Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Incidend during take off in Doha

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Incidend during take off in Doha

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Oct 2011, 08:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: london
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Incident during take off in Doha

I have just heard that one of the A306 F had serious incident during take off.
It looks like they have had engine fail before V1 and despite of that they took off??
Any more info please?

Last edited by bigdeal; 10th Oct 2011 at 13:55. Reason: speling
bigdeal is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 13:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they have had engine fail before V1 and despite of that they took off??
Well they possibly made a very good decision then.

V1 is the speed at which the first stopping action must be taken in an RTO... (it most certainly is NOT a decision speed)...

...so, if the failure occurred at 1-2 knots prior to V1 (depending on what certification standards you're dealing with) and there was not enough time to assess the damage then the correct decision was made. No?

Of course none of us know exactly what the circumstances are, so unless we're big-league quarterbacks with monday-morning ball practice let's just refrain from Kangaroo-courting our colleagues and show some respect?

MGC

Last edited by Mr Good Cat; 9th Oct 2011 at 13:30.
Mr Good Cat is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 16:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Well thats a big volcano...
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Cat, are you sure about that ?

"V1 is the speed at which the first stopping action must be taken in an RTO... (it most certainly is NOT a decision speed)..."

You missed a very key word there is your paraphrase " MAXIMUM ". If you put this word in there correctly you certainly have a decision to make at this point dont you ?



let me take the EASA definition as we are taking bus here, which is pretty much the same as the FAA anyways...

‘V1’ means the maximum speed in the take-off at which the pilot must take the first action (e.g. apply brakes, reduce thrust, deploy speed brakes) to stop the aeroplane within the accelerate-stop distance. V1 also means the minimum speed in the take-off, following a failure of the critical engine at VEF, at which the pilot can continue the take-off and achieve the required height above the take-off surface within the take-off distance.
itsbrokenagain is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 17:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Beach
Posts: 444
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Almost correct with V1 speed.

JAR certification gives a 2 second buffer or thinking time in which to start the process of stopping ie brakes/rev etc

FAA if I recall only allows 1 second, although that may have changed.

So if fire bell goes at exactly V1 the perf figures allow for 2 seconds in which to make your decision and start stopping , so you will go above V1 and the figures have an allowance built in for this. Not much thinking time I'll grant you but it's there.

It also explains why types certified under grandfather rights have "better" figures than new types.eg 737 has 1 sec , 320 or newer types have 2sec so worse performance on paper but in reality a fraction safer.
145qrh is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 18:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
145,

Yes, the calculations of V1 include this buffer, but that does not mean it should be used. We always have buffers built into the performance figures, but we then try and not eat into them.

You do not have one or two seconds after V1 to initiate an RTO. If it has not been initiated by V1, the takeoff should be continued unless the aircraft is unflyable.

MGC is correct in saying that a failure close to V1, with insufficient time to react and initiate an RTO before V1, should be taken into the air.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 20:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 31-43,000 feet ALL the friggin' time!
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thread Creep

What about the incident?
jeff748 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 03:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mars
Age: 44
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's the reason why many operators all over the world are using the "V1" callout 5 kts before the calculated V1.

Nice & safe flights!
GoAround_Flaps20 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 04:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uae
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What operators around the world are calling V1 early as SOP, I,m sure their regulators would like to know or other Regulators would as well. V1 is V1
fatbus is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 06:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MCO (occasionally)
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just curious, but what did the captain brief prior to takeoff regarding engine failure...
FrankR is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 09:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FAA is changing the definition of V1 Decision Speed into V1 Action Speed ... if you didn't start any actions (reject take-off maneuver) before V1, it is safer to threat whatever you have as an in-flight emergency!
Non Zero is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 09:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Doxa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe this is the old case which has happened one or two months ago.It was not typical engine failure, it was power lost at 80-90 kts.
Most probably we will learn about that situation in next flight safety bulletin.
devilavocado is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 15:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Milan
Age: 46
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any failure before V1 is a STOP or GO.
If they decided to continue take off still is a good and safe choice.
bettigio is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 18:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good grief ! What are they teaching you kids today. My present company SOP briefing could not be clearer. " Up to 80 kts I will CONSIDER stopping for anything. Between 80 & V1, I WILL stop ONLY for an Engine FIRE, FAILURE , Thrust reverser deploy or ANY other failure which affects the flying quality of the aircraft. Oh & yeah, nearly all of us are calling V1 at V1-5..............pretty bog standard throughout the industry. Question bubbles at or slightly before V1 really worries me.
Landflap is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 23:26
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: somewhere
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BETTIGIO...are u serious? ANY failure before V1 stop or go???

I think that "before V1 for eng fire, eng failure, or aircraft unable to fly the Aircraft must be STOPPED"....if other master caution it is for sure safer to continue..."


if they had an ENG FAILURE Before V1...even if there is not much time to UNDERSTAND WHAT KIND OF FAILURE u can understand that 1 eng has gone ..so ABORT t.off....

anyway as someone said who knows what conditions they ahd that they...
blusky75 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 08:40
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blusky 75, well said. One of the few on this thread who seems to know what he is talking about. 'Sittingidly' adopts his familiar attack frame of mind which worries me even more than the other contributers. "credibility" ? Good grief man. I wonder who are the Trolls and who are the Professionals and who are the Ameteurs. Be reminded, lots of people who are not pilots read these forums. I can see them reaching for the ticket cancellation option when reading some of this nonsense. For the real professional pilots out there, no need for reminding you what to do before V1 and what to do after V1. 'Sittingidly' , over to you for your customary English Language lessons, spell checks, off thread persuasion etc etc; Yawn Yawn !
Landflap is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 05:34
  #16 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...we are actually duped into the mindset of criticizing our fellow pilots before we even know the facts? Management really has won the battle, much to the detriment of flight safety.
Should be written in stone above the crew-room door.
Farrell is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 06:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Milan
Age: 46
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blusky 75: Yes I'm serious: "Any failure before V1 is a STOP or GO decision.
Now off course depending on the failure and the speed which may occur I will decide what to do.
I will reject for anything below 100 kts for sure, no doubt.
I will reject above 100 kts and before V1 only for severe malfunctions such as engine fire, engine failure, loss of control or anything I decide it's better to stay on ground.
Exactly at the V1 I will continue for sure, no matter what.
"An engine on fire still is an engine giving thrust"
Happy flights.
bettigio is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 07:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did they return ? after dumping fuel ? What was the title of this thread again ?

I love KIS, Keep It Simple, for the Bobby Drivers and as described lovely from a Colleague of mine who got accused to be a POW Veteran: Before 80 kts, between 80 kts and V1, before or at V1, the Criterias are outlined and cristal clear, after V1. The Bus Drivers hear 100 kts and next call is V1.... clear shot as well.

There is no time / space for personal preference as V1 -5 or other hobbies when it comes to the distance / speed / time critical subject.

In real life when the day comes why you are paid for and you stop on the paved surface after the bell rings, (better to hear after listening to the CVR), determination and conclusion would be: Good Boy / Girl, you end up with the Nose Wheel in the Mud: Bad Boy / Girl.

Never think your Fleet Manager, Chief Pilot or other Desk Fliers will protect you because of skidded over a Banana Leaf or something else, fact is you are in the Spot Light and you create a shadow. You have to face uncomfortable questions and also accusations. Suddenly you are the only one who then realises that you are on your own and defense is not that easy done in such cases. You have had a "split second" to decide, the Desk Flier has hours, even day´s, to read and repeat the action that should have been taken and if it is not the same you have choosen in the split second you have to face the cold wind first.

Remember if, God forbidd, you ever have such an event: Everything you state afterwards can and WILL be used against you, from all involved. The Manufacturer will not take any responsibility if he can avoid that. The Airline will not take the blame either, the Insurance Company is also interested to find if they can send the Bill off to the Airport maybe and finaly the Authority is happy to put the blame on someone else then themselves. So be aware that the "bad card" is handed around and the last in the chain got bitten.

Fly safe and land happy

NG
B737NG is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 08:08
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737NG, terrific post. My faith, slowly being restored. And those of us who do not fly "the bus"....geees, what is that (?) the number 31 to Hammersmith ? According to one, we are irrelevent. We do not get that auto call on my Boeing so, I would say, everything helps. V1-5 is a real concentrator for me. "Bettigio", my hero training Captain at Seattle once reminded me that a jet engine is ALWAYS on fire..............c'mon, relaxed me a little. Safe flying chaps.
Landflap is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 20:12
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: somewhere in the sky
Age: 54
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Complicate the uncomplicated

I would have been absolutely pleased of this discussion if this thread was based on FACTS from the incident that has happened during that particular day and that particular flight from Doha! But with all my respect to the contributors here, you just don't know what were the events that have led to the crew decision!

I'm sure that many of you here are speaking out based on the superior knowledge and superior skills as superior pilots. But how relevant is that if you cannot construct the factors together and come up with a definite conclusion?

What is shocking though, is to see the great variation in opinions about handling RTO,s and making the Go/No-Go decision!
WELCO is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.