Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

The Great PO/5Y Debate

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

The Great PO/5Y Debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2007, 17:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Pathetic PO/5Y Debate

Thought this would be a fresh header for discussion / info on soon upcoming Polar arbitration .

Last edited by L-38; 2nd Dec 2007 at 14:53.
L-38 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2007, 17:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Navarre
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's hope it doesn't denigrate into personal attacks. Thanks for starting the thread
layinlow is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2007, 18:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which one, don't you guys have half a dozen or so on going?
WhaleDriver is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2007, 18:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Navarre
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which is exactly why I wrote what I did.
layinlow is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2007, 23:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How soon until we hear something from this weeks arbitration?
iahtexan747400 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2007, 19:59
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably not until the Merc somehow gets around to posting the transcripts of it's ruling.
L-38 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 02:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kind of funny how Polar guys have to rely on an Atlas guy to give them information they should know about from their own elected MEC.

That say's a lot about the Polar MEC coming from a Polar guy.
mercpc9 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 18:42
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please Merc - For now, stow your dagger as no slight of Polar was intended.

The MEC usually has reasons for their confidentiality, however for situation info, you seem to have historic librarian skills. . . . "any port in a storm" applies.

Metaphorically, we all feed from the same nipple - right?

Last edited by L-38; 28th Oct 2007 at 20:38.
L-38 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 00:24
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Navarre
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Polar MEC doesn't put anything out until something is final. No sense flapping the gums needlessly.
I did received a letter from ALPA though on the suit brought concerning the unauthorized scab list. Everything stated in the letter I agree with. Whoever put the list out should be hung by the short hairs. The thing is, I am very, very sure the MEC had nothing to do with it. Maybe it will comes out in the hearing. You may not thin much of Bobb or Robin but they are not that dumb.
layinlow is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 08:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nevada
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arbitration

The federal court ordered hearing was heard by the arbitrator last week. This is the arbitration which will decide if the company has the right to expedite a grievance. The arbitrator requested briefs from both parties. He advised that his next available date to continue this arbitration will be sometime in the spring.

The remaining two arbitrations are scheduled for the 30th and the 5th.

It will be interesting to hear what comes of the investigation into the the alleged scab list posting. From what I read in the ALPA mailing, the two neutrals will investigate all aspects of the list. Not only if it was published wrongly and by who, but also whether or not there is any validity to the list. I guess it could be said that some might regret what they wished for...
LANCERDVR is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 13:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Navarre
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tend to agree with you on that note. I was going to mention one section of the letter that give relief from anyone who acted in violation of ALPA's strike policies, but elected not to do so But since you brought it up; I found that sentence puzzling since no one did anything contrary to ALPA's strike policy.
Personally, it is all water under the bridge and there are a lot bigger fish to fry. This arbitration is step one. I could care less what happened in the past. There are a lot of good people out there getting hosed by AAWH management (not Atlas crews) and my only concern is that everyone wins with the exception of Cato
layinlow is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 14:03
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: US
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The thing is, I am very, very sure the MEC had nothing to do with it. Maybe it will comes out in the hearing. You may not thin much of Bobb or Robin but they are not that dumb.
Funny how the PPRNUNE scab list was published, including birth days, within a day of those birthdays being transmitted to the Polar MEC by the company. Coincidence? I think NOT! ONe person on that list, was told by a Polaroid who should know, that he was placed on the list because he "drove by the Pickett line in Anchorage, and flashed them the bird."
WhaleFR8 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 15:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Purchase, N.Y.
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
“There are a lot of good people out there getting hosed by AAWH management (not Atlas crews) and my only concern is that everyone wins with the exception of Cato.”
What has Mr. Cato ever done to you that would elicit these remarks?
Christian Polyp is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 15:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Navarre
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not going to get into a discussion over who did what. As far as I m concerned, it doesn't make a whit. Let's just cool it and wait until a ruling is made. OK?
Then, and only then can comments be posted concerning this lawsuit.
layinlow is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 15:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whale

If your are so sure Bobb and Robin (and others) did what you insinuate they did...why sign off on ALPAs' Special Hearing alternative? Originally you were already counting your $500K...weren't you?

You are just as guilty of preconvicting(?) on circumstantial evidence as the scumbag who circulated the PPrune list.
cptvac is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 20:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ouch!!!!!!!!!!!11
trashhauler is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2007, 21:29
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cptvac
Whale

If your are so sure Bobb and Robin (and others) did what you insinuate they did...why sign off on ALPAs' Special Hearing alternative? Originally you were already counting your $500K...weren't you?

You are just as guilty of preconvicting(?) on circumstantial evidence as the scumbag who circulated the PPrune list.
I think once ALPA National found out that they had to represent Bobb and the rest in the civil lawsuit for inappropriately releasing their list, they started looking for alternatives. Since all of the ones that had control of the list don't have any real money, judgments against their estates would probably be the best that they would get. A lot of money to be spent with no real payout in the end for those falsely accused by those controlling the list.

So the Special Hearing Alternative came to being instead of the civil suit. Even though there were no scabs and still are none. ALPA Nationals original limp d!@k approach to the original Article VIII just made things worse inducing this latest event to clear the names of those Atlas crews wrongly accused by Polar.

ALPA dropping the Article VIII's

mercpc9 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2007, 00:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm confused. The letter you posted is dated over a year ago, and I see no where that it absolved anyone of anything. It just states that ALPA is dodging the issue due to the fact that the APLA MEC filed the grievances too late, not that the investigation showed no violations. Forgive me if I am wrong, but would opening up the can of worms all over again, maybe show some skullduggery? If I remember correctly you guys wanted a lot of money from the Polar MEC, now you don't. What gives?
Sometimes it is better to let sleeping dogs lie. At any rate, I hope find out who did the dastardly deed.
trashhauler is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2007, 00:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nevada
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
arbitration

Not only to find out who did the deed, but also to find out which, if any, of those on the list actually scabbed! I understand a lot of Polar freight moved during the strike, so who moved it? I guess we shall finally find out.
LANCERDVR is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2007, 11:39
  #20 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Close to FACT
Age: 55
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scabs

Don't go there.
CR2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.