Silhouette challenge
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Age: 65
Posts: 6,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gents, sorry had to dash out but back now.
Had to investigate the engine LM as different power plants were used - as far as I can see none of the types you mentioned were fitted.
Not a PWS design, but it is European.
Had to investigate the engine LM as different power plants were used - as far as I can see none of the types you mentioned were fitted.
Not a PWS design, but it is European.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good evening gents,
Welcome back from your travels skytrain
I think your challenge may be the Polish Meindl/van Nes A-VII (M7), powered by a Walter Radial ?
Welcome back from your travels skytrain
I think your challenge may be the Polish Meindl/van Nes A-VII (M7), powered by a Walter Radial ?
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Age: 65
Posts: 6,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Meindl/van Nes A-VII (M7)
Your control Sinco.
A-S Genet,not Gannet....!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Ken,
Dunno why I typed Polish, bit of brain fade I guess!! I said Walter radial 'coz that's how I found it (Goggle Walter radial engine and check images) that site said it had a Walter NZ-80, but the illustration of that one looks more like a Genet cowling!
I'll be a short while as I haven't got one ready to go.
Ok here we go!
Dunno why I typed Polish, bit of brain fade I guess!! I said Walter radial 'coz that's how I found it (Goggle Walter radial engine and check images) that site said it had a Walter NZ-80, but the illustration of that one looks more like a Genet cowling!
I'll be a short while as I haven't got one ready to go.
Ok here we go!
Last edited by SincoTC; 2nd Apr 2011 at 20:27.
Looks very Handley-Page ?
Join Date: May 2010
Location: EU
Age: 82
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TC, I think yours is Gloster TC.33, designed to meet Air Ministry specification C.16/28, which required the ability to carry 30 troops and their equipment for 1,200 miles (1,930 km) and was the same specification that produced the Handley Page H.P.43 and the Vickers Type 163.
None of the C.16/28 contenders were awarded a production contract, and thus only the prototype was built.
If correct, OH, at least until tomorrow, because I am going to hit the sack
Nice challenge, was looking all around before UK….
Good night!
EDIT:
None of the C.16/28 contenders were awarded a production contract, and thus only the prototype was built.
If correct, OH, at least until tomorrow, because I am going to hit the sack
Nice challenge, was looking all around before UK….
Good night!
EDIT:
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are correct Reg but I now see that you were pipped to the post, hard luck!!
It is the Gloster TC.33 (how could I resist a TC !!)
Goodnight mate, sleep well
Edited to recognise buttrick's prior correct identification of the Challenge
It is the Gloster TC.33 (how could I resist a TC !!)
Goodnight mate, sleep well
Edited to recognise buttrick's prior correct identification of the Challenge
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ooops, I see why Reg was sobbing, I missed buttrick's prior Post!! Sorry mate.
Well done buttrick, you strike again ! BTW, I see you joined in 2006, where have you been all this time?
buttrick has control
Edited to say, have you got your image posting sorted out yet??
Well done buttrick, you strike again ! BTW, I see you joined in 2006, where have you been all this time?
buttrick has control
Edited to say, have you got your image posting sorted out yet??
Last edited by SincoTC; 2nd Apr 2011 at 23:03.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're nearly there mate!
You need to paste the Direct link URL below (I grabbed it before you deleted the attempt) between the image placeholders ([img] and [/img]) as I mentioned in my tips the other day!
http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/...t/Image1-1.jpg
Copy this and just remove my round brackets,
([img]http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/...t/Image1-1.jpg[/img])
buttrick has declared Open House
You need to paste the Direct link URL below (I grabbed it before you deleted the attempt) between the image placeholders ([img] and [/img]) as I mentioned in my tips the other day!
http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/...t/Image1-1.jpg
Copy this and just remove my round brackets,
([img]http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/...t/Image1-1.jpg[/img])
buttrick has declared Open House
Last edited by SincoTC; 2nd Apr 2011 at 23:32. Reason: I think buttrick has gone to bed, well, it is gone half past two there!!
Join Date: May 2010
Location: EU
Age: 82
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
buttrick, I checked you out, and your first post on this thread was on my gaff-rigged yawl last November. Given that, you cannot be all bad .
Welcome again to the crowd!
Reg
Welcome again to the crowd!
Reg
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perseverance pays off
I'm a bit puzzled by the apparent perspective; you can see a trace of the port wingtip and horizontal tailplane, but from that clue, which does match with the cockpits, I would expect to see more separation on the landing gear legs, which would need to be more "side-on" to merge like they appear!
Is it a Miles Hawk Major?
I'm a bit puzzled by the apparent perspective; you can see a trace of the port wingtip and horizontal tailplane, but from that clue, which does match with the cockpits, I would expect to see more separation on the landing gear legs, which would need to be more "side-on" to merge like they appear!
Is it a Miles Hawk Major?