Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Mar 2010, 17:42
  #3661 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
The Heathrow departures is useless.

The BA.com one is better. Filter out the codeshares (rough rule, anything not T5 except AUS) and it is a very threadbare program the rest of the day. Suprisingly so, to me anyway.
RomeoAlphaMike is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 17:42
  #3662 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They said they'd fly all of them at one point. Unfortunately, BASSA decided to get involved.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 17:42
  #3663 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My reliable source told me 14 would be departing (re-opened for passengers). Looks like 15 now
The 15 that are departing are part of the planned departures
bashareholder is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 17:42
  #3664 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Enough on the 'guess the number of flights thing' please - when making a claim, post a link to somewhere or something that proves your point, otherwise please avoid a speculation war
TightSlot is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 17:48
  #3665 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry

Sorry chaps - go to Track Flight Status, Airport Delays and other Flight and Airport Information

You need to ensure that you check the box to hide the codeshares and then click update (as they are not BA operated but Willie has been including them, tut tut)

You can then see the true picture instead of the spin being put out - BA operated about 43% of their schedule today not including codeshares
bashareholder is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 17:56
  #3666 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA T5 departures

How about:

BAA Heathrow: Flight departures today at Heathrow Airport | Live Heathrow Airport departures

Seems quite a few are getting away or am I missing something.
101917 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 17:56
  #3667 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, Engineer from LHR here.
Just wondered if I could veer this thread back to basics. Understand if folk think its been done to death but, could BAshareholder or any of the other pro-union posters (sorry to polarise you but I think we are all either one way or the other by now), please tell me what would satisfy you to end this action.

What do you actually want?

Simple question, but there has been so much talk and detail that I have pretty much lost track of the main demand.
Detail is important - but what is the main issue that would get you guys on-board to begin listening and talking?
Spanner in the works is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:02
  #3668 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in between
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just flew a jumbo over to the westcoast. Bags were there, everything as per usual.

I asked the engineer if he heard anything about their union or the handlers union backing the strike and meeting with Unite. He said his union did not back the strike and certainly wouldn't cause any disruption.

All Unite seems to be able to do is spread lies. Why appeal to BA's board, they are 100% behind WW, otherwise it wouldn't have gone this far.

I really wonder how this is going to end. One thing is certain, there's going to be a lot of

PS. BAshareholder, is that really the best you can do, nitpick about percentages of flights? volunteers are being stood down because they've got more crew than required. What does that tell you
Dutchjock is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:03
  #3669 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: surrey
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unite have just been reported on Sky and BBC as saying that only 5 cabin crew have broken the strike!!!

Maybe he got the figures for Gatwick the wrong way around!
jetpack2 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:10
  #3670 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Human Factor
Litebulbs,



IMHO, expect either "LGW + a bit" or "Virgin +10%"
Why not role all payments into a basic, even if it is market + 50%, but save on the restrictive conditions? It would be interesting to know the pre/post 97 split of existing staff. To me, to get through this with the staff onside, then you have to appeal to the majority, but protect the minority too.

A blank piece of paper should be agreed by both sides and a reasonable time limit set. All existing terms and conditions should be parked and new ideas brought to the table. A simplistic idea, but if it was me, that is what I would push for now.

I would base this on the point that Mr Walsh has supposedly said that contract notice will be served, if this is not resolved. So get to the table first, knowing that you have stopped the disruption. The point has been proved that BASSA can disrupt and can do again.

This is a bit disjointed as Chelsea have just messed up again!
Litebulbs is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:11
  #3671 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need to ensure that you check the box to hide the codeshares and then click update (as they are not BA operated but Willie has been including them, tut tut)
A "wet lease" is officially counted as BA operated, hence their use of the "Speedbird" callsign and a BA flight number. The BA123 is still the BA123, whoever operates it.

With reference to "appealing to BA's board", who does Unite think instructed Willie Walsh to use these tactics? Remember, it was Martin Broughton who suggested that BASSA were on the menu, not WW.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:14
  #3672 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A "wet lease" is officially counted as BA operated, hence their use of the "Speedbird" callsign and a BA flight number. The BA123 is still the BA123, whoever operates it.
Hi Human Factor - the operated flights include the wet leased aircraft - it's the codeshares such as flights to Dublin etc that you need to clear to see the true picture
bashareholder is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:22
  #3673 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you say so. However, even on a codeshare they're still BA passengers and BA are still being paid for their flights.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:24
  #3674 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Wet Leased aircraft will have a BA flight number, but will use the Lessee's call sign, as they operate under the Lessee's AOC. So those Ryanair charters into Gatwick , while carryng the BA123 flight number, transmit on radio as Ryanair567.
RomeoAlphaMike is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:27
  #3675 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Litebulbs

Why not role all payments into a basic, even if it is market + 50%, but save on the restrictive conditions?
I suspect it would be highly unlikely to see anything added into basic and therefore pensionable pay - far more likely that there would be a "travel payment" on top of the basic, rather than allowances as there are at the moment. It would be far easier for BA to administrate leading to an additional saving for BA, also a lower pension burden which is probably the overriding thing. Having said that any new contract would place crew in BARP and the liability to NAPS would become definite and fixed for a huge swathe of crew so you can see this becomes quite an interesting avenue for BA financially.

But hey, I am no financial wiz, perhaps you are right.
Juan Tugoh is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:27
  #3676 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "20 BA a/c at Cardiff" claim....

As promised, I overflew CWL this morning. Two BA aircraft were visible on the apron, and one empennage was sticking out from the Maintenance hangar. (There may conceivably have been room for 1 more in the hangar)

If 20 aircraft had been there they'd have been parked up on taxiway Golf (the old runway 03/21). However nothing there except a taxying PA28.

Plenty of photos taken from the overhead as "evidence", I'll upload one tomorrow (Mods permitting).
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:29
  #3677 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE]I like facts - I suppose the fact is maybe BA should have called them in today as they have had to cancel 38 flights due to depart between 18:00 and 21:00 tonight - 7 will go./QUOTE]

Shorthaul would be cancelled because no shorthaul crew are doing scheduled nightstops at the moment. Only wetlease and about 20 shorthaul round trips crewed by BA were going today.
Jadzia is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:31
  #3678 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wet Leased aircraft will have a BA flight number, but will use the Lessee's call sign, as they operate under the Lessee's AOC. So those Ryanair charters into Gatwick , while carryng the BA123 flight number, transmit on radio as Ryanair567.
Sorry to keep bringing this up but the bloke in the "white tail" 757 which departed ahead of me from LHR this morning was definitely a Speedbird and definitely wasn't ours.

Edit: If you want a source, get NATS to pull the tower tapes from LHR at about 0915Z.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:31
  #3679 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did an early standby at LHR today. The place quickly filled up with crew sporting the nice retro Nokia mobiles. However, very few rang until it was time to go home, in my case after just 4 hours 10 mins. Sort of suggests that people were turning up for their trips in significant numbers.

The atmosphere was strange - a lot of worried and scared people initially, but most people seemed to feel reassured once they'd finished their shift.
The hi vis vested managers are everywhere, including the crew car park.

The only pickets I saw were on Sky TV. (At Hatton Cross, numbering about 12!)

Interestingly, not only BF there today, but Martin Broughton too, circulating and chatting to crew. Delivering the same message: "We are serious about the staff travel, strikers will not get it back". I have to say, if Tony Woodley is pinning his hopes on Mr Broughton stepping in to curb Willie's enthusiasm, if I were him I wouldn't hold his breath unless he fancies himself a nice shade of blue.
Beagle9 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 18:36
  #3680 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Juan Tugoh

Thats what you do with a blank bit of paper. You all set the restrictions and the benefits. It could just be as simple of what is pensionable and what is not.
Litebulbs is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.