Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Cargolux details requested!

Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Cargolux details requested!

Old 13th Apr 2017, 19:30
  #1381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Moon
Posts: 32
@indrapoera
@cliff second
@intrance

Thanks guys for the support.
As always, pinch of salt is a must with these replies.
Whatever hawk, final or anyone says is never taken to heart anyway.
Still got the job, still going to fly.

Besides, mommy and daddy pay for my rent, my car and all my bills. Flying the 747 is just for fun. I can't wait for the warm welcome, I'll record it with my go pro so I can cherish the moment.

I'm done now, I'll be lurking in the background until something useful or interesting is said.

Peace
Aeroshizzle is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2017, 23:34
  #1382 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: On the road
Posts: 163
Originally Posted by final06 View Post
How nice for you.

Ha ha made me laugh, fair play. I'll admit does read like that.

Originally Posted by final06 View Post

By the nonsense you are writing it is pretty obvious that you are not flying for CLX and thus don't understand the complexity of our operation.

Why do you (and a few others) try to put us in the "old man bad attitude bad crm" corner when we point out some very valid points?

Bad attitude is more often a problem on the RHS.

Some of the 200 hr wonderkids now got 2000 hrs and they are still convinced they are special and gods' gift to aviation.

Instead of behaving like real men they behave like pussies.

They show all symptons of modern society kids raised by overprotecting parents and are sometimes not even able to take a simple roster change without crying.

Or they follow the order of their girlfriend and report sick when their roster plans them to fly to some "not so nice" destination.

The list is quite long actually.
P.
2000 hours = pussies? That's probably got more to do with character than flying hours.

I'm not crap talking you chief. You have my sympathy re terms. Pilots should stick together and support each other, but this is an open forum and anyone is welcome to debate. Someone crap talking a new hire over experience is bad form and attracts a challenge on a public forum. Useless unions and business practice getting away with murder is what's doing our industry in.
Cliff Secord is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2017, 13:47
  #1383 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kopavogur
Posts: 25
Some guys on this topic really need to get off their throne.
The Airline I fly for has been recruiting and training people with less than 2000h. Jet. Or even TP for years, without problems, and we fly to very challenging places, Worldwide.
And please do not start proclaiming that Cargolux standards are higher, trust me, they are not. Not at all.

The B747 is a great aircraft and easy to fly. Almost like a B737 but more stable.

" having to guide you around the World"..?! Seriously mate? In reality, Long-Haul flying is NOT that hard, cpdlc has significantly eased comms enroute, most airports now have RNAV approaches if not equipped with ILS, weather you also have in Europe,... and training takes care of the peculiarities and remaining challenges.
You do not want to guide? Then don't be the Captain.

Greetz,

A B747-400 Captain, flying for an EASA airline.
Icelanta is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2017, 18:43
  #1384 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: London
Posts: 3
Mollymawk

Hi guys
I have just been envied to take the mollymawk soon. Does Someone knows the minimum score in science? A lot of new staff for me..😅
Good weekend for all
Jetmga is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2017, 13:12
  #1385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: hong kong
Posts: 17
Jetmga,
Appalling English stay where you are
fda747 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2017, 16:36
  #1386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hole
Posts: 35
May someone please confirm:

The initial pay for new joiners at cargolux italy is higher than the pay for newbies at cargolux classic?!

Thanks
AERO75 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2017, 04:28
  #1387 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UR978 southbound
Posts: 56
No. It is even lower.
final06 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2017, 14:40
  #1388 (permalink)  
F2L
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: .
Posts: 41
CargoLux Assessment

I just receive an invitation for psychometrics test in Luxembourg, anyone knows how the process is? Do I need to come back home After psychometrics or all the assessment is done in a consecutive days?

Regards...
F2L is offline  
Old 23rd May 2017, 21:51
  #1389 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 323
Cargolux still's has a problem with lack of pilots, specially F/O. Flights are constatly delayed, rosters changing constatly , according to some news, in the cargo world dedicated press.
Augmented crew are mostly with F/O.
The EASA flight crew limits are completly facke. Doesn't contribuit for a correct fatigue managment. With 3 pilots per flight you can extend dutty period for more than 12 hours, do 2 landings, after a "red eye"flight , and then continue to the final destination.
Can you imagine doing a cargo flight in these conditions? I belive it's hard.
This company has serious problems with fatigue issues. Their union pilots are aware of it. But the managment seems, that ignores it. People don't understand why?
I know some pilots with a lot of flight experience, flew long haul, on Airbus and Boeing, that simply applied, but didn't receive an answer from Cargolux.
They are motivated people, and Cargolux could take an advantage from it, instead hiring F16 pilots.
Why they aren't flexible? There is no age limit, but seems that they do.
Any pilot with 45 years can give at least 20 years more of his life to CLX.
trancada is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 11:52
  #1390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ---
Posts: 281
Trancada,
Some of your points are slightly exaggerated, although nobody will say EASA FTL is a good thing.
I can imagine no airline is interested in highly qualified pilots who are around 20 years older than the average person being hired if they run by a seniority list.
The jury is still out with proof whether the lack of widebody or cargo experience is actually an issue. Most guys I have seen being hired over the last years were all very capable and social persons, so the drama seems to be slightly out of place.
ray cosmic is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 12:39
  #1391 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: EU
Posts: 19
-EASA FTL is a disaster for Cargolux. ''So to say they are exaggerated''. Please explain yourself? Because everyone I fly with is dead tired of dutys of 15-16 hours with multiple sectors. those duty are now very common. dutys like; LUX-KMQ-ICN(15-16 hours duty. and they are done with three man crew. where a Pax airline does europe-asia(japen, korea ectra) just ONE sector with min 3 or 4 man crew.

-training at Cargolux is really great. most of the trainers are great people. transition for 320,737 to B747. is more or less the same as turboprob to B747. is that a good system? is it fair to the people coming for turboprob?(its like one or two sims session extra and couple of extra line sectors compared to 737 or 320). those people coming from turnoprop are all really good people and the trainers are all great, and doing there best. but you have to ask yourself, how is the training system working out? bottom line is 'money and time'. more training mean more money and time.
Hank Moody is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 13:13
  #1392 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: bespin, the cloud city
Posts: 1,168
Cargolux still's has a problem with lack of pilots, specially F/O. Flights are constatly delayed, rosters changing constatly , according to some news, in the cargo world dedicated press.
Read that too and whether it's true or not, the proof is in the pudding. They put down some reasonable minimums i.e. the 1500 hrs jet or heavy-TP and I wonder, given what said above, if the requirement is set in stone or no.

Anyone with hands-on experience on the matter?

Safe flying

PZ
papazulu is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 13:22
  #1393 (permalink)  
LBR
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: France
Posts: 38
I agree with Ray.
Trancada, if you are not fit enough to continue after the first leg, "to the extent that the flight may be endangered", you are supposed to "not perform duties on an aircraft" and take a crew rest.
That's your responsibility!
If you can't handle the responsibility that comes with the job it might be time for a career change.
But first try some "Controlled Rest on Flight Deck" when you feel tired.
LBR is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 14:28
  #1394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: EU
Posts: 19
LBR,
what do you think if you have standard rotations on regular basis, you know its way to much regarding tiredness, should you just take your ''responsibility'' and park the aircraft and go into rest on a regular basis?

should a rotation in general not be so tired that you have to think parking the aircraft every time? whether we like it or not, if we park a aircraft because the rotation is to tired. i bet everyone feels a extreme pressure not to do it. Ofc there are always supermans who doesnt feel that pressure from the office. but im not talking about those supermans, talking about a normal human pilot.

i wish, i had the courage like you, LBR
Hank Moody is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 16:16
  #1395 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: EU
Posts: 19
Ray,
I hope you put your words into action. if we all where doing it what you where saying, i agree with you. I feel we as pilots has a responsibility to say no when we are really tired. but I feel the office has also a responsibility not to make rotations, knowing it will be very tiring. because that means you are put in a corner with intent. I have to say the most colleague speak all agree that giving away or duty times limitaions in our CWA made our work way more tiring. I dont need to tell you, the enormous increase in fatigue reports. but lets hope in the future its changes a bit
Hank Moody is offline  
Old 26th May 2017, 12:42
  #1396 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UR978 southbound
Posts: 56
We pilots are our worst enemies.

We have some 100 colleagues at CV who are selling their OFF- and VAC-days on a regular basis.

"Now it's the time to make money!" or "I make the same money as a captain!" [as F/O]

These people pass a dangerous message to the management:
"It is not all that bad" or "EASA FTL - no problem".

Quite a few of these get nicer trips than the rest of us which are even withheld by crewplanning to have "something nice" to offer.

These short sighted "colleagues" do not see the point that they pay a hefty price for their short-term greed with health issues and expensive divorces when their last paychecks are taken into account for the alimony they will pay.

As long as the company can count on these people nothing will change.
No roster stability and not enough crews.

I found this gem in the Middle East forum on a similar problem:

"wanna know why?

because we, humans, are stupid, selfish and greedy.
and we, pilots, are humans.

and that's why."
final06 is offline  
Old 26th May 2017, 15:21
  #1397 (permalink)  
LBR
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: France
Posts: 38
Hank, had to do it once.
Planned FDP 15:20
Started with some delay at the first station.
Colleague who took the first rest came back after 4 hours saying that he couldn't sleep.
I was getting tired at the end of the first leg so we took the decision to have a layover in OVB.
True, it's not easy as you know it might cause delays and mess up your colleague's schedules.
On the other hand, it is your duty as a crew member to take those decisions.
LBR is offline  
Old 26th May 2017, 18:09
  #1398 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Moon
Posts: 32
Too hopeful?

Am I naive to think that the more pilot recruitment the better the rosters? Or will it never go back to how I was?
*it
Aeroshizzle is offline  
Old 27th May 2017, 15:24
  #1399 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: sidney
Posts: 1
cargolux second round

Originally Posted by Aeroshizzle View Post
Am I naive to think that the more pilot recruitment the better the rosters? Or will it never go back to how I was?
*it
Aeroshizzle, congrats !!! I passed on mollymawk test and have to face the interview now. do you have any tips captain?? what type of ATPL Questions have they asked?


best regards.
indiazulu10 is offline  
Old 29th May 2017, 11:14
  #1400 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UR978 southbound
Posts: 56
Originally Posted by Aeroshizzle View Post
Am I naive to think that the more pilot recruitment the better the rosters? Or will it never go back to how I was?
*it
May be too optimistic.
This is an ongoing problem. We never had enough crews, and we are not talking about a decent and working standby system.
We had contract captains that spent the better part of 10 years in the company.
F/Os were not amused to say the least.
final06 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.