Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Latest Future Brize 'hiccups'

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Latest Future Brize 'hiccups'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th May 2010, 21:24
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sneaking up on the Runway and leaping out to grab it unawares
Age: 61
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And your point is?
ExAscoteer is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 21:31
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
There is a link here, so stick with it.......

Listening to various deliberations about the future bases required for MFTS, and I quote 'Valley and Linton must remain open to avoid putting all our eggs in one basket'.........

So where will all our AT divert to, when BZN is the only AT base in use???? Say when a Herc has an issue and blacks the rwy???
Could be the last? is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 21:38
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Eric
That's a fantastic site RAF SARGE,thanks for pointing me in that direction mate.
What's the "& bull" bit mean ?
It looks like these guys know more than us

B.E.
The &Bull; is just HTML code for the round circle in the title of the forum, that's all.

Originally Posted by Could be the last?
So where will all our AT divert to, when BZN is the only AT base in use???? Say when a Herc has an issue and blacks the rwy???
The same civilian airports that are already designated to take Brize Norton diversions when Brize is u/s due to bad conditions.

Cheers,
Mike
MichaelBuckle is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 21:50
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"We shall have to sit, wait and see, rather than talk 10 pages of b0llocks and speculation on here." - VinRouge

Why spoil the PPrune habits of a lifetime? Roll on the rampant speculation!

Good news is that the crew are ok.

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 21:53
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer
And your point is?
My point is they may well have had 19 tons of fuel on board but if it's stuck it's stuck and all the freefall, winding, torque shaft disconnects in the world will not get it down..................
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 22:37
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Between Chippenham and Wooton Bassett
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, but when the poo hits the turbine, the undercarriage is comprised of 3 seperable systems, operated in normal conditions by 1 hyd system in flight.

For all 3 to fail is unlikely. For the lowered undercarriage (mains) to both collapse on landing is most unlikely, due to the nature of the friction washers at the bottom of the 4 mains screwjacks.

The nose U/c has 2 additional methods of emergency lowering, but has (rarely) collapsed on landing in the past.

I think you know the answer to this question........
Photoplanet is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 22:54
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Photoplanet
Yes, but when the poo hits the turbine, the undercarriage is comprised of 3 seperable systems, operated in normal conditions by 1 hyd system in flight.

For all 3 to fail is unlikely. For the lowered undercarriage (mains) to both collapse on landing is most unlikely, due to the nature of the friction washers at the bottom of the 4 mains screwjacks.

The nose U/c has 2 additional methods of emergency lowering, but has (rarely) collapsed on landing in the past.

I think you know the answer to this question........
Collapsed......................who mentioned that

Just tried to have a closer look at the pic and cant see any U/C doors open but the one thing I dont know and you dont know is exactly what happened so lets wait and see eh
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 23:20
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To those people asking how the **** could an Albert crew land wheels up, all I'm going to say is they certainly are not the first, and I will bet my life they will not be the last if it is just a finger problem.....

However, I would strongly suspect a problem that prevented one part of the gear being lowered, so landing belly would be safer than trying land with only half the gear deployed. If you have a look on YouTube thre is a full video of ( think it's American) a Herc belly landing due to u/c issues, and being a high wing a/c it takes it very very well....

YouTube - Bad landing C-130 Hercules

But no one knows the facts, The main concern is that all the crew are safe, aircraft can be replaced....

Now, was XV304 on a print????

Last edited by Kengineer-130; 6th May 2010 at 23:48. Reason: Found the link!
Kengineer-130 is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 23:24
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BigGreenGilbert
SFFP, this is a rumour site. No one's hurt (physically - a few egos and reputations may be damaged), if you don't like the speculation, don't read it.

btw, what is the guidance for a Herc if part of the u/c will not lower, is it to land with no u/c or to land with any available u/c ?

BGG
And their in lies the clue young man

Last edited by Seldomfitforpurpose; 6th May 2010 at 23:34.
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 23:32
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spolling

SFFP
And their in lies the clue young man
Spoll chock, over.
Spurlash2 is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 07:34
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Albert Another

A ‘can do attitude’ is what we are all about
That is what got you into this position in the first place.
philrigger is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 12:55
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 791
Received 34 Likes on 11 Posts
Had the aircraft flown in from Liverpool?
oxenos is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 13:24
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle
Age: 53
Posts: 613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
However, I would strongly suspect a problem that prevented one part of the gear being lowered, so landing belly would be safer than trying land with only half the gear deployed
Yup, as you can clearly see in the video clip, the fireman had stopped playing volleyball and were sitting in a fire engine by the side of the runway awaiting the arrival of the Herc.
MATELO is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 13:31
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Did somebody say "Gear Up Landing...?"
Just imagine if there was some sort of aural warning to stop that:"

Any truth in the rumour that the aural warning can be suppressed by pulling a CB?

Just wondered.........

BTW u/c doors all appear to be closed
tommee_hawk is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 13:36
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes the horn can be disabled by pulling the CB for it.
Kengineer-130 is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 14:35
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New photo posted on the fightercontrol link now showing the main gear doors shut... as they appeared to be when it happened.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 15:13
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matelo, the video is NOT of the Brize incident...It was just to show how well an Albert can take a belly landing.
Kengineer-130 is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 15:38
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N51 09".94 W001 45".51
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely if this was an emergency wheels up no captain worth his salt would have done it at Brize and blacked the runway. A short hop to Lyneham and 2 runways would be a better option ?
billynospares is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 15:57
  #59 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by billynospares
Surely if this was an emergency wheels up no captain worth his salt would have done it at Brize and blacked the runway. A short hop to Lyneham and 2 runways would be a better option ?
You know all the facts?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 16:00
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunny Wilts!
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As this is a site for rumour and speculation...Gear horn CB tripped and forgotten about. No U/C or util hyd problems as surely there would have been a call / diversion to black another runway.

Come on gents, how many times have you forgotten to reset the CB and during a busy sortie, said what you thought you saw? I suspect alot of people. We are only human.

Glad everyone was ok, a few damaged egos but no injuries.
cheesedoff is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.