, etc and key others ashore. I bet the Secretary for Defence, Ben Wallace, who of course has to stand up in Parliament and announce a loss of £100m of public assets, saw it within a few hours. Plus all his officials ...
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Timelord
Thanks Mog and EFJ. So I suppose that, even if the pilot senses or is informed of a loss of thrust, the only thing he/she can do is sit with it and hope that it flies and be ready to eject.
How often have we seen on these pages "lessons have been learnt" etc, then we see this...
Procedure to show all pre flights completed is being introduced. [email protected] had a similar incident, but not widely reported.
Cat Techie , no I am not part of the JSF program but I, like others, have a real concern about an over- reliance on simulators. I know a couple of the F35 guys and a good few Typhoon pilots too. I know which ones get more time doing real flying.
Serious question... do pilots do a "simulated" walkround before a sim trip?
Procedure to show all pre flights completed is being introduced. [email protected] had a similar incident, but not widely reported.
Cat Techie , no I am not part of the JSF program but I, like others, have a real concern about an over- reliance on simulators. I know a couple of the F35 guys and a good few Typhoon pilots too. I know which ones get more time doing real flying.
Serious question... do pilots do a "simulated" walkround before a sim trip?
In the sim I ran it was pretty hard to get the crews to do any checks prior to the end of the runway. They always wanted a “hot start” . It was a hobby horse of mine; if you want sims to count as flying you have to do every element of the sortie, including start up and taxi back / shut down. When we did do “cold” starts we would sometimes say “I am holding up x pins” where x was the wrong number.
Last edited by Timelord; 30th Nov 2021 at 14:53.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re question: #216, ?
a takeoff distance calculation - brakes off to ramp, to accommodate differing mass.
From the video #236, the first aircraft starts after the line (2), the second from behind the line; why the different ground roll mass ?
The leaked video appears to have a shorter ground roll than both.
From the video #236, the first aircraft starts after the line (2), the second from behind the line; why the different ground roll mass ?
The leaked video appears to have a shorter ground roll than both.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kilmarnock,United Kingdom
Age: 67
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Procedure to show all pre flights completed is being introduced. [email protected] had a similair incident, but not widely reported.
This accident took place towards the end of a what has been a long and successful deployment with numerous launches from QNLZ by RAF, USMC and Italian F-35B's.
I can't see how any difference in pre flight procedures would not have been noted and incorporated long before this event took place.
Surely USMC, RAF and RN air and ground crew have been working together closely enough to have raised this similair incident?
This accident took place towards the end of a what has been a long and successful deployment with numerous launches from QNLZ by RAF, USMC and Italian F-35B's.
I can't see how any difference in pre flight procedures would not have been noted and incorporated long before this event took place.
Surely USMC, RAF and RN air and ground crew have been working together closely enough to have raised this similair incident?
Originally Posted by safetypee
Re question: #216, ?
a takeoff distance calculation - brakes off to ramp, to accommodate differing mass.
From the video #236, the first aircraft starts after the line (2), the second from behind the line; why the different ground roll mass ?
The leaked video appears to have a shorter ground roll than both.
From the video #236, the first aircraft starts after the line (2), the second from behind the line; why the different ground roll mass ?
The leaked video appears to have a shorter ground roll than both.
I suspect that the same applies to Dave.
Mog
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Narfalk
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY
How often have we seen on these pages "lessons have been learnt" etc, then we see this...
Procedure to show all pre flights completed is being introduced. [email protected] had a similar incident, but not widely reported.
Cat Techie , no I am not part of the JSF program but I, like others, have a real concern about an over- reliance on simulators. I know a couple of the F35 guys and a good few Typhoon pilots too. I know which ones get more time doing real flying.
Serious question... do pilots do a "simulated" walkround before a sim trip?
Procedure to show all pre flights completed is being introduced. [email protected] had a similar incident, but not widely reported.
Cat Techie , no I am not part of the JSF program but I, like others, have a real concern about an over- reliance on simulators. I know a couple of the F35 guys and a good few Typhoon pilots too. I know which ones get more time doing real flying.
Serious question... do pilots do a "simulated" walkround before a sim trip?
As for proceedure. Civvy turboprops I am involved with have strops and blanks fitted as policy. With a tech log entry obvious to the Captain that they are fitted. They are signed for being removed by morning engineers or the Captain if no engineer is available. Simple but effective.
