Further capacity at this point only further dilutes yields (particularly with a lack corporate demand at the moment) and is certainly not sustainable. The grab at market share will end with a casualty.
|
Originally Posted by jrfsp
(Post 11015058)
The grab at market share will end with a casualty.
|
Originally Posted by Keg
(Post 11015085)
Probably. Of Qantas, Rex, Virgin and Jetstar who are you putting your money on it to be?
|
But Rex is using a plastic knife that you get in kiddie pirate costumes.
|
Originally Posted by Climb150
(Post 11014248)
I would like to share your enthusiasm but I doubt Australians would be ok with people coming into Australia without quarantine regardless of a negative CoVID test.
Even with the vaccine, some people will refuse to take it and you will still get very small outbreaks in the community. People will still get sick and some will dye. The anti-vaccers will always be around,they are anti everything(most of them anyway) so in reality not much notice will be taken of them. As i see it,as long as the majority are aware of what is required to keep us all safe,the rest shpuld fall into place. |
Originally Posted by blubak
(Post 11015134)
I think we just want as much care as possible when borders open again,everybody wants to see money being spent by tourists & as many people back at work as possible.
The anti-vaccers will always be around,they are anti everything(most of them anyway) so in reality not much notice will be taken of them. As i see it,as long as the majority are aware of what is required to keep us all safe,the rest shpuld fall into place. |
The signs elsewhere are slowly showing positives also...
https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/202...ed-get-flight/ |
Originally Posted by jrfsp
(Post 11015058)
Further capacity at this point only further dilutes yields (particularly with a lack corporate demand at the moment) and is certainly not sustainable. The grab at market share will end with a casualty.
But given how the last capacity war ended, I’d say it might also comes down to who blinks first.... If QF have taken on a lot of debt through COVID and then lose money again, they’ll have to call it quits on the “line in the sand” eventually (but they’re still stronger than Rex/VA). If VA are aggressive and Bain etc want see results that convince them to tip in more cash, they might end up back in a sustainable position. But last time around, they ran out of cash before QF. Rex are the more unknown IMHO. They have a decent war chest for now and (arguably) lower costs (wages and lease fees) for their small fleet. They also have a large regional network to generate cash to help with the current aggressive expansion. Buuuuuuttt, how long will their cash last and will the new investors (PAG) be willing to put more in? |
Originally Posted by aviation_enthus
(Post 11015904)
To early to call “the weakest link”.
But given how the last capacity war ended, I’d say it might also comes down to who blinks first.... If QF have taken on a lot of debt through COVID and then lose money again, they’ll have to call it quits on the “line in the sand” eventually (but they’re still stronger than Rex/VA). If VA are aggressive and Bain etc want see results that convince them to tip in more cash, they might end up back in a sustainable position. But last time around, they ran out of cash before QF. Rex are the more unknown IMHO. They have a decent war chest for now and (arguably) lower costs (wages and lease fees) for their small fleet. They also have a large regional network to generate cash to help with the current aggressive expansion. Buuuuuuttt, how long will their cash last and will the new investors (PAG) be willing to put more in? The predatory Sydney Canberra flights they plan to launch with their SAABs is laughable, this route is mostly business and politicians which neither will never travel on a SAAB unless they're going to Bourke and the RAAF jets are all broken. |
Originally Posted by Fujiroll76
(Post 11014239)
It’s been confirmed that the Oct 2021 ramp up will include 40% of pre COVID levels, increasing to 70% in the following 12 months to Oct 2022. This indicates the 787/330 will be at 100% capacity with the remaining 30% set aside for the potential 380 return 12 months later (Nov 2023)
insert a 20% reduction in flight crew who took VR / ER who won’t be returning. insert the LH crew who are starting to transition to SH as of next BP Is it just me or should some serious recruitment, be at the very least being discussed at the round table... 12% of the list are greater than 60 years as it stands today..most are unlikely to be around come 350 ULR ops. Theres cause for optimism. If the 787/A330 flying comes back as suggested then there will have to be more training. That would mean advertised slots. That would indicate useful work? A380 crew could bid for them, even Captains could use their golden bid to bid back at the company’s discretion. Most would have the seniority to be awarded a slot. If the company refuse then how can the company argue ‘no useful work’ and continue to stand A380 down? |
Will an A380 pilot want to burn a ‘bid back’ to get back to flying 12 months earlier? The consequence is they can’t return to the A380 and may not be able to use their bid back on the 737 approaching 65.
|
It’s a personal thing I suppose?
If they can last another two years on Annual leave then that’s great! |
Originally Posted by Keg
(Post 11021394)
Will an A380 pilot want to burn a ‘bid back’ to get back to flying 12 months earlier? The consequence is they can’t return to the A380 and may not be able to use their bid back on the 737 approaching 65.
|
There is no way International flights (above current repatriation flight) will be ramping up in October. This was all predicated on having the vaccine rollout completed by end October. The vaccine rollout is proving a dismal failure (already 3.4m doses behind planned) and the latest blood clot scare campaign will put things behind even more. More and more people will wait for the Pfizer or Moderna of which Australia cannot get anywhere near enough, probably for years. I think there will be millions of doses of Astrazeneca left on the shelves, with millions content forgo the vaccine and just keep international borders shut.
For states like WA, they'll be lucky to have free international travel before 2023. My best guess is that by October, we might have a fairly reliable Tasman bubble at best and hopefully more sensible state border controls. |
Originally Posted by The The
(Post 11021923)
For states like WA, they'll be lucky to have free international travel before 2023. |
Originally Posted by Fujiroll76
(Post 11014239)
It’s been confirmed that the Oct 2021 ramp up will include 40% of pre COVID levels, increasing to 70% in the following 12 months to Oct 2022. This indicates the 787/330 will be at 100% capacity with the remaining 30% set aside for the potential 380 return 12 months later (Nov 2023)
|
Originally Posted by MelbourneFlyer
(Post 11021947)
Confirmed where and by whom? If you're talking about anything Qantas has officially announced, October 2021 sees the nomination and very subject-to-reality return of almost all international flights bar some cities and bar the A380s, which would seem to represent more than 40% of capacity, or are you talking about estimated demand, ie not the number of seats flying but the number of bums on seats?
|
I think that the public and their politicians will now only accept a zero covid risk. Unless the Federal government steps in with a compulsory vaccination program, 14 day quarantines are going to be with us for a very long time. If there isn’t a very high proportion of vaccinated population then we will continue to have sporadic cases and sporadic shutdowns and lock-outs. That will kill any demand for much flying across any borders, domestic included.
|
Originally Posted by Climb150
(Post 11014248)
I would like to share your enthusiasm but I doubt Australians would be ok with people coming into Australia without quarantine regardless of a negative CoVID test.
Even with the vaccine, some people will refuse to take it and you will still get very small outbreaks in the community. People will still get sick and some will dye. |
Originally Posted by lc_461
(Post 11021926)
Raises the point - can 'militant' states like WA go against the Commonwealth in the opening of their federal border? Eg Commonwealth removes restrictions on international travel, can WA refuse to allow entry into PER via that route?
I believe the 'full faith and credit' clause (s118) as it is called, means that every other State and the Commonwealth must accept and give full faith and credit to acts, laws and regulations that a State adopts in the interests, in this case, of public health which is well within the purview of State powers. This is why Clive was never going to win his stupid case, because if WA passed a law imposing a tariff on movement of persons and goods into WA, then that would be a clear breach of s92 and unconstitutional because trade and commerce is not a State power as the Constitution bars any interference with it. BUT, s118 is what allows the State(s) to impose entry restrictions based on laws and regulations that they have the Constitutional power to enact and enforce. Long explanation I know but that's my understanding of why the States can continue to impose these restrictions. *EDIT* I just re-read your question - interesting - but I think the answer is still yes. WA refused to let a ship dock at Fremantle at the beginning of the crisis. I believe refusal of landing would come within the State's rights - it is probably one for a constitutional expert though because external affairs is a Commonwealth responsibility which I would suggest includes the regulation of shipping etc (as aviation in the sense of powered flight didn't exist when the constitution was written). The Commonwealth has the power to regulate and make laws for emigration, immigration and - I think it actually says - "the naturalisation of aliens". But I would think that just means they can make laws for it - it doesn't mean they can force a State to accept a vessel if they don't want to - just as they can't force WA, SA and Queensland to all adopt Standard Gauge for all their railways. |
Originally Posted by Fujiroll76
(Post 11022054)
Andrew David a few town halls ago. This is the realistic schedule come October. Ie services flown not capacity expected.
Did he thank everybody before he spoke🤭 |
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 11021558)
I’d say most would burn it in a heartbeat!
After listening to a number of webinars, it’s clear that this situation is taking a considerable mental toll on some. :( |
Originally Posted by blubak
(Post 11022374)
Did he thank everybody before he spoke🤭
That’s a very good question. Number one on slido! |
Originally Posted by lc_461
(Post 11021926)
Raises the point - can 'militant' states like WA go against the Commonwealth in the opening of their federal border? Eg Commonwealth removes restrictions on international travel, can WA refuse to allow entry into PER via that route?
"All persons entering WA must quarantine at an approved facility, currently the only approved facility is at Ginbata Airport GBW / YGIA." Followed by.... "Persons must pay the cost of 14 days tent quarantine, currently at $1,000 / day." And if airlines didn't get the hint....... "This also applies to all airline crew but due to the additional risk all airline crew must quarantine for 28 days" As my Papa says, "There's more than one way to skin a cat". TTS |
Was up at Tamworth and the talk is that they are bringing in overseas ( Asian ) pilots as FOs on the Dash using 457 visas.
I was working as a builders labourer ( gratis ) during the full lockdowns for my son in laws new house build and the other builders labourer was an Emirates 380 FO. He was a very hard worker and I am sure would have taken any aviation job going after his Emirates stand down. |
Originally Posted by pistonpuffer
(Post 11025978)
Was up at Tamworth and the talk is that they are bringing in overseas ( Asian ) pilots as FOs on the Dash using 457 visas.
I was working as a builders labourer ( gratis ) during the full lockdowns for my son in laws new house build and the other builders labourer was an Emirates 380 FO. He was a very hard worker and I am sure would have taken any aviation job going after his Emirates stand down. There is absolutely no talk of that happening. Recruitment is planned for later this year and most likely will be to fill in MEL and SYD spots initially. There are plenty of locals who would be more than suitable. QLink will also most likely issue an internal EOI first, just like NJS and Network have done. There is also bound to be a few cadets from the QFPP academy who are due to finish soon and those who have made it through the selection process could possibly be offered a spot. |
An EOI for dash spots in ML and SY has already gone out to Jetstar Wide-body pilots.
|
Don't totally understand, are you saying that will not happen?
|
Originally Posted by pistonpuffer
(Post 11027317)
Don't totally understand, are you saying that will not happen?
Correct...that will not happen. |
Rumours circulating that an EOI is imminent for 787 & 330 SO’s to return from LWOP early.
747 RIN completed with ground schools scheduled for next month. All who took LWOP will be offered to return prior to end of year. With a mix of repat and potential travel bubbles, all are required to meet the demand |
Bring ‘em back and CR them! :} |
|
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11028358)
Stay positive folks - don’t let the negative Nancy’s on here stifle your optimism. edit: link changed - https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/me...gathers-speed/ |
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11028358)
"error": { "code": "401", "message": "Invalid access token" } } Is this what your link is supposed to give: https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/me...gathers-speed/ |
Originally Posted by Chris2303
(Post 11028417)
This is what that URL is giving me{
"error": { "code": "401", "message": "Invalid access token" } } Is this what your link is supposed to give: https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/me...gathers-speed/ try this QANTAS GROUP RECOVERY GATHERS SPEED • Group Domestic capacity increasing beyond previous estimates to reach 90 per cent of pre-COVID levels in Q4 FY21; Jetstar to exceed 100 per cent due to strong leisure demand. • All Qantas and Jetstar domestic crew now back at work. • Recovery strategy puts short term focus on cash positive flying over profit margins – meaning more low fares to help drive demand. • Continuing to target resumption of rest of international network from late October; continued flexibility for customers. • Premium international lounges in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane to reopen. • New deal signed with Accor https://investor.qantas.com/Download...5/02363725.pdf |
And yet:
Covid-19: Australia will have 1000 cases a week if borders are opened, Scott Morrison warns Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison says there would be at least 1000 coronavirus cases in Australia every week if the international borders were to open, even when vulnerable people are vaccinated. Morrison was asked by Perth radio 6PR to clarify Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt’s comments earlier this week that international travel could remain off-limits even if the entire population is vaccinated. The Prime Minister also laid out future plans to allow Australians to travel overseas for business and funerals and potentially quarantine at home, before allowing mass travel again. ... Asked if that meant the entire world would need to be vaccinated before Australia could reopen, Morrison said it was a “moving situation”. “We can’t control what is happening in the rest of the world,” he said, adding that quarantine-free travel had already opened to New Zealand. He said work was underway to open a travel bubble with Singapore, but ruled out similar pathways for Europe, the United States, India, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and other countries with large outbreaks. |
I think the point that ScoMo is trying to make, is that even with 1000 cases a week, it will result in minimal deaths, assuming the vulnerable are vaccinated.
We need the media to report deaths or serious illness, not cases. Zero cases forever is fantasy land! |
Originally Posted by Transition Layer
(Post 11028914)
I think the point that ScoMo is trying to make, is that even with 1000 cases a week, it will result in minimal deaths, assuming the vulnerable are vaccinated.
We need the media to report deaths or serious illness, not cases. Zero cases forever is fantasy land! |
Originally Posted by Transition Layer
(Post 11028914)
I think the point that ScoMo is trying to make, is that even with 1000 cases a week, it will result in minimal deaths, assuming the vulnerable are vaccinated.
We need the media to report deaths or serious illness, not cases. Zero cases forever is fantasy land! And further to this, what he is trying to say is that we can’t have those case numbers if State Premiers continue carrying on and locking borders at the sound of someone sneezing. Common sense would say if your most vulnerable are vaccinated, and state premiers agree not to close borders when cases emerge, then you can open up flying from International destinations in a controlled way (ie from permitted countries and to those who have been vaccinated). But common sense ain’t all that common amongst our so called political ‘leaders’. |
VIC, NSW and QLD will not be open if there is so called ‘thousands’ of cases a week.
Pipe dream. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.