Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

AUKUS

Old 10th May 2024, 08:24
  #1601 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 420
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
https://www.defensenews.com/naval/20...some-may-help/

US Navy’s submarine fleet is too small. Here’s how selling some may help.

This is the first story of a two-part series on how the U.S. submarine force is participating in the trilateral AUKUS alliance. Click here to read the second story.
That re-enforces my earlier post to you. Where I said:
"No one has ever accused the US of being altruistic. The US wants to forward deploy to Australia. They need nuke sub infrastructure and manpower. It is better for the US, to have Australia with a few of their nuke subs. The main sub is going to be the UK/AU. It's actually a disadvantage to Australia to run 2 types of attack subs. There will be more articles with FUD headlines than I could count over the next 10 years. Congress will also play their games. At the end of the day the primes are going to make money and let's face it. That's all that matters."
golder is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 28th May 2024, 13:33
  #1602 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,863
Received 1,932 Likes on 867 Posts
Australia:

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal...0240526-p5jgom

Questions surface over fast-tracked $10b warships
ORAC is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 04:51
  #1603 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 420
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Answer given and clickbait continues.

Asked what changes would be allowed, a Defence Department spokesman said: “The General Purpose Frigate program is now in an evaluation process and Defence will not comment while the process is being conducted to protect commercial, procurement and probity processes.”
golder is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 06:34
  #1604 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 113 Likes on 71 Posts
so much whinning about how fast they are doing, so much whinning about how slow hunter and most other procurements are

The TLDR what the govt wants in order of importanceThey announced that its got to be in build by 2026 for 2029 delivery

transfer of design for onshore build

effective sustainment and maintainence systems in AUS

compliance with regulatory,legislative and class regulation

interoperabolity with AUS and allied systems

So AUS wants a complete or nearly complete design that the builder can start building next year with a delivery no later than 2029, Meko A210 is a design they have been working on for 18+ months so should be completed, Mogami is complete, **** but complete, Daegu (know nothing about the design) is, tasman / alpha 3000 is concept as is the baby constellation
rattman is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 07:41
  #1605 (permalink)  
Bug
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Here
Posts: 69
Received 56 Likes on 20 Posts
The odd thing is they are not including Arrow 140, which would seem an excellent option. Possibly they don't think it can be built in timeframe.
However RAN procurement has a checkered history, to say the least. That combined with Marles means probably end up a shambles.
Little or no prospect of the 7 - 11 hulls eventuating on past performance.

Bug is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 29th May 2024, 08:33
  #1606 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 113 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by Bug
The odd thing is they are not including Arrow 140, which would seem an excellent option. Possibly they don't think it can be built in timeframe.
However RAN procurement has a checkered history, to say the least. .
Allegedly 5 companies, considering Gibbs and Cox with the baby constellation are only design / engineering and zero ship building maybe BAE with arrowhead was the 5th and not gibbs and cox

That combined with Marles means probably end up a shambles
Cant be worse than pretty much every LNP defense minister. Every defence minister since nelson and fitzgibbon has sucked at their job, Dutton, Payne and reynolds being the stand out worst
rattman is offline  
Old 30th May 2024, 23:46
  #1607 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,873
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
Allegedly 5 companies, considering Gibbs and Cox with the baby constellation are only design / engineering and zero ship building maybe BAE with arrowhead was the 5th and not gibbs and coxt
I understand that the A140/Type 31 is a Babcock design, not a BAE product.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2024, 09:25
  #1608 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,863
Received 1,932 Likes on 867 Posts
“Stand alone contract for 12 main shaft seals for VIRGINIA class SSNs to be 100% manufactured by Wartsila in Havant, Hampshire, UK, with procurement via Defense Maritime Solutions, Inc. Genuine question: have these always come from the UK plant, or is it the first time?”
ORAC is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Jun 2024, 06:45
  #1609 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,863
Received 1,932 Likes on 867 Posts
Australian government just axed substantial parts of the LOTE (life extension) efforts for Collins submarines, while going ahead with the overall program. A few thoughts on the matter. Official statement here. 1/9

https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/...type-extension

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...161918973.html
​​​​​​​
ORAC is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2024, 07:34
  #1610 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 420
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
It looks like there has been a change of mind. It isn't going to be used on AUKUS either. "The SSN AUKUS nuclear-powered conventionally armed submarines will likewise not be fitted with this particular design. "

It seems on advice, that adding Tomahawk cruise missile capability to the Collins class submarines is not viable and does not represent value for money. It currently has and looks like will keep, the Harpoon missile.

Last edited by golder; 5th Jun 2024 at 07:59.
golder is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2024, 09:41
  #1611 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brizzle
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Adding Tomahawk capability to the Collins class was only going to be viable if you managed to persuade Raytheon to reopen the TTL Tomahawk production line and they’ve clearly failed to do that.
Flap Track 6 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2024, 16:26
  #1612 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 205
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
In the Starship #4 test flight (
) they had live video feed from liftoff through to both splashdowns. All the way through the plasma of very lengthy 'deorbiting'. That says a lot about the ability to communicate with hypersonic vehicles provided one owns a sufficient fleet of suitable comms satellites in orbit. For sure Starship has sufficient scale to provide lots of power, and some relatively benign locations on the unheated side. But as a very obvious demonstrator it is a sign of things to come. All the nations who either ar ealready, or may in due course become, part of AUKUS have an interest in hypersonics. Even if they have come to the conclusion they'd rather do it as a consortium than on their own.
petit plateau is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2024, 04:36
  #1613 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 420
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
“Stand alone contract for 12 main shaft seals for VIRGINIA class SSNs to be 100% manufactured by Wartsila in Havant, Hampshire, UK, with procurement via Defense Maritime Solutions, Inc. Genuine question: have these always come from the UK plant, or is it the first time?”
I Don't know, but under AUKUS. Both the UK and AU will enter the supply chain
South Australia makes play to enter US nuclear submarine supply chain ahead of AUKUS build - ABC News
The SA government has struck a deal with shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls Industries to allow SA companies to enter supply chains for US nuclear-powered naval submarines.
golder is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2024, 20:33
  #1614 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,863
Received 1,932 Likes on 867 Posts
@BAES_Maritime has submitted a planning application for the future development of Barrow site to support increasing submarine production.

Potentially a very large building at site of former gas and fuel storage facility on Barrow Island (centre of image).

https://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/24383...t-barrow-site/


​​​​​​​
ORAC is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2024, 02:16
  #1615 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 65
Posts: 7,325
Received 492 Likes on 307 Posts
I share your disappointment. If we get into a shooting war again, running out of Tomahawks is bound to happen early in the campaign...
Lonewolf_50 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.