Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Canada
Reload this Page >

Avcanada censorship

Canada The great white north. A BIG country with few people and LOTS of aviation.

Avcanada censorship

Old 12th Aug 2009, 19:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1998
Location: Where the job is!
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Avcanada censorship

There seems to be a serious censorship problem on the Avcanada forums. Truthful threads that are unfavourable to certain individuals and organisations vanish without explanation. Efforts to expose safety issues and abusive practices towards employees are obstructed by Avcanada mods. To make it worse, this censorship is unevenly applied, as some very critical posts are allowed to remain. It takes time and effort to compose suitable posts, particularly where there are problems being exposed and one wants to be fair as well as being exact to avoid any defamation. It is frustrating to see this thrown away by uncaring or obstructive mods on Avcanada. Until this problem is resolved Avcanada should be avoided as it is a waste of time and effort to post anything the slightest bit controversial or unfavourable to certain parties on there. Issues affecting Canadian aviation should be posted on this forum, where they will receive a fair exposure.


Below are the first two posts from a thread “Mods!!.. QUIT deleting GOOD threads!!”that was started on Avcanada today to address this issue. It has already been deleted without explanation by Avcanada’s mods.

flyinthebug:
Who else is getting completely fed up with the moderation of this site??.. Im ranting but would you please explain to me where the "crash in YXL" thread now went? We had a GOOD discussion ongoing on that thread, no names were used (other then the company name was mentioned).. Please tell me why you couldnt just omit the name of the air service and let a good thread carry on?.. I see MY accident from last year is still on here. It also has the companies name in that thread.. so WHY did this latest accident in YXL get taken down?.. Maybe i should threaten to sue you for keeping MY thread up about MY accident for the past year?.. This is unacceptable and your gonna lose some valuable posters if you keep this kind of dictatorship up on this site!
My .02 cents for the day
Gets off soapbox
Rant over.
Fly safe all!

Carrier:
I agree that there is a problem on here with good posts or whole threads being eliminated. It is particularly unhelpful to honest operators and employees in Canadian aviation when posts and threads exposing unsafe practices, companies and individuals or acts of dishonesty vanish. Avcanada should be endorsing and encouraging such posts. It should be part of the solution to improve aviation safety and weed out shysters by exposing them, rather than being part of the problem by working with the shysters to hide their wrong doings and let them continue to exploit and threaten the safety of both those who work in the industry and those who are its customers.
A perfect example of Avcanada’s wimping out is its removal earlier this year of the whole thread on the Canadian ATPL obtained by forgery while the newspaper report on the court case, in which the individual admitted his guilt, remained in the public forum on the Calgary Herald’s website and is still available on other forums: http://www.pprune.org/canada/367387-...aked-atpl.html Those considering employing the guilty individual in future or working for or being a passenger on one of the air operators that employed him after the problem with his ATPL became known should have this information available to them so that it can be part of their decision making. The same applies to certain unscrupulous companies where threads and posts naming them and identifying their deficiencies have mysteriously vanished. This also applies to Transport Canada and its deficiencies, including its ineffective SMS.
What is so mystifying and unpleasant is the uneven application of the censorship by Avcanada. Some companies and individuals get immediate protection and anything the slightest bit unfavourable is immediately removed. Indeed, it seems that the names of some cannot be mentioned on here in any context. On the other hand the unfavourable posts on others are ignored and left on here. Why the difference?
I appreciate that Avcanada does not want defamatory statements on here but the truth is not defamatory and there is no excuse for Avcanada eliminating truthful but unfavourable posts and threads on certain companies, government departments and individuals.
If Avcanada will not get its act together and make a stand on improving safety and eliminating abuse in Canadian aviation then there are alternatives. Copy threads you are interested in on to your computer. If they vanish from this board then repost them on another forum such as http://www.pprune.org/canada-42/

Last edited by Carrier; 12th Aug 2009 at 19:59. Reason: link not working
Carrier is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 23:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which individuals and companies are getting special protection? I didn't know that this was happening.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 02:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It doesnt take much to see which companies seem to get preferential treatment over on AvCanada...

Borek, Summit, WJ seem to me to be the main benefactors lately of the moderators while other companies seem to get the raw end of the stick (or their CP's, Ops Managers, etc).

It used to be funny, but its always the same old people complaining or making comments about how everyone else has problems, and yet when a particular companies Twin Otter runs off a 4,000 ft strip it is left up for a day or two, then like Houdini it disappears.

Lets just hope "we" dont screw PPRune up as bad as AvCanada is...
+TSRA is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 02:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ontario, Cambridge
Age: 51
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure i can accommodate you all on our aviation site if need be.
All it takes is a little tweaking of the program and it's up! and we have good mods, un biased.
I recently looked at AVCanada and i don't think i will sign up, i have read as a guest but never posted on there.
MAN2YKF is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 03:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1998
Location: Where the job is!
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Additional companies mentioned in Avcanada threads that have vanished are Bar XH AIr, Courtesy Air, National Aviation Inc, Sunwest Aviation and the company referred to in the “crash in YXL” (Sioux Lookout) thread. An individual who seems to have benefited is Ryan Atkins of ATPL forgery infamy. It seems none of these can be mentioned on Avcanada in an unfavourable light.
Carrier is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 05:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Margarittaville
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So fellaz.....why do I love the good old US of A..... Gear up ..fire up and git u gunz...!!!
SIERRA ECHO XRAY is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 16:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: somewhere in Western Canada
Posts: 202
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My guess is that it has something to do with some recent court rulings, and the possibility of lawsuits. An example:

Law Times - Controversy rages over Internet privacy rights
CaptW5 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2009, 00:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver Island
Age: 56
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, you might know me as a mod over on that there forum being discussed. Only since March, mind you, but nevertheless ...

The most recent thread disappearance started like this ... I got a PM from the accident pilot asking that the thread be removed as he/she was still "recovering". I told that person that I would pull it for the time being, but no more than a week, and would have to discuss with the other mods. Other mods received some PMs suggesting that there was reason to leave the thread for discussion and so it was returned to service, so to speak. In the meantime, someone had posted a "what happened to the thread" thread. Then it disappeared with no trace in the logs. My guess is that admin received a PM, maybe even a lawyered up PM, demanding removal. The rest of the mods don't know what happened to that thread. Admin has no obligation to tell us, but may do so when he gets a chance.

Other threads referenced here which have disappeared have gone because someone did, in fact, lawyer up. AvCanada does not have the money to fight in court for the words of anonymous users who may not even have their stories straight.

AvCanada has a different moderation style, to be sure, than Pprune. Not better or worse, but different.
dhc2widow is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2009, 12:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WARNING: Personal Opinion

I've read through many posts on various topics on Avcanada's website. Rarely is there a post of interest to me so I wouldn't waste my time regestering.

Let's be honest. PPRuNe has it's similar postings because Pilots are Pilots but it's at least global in content.

Western forum, West Jet bias? There's a surprise!!

For my money, I wouldn't waste my time with AvCanada's forum. But, that's me. I can assure you, I've had one or two of my own postings on PPRuNe 'disappear' for whatever reason. It happens.

It all boils down to freedom of choice and don't bet on not being censored.

Willie

Last edited by Willie Everlearn; 14th Aug 2009 at 13:12.
Willie Everlearn is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2009, 13:20
  #10 (permalink)  
Tan
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The World
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’m not surprised as I had a similar experience on Pprune concerning WJ. It turned out that one of the Mods was either trying to get hired by WJ or was already an employee of WJ. The same Mod using the same handle is also a Mod on AvCanada and is a WJ pilot.

It’s called selective censorship whatever...
Tan is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2009, 13:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
I read avcanada regularly. There is a general lower maturity level than the AEforum or PPrune, but it is great for keeping somewhat up to date on the smaller companies and other aspects of Canadian Aviation besides the big companies.

I suggest that censored Avcanada stuff be posted here on this thread.

But not the immaturity.

Last edited by punkalouver; 15th Aug 2009 at 02:51.
punkalouver is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2009, 17:46
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1998
Location: Where the job is!
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote by Doc, mod on Avcanada: “I've never understood how these companies even answer their phones when this CONTRAIL dude calls.
These companies are puppets on a string. Nothing more.”

It’s just like Avcanada’s response when someone representing the ATPL forger or Sleazebag Air phones! Doc, please set the example then. You, Widow, Admin and the other mods need to practise what you preach.

It is not defamation to state the truth. Except in certain situations, such as those involving juvenile delinquents or state security, every Canadian has the right to know what is said and admitted and by whom in a Canadian law court. It is not defamation to report on or pass that on to others. That includes the case of the pilot who pleaded guilty to forgery regarding his ATPL. The present Avcanada knee-jerk reaction to every complaint from or on behalf of wrongdoers is destroying Avcanada’s credibility. Readers cannot know if what is left on Avcanada is the truth or is some distortion at the behest of a slimy operator, individual or some low-life lawyer. It undermines those of us who are making efforts to have Canadian aviation cleaned up and the unsafe and abusive operators and individuals weeded out.

As stated, Avcanada has destroyed its own credibility. By now the word is out to every aviation spiv and his lawyer that a simple lawyer’s letter or phone call will cause Avcanada to remove or distort any exposure on its site of wrong doings involving them! They can carry on with their dirty tricks and unsafe practices, secure in the knowledge that victims and other interested parties will not be able to expose them on Avcanada.


Quote by Doc: “...it's a subject that's long over due to be discussed”

So selective! Why Contrails and not others who are actually worse or openly unsafe, dishonest or unethical? There are many other subjects in vanished threads that are long overdue to be discussed - and exposed.
Carrier is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2009, 18:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly... the mods at AVCanada, and YES Widow I put you into this group too, do not practice what they preach.

Too many times are posts and topics removed which have no basis for legal action, they are simply sessions, yet you make a comment and then suddenly a day later the post (or thread) is missing.

Sure there will be some cases where a thread or post must be removed because of possible legal ramifications, I dont think anyone here or on AvCanada would doubt that, however the level of deletion over there is such that the courts in Canada must be FILLED with lawyers, companies and pilots bending each other over.

And before you respond with some sort of "...but we dont have the money to respond to every lawyer and lawsuit...", explain to me how a previous CP of mine was allowed to be raked over the coals in numerous different threads - not that I specifically disagree with the comments made, but alas, when someone mentioned something about a Borek CP that post was on the board for a shorter period of time than it takes my wife to go from 0 to .

Rant over.
+TSRA is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2009, 00:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carrier,

you are nothing but a gossip looking for gossip. Not trying to SAVE the community. You read about RA in the paper isn't that good enough? People have lives and deal with stress differently. Can't you respect that. Glass houses my friend. btw don't know RA or anything about him, but you sure have a thirst.

The problem is that why don't you research things yourself instead of relying on third hand information on a slag-fest forum. It always amazes me that the real **** show stuff doesn't get deleted. It's their site. they can do what they want. If you don't like it leave. Go cry on another forum.

get a life.
upperflightlevels is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2009, 04:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In a pile of leaves
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The more I think about it the more it offends me to hear some random guy bleating about some random conspiracy theory - I put at least a couple of hours a day into AvCanada, checking posts, approving posts, filtering out spam posts and dealing with the thousand daily micro-dramas that occur on the site.

Hey there, whomever started this thread, I'm Sulako.

I'm a mod on AvCanada so feel free to vent at me if it makes you feel better about life. While I'm listening to you whine like a mule, I would like to take the time to let you know a few things about AvCan so maybe this can die down for a little while - it'll inevitably come up again, and it's usually a year or so between "AvCanada mods are fascist/communist/terrorist whatevers".

AvCanada is a privately run site. It's run as a non-profit, and there's no money for lawyers, so we remove threads that people complain about. If any one of you decided to be a complete doorknob and randomly write an Avcanada mod an email asking for a post to be removed, it likely would be, because we don't have the money to hire lawyers to tell you to get stuffed.

It's really that simple. And if you don't like it, don't visit the site. That seemed intuitive to me, but clearly I'm mistaken.

If I come across as hostile, it's nothing actually personal toward submitter - I don't even remember the name of whomever started this thread, but it's because we go through this on a regular basis in our forums and I just get tired of it. Being a mod is a pretty damn thankless job, but we really do try our best, because we are proud of the site and because we want to bring value to Canadian aviation. Now as mods we aren't robots, we are human beings, each with our own experiences and biases. Every single day there are about 100 things for us to do on the site, and lots of those are grey-area things, like moderating a thread that is about to go nuclear but hasn't yet, or moderating between two people having a fight in the forums, etc. Now let's mix a tonne of work with nearly a dozen mods on the site, and it's inevitable that some judgement calls would be made differently by different people. The thing that unites all the mods is that we are all a) unpaid, and b) we are all very proud of the site and of our contributions toward it. If you enjoy the site, great. If you don't, then that's okay too - life will go on for all of us.
Sulako is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2009, 12:16
  #16 (permalink)  
Tan
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The World
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good post..
Tan is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2009, 23:54
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I think is the worst is when the likes of Widow and such Edit a post, Deleting or removing a post is one thing but when they edit your post and literally put word in your mouth that is bush league.
ScudRunner08 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2009, 02:49
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver Island
Age: 56
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't like profanity replacement? You'd rather see the whole thing gone than see it cleaned up? Not everyone wants to read the potty mouth along with the relevant comments.
dhc2widow is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2009, 12:06
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 975
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
SR08;

I've seen some AvCanada posts before they were edited, and I think you and the others should be thanking the mods for taking the trouble to leave the relevant parts in while taking out the nonsense. If I'd have been doing the moderating, the whole thing would have been gone.
J.O. is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 22:36
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Widow go back and Read what I stated, here ill save you a mouse click.

What I think is the worst is when the likes of Widow and such Edit a post, Deleting or removing a post is one thing but when they edit your post and literally put word in your mouth that is bush league.
Profanity Replacement with a @#$@#% etc is a fine example of profanity replacement, but when someone for instance says

Exhibit A

AVCANADA • View topic - Life in Paulatuk

It Proves the Search Function works! he probably googled Windy
When the Original post stated
It Proves the Search Function works! he probably googled Inbreeding
This is an example of Putting word in people's mouths.

Off colour remark Yes
Profanity (potty mouth) No.

Given the topic of the thread and previous post on the topic it's a completely valid statement hardly worthy of Censorship, I think when censorship is dished out unevenly or inconsistently it lesson's the credibility of any site. I know mods have differing opinions on a topic but I would suggest at the very least a note should be sent to the poster stating "I have deleted your post for the following reason" (two seconds to type) and would save a lot of confusion. Agree or disagree with the mods decision you have at least been given a reason and a chance to modify your post in your own words.

I realize and agree that AvCanada cannot afford a lawyer to tell most of these companies to take a hike and that truth is not libel. So if XYZ Airline has an accident and its being discussed in a thread and it remains a factual discussion ask them if they have called or written the local papers and have ask them to censor their reports and get Transport Canada to pull the CADORS reports offline.

Either way AvCanada owes its popularity and thus its advertising revenues that maintain the site to the wide range of topics and opinions expressed on it. If AvCanada is censored beyond a reasonable amount it will loose credibility. I love magazines that favorably review a product such as a car or video game and the following page is a full spread advertising that product.

AvCanada as one put it is like a Bar allot of BS some fighting a lot of opinions with some Truths not always entertaining but worth a stop by for a drink.
ScudRunner08 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.