Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Brize move a farce..

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Brize move a farce..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Aug 2011, 17:33
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 59
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last week a VC-10 carried out max power runs at 23:45 for an hour
Can't put the blame for that one on the closure of Lyenham and the Hercs moving over.
November4 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 17:50
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Nimby

This reminds me of a certain Sqn Ldr who moved close to Kemble only a couple of years ago, complained about the noise (what noise!), lobbied his local council who spent thousands of pounds of our money trying to shut the airfield down which had only been there since the middle of the last century.

There is a great article in the latest issue of Pilot entitled 'Be careful what you wish for, Nimbys'. In short, if they closed Brize it would become something worse, possible an open prison?
sharpend is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 19:02
  #83 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Can't put the blame for that one on the closure of Lyenham and the Hercs moving over.
Are there limits on space or similar for power runs? Is it possible that the Funbus had to wait for a slot?
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 19:04
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
It may have simply been fixed at that hour, and needed for an early start in a few hours. Sometimes when it needs to go, it needs to happen now.
Runaway Gun is online now  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 19:57
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London Village
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the same people complaining about the 'torturous' noise also the ones who are likely to be revelling in a predicted 25 % increase in rental prices and almost a 10 % rise in house prices?
Redcarpet is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 20:24
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nr Witney
Age: 73
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An interesting thread - of course the move isnt a farce. As with all things military the skills and abilities of our people on the ground will make the integration of Lyneham & Brize work. Yes, there are the inevitable teething problems involving the squadrons meshing together. Yes, there will be problems with the local community and the station when different flight patterns become apparant, and of course any engine runs after midnight are a pain in the ass - why shouldnt nearby residents complain?

As for me, well I live within the circuit at Brize AND I work shifts there. But, I also know that eventually Brize will settle down as the new RAF 'Superbase' - already action has been taken regarding low flying by the C130's at night - no more 500' circuits Southside unless operationally essential, and there already seems to be a new set-up for Herc engine runs (on taxiway Golf by the almost completed repatriation centre rather than on the old 101sqn bays). Lets be fair gents, how many of you would put up with Hercs at full chat for up to 2hrs at a time after midnight??

Whether we like it or not, we now live in a world where those who pay our (military)salaries and purchase our (military)aircraft have a say too.

Exactly as you do
BirdController is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 21:11
  #87 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets be fair gents, how many of you would put up with Hercs at full chat for up to 2hrs at a time after midnight??
Can't speak for the rest of humanity but I certainly "coped" with it for 16 years... Being a herc pilot doesn't make me immune to annoying noises. I just got used to it. I assumed it was something to do with my living on and near an airfield....
StopStart is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 21:27
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kettering
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sharpend
In short, if they closed Brize it would become something worse, possible an open prison?
Well I'm sure the locals around what was RNAS Ford don't complain about noise anyway.
LookingNorth is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2011, 23:49
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
It's quite simple, one of the two bases had to go
I beg to differ. True, Lyneham has the shorter runways (but the big jets could and did land there) but they were big enough for the C130. The original basing study had to choose between Lyneham, Brize Norton & St Mawgan and the latter was closed; there was no need to close a second airfield. 'Closing' (it's not even going to close now) Lyneham & moving the C130s to Brize has cost £190 million (& some more) with the expectation of makings savings sometime in the future. We are short of money now, it was a very dim decision to spend alot of money in the present hoping to save a bit in the furure.

We have lost a fine airfield with a supportive local population where you could fly 500ft circuits without them complaining (well, not much anyway). Brize aircraft would come to Lyneham to fly circuits at weekends because they couldn't at home.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 07:50
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
Just how big and how heavy were the 'big jets' when they landed there? And could they really get off with a full load?
Runaway Gun is online now  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 08:19
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middle England
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We certainly had a fair number of stretch DC8s though the early 90's with full loads of tank armour (every other day as I recall), they managed to get away (unless there is an undiscovered pile of Chobam/Aluminium mix just off the end of the runway! )
Jumping_Jack is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 08:21
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seen Tristars there, and they're about as big as it gets - heavier footprint than a 747. As I understand it the taxiways and parking was also a probem?
glum is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 08:23
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
Well, during GW2 the C17s would land at Lyneham to load up before heading off to the Gulf so they weren't taking off empty. Charter DC8s & A300s seemed to have no problem operating to the ME out of Lyneham.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 08:28
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
As I understand it the taxiways and parking was also a probem?
DC8s & A300s used the main pan but parked close to Entry 2. The lines & parking bays were painted for C130s so for larger aircraft there wasn't too much room when the pan was full of aircraft. C17 has always managed to park outside the Main Terminal when doing Pabbays, even when there were aircraft parked in the bays, although it looked quite tight.

Last edited by Ken Scott; 5th Aug 2011 at 08:40.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 09:13
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
RA - it may not be covered by ECHR, as noise is adequately covered under environment law. Environmental legislation does not necessarily recognise - and accept - long-standing infringments. The RAF has no more right to make noise than any other organisation, although aircraft noise is a necessary byproduct of a lawful enterprise.

I quote from a report into military aircraft noise:
'Noise has long been established in common law as a form of nuisance, to wit, a material interference with a person's enjoyment of property rights...Under Environmental Protection Act (Part III) 1990 individuals may bring action in a civil court for nuisance in which they seek a court order (injunction) restraining the defendant form continuing some wrongful act or omission, and seek damages in compensation. Although Crown Exemption was granted for noises of a military or operational nature, it is likely that over the next decade European legislative pressure may result in the loss of immunity and [it is expected that] passive noise mitigation measures must be introduced to achieve the extant standards and to ensure a continued 'Good Neighbour' policy.'
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 09:40
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
Running engines in the middle of the night is completely unnecessary - Afghan War or no Afghan War.
Many others will disagree with you Brian. These transport aircraft are not out flying for a jolly time in the Virgin Islands, but are taking important freight/personnel/supplies etc out to a war zone. Sometimes they have to evacuate wounded or worse back home.
Runaway Gun is online now  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 09:44
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brian, some good points there and almost all valid. Apart from the last one. If one can count the number of potential assets (aircraft in this case) on the fingers of two people then the engineering required to maintain 'output' is critical. We don't have the luxury of carrying u/s aircraft anymore. I'm not necessarily pro noise but I do live in the real world. Close to Brize as it happens.

Some of the cold war warriors need to realise the RAF is not the beast it used to be.
Grabbers is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 10:15
  #98 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry Brian but little Johnnie copping it because everyone was being bothered by the nasty planes and couldn't sleep is reaching in extremis. What if they stayed up watching TV all night? Or perhaps the baby was crying all night? Or there was a loud thunderstorm? There are plenty of things that will disturb a night's sleep and suggesting that just one of them in isolation will lead to the collapse of the Oxfordshire NHS is, I'm afraid, a little poor

PS. the VC10 nav couldn't sleep because of the noise or because he kept falling off the bouncy castle?
StopStart is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 10:59
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
Running engines in the middle of the night is completely unnecessary - Afghan War or no Afghan War.
One of the more ridiculous assertions I've read on this forum, and that's up against some pretty stiff competition. No engine runs during the night equals no serviceable aeroplanes in the morning which means no training or operational sorties.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2011, 11:13
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
I stress the earlier legal point - the RAF have no right to create noise that constitutes a nuisance - irrespective of how long they have done it at any location - the principle of 'Ancient Lights' doesn't apply (ie enjoyment of/exercise of an activity acquired through lapse of time); at present Crown Immunity stops further sanctions being taken, however it is behoven on the operating authority to take all practical measures to mitigate noise form aircraft operations.

In other words, just because Brize Norton has been there since 1918 (or whenever) gives it no more right to produce noise than a new manufactory with noise producing processes which may consitute a nuisance. At present, noise from military activity enjoys excemption, but this is a fairly weak defence this day and age.

And before I am accused of not 'supporting our boys on the Malabar Front', I am simply pointing out that producing noise that is a nuisance is illegal. And yes, I do think it naive of people who buy properties around an established noise producer - bet it an airfield, an range, cow shed or church bells - and then complain about it. The lovely church bells from our parish church clock near our UK home have been silenced between 2200 - 0800 because of lcocal complaints; where I am currently residing we are woken up with noise from our nearby place of worhsip at 0600 - and repeated throughout the day till about 11 pm - or later. I wouldn't dare complain - the locals would be at the door with flaming torches and all manner of sharp objects post haste.
Whenurhappy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.