UAS 's to close (Merged)
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sunny (or Rainy) Somerset, England
Posts: 2,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BEags - merged 2 of them but left the other as it is a specific question and will be answered in due course, I'm sure, by a link to one of the 3000 other threads on the same question from the past.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
News cometh from On High regarding recruitment:-
All UAS's informed yesterday that Sept 05 recruits WILL NOT be subject to an aircrew medical or any kind of aptitude testing, only the general RAF medical will be performed. Deduce from that what you will.................
All UAS's informed yesterday that Sept 05 recruits WILL NOT be subject to an aircrew medical or any kind of aptitude testing, only the general RAF medical will be performed. Deduce from that what you will.................
I'd deduce that some f*ckwit hasn't worked out that whether it's ten hours p.a or 30, it's worth making sure that the recipient has the aptitude and fitness necessary to be of interest to the RAF at the end of their time at Uni.
Otherwise they might just as well give me ten hours per year. Or my mother in law.
Otherwise they might just as well give me ten hours per year. Or my mother in law.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damnit I reckon I'm gonna fail the eye tests on the medical as my eyes aren't great 
. Hopefully I can still get into ground crew or something and mayb pick up some flying somewhere 
. Hopefully I can still get into ground crew or something and mayb pick up some flying somewhere
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All UAS's informed yesterday that Sept 05 recruits WILL NOT be subject to an aircrew medical or any kind of aptitude testing, only the general RAF medical will be performed. Deduce from that what you will.................
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More confusion
Heard on the grapevine that this grand plan, fully and successfully implemented, is intended to save less than £4m a year. (Oh, and that's before the cost of additional QFIs, and Adv Trg, and actually not getting the savings due to over optimisitic forecasting.) If true, probably not far from cost neutral then.... whilst hacking lots of people off. Cracking plan! 
And from what's been posted, not clear on how this is supposed to link with the great PFI MFTS thingy (of which there seems to be a degree of silence, along with FSTA and other rental agreements) in 200X?
Any ideas anyone? Obviously I'm too dim to understand all of this.
S41
PS To potential UAS-studes: it looks great, and go for it- but if you end up at Southampton, pls learn how to run a BBQ!
[Edited for typing... ]
And from what's been posted, not clear on how this is supposed to link with the great PFI MFTS thingy (of which there seems to be a degree of silence, along with FSTA and other rental agreements) in 200X?
Any ideas anyone? Obviously I'm too dim to understand all of this.
S41
PS To potential UAS-studes: it looks great, and go for it- but if you end up at Southampton, pls learn how to run a BBQ!
[Edited for typing... ]
Let's not get on to the subject of MFTS and its boundaries (UAS in/out, AEF in/out, Grading in/out, DHFS in/out, left leg....), we wouldn't want to confuse the bidder(s) just ahead of CSD proposals
Sod the business-speak w@nk words - but why should the Mightily F*cked-up Training System bidders be interested in Constant Speed Devices?
A once proud RAF will soon be nothing more than a Rental Air Farce. Still, it'll get a few thrusting tossers promoted onwards and upwards to the stars they all crave, no doubt.
A once proud RAF will soon be nothing more than a Rental Air Farce. Still, it'll get a few thrusting tossers promoted onwards and upwards to the stars they all crave, no doubt.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Not the front line
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
I thought this thread might be worth a bit of a bump. I'm not in touch with any UASs, and I'd like to know how the new system's working; assuming it is! What about all the studes on the old system? Is anyone still doing EFT? Are DE studes still being sent to all UASs, or just the "big three?"
Seeing this quote from earlier in the thread worried me. Many years ago, I had a pair of letters offering me cadetships from both organisations mentioned... I took the one that lands me in the "military aircrew" forum rather than any other, and I do often wonder if that was the smartest move in my life...
Originally Posted by BEagle
But when ba starts sponsored training again - as assuredly it's going to have to - competition between the RAF and the airlines will be direct. And on current showing, the RAF is going to have to find something pretty substantial to offer....
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: ISLE OF MAN
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
bin the Reds. Keep the UAS's but open up their remit a bit to include more interested youngsters. Indeed, some pimply fifteen year old rubbing shoulders with someone telling him/her how good Uni is might even have an unintended positive effect on their educastion prospects?
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
Not wishing to open up another pointless chestnut or go off-thread, but I'd speculate that the Red Arrows are the 'cause' of more youngsters entering the RAF than UAS's.
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
The new EFT Sqns don't formally "stand up"* until 1 Apr 06, so it is possible that some UASs still have the DE courses. I suppose my UAS still does even though we have already split, physically if not formally, into UAS and EFT Sqn. As for how it's working, well the PDLT seems to be working fine, but the flying has tailed off quite a bit. It's just as well as I feel really busy trying to work out a calendar for the New Year (how to run a PIFT or Summer Camp for instance), but I should like to think that it won't be only the mad keen new 1st years who will come flying. Of course it could be that my "presence circuits" need recharging and I should offer special incentives to the studes: how about an extra 10 mins aeros per 3 sorties flown before Easter? http://www.pprune.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif
*Ghastly Murcan expression now unversally adopted it seems; why can't we have our own expressions, and what was wrong with the Bingos and Joker the way we have had them for years, moan-moan-moan ... http://www.pprune.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbs.gif
Originally Posted by Elmlea
I thought this thread might be worth a bit of a bump. I'm not in touch with any UASs, and I'd like to know how the new system's working; assuming it is! What about all the studes on the old system? Is anyone still doing EFT? Are DE studes still being sent to all UASs, or just the "big three?"
Seeing this quote from earlier in the thread worried me. Many years ago, I had a pair of letters offering me cadetships from both organisations mentioned... I took the one that lands me in the "military aircrew" forum rather than any other, and I do often wonder if that was the smartest move in my life...
Seeing this quote from earlier in the thread worried me. Many years ago, I had a pair of letters offering me cadetships from both organisations mentioned... I took the one that lands me in the "military aircrew" forum rather than any other, and I do often wonder if that was the smartest move in my life...
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
But why the low fg rate? It's that way here too - and at all other UASs i've spoken to. We've tried portray this interim period to the studes as it is - an effectively unlimited time (no 10hr limit til 01Apr06!) to get as far as possible - and yet our SCT is pretty much all that's keeping the dust off of the ac.
Does anyone have any thoughts on the students lack of flying?
Could it be that the system has already backfired? The aim of taking away assessed flying to bring back the 'fun' element could also be reducing the sense of achievement for anything beyond solo....or are we QFIs just so bored that we've started to read too much into things?
Maybe we'll be offering free flying at our next Christmas Draw to remind them that it's still a University AIR Sqn!
Uncle G
Does anyone have any thoughts on the students lack of flying?
Could it be that the system has already backfired? The aim of taking away assessed flying to bring back the 'fun' element could also be reducing the sense of achievement for anything beyond solo....or are we QFIs just so bored that we've started to read too much into things?
Maybe we'll be offering free flying at our next Christmas Draw to remind them that it's still a University AIR Sqn!
Uncle G
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Up there somewhere
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
IIRC...
There are no DE's on UAS's at the moment other than YUAS with the foreigners
Next EFT streaming board is in Sept this year IIRC, last one was Dec 05.
There are no DE's on UAS's at the moment other than YUAS with the foreigners
Next EFT streaming board is in Sept this year IIRC, last one was Dec 05.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
I think the new system needs a while to run before any serious comment can be made. What is positive is that it is now an organisation which opens the world of flying/aviation to young people- just as Trenchard originally envisioned. None of this we have to get X numbers of people up to OASC or X pilots finishing EFT. Just openly and honestly a ‘look see opportunity’ into flying and the military (and with the lower medical standards etc).
I was on a University Air Squadron and left once the new changes took effect in November. I had an awesome time on my UAS, probably the best 2 years of my life.
Having said that, I think it's obvious that from now on it's all down hill. My biggest issue with the system is the fact that whilst students lose the pressure of 'flying' and EFT whilst at university; even more pressure is put on the senior students to make the squadrons run effectively, now that staff numbers will have dropped from about 6 to 1! Organsing activities, camps, sports, adventurous training; transport, town nights and the list goes on………….
As a senior student you’re likely to be in the last year at university- which often counts for the most towards your degree; consequently you want to do the best you can. Now that EFT does not exist, neither does the mentality of focus on flying (get good scores = streaming) and settle for a 2.2 (pilots degree). For those of us who are not Bursars and faced with the poor intake at OASC, we have no guarantee of a future with the RAF. Therefore attaining nothing less than a 2.1 becomes the new priority, and remaining on a UAS is no longer productive.
The changes for me illustrated here, on the UAS level the changes/downsizing future of the RAF. For me this has a negative impact. I just cant see the future that I originally envisioned a few years ago.
All you have to do is read the comments in the 'why are people leaving in droves' thread.
The UAS system will sadly be gone within the next few years - or redistributed amongst the other services; university naval units etc... It only survived the 2005 chop through the skin of it's teeth.
I cant see how the bean counters can justify the UAS system under the current climate. It is a great recruitment tool- but the RAF doesn’t need to recruit pilots- it will always have a steady flow of wannabes to it's doors without UAS's. What they need to do is focus more on the ground branches like engineers. They should never of changed the system in 1995.
Referring to the comments of students becoming attracted to other careers like airlines BA etc – very true. I’m very sure that current bursars are planning for a career change after 12/16 yrs! But I think ultimately you have to look at the bigger picture of why are high quality students attracted away from careers in Aviation and towards business, finance & IT??
I did leave as I do now see entrepreneurism as a more attractive future.
I hope that UAS’s stay, mine did me very well. I wish that other students will be able to experience many of the opportunities which I have been so fortunate to receive.
But are they financially viable? (political persuasion just wont work, not in today’s climate)
I was on a University Air Squadron and left once the new changes took effect in November. I had an awesome time on my UAS, probably the best 2 years of my life.
Having said that, I think it's obvious that from now on it's all down hill. My biggest issue with the system is the fact that whilst students lose the pressure of 'flying' and EFT whilst at university; even more pressure is put on the senior students to make the squadrons run effectively, now that staff numbers will have dropped from about 6 to 1! Organsing activities, camps, sports, adventurous training; transport, town nights and the list goes on………….
As a senior student you’re likely to be in the last year at university- which often counts for the most towards your degree; consequently you want to do the best you can. Now that EFT does not exist, neither does the mentality of focus on flying (get good scores = streaming) and settle for a 2.2 (pilots degree). For those of us who are not Bursars and faced with the poor intake at OASC, we have no guarantee of a future with the RAF. Therefore attaining nothing less than a 2.1 becomes the new priority, and remaining on a UAS is no longer productive.
The changes for me illustrated here, on the UAS level the changes/downsizing future of the RAF. For me this has a negative impact. I just cant see the future that I originally envisioned a few years ago.
All you have to do is read the comments in the 'why are people leaving in droves' thread.
The UAS system will sadly be gone within the next few years - or redistributed amongst the other services; university naval units etc... It only survived the 2005 chop through the skin of it's teeth.
I cant see how the bean counters can justify the UAS system under the current climate. It is a great recruitment tool- but the RAF doesn’t need to recruit pilots- it will always have a steady flow of wannabes to it's doors without UAS's. What they need to do is focus more on the ground branches like engineers. They should never of changed the system in 1995.
Referring to the comments of students becoming attracted to other careers like airlines BA etc – very true. I’m very sure that current bursars are planning for a career change after 12/16 yrs! But I think ultimately you have to look at the bigger picture of why are high quality students attracted away from careers in Aviation and towards business, finance & IT??
I did leave as I do now see entrepreneurism as a more attractive future.
I hope that UAS’s stay, mine did me very well. I wish that other students will be able to experience many of the opportunities which I have been so fortunate to receive.
But are they financially viable? (political persuasion just wont work, not in today’s climate)
Re: UAS 's to close (Merged)
Originally Posted by jindabyne
Not wishing to open up another pointless chestnut or go off-thread, but I'd speculate that the Red Arrows are the 'cause' of more youngsters entering the RAF than UAS's.