The 160 knot thread
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UAE
Age: 63
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my hands are tied
***Finally you, me, the cleaners and caterers all know the benefit of having closer holds, but it hasn't quite seeped thru to GCAA yet.***
I have only been in UAE a short while, so I'll let Air No services take up the cudgels on this...but to all the other pilots out there, you get pushed down so that the UAE controllers have a fighting chance to get you down into the hold. DESDI is after all only about 40 miles from touch on 12.
We simply can't have you guys slowly wandering down in the hold from FL350 and have you expect to get ahead of the guy below you in the pattern...West sector can only hav 6 in the hold, North overlies this and also has sector capacities that regularly are exceeded.
When that occurs, some are taken over to BUBIN and some are held out of UAE airspace.
With Dubai apporach regularly asking for more than the agreed 20nm (yes, that's right sportsfans 20nm in trail between 1730 and 2230) the holds fill up pretty quickly AND take a long time to clear.
So if yo go back a place in the sequence because you won't descend fast enough, every spot back is at least 20nm extra.
We in the UAE are TOLD what spacing to give...so can you save your grumbling for when you arrive on 124.9? thanks
I have only been in UAE a short while, so I'll let Air No services take up the cudgels on this...but to all the other pilots out there, you get pushed down so that the UAE controllers have a fighting chance to get you down into the hold. DESDI is after all only about 40 miles from touch on 12.
We simply can't have you guys slowly wandering down in the hold from FL350 and have you expect to get ahead of the guy below you in the pattern...West sector can only hav 6 in the hold, North overlies this and also has sector capacities that regularly are exceeded.
When that occurs, some are taken over to BUBIN and some are held out of UAE airspace.
With Dubai apporach regularly asking for more than the agreed 20nm (yes, that's right sportsfans 20nm in trail between 1730 and 2230) the holds fill up pretty quickly AND take a long time to clear.
So if yo go back a place in the sequence because you won't descend fast enough, every spot back is at least 20nm extra.
We in the UAE are TOLD what spacing to give...so can you save your grumbling for when you arrive on 124.9? thanks
Must be about that time when we mention what a great idea it would be for DXB app to controll the holds at Bub and Desdi. 
Maybe Santa might bring it for Christmas
Don
Maybe Santa might bring it for Christmas
Don
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not sure now
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Point is if we say 160, it's because that's what the guy ahead is doing, and tower is busy puckering their sphinxter to get a departure off in between. So if u could be so bothered please, feel free to use airbrakes, flaps, landing gear, parachutes, hands out of open windows, whatever slows u down, your choice, we're easy, but if u get too close to the guy ahead, you're going to go around, and not only you, but also add a couple of laps to your good friends doing gulf sightseeing tours at Desdi and Bubin
As an Approach Controller in DXB, I usually finish my understaffed 9 hour midnight shift, and rush home to firstly compute minimum clean speeds for not only 777-300, but also IL76's, F50's and even the odd PA28, from any point within 20 miles of Dubai, all dependent on their weight of course. I then (this is before I get sleeping mind you)
I'm hoping this thread can help both sides. Please be aware of some of our limitations and help us out when you can. If we say min clean speed is 227 then that means 187 and 167 will be a lot more acceptable to us than 180 and 160. Also this thread may make quite a few guys think twice before accepting a speed they don't intend to fly. That will make your life easier in the long run.
Typhoonpilot
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could the mod turn this thread into a poll on who would or would not like to see close in holding introduced?
Maybe some brave young ATCO down in AUH could then show the Great Dane the result. Let me be the first to vote.
Yes please.
I'd suggest a new thread, started as a poll - please feel free to launch it. 4HP
Maybe some brave young ATCO down in AUH could then show the Great Dane the result. Let me be the first to vote.
Yes please.
I'd suggest a new thread, started as a poll - please feel free to launch it. 4HP
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 24 27 45.66N 54 22 42.28E
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok one thing at a time. To the guy complaining about getting "pushed" down to be FL270 20 NM Nth of ORSAR. Have a chat to some A330 pilots at your airline who are complaining about being held up at FL270 20 NM nth of ORSAR. If we let everyone fly their own profile we would have Emirates A330's dragging their belly at 10 thousand 60 NM from touchdown while the 767 behind is FL250 70 NM from touchdown. You guys ever tried to hold your spacing with 15,000 ft difference in the height, and subsequently about 120 KT's difference in ground speed. Second big consideration in getting you maintaining 20 NM nth of ORSAR is cos Tehran has a history of assigning to aircraft on top of each other both descent and "inshallah" it will work. They then hand the S**T fight over to us with no separation. If you doubt it ask some of your fellow pilots who have first hand been on the recieving end of Tehran when they have "lost the plot". Because of this history we require all aircraft to or from Tehran to be in level flight maintaining a vertically separated standard level. It may cost you extra fuel, but whats the cost of the alternative?
Now onto the one about Dubai controlling the hold. First off for them to control the hold wouldn't they first have to actually look out that far??? Look they are welcome to have the hold but the fact that some nights the hold is up to FL300 and mixing with the overflyers may make that a little difficult. If you have a problem with how we manage the hold you tell us please. Currently we get told by Dubai what spacing they require. We hold you to achieve that spacing. We hand the aircraft off spaced by that amount. Now if Dubai know better when to bring aircraft out of the hold, maybe they could enlighten us and we could do it. As I said though Dubai is more than welcome to take our holds, but how that would help, I'm not sure, and I'm not sure they actually want the hold.
Finally about flying 169 KT's when told to fly 160 KT's. If someone flys 259 Kt's when I have told them to fly 250 Kt's and due to this 9 Kt's closing I lose my spacing, I won't care, but the guy "cheating" will be given vectors at best, and holds at worst. It's their choice. Easier all round to tell us you can't do it, and we will see what we can do.
Anyway sorry for the thread creep, back to 160 KT's on final.
Now onto the one about Dubai controlling the hold. First off for them to control the hold wouldn't they first have to actually look out that far??? Look they are welcome to have the hold but the fact that some nights the hold is up to FL300 and mixing with the overflyers may make that a little difficult. If you have a problem with how we manage the hold you tell us please. Currently we get told by Dubai what spacing they require. We hold you to achieve that spacing. We hand the aircraft off spaced by that amount. Now if Dubai know better when to bring aircraft out of the hold, maybe they could enlighten us and we could do it. As I said though Dubai is more than welcome to take our holds, but how that would help, I'm not sure, and I'm not sure they actually want the hold.
Finally about flying 169 KT's when told to fly 160 KT's. If someone flys 259 Kt's when I have told them to fly 250 Kt's and due to this 9 Kt's closing I lose my spacing, I won't care, but the guy "cheating" will be given vectors at best, and holds at worst. It's their choice. Easier all round to tell us you can't do it, and we will see what we can do.
Anyway sorry for the thread creep, back to 160 KT's on final.
I was hoping that if DXB controlled the holds we could avoid the slow cross country zig zag journey that we follow from the hold to the runway. Seems its not to be.
Don
Don
Guest
Posts: n/a
other airspaces have to deal with different aircraft types aswell and even 330'ies can fly 3deg paths with adequately trained jockeys and appropriate sop's. so that's not the problem.
it's basically about control and coordination. as long as three to five proud acc's mingle in a airspace of suitable size for only one, nothing will improve. especially if one neighbour, signing the paycheck of the big viking, enjoys spoiling the party of it's hated northern competitor.
the only viable solution would be one control for the uae. but as the probability to this happening is as high as ey and ek will ever join forces, we'll keep on enjoying the local rivalry from the cyclone over sheik zayed road right down to desdi.
keep it safe
ttn
it's basically about control and coordination. as long as three to five proud acc's mingle in a airspace of suitable size for only one, nothing will improve. especially if one neighbour, signing the paycheck of the big viking, enjoys spoiling the party of it's hated northern competitor.
the only viable solution would be one control for the uae. but as the probability to this happening is as high as ey and ek will ever join forces, we'll keep on enjoying the local rivalry from the cyclone over sheik zayed road right down to desdi.
keep it safe
ttn
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Land of Red Light Tulips (NOT!!)
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry boys, didn't mean to be a beeyatch last night, but when I read,
"The problem is thus: A Boeing 777-300 at max landing weight ( which is what we often arrive at ) has a min clean speed of 229 knots; flaps 5 speed of 189 knots; and flaps 15/20 speed of 169 knots."
I just kinda lost it... U can imagine all us controllers this morning by the water cooler (we can actually afford one of those) saying "Awww poor guy had to take out landing gear". But know this, we (ATC) do kinda understand what you guys have to go thru, and MOST of us, try to give reasonable clearances, with the expectation that if you can't do it, you'll tell us.
I came from YVR, where we had 170 to 4 miles, and it worked like a peach, but it was at an airport that was designed to handle more then 3 jets and a helicopter at any given time. Coming here was definitely my version of S&M. DXB is not able to handle any moderate levels of traffic right now, when it gets busy, we have to bring everything to a grinding halt, we have no choice.
When it's busy, and we should be getting more expeditious, all our procedures handcuff us. If someone up in mgmtville said something like "no departures for the next 60 minutes" we could then open up director, and pack arrivals in 3 - 4 miles apart and completely eliminate the need for UAE to hold most of u guys. But the second you make the tower have to blend in the 8 guys taxiing for departure, that's it, it becomes a gong show... and it happens every night, all night.
The worst part of it all, is when you try to be expeditious, if you have any sort of screw up, you're given a minimum 6 day "Walk in Zabeel Park" (a.k.a "Retraining"). TPilot, Imagine u do 169 kts instead of 160 and when u park your 777-300 there's someone with a clipboard waiting, who has been watching u, and he escorts u for your 60 lashings in front of all your friends.
Yup, there are so many different people here with good, valid, workable ideas, but it makes no difference...
So what can I personally do? I will try to give 9 miles, for u 777 boys, to do 170 to 4, but know that there will be times where I can't. I successfully gave a hold at the SHJ VOR to a GXA until the weather in SHJ cleared this morning, and he almost did it, so I now believe I can do anything in this world... even land my 777 at DXB on Simulator 95, while ling ling and Zsa Zsa ask me where I got that crazy captians hat...
See ya!
"The problem is thus: A Boeing 777-300 at max landing weight ( which is what we often arrive at ) has a min clean speed of 229 knots; flaps 5 speed of 189 knots; and flaps 15/20 speed of 169 knots."
I just kinda lost it... U can imagine all us controllers this morning by the water cooler (we can actually afford one of those) saying "Awww poor guy had to take out landing gear". But know this, we (ATC) do kinda understand what you guys have to go thru, and MOST of us, try to give reasonable clearances, with the expectation that if you can't do it, you'll tell us.
I came from YVR, where we had 170 to 4 miles, and it worked like a peach, but it was at an airport that was designed to handle more then 3 jets and a helicopter at any given time. Coming here was definitely my version of S&M. DXB is not able to handle any moderate levels of traffic right now, when it gets busy, we have to bring everything to a grinding halt, we have no choice.
When it's busy, and we should be getting more expeditious, all our procedures handcuff us. If someone up in mgmtville said something like "no departures for the next 60 minutes" we could then open up director, and pack arrivals in 3 - 4 miles apart and completely eliminate the need for UAE to hold most of u guys. But the second you make the tower have to blend in the 8 guys taxiing for departure, that's it, it becomes a gong show... and it happens every night, all night.
The worst part of it all, is when you try to be expeditious, if you have any sort of screw up, you're given a minimum 6 day "Walk in Zabeel Park" (a.k.a "Retraining"). TPilot, Imagine u do 169 kts instead of 160 and when u park your 777-300 there's someone with a clipboard waiting, who has been watching u, and he escorts u for your 60 lashings in front of all your friends.
Yup, there are so many different people here with good, valid, workable ideas, but it makes no difference...
So what can I personally do? I will try to give 9 miles, for u 777 boys, to do 170 to 4, but know that there will be times where I can't. I successfully gave a hold at the SHJ VOR to a GXA until the weather in SHJ cleared this morning, and he almost did it, so I now believe I can do anything in this world... even land my 777 at DXB on Simulator 95, while ling ling and Zsa Zsa ask me where I got that crazy captians hat...
See ya!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dubai
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
while ling ling and Zsa Zsa ask me where I got that crazy captians hat...
Thought you were claiming to be impoverished.....
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As an end user, I don't give a rotund rodent's rectum who is the provider of that service. I'd just like whomever that provider is to give me something closer to the service I receive in most other places I take my bosses' big while shiny jet to.
The current holding patterns for Dubai are simply too far away from the airfield, and the cross country marathons we are asked to undertake after leaving the holds (or do instead of entering the holds) gobble up too much fuel. This is not necessarily because of the length of the post holding (or instead of holding) vectoring, but moreso because of the frequent level offs required and the too early reductions in speed to below 230 knots that are all too often required of us.
It will come as no surprise to most ATCOs reading this thread that EK pilots have come under some perssure recently to reduce unnecessary fuel uplift to a minimum. This has resulted in most EK pilots having very little fuel to play with on arrival into Dubai, and with the stop-start descents and slow down/go faster speed control we so often experience after leaving Dubai's far away holds, it's simply not possible to calculate with any degree of accuracy how much we're going to burn to touchdown. I'm sure I'm not the only one who allows for a far higher fuel burn ex the hold in Dubai than for any other port in our network.
The current holding patterns for Dubai are simply too far away from the airfield, and the cross country marathons we are asked to undertake after leaving the holds (or do instead of entering the holds) gobble up too much fuel. This is not necessarily because of the length of the post holding (or instead of holding) vectoring, but moreso because of the frequent level offs required and the too early reductions in speed to below 230 knots that are all too often required of us.
It will come as no surprise to most ATCOs reading this thread that EK pilots have come under some perssure recently to reduce unnecessary fuel uplift to a minimum. This has resulted in most EK pilots having very little fuel to play with on arrival into Dubai, and with the stop-start descents and slow down/go faster speed control we so often experience after leaving Dubai's far away holds, it's simply not possible to calculate with any degree of accuracy how much we're going to burn to touchdown. I'm sure I'm not the only one who allows for a far higher fuel burn ex the hold in Dubai than for any other port in our network.
Last edited by Wiley; 16th Sep 2006 at 05:13. Reason: ungarbling my garbled Engluush
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: T.C.
Age: 56
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great thread, and the usual stuff about speeds and holds. Just left dubai and back working at the busy single runway place in the south east of England. a pleasure to have control of the holds 20 miles from the airport, be able to do CDA's and control aircraft that comply with speeds on final approach!!!
However if you ask, we in ATC are flexible enough to accommodate, as are the ATCO's in Dubai. However have as Futre Kofe shop dweller stated very amusingly, Dubai is totally under staffed and are working (as we all know), with totally crap procedures.
Not had any requests from Emirates regarding speeds into EGKK yet, why?
However if you ask, we in ATC are flexible enough to accommodate, as are the ATCO's in Dubai. However have as Futre Kofe shop dweller stated very amusingly, Dubai is totally under staffed and are working (as we all know), with totally crap procedures.
Not had any requests from Emirates regarding speeds into EGKK yet, why?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dubai
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not had any requests from Emirates regarding speeds into EGKK yet, why?
What really impresses me about EGKK is that even when things go slightly wrong (which is not often) the controllers maintain their calm demeanor and just sort it out. None of the over excitable nonsense we experience on a daily basis elsewhere.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Airplane
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Holding, if I had to choose. The current procedures are better. Why you ask.
Because of the distance from the airfield we are able to hold at a higher altitude which if I remember correctly is more efficient.
It almost always leads to a continuous descent while holding which is in my opinion more efficient.
If holding for a time that exceeds my fuel requirements I can divert to an alternate airfield without having to use more fuel to climb to a suitable altitude, again more efficient.
If I do have to divert it it more likely that i will get a more direct routing. If the hold is close to Dubai fuel will be burned having to exit the complex airspace and no doubt a continuous climb to altitude would be interrupted on the way to the alternate. At desdi an almost direct route to auh with continuous descent is likely. From Bubin the same could be said for Muscat or others.
I'm not sure but i think the holding airspace is larger then it would be in close thus allowing more flexibility for extended outbound legs which is more efficient.
Don't change it.
7
Because of the distance from the airfield we are able to hold at a higher altitude which if I remember correctly is more efficient.
It almost always leads to a continuous descent while holding which is in my opinion more efficient.
If holding for a time that exceeds my fuel requirements I can divert to an alternate airfield without having to use more fuel to climb to a suitable altitude, again more efficient.
If I do have to divert it it more likely that i will get a more direct routing. If the hold is close to Dubai fuel will be burned having to exit the complex airspace and no doubt a continuous climb to altitude would be interrupted on the way to the alternate. At desdi an almost direct route to auh with continuous descent is likely. From Bubin the same could be said for Muscat or others.
I'm not sure but i think the holding airspace is larger then it would be in close thus allowing more flexibility for extended outbound legs which is more efficient.
Don't change it.
7
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hotels everywhere
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Classic - I always - (even in my most self involved moments; fyndraai and final approach usually )- knew that ATC 's were people with a sense of humour and more than just ME on their radar. Now its confirmed!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SSE of smoki
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Airbus 757,
holding at high altitude makes very little difference to the fuel flow in the Boeing 777.
As an example, in a B773 at a weight of 220 tons:
At 1500 ft the fuel flow is 6640 kg per hour, or 111 kg per minute.
At 30 000 ft the fuel flow is 6460 kg per hour or 108 per minute.
20 000 ft seems a good average, with a fuel flow of 6180 kgs per hour or 103 kg per minute.
Rgds.
holding at high altitude makes very little difference to the fuel flow in the Boeing 777.
As an example, in a B773 at a weight of 220 tons:
At 1500 ft the fuel flow is 6640 kg per hour, or 111 kg per minute.
At 30 000 ft the fuel flow is 6460 kg per hour or 108 per minute.
20 000 ft seems a good average, with a fuel flow of 6180 kgs per hour or 103 kg per minute.
Rgds.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I frequently arrive at major airfields such as DBX,AMS,LHR etc. at a landing weight of approx. 300 tonnes, which if using Flaps 25, requires a Vref of 164kts (+5, =approach speed of 169 kts). I always inform ATC approach on 1st contact with my minimum speed to touchdown of 170 kts and have never had a problem. If you need a higher speed than 160 kts, why not inform ATC as early as possible, about your requirements? They're nice people, really!