What Are The R.A.F. Regiment For?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without the beloved RAF Reg, I think we really could become the 'civvies in uniform' that a lot of the Army think we are. I feel safer knowing the Reg are training and looking after us for / on deployed Ops.
When it comes to CCS, I may sit there in the gas chamber muttering some of the choicer phrases of the Queen's English under my breath about the git that is clearly enjoying himself far too much for my liking.
But having worked very closely with the Regt on ops in both theatres, I can say that I would rather go to war with them than without them. They know their stuff and have patiently advised me on many occassions so that I can make an informed decision.
That said, I can see both sides of this thread. In the case of those slating the original question as being inappropriate, what are the odds that the very same question is asked of prospective candidates by the Board Members at OASC - why join the Regt when you can join the Army if you want to be an infanteer? From my relatively un-informed persective, would it not be better to think of them not as soldiers or infanteers, but a specialist cadre filling a vital niche role? Thinking in those terms, it would put them alongside other specialist units - Jt NBC Regt, TSW etc all of whom play a vital role which could arguably be carried out by less specialist inf / logs units, but you rarely if ever hear their existence questioned.
But to finish off, I would say consider the following points:
1. If the RAF Regt doesn't have a unique role that can't be carried out by others, why have we recently increased their establishment adding another FP Wg and Field Sqn?
2. As Gen Douhet presciently said "It is easier and more effective to destroy the enemy’s aerial power by destroying his nests and eggs on the ground than to hunt his flying birds in the air". Seems to sum up the situation we have been facing over the past few years and the reason we need the RAF Regt.
3. "Every airfield should be a stronghold of fighting air-groundmen, and not the abode of uniformed civilians in the prime of life protected by detachments of soldiers. It must be clearly understood by all ranks that they are expected to fight and die in the defence of their airfields." Seems that Winston thought there was a role for the professional defence of airfields; shame the current trend for contractorization of the military will probably leave us unable to defend our own airfields these days.
And now having sold my soul in defence of the RAF Regt, I'm going to lie down in a darkened room.
But having worked very closely with the Regt on ops in both theatres, I can say that I would rather go to war with them than without them. They know their stuff and have patiently advised me on many occassions so that I can make an informed decision.
That said, I can see both sides of this thread. In the case of those slating the original question as being inappropriate, what are the odds that the very same question is asked of prospective candidates by the Board Members at OASC - why join the Regt when you can join the Army if you want to be an infanteer? From my relatively un-informed persective, would it not be better to think of them not as soldiers or infanteers, but a specialist cadre filling a vital niche role? Thinking in those terms, it would put them alongside other specialist units - Jt NBC Regt, TSW etc all of whom play a vital role which could arguably be carried out by less specialist inf / logs units, but you rarely if ever hear their existence questioned.
But to finish off, I would say consider the following points:
1. If the RAF Regt doesn't have a unique role that can't be carried out by others, why have we recently increased their establishment adding another FP Wg and Field Sqn?
2. As Gen Douhet presciently said "It is easier and more effective to destroy the enemy’s aerial power by destroying his nests and eggs on the ground than to hunt his flying birds in the air". Seems to sum up the situation we have been facing over the past few years and the reason we need the RAF Regt.
3. "Every airfield should be a stronghold of fighting air-groundmen, and not the abode of uniformed civilians in the prime of life protected by detachments of soldiers. It must be clearly understood by all ranks that they are expected to fight and die in the defence of their airfields." Seems that Winston thought there was a role for the professional defence of airfields; shame the current trend for contractorization of the military will probably leave us unable to defend our own airfields these days.
And now having sold my soul in defence of the RAF Regt, I'm going to lie down in a darkened room.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ?
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats a frickin good question. On the whole I have come the conclusion that it is to cruise around Kandahar on WMIKs that could be utilised by proper soldiers.
Having said that, some are fantastic, but let down by the majority who are clinically brainless and full of their own self-importance.
Having said that, some are fantastic, but let down by the majority who are clinically brainless and full of their own self-importance.
Scotty,
several members (one is too many) have been killed or injured on operations. They have my utmost respect for their sacrifice, and their families my deepest condolences, as do the families of the MTD/Engineers and aircrew who have paid the same price.
However, the original poster asked a question which had nothing to do with whether people had been injured. That is a seprate issue which affects numerous trades outside of the RAF Regiment, as well as within.
The question was, what is the RAF Regiment for?
Al R - I don't think there was any teddy throwing. We have differing opinions. I just dont shout you down for expressing yours. The point about Voltaire may well be true....wikipedia will be my next stop.
several members (one is too many) have been killed or injured on operations. They have my utmost respect for their sacrifice, and their families my deepest condolences, as do the families of the MTD/Engineers and aircrew who have paid the same price.
However, the original poster asked a question which had nothing to do with whether people had been injured. That is a seprate issue which affects numerous trades outside of the RAF Regiment, as well as within.
The question was, what is the RAF Regiment for?
Al R - I don't think there was any teddy throwing. We have differing opinions. I just dont shout you down for expressing yours. The point about Voltaire may well be true....wikipedia will be my next stop.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WSM
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I served for 15 years with the rocks on Rapier and I came to the view that if you can do your job as well and as professionally as they do theirs then you can be justifiably proud of yourself. I made some good mates but you were always a guest, never a member, (a stance that suited both parties I might add). Their esprit de corps sets them apart because whilst the rest of us may banter about which trade/branch is the best they truly believe that they are Gods chosen ones.
Having worked with the RA & REME I think that a serious mistake was made when the SHORAD role was transferred that will only come to light in the heat of combat. Not knocking the Army but there is no history of air awareness and I will always be happier to have an RAF beret (even if styled to absurdity) on the fenceline.
A bunch of knobs at times but top at what they do.
Having worked with the RA & REME I think that a serious mistake was made when the SHORAD role was transferred that will only come to light in the heat of combat. Not knocking the Army but there is no history of air awareness and I will always be happier to have an RAF beret (even if styled to absurdity) on the fenceline.
A bunch of knobs at times but top at what they do.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Far away
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gents, the fact of the matter is that if there was no role for this outfit they would soon cease to exist. If they they did not produce the goods on a regular basis to the required standard then they would have been given the chop some time ago. If there was any doubt about their reliability or professionalism they would have been binned or merged in the past. The fact that they are growing in size (relatively to the size of the RAF) speaks volumes.
F**k me you lot are serious.......
It's Christmas - lighten up!
It's Christmas - lighten up!
Does that mean you feel stupid after your original post? You definately should.
For what it's worth, I came back from Basra in October. I didn't see the RAF Regt sat outside the EFI in 6 whole months. I DID see many on duty army units in the ECOS though. What's the point then? Pray tell. We all have to have down time.
The RAF Regt did more than their bit in defending the COB through their off base anti MANPAD patrols. As did the RAF Police with their anti IED foot patrols and VCPs OUTSIDE the wire. As did the various army units with their anti terrorist Armoured patrols.
I'm finding this "Anti any trade that isn't aircrew or techie" argument to be pointless, stupid, and frankly embarrassing to the aircrew and techie trades.
Aircrew (and techies alike) would struggle in any given theatre if it were not for the input of all other trades.
For ****'s sake can we stop slagging down the few trades that lose lives looking after you.
It's a typo for thick. Did you not manage to work that out?
Oh dear, AAC requiring English teacher again.
No pram here by the way. It's just that you're a c**t. That's all.
Oh dear, AAC requiring English teacher again.
No pram here by the way. It's just that you're a c**t. That's all.
That's okay buddy. You're only an ASSISTANT after all. We'll have to rely on the proper controllers to do the hard stuff.
AAC and ATC aside, obviously then Laarbruch.....
If you can't see that it takes more than ATC to get an RAF aircraft down onto the airstrip at a hostile airfield, then you're still a cnut. (Cnuts never change their stripes eh?
IF you are Military aircrew, I hope your next approach over Baghdad is uneventful. Because if it is... that's not by accident you know.
(I could have wished you nastiness, but I won't)
If you die, that's just a shame.
IF you are Military aircrew, I hope your next approach over Baghdad is uneventful. Because if it is... that's not by accident you know.
(I could have wished you nastiness, but I won't)
If you die, that's just a shame.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forget said: Calm down Al, calm down. It's a joke
When we drank a few beers the other day for those 'of us' who won't be seeing Xmas this year, we didn't consider whether or not they were 'in the majority' who were 'clinically braindead'. We remembered them for the fact that they died (in possibly, the same theatre that Mingun derived his opinion) so that he could sleep safely (in order to do his job) and then come back safely to exercise his 'right' to snipe at them from the anonymity of a messageboard. Yes, he does have that right.. but the fact that he feels the need to give in to this overwelming urge, especially at this time of year, marks him out as an individual of true distinction. I wonder if those who quietly protect him in theatre know with how much contempt he regards the majority of them.
Minigun said: .. clinically brainless and full of their own self-importance. I can't take anyone seriously when they sign off with 'Per Ardua'.
So, to put you back inside your comfort zone I've worked something out for you. In the average tour, a 21 year old 'clinically braindead' gunner on his first tour can get posted these days with a 6000 hour badge. As for anyone (clinically braindead or not) who does over 20 years, well.. they'd probably need their own personal Loadmaster to carry all their badges. And no, I don't need Wiki to confirm for me that you're punching above your weight when you're trying to be clever or funny. The people you work with could probably do that for me far more easily.
Per Ardua Minigun, and Happy Xmas. Stay safe.
Al.
So, to put you back inside your comfort zone I've worked something out for you. In the average tour, a 21 year old 'clinically braindead' gunner on his first tour can get posted these days with a 6000 hour badge. As for anyone (clinically braindead or not) who does over 20 years, well.. they'd probably need their own personal Loadmaster to carry all their badges. And no, I don't need Wiki to confirm for me that you're punching above your weight when you're trying to be clever or funny. The people you work with could probably do that for me far more easily.
I say again, the poster asked a question. I answered it according to my opinion. You have made your opinion clear (apart from the paragraph above).
I, unlike others I grant you, do not hide behind anonymity. I would be prepared to voice any opinion expressed here in person, in fact, I am very likely to.
You on the other hand, are a retired rock ape who is now a shelf stacker for all I know, who feels the need to spend all his time on a military aviation forum telling those still serving what is required from them, and how things are.
Apart from being quite sad, it seems you need to get a life and let go of the military. It's not Germany in the 70's or 80's anymore.
I will express my opinion whether you or any other tw@t like you agrees with it or not. That is the democracy we supposedly protect. You have the right to do likewise, a right you seem to exercise equally well.
For the record, their are things the RAF Regiment do very well. Are they the panacea - no I think there is room for improvement.
Could the Army do it equally well - Yes. Could they do the job better - probably.
Lets not get this out of proportion - Airfield Defence boils down to patrolling, vigilance, gathering and use of local intelligence as well as control of entry - I am pretty sure the Army could cope.
Have a good Xmas Al - but try and talk to some civvy's occasionally.
Champagne anyone...?
Hoisted by my own petard I believe.....
Hey, stopstart, you are right! You know those F*ckers in the congo....
Not strictly comparable subjects but touché nonetheless.
My early New Year's Resolution then is to stick solely to taking the piss in the future. To that end I refer you all back to post #2 of this thread and thence to previous post after that.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 59
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Close brackets after the eh?
For the record, their are things the RAF Regiment do very well
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(I think the Royals took 1967 off),
Assuming by Royals you mean the Bootys I must correct the quote above.
In 1967 (November IIRC) the Royal Marines were the last to leave Aden, picked up from the beach and then out to waiting RN ships.
RAF Regt were there at times during the "twubbles".
To all in the current sh1tholes, Merry Christmas and stay safe.
s37
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oxford
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have to say I've read some crap on this site before and have stopped posting because there's so much ill-informed drivel here but MGD's take the biscuit.
a. Who gives a Monkey's what the Army thinks about the RAF Regt? AARSE is like a NAAFI bar on a Sat night when it comes to educated or informed comment. If they had bothered themselves at school or were capable of providing some insightful criticism they wouldn't be in the Army or posting on AARSE.
b. As a current SH bloke who has spent too much time over the last 5.5 yrs in sites protected by our finest Rocks, I would like to disassociate myself with Minigun's derogatory comments on the RAF Regt. I think it was meant so that all of us could be reminded that he works in Afgh sometimes. Boys (Rocks that is), the rest of the SH world think you're all great, and your EVCP drills are top too.
c. Minigun is a knob of the highest order who has been fighting the Muj/TB since he was a child. He is out of the AIDU, Silsoe Sid, WEBF, Walt mould of poster. PPrune is only here for him to berate all those who are not chippy CH-47 crewmen (he works in Afgh you know?) who feel able to shamefully decry the efforts of brave men who protect our airfields.
MGD - do your self a favour Chum. Have a look at the photos of the RAF Regt lads KIA'd in the last couple of years in both theatres and re-read your first post, then stop trying to defend yourself and apologise to the RAF Regt readers and trhen the forum. Then change your name and slink away.
T**T!
Merry Christmas, from a desert site defended by Rockapes.
SP
PS. If the whole thing's a fishing trip, then you got me!
a. Who gives a Monkey's what the Army thinks about the RAF Regt? AARSE is like a NAAFI bar on a Sat night when it comes to educated or informed comment. If they had bothered themselves at school or were capable of providing some insightful criticism they wouldn't be in the Army or posting on AARSE.
b. As a current SH bloke who has spent too much time over the last 5.5 yrs in sites protected by our finest Rocks, I would like to disassociate myself with Minigun's derogatory comments on the RAF Regt. I think it was meant so that all of us could be reminded that he works in Afgh sometimes. Boys (Rocks that is), the rest of the SH world think you're all great, and your EVCP drills are top too.
c. Minigun is a knob of the highest order who has been fighting the Muj/TB since he was a child. He is out of the AIDU, Silsoe Sid, WEBF, Walt mould of poster. PPrune is only here for him to berate all those who are not chippy CH-47 crewmen (he works in Afgh you know?) who feel able to shamefully decry the efforts of brave men who protect our airfields.
MGD - do your self a favour Chum. Have a look at the photos of the RAF Regt lads KIA'd in the last couple of years in both theatres and re-read your first post, then stop trying to defend yourself and apologise to the RAF Regt readers and trhen the forum. Then change your name and slink away.
T**T!
Merry Christmas, from a desert site defended by Rockapes.
SP
PS. If the whole thing's a fishing trip, then you got me!