Ptc Irl Skills Assessment
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N.Ireland
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ptc Irl Skills Assessment
Hi Guys,
I have a place booked to complete a skills assessment course with PTC IRL In Waterford on Sept 3rd 2008. I'm worrying about it as i know i may only have one chance to impress.
There are two parts, the first is PILAPT Computer based skills test and the second is a flight assessment. I have requested information form the college but without reply.
Can anyone give me some details on the assessment parts? has anyone completed it? what kind of preperation can i do to perpare for the assessment if any.
Thanks for all your help,
Kevin
I have a place booked to complete a skills assessment course with PTC IRL In Waterford on Sept 3rd 2008. I'm worrying about it as i know i may only have one chance to impress.
There are two parts, the first is PILAPT Computer based skills test and the second is a flight assessment. I have requested information form the college but without reply.
Can anyone give me some details on the assessment parts? has anyone completed it? what kind of preperation can i do to perpare for the assessment if any.
Thanks for all your help,
Kevin
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have requested information from the college but without reply.
And, just one thing, makes two of us now. Looks like they arn't interested in training Professional pilots.
Keep away, and train elsewhere.
G-XO
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: somewhere
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm worrying about it as i know i may only have one chance to impress.
It takes a lot less than what you might think to get over that "test".
I would not hand over my hard earned cash if a training school did not reply to my questions
DK
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pilot assessment tests in flight schools are a racket. They are merely window dressing to lure in naive young candidates who don't realise that the real test is whether or not you have enough money to pay for it. It is an attempt to give the impression that their school only take the best students. You will of course be in that category.
At one school I know they introduced a test. When I asked why, the answer was that enquiring students or their parents would often ask for one, the other schools had one and it was the easiest money you could make.
They're not real tests, merely a sales pitch. I'm not picking on PTC here. It's the same with them all. Oxford Aviation academy do have a comprehensive two day skills test. Compare that to other so called skill tests. But even the Oxford only require it for their integrated program and frankly in my opinion it's as much to do with maintaining their reputation for producing good pilots than anything do do with your ability.
They are just a waste of money, don't bother with them, save it for the real training.
At one school I know they introduced a test. When I asked why, the answer was that enquiring students or their parents would often ask for one, the other schools had one and it was the easiest money you could make.
They're not real tests, merely a sales pitch. I'm not picking on PTC here. It's the same with them all. Oxford Aviation academy do have a comprehensive two day skills test. Compare that to other so called skill tests. But even the Oxford only require it for their integrated program and frankly in my opinion it's as much to do with maintaining their reputation for producing good pilots than anything do do with your ability.
They are just a waste of money, don't bother with them, save it for the real training.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N.Ireland
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all your help lads
Cheer's everyone for replying. You have all given me some good things to think about. I bought a few books from amazon which hopefully should give me some more good tips. Fingers crossed everything goes well.
From your replys, it seems so pointless though that i am made pay 300 Euro or £240 for a test that i really dont need to do. Apparently the college will not accept anyone who has not completed one of these "Skills Assessment Days". What an easy money earner for the college but agian pointless for the individual
From your replys, it seems so pointless though that i am made pay 300 Euro or £240 for a test that i really dont need to do. Apparently the college will not accept anyone who has not completed one of these "Skills Assessment Days". What an easy money earner for the college but agian pointless for the individual
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N.Ireland
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't get me wrong there is no way i'm going to rush into giving my hard cash away!
Off topic as requested, i have been based in Belfast in University for the last 4 years but now back home in Newry, Co.Down, but i'm an Armagh man through and through!
Off topic as requested, i have been based in Belfast in University for the last 4 years but now back home in Newry, Co.Down, but i'm an Armagh man through and through!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Putney
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FTOs
I can't tell you which FTO is best but I do know that airlines, generally, prefer pilots who come through the integrated route. Saving money here and there by doing bits of training in different schools might sound good, but it doesn't impress airlines. Good FTOs defend their reputations by having a taut selection system which includes PILAPT or COMPASS or similar. Airlines know that and go with it. You can challenge the system all you like, but if you want to get in, you've got to go with it, at least until you become the CP or HoT and can make a change. If you pass the selection procedure with OAC or FTE or CTC or PTC or whatever, at least you know you should get a return on your Euros97,000 or £Sterling 70,000. If you head off down the cheapo route, you can't be sure of anything.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: the moon
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FTO assesments are garbage, all they care about is whether or not you have a cheque for around 100k in your back pocket.
You cant tell if someone has an aptitude to be a pilot or not by some ****ty computer test followed by 30 mins in a cessna. Get real, you cannot assess whether someone has an aptitude for flying or not until around 20 hours into PPL training. Which is why i always reccommend that people get a PPL first before deciding whether or not to go after a cpl/ir.
You cant tell if someone has an aptitude to be a pilot or not by some ****ty computer test followed by 30 mins in a cessna. Get real, you cannot assess whether someone has an aptitude for flying or not until around 20 hours into PPL training. Which is why i always reccommend that people get a PPL first before deciding whether or not to go after a cpl/ir.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: somewhere
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't tell you which FTO is best but I do know that airlines, generally, prefer pilots who come through the integrated route
Have you experienced both sides of the coin? Have you tried to apply to airlines with 2 different sets of CV, one as Integrated and one as Modular Trained Pilot and failed or passed in any of them?
I' ve trained in the cheapest modular way and to make matter worse I did it across the pond in the wrong time (B4 9/11) and...got 4 (four) interviews both with airlines (including FR) and GA operators. I was NEVER asked where/how I trained...
If you pass the selection procedure with OAC or FTE or CTC or PTC or whatever, at least you know you should get a return on your Euros97,000 or £Sterling 70,000. If you head off down the cheap route, you can't be sure of anything.
Again...RUBBISH. Quite often the small prints say "...MIGHT be offered a job INTERVIEW with such airline..." but getting your butt on that seat is a different story...
Wake up kids!
DK
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Putney
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aptitude and Training
I'm sure you folk know best. However, believe it or not, aptitude tests have been carefully scrutinised by independent bodies and have been found to be one of the tools that can assist in the pilot selection process; written tests, psychometric analysis, group exercises and interviews are others. I know of 3 well known airlines that will only take low hours candidates from integrated course cadet programmes or from approved FTOs on the specific recommendation of the HoT. By all means get a PPL before entering professional training, it's fun and gives you some idea of your potential. Beyond that, look at the airline employment statistics for the path you next follow. If you go down the modular route, you are more likely to have to move into FI or air taxi work before being considered by an airline. There are no guarantees with an integrated course, but more people seem to get taken on by airlines from those courses than from elsewhere. Right now, there is no shortage of low hours applicants to airlines. So, airlines will pick and choose to get what they believe to be the best recruits. Nothing new there and few signs of change over the next few years, I would have thought.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Every place but home
Age: 47
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have done the apt test at PTC in July and am starting the Flybe mentored pilot scheme in October. I already hold a PPL. The tests are striaght forward, and there is nothing you can really practice, you can either do them or you can't! Go on to google and put pilot apt in and you will see two or three web sites that offer similar tests to what you will be doing. www.pilotaptitude.com This is a good site, and just to put my two penneth in I believe that testing is a good way of seeing weather you have the ability to do the job before you hand over a serious wod of cash.
Anyway hope it helps and good luck, and i might see you there.
Anyway hope it helps and good luck, and i might see you there.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh dear another integrated vs. modular debate. Lets try and put this one to bed as quickly as possible with a few facts.
There is only 1 major airline in the UK and Ireland that only takes low hour pilots from an integrated course. Its called BA. Every other airline has taken modular low houred students AS WELL AS integrated.
The majority of integrated students from Oxford are however NOT going to BA. They are going to FR. That means they are paying whatever an integrated course costs plus funding a 737 type rating on top.
Aer Lingus, Aer Arran, Air Southwest, BMI, FR, Thomson, Flybe (I could list them all but I can't be bothered typing) have all taken modular students over the past 5 years or so that I have been following the industry.
You can do the maths yourselves as to whether an integrated course or the modular way is cheaper or not. You can also read the thousands of threads on pprune over the years and see the myriad of different ways in which people like myself have gotten jobs.
The only advantage that I see an integrated course offers is if your heart is set on going around the Bovingdon hold. If thats the case then you will need to be in the top of your class AND be lucky enough to graduate at a time when BA are recruiting AND of course be referred by your instructors. Then there is the small matter of a few entry tests to pass.
If you have the cash to burn then feel free to throw it at an integrated course. Please don't go there (or come on here for that matter) thinking that you will be guaranteed a job because you stand no better or worse chance of getting a job than someone that has gone modular. And if you go integrated thinking that you will get BA then you must be feeling lucky in which case I would suggest buying a lottery ticket as well.
There is only 1 major airline in the UK and Ireland that only takes low hour pilots from an integrated course. Its called BA. Every other airline has taken modular low houred students AS WELL AS integrated.
The majority of integrated students from Oxford are however NOT going to BA. They are going to FR. That means they are paying whatever an integrated course costs plus funding a 737 type rating on top.
Aer Lingus, Aer Arran, Air Southwest, BMI, FR, Thomson, Flybe (I could list them all but I can't be bothered typing) have all taken modular students over the past 5 years or so that I have been following the industry.
You can do the maths yourselves as to whether an integrated course or the modular way is cheaper or not. You can also read the thousands of threads on pprune over the years and see the myriad of different ways in which people like myself have gotten jobs.
The only advantage that I see an integrated course offers is if your heart is set on going around the Bovingdon hold. If thats the case then you will need to be in the top of your class AND be lucky enough to graduate at a time when BA are recruiting AND of course be referred by your instructors. Then there is the small matter of a few entry tests to pass.
If you have the cash to burn then feel free to throw it at an integrated course. Please don't go there (or come on here for that matter) thinking that you will be guaranteed a job because you stand no better or worse chance of getting a job than someone that has gone modular. And if you go integrated thinking that you will get BA then you must be feeling lucky in which case I would suggest buying a lottery ticket as well.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fegan, I think the gist of all the comments is not to worry about the 'tests'. You will pass. Everyone does. It's not like the OAA tests or the RAF or something like that. It's more of a marketing exercise than a test.