Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Should edward snowden be allowed to travel to the uk ???

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Should edward snowden be allowed to travel to the uk ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2013, 06:48
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shutterbug:

Well said; our colleague parabellum should really take look at the big picture.
I like your reference to "military mind" as an appendage to a nom de plume sometimes says a lot.
errrr..OP you're sounding like a big hypocrite. Aren't you the one that defends China and North Korea and puts these two nations on a pedestal??? One a communist and the other a dictatorship known for extreme human rights abuses. I don't think your one to stand here and criticize the United States.
Flap10 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 07:16
  #42 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear shutterbug, what melodrama you manage to inject into your inaccurate post. I don't plan to go down that road but will point out to you that on the one hand you say:

since he is prepared to "do the time."
Err............No he isn't, he is scuttling for sanctuary as fast as his legs will carry him, (though Russia may still put a spanner in that one).

Trawling the entire internet for personal information on the entire population beyond the scope and sanction of governmental authority just because they can?
Do grow up, they haven't the time to waste listening to your puerile 'phone conversations or tracking your internet. They are hoping to catch people who would happily destroy everything you value, including yourself, if they can. You are just too wrapped up in your civil libertarian rose coloured, huggy-fluffy world to see this. There are a lot of advantages to having been in the military, continual reality checks being just one, an understanding of the need for security is another.


We've known for years these sorts of shenanigans were going on
Indeed we have and people with a proper understanding of 'need to know' accept this.

Thank you Ed for your sacrifice
Oh Lord, please spare us from this Cyclopean outbreak and don't let them breed.

Last edited by parabellum; 25th Jun 2013 at 07:23.
parabellum is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 07:23
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: flying by night
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A spokesman for the NSA summed it up very well, when he expressed happiness that Snowden was charged with espionage, after he left the NSA:

"These charges send a clear message," the spokesman said. "In the United States, you can’t spy on people"

and

"Only by bringing Mr. Snowden to justice can we safeguard the most precious of American rights: privacy"

He seemed totally unaware of the irony...

Another mildly entertaining piece of news about this charade, more related to aviation: The Aeroflot flight to Havana was full of journalists trying to take pictures of Snowden - who wasn't on the flight. When the doors were closed and they realized Snowden wasn't there, they also found out that no alcohol is served on that flight. Upon arrival in Cuba the captain grabbed his camera and took pictures of the journalists:

No sign of Snowden as Aeroflot plane lands in Havana

Last edited by deptrai; 25th Jun 2013 at 07:59.
deptrai is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 09:33
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Not in a Bus
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Military Mind

Interesting that the phrase, 'Military Mind' seems to be being used as a derogatory expression. Here's the first definition which pops up in the no doubt heavily censored and stored in a vault google page:-

" common expression for the professional mind-set that unemotionally evaluates every issue affecting the accomplishment of a crucial mission; a reasonable or rational mind, a trained or mastermind "

I'd aspire to that and I'll keep mine if I have one thanks.
White None is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 11:14
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Asia
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flap 10:

Are you trying to get me on the CIA "to be looked at list"? If you are then that's the essence of this whole debate.

O.P.
Ocean Person is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 21:32
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: a shack on a hill
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
common expression for the professional mind-set that unemotionally evaluates every issue affecting the accomplishment of a crucial mission; a reasonable or rational mind, a trained or mastermind
- a good definition of a sociopath, as well.
PS: A great thread to complete the ignore list, anyway.
heavy.airbourne is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2013, 03:43
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Not in a Bus
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Military Mind = Sociopath..??..!!

By the same criteria of my looking up the definition of Military Mind, (arguably not the most accurate but intended to be unbiased - we could all find others to better suit our personal slant); from the first google definition:-

"SOCIOPATH" - A person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

Do you feel that accurately defines the leading Military Minds or describes the attitudes and reasoning process of your ex Mil colleagues? I accept that your answer may be "Yes", I'm just interested and suspect, actually, not really.

Apologies to others for pinging slightly off topic here but the mindset of BOTH Snowden and the agencies now seeking to catch/silence/prosecute/waterboard? him is interesting is it not? Also there are enough of us here to be insulted by heavy.airbourne's comment, although to be honest amused is probably more correct.
White None is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 04:04
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ward 8
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the eddy snowden world tour

yes eddy can go...... get in line with his ID90 no probs, should be able to get a seat next to the dunny in mid October.

next big question please
AU-501 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 11:18
  #49 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: hong kong
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Snowden seems destined to remain a stateless person for the foreseeable future......
The message has been the subject of much complaint and protest but the messenger is doomed to remain in transit sans travel documents .....
mr Q is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 11:58
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope he applies for asylum in Iran. That way the Sun newspaper can run the headline

"Mountain goes to Mohammed"

Just kidding... I hope he rots in hell. Whistleblower my @rse, he sold his country out for his own benefit and ego. Had he really had moral objections to the behaviour of his government, he had many avenues to "blow the whistle", but none of those would bolster his sagging ego and bank balance. Take a moment to review his life history on Wikipedia and you will spot a tread. He thought he was something special, but he failed at everything. Now he is just a failed traitor and deserves to rot in some third world despot country.

He has allowed himself, and any sensitive information in his head, to be compromised by an unfriendly power. He is no whistleblower, just a traitor. History teaches us there is no such thing as a successful traitor.
Liam Gallagher is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 12:41
  #51 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: hong kong
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely Sir Anthony Blunt KCVO , Philby, Maclean , Burgess were all successful traitors ...
mr Q is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 13:16
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he sold his country out for his own benefit and ego
Really Liam?? Exactly what benefits are those?? Because from his vantage point he doesn't really have any.

He has allowed himself, and any sensitive information in his head, to be compromised by an unfriendly power
F%^k me please tell me you're not that stupid and gullible????
Flap10 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 13:32
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flap 10

Do think he was not paid by Guardian? Do think he paid for his hotel in HK, his airfares? i bet he is peddling a book deal. He hoped to gained from this. Hopefully he won't. This was all about him.

I am not sure if you are ex-military, however anyone with specialist knowledge is not allowed, nor should they allow themselves to be alone with foreign intelligence specialists. He engineered this situation and has allowed himself to be interviewed without supervision by two countries unfriendly to the US. That's not "whilstblowing".

By the way, gulliable is no longer a valid word in the English language as it has not appeared in the Oxford English Dictionary since 1975.
Liam Gallagher is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 13:47
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US government wants to usurp people's authority | South China Morning Post
Flap10 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 16:59
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Q

I think you will find it's just Anthony Blunt.

Perhaps i am being a bit subtle. A successful traitor is known as a hero, patriot, freedom-fighter or whistle-blower. Remember, the victors get to write history. Had the Soviets won the Cold War, the four gentlemen to which you referred would not be known as traitors.

Mr Snowden has passed his sell-by date and the super-powers want rid of him as he's an embarrassment. The best result for everyone is for him to go into exile in a despot South American country and learns what a real oppressive, intrusive government looks like.

In the mean time Snowden would be wise to learn Spanish phrases like "No, I do not want sex in the shower" and "It can't me my turn to pick up the soap again" and "Do you want fries with that".

The last thing Obama wants is Snowden to return, the adulation, show trial and book deal would give Snowden what he seeks. Hopefully, some big smelly cell-mate will give him what he deserves.
Liam Gallagher is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 19:08
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think those of you claiming Snowden is a traitor need to reflect a bit and consider this quote by one of only true great presidents; Benjamin Franklin:

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Who is the traitor, the man who reveals a complete disregard and trouncing of the US Constitution or the people in Government who trash the very principles the country was founded on?! I find it disgusting and troubling that so many people seem hell bent on defending and supporting actions by Governments that are bordering on tyrannical.

Last edited by Threethirty; 2nd Jul 2013 at 21:32.
Threethirty is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 21:43
  #57 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are an idealist Threethirty, unfortunately the world simply doesn't work that way.
parabellum is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2013, 02:42
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snowden..he is simply a 30 year old kid, possessor of ideals from a cleaner age and frankly a breath of fresh air to the mass of us who despise the nannying vitiates who run the global politic. Those who "whistle" without exposing so called national secrets..and lets face it, we all know that spying is now a massive listening business and not the Philby esque polemic of the 60's, are merely re emphasising the need for us to refocus on how necessary GCHQ, KCS and NSA organisations really are. After all, the Orwellian games are only just beginning...!!
Pucka is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2013, 02:59
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What information has Snowden divulged that is evidence the US Government has a systemic disregard for the constitution?

The fact the US government collects data on phone calls and emails is hardly an earth shattering revelation. Google, Yahoo, Microsoft all do this and use that to target advertising to the user (ie you). It is a very different matter if the US government is reading the emails or listening to the phone calls without the appropriate authority. Snowden has made no allegation this is happening on a widespread or systematic basis.

The revelation the US spies on its Allies is hardly earth-shattering. The faux shock of certain publicity seeking EU Officials is laughable, What do you think all the Military Attaches to all the EU Embassies in the US/UN do? What do you think is in all the diplomatic bags heading back to the EU from the US/ UN?

Snowden has focused on trading secrets that embarrass the US government to grab headlines to boost his own ego/bank balance. However, in doing so he is also giving up other information (perhaps unwittingly) that harms the US and ultimately puts Operatives/ US interests at risk.

Do you think those who are providing intelligence to the US at their own personal risk, be it a US Serviceman, a Taleban member or a foreign government official, sleeps well at night knowing that any member of the US Intelligence Services could wake-up tomorrow morning and declare himself a "whistle-blower" and sell him out for 15 minutes of fame and a bag of cash?

For those who think Snowden is a patriot. The next time you are at a party, sipping your Chardonnay, and find yourself saying that the Police or the government needs better intelligence to solve whatever problem is the topic of the day, stop yourself because you have just defeated your own argument.

Last edited by Liam Gallagher; 3rd Jul 2013 at 03:04.
Liam Gallagher is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2013, 03:27
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Not in a Bus
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pucka

A)
Nannying
I concur wholeheartedly that Governments telling us to act this way or that, to compensate idiots who fall over on our shop floors and who use a significant proportion of GDP to provide Health and Safety signs reminding us to breathe in and out are "Nannying" and it's unnecessary. However, are you, (I'm genuinely unsure), saying that, post cold war, GCHQ NSA etc are unnecessary and "Nannying"? (!) I personally think that if those running the global politic did retire those organisations, the world would have a short break in terrorism/Nuke development etc etc whilst the bad guys partied then set off with a will again shortly after unhindered by any resistance.

Secondly,
simply a 30 year old kid
How old does one have to be these days to be responsible for ones own actions, presumably one would have to reach that age before being handing in your toys and being given a high security clearance?

3: -> , and for the benefit of Steve the Pirate, I can't find anyone who agrees that
vitiates
is a noun
White None is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.