Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Recruitment

Old 7th Sep 2018, 09:22
  #1881 (permalink)  
34R
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 48
Posts: 179
What a tedious thread this has become......
34R is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2018, 05:13
  #1882 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 163
It sure has!
SHVC is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2018, 01:49
  #1883 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,176
Smile

Cognitive dissonance.

Originally Posted by Keg View Post
Iíve advocated for every pilot who meets the minimum criteria to do the psychometric testing. That way you find the Ďdiamond in the roughí; the best psychometric pilots irrespective of experience. Sure there are more parts to the process but the psych helps builds a more complete picture.
Iíve removed the number so as to make it less tedious.

Perhaps the tediousness of this thread comes more from the often snide, passive aggressive, often personal attacks rather than an Ďopinionated individualí responding to those things?

My humble thanks to those colleagues Iíve run into at work who encourage or thank me for something Iíve said on PPRuNe that resonates. Interestingly the rock throwers on PPRuNe never say anything to my face.

1. Anyway...
2. Enjoy the rest of your weekend folks.
3. Hooroo.

.
Keg is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2018, 06:07
  #1884 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 156
Originally Posted by pilotchute View Post
Asking me during an interview whay my biggest fear is could possibly be the stupidist question I have ever been asked. If you or someone you know who is a strong candidate didn't get past application stage they were probably weeded out on one of many worthless criteria come up with by HR.
Be careful with this question, know a guy who was going for a mining job in WA who was asked this question, his response was something happening to his family. When he was rejected they said they had concerns he may struggle with being away from home for extended periods of time........ An no - i'm not joking
logansi is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2018, 09:06
  #1885 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 634
Originally Posted by logansi View Post
Be careful with this question, know a guy who was going for a mining job in WA who was asked this question, his response was something happening to his family. When he was rejected they said they had concerns he may struggle with being away from home for extended periods of time........ An no - i'm not joking
I don't doubt that for a second - and is the reason HR, and the power it appears to now wield in our industry, gives me the $hits...
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2018, 11:25
  #1886 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Age: 37
Posts: 115
Just replace 'your' with 'their' when formulating your reply.
Gligg is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 04:54
  #1887 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 786
So today we find out the additional 6 787 are starting to arrive next year not April 2020 as I believe was announced. Sydney basing will open earlier and therefore in my opinion pilot recruitment will have to pick up.
dragon man is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 05:53
  #1888 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 147
Revised schedule was announced previously, around May I think. Extra 787s (6) starting 2019 with the last arriving mid 2020... so old news but your point remains valid
crosscutter is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 08:58
  #1889 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 786
Originally Posted by crosscutter View Post
Revised schedule was announced previously, around May I think. Extra 787s (6) starting 2019 with the last arriving mid 2020... so old news but your point remains valid
Correct, my apologies, Iím hearing they are working on some form of sweetener to entice 747 crew to go there to avoid a RIN. What that is I donít know.
dragon man is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 09:49
  #1890 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 200
In either case, middle seniority and junior crew get screwed again.
goodonyamate is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 10:31
  #1891 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 786
Originally Posted by goodonyamate View Post
In either case, middle seniority and junior crew get screwed again.
How is that?
dragon man is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 10:42
  #1892 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Originally Posted by dragon man View Post
Iím hearing they are working on some form of sweetener to entice 747 crew to go there to avoid a RIN. What that is I donít know.
That would have to be some sweetener.
ruprecht is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 10:54
  #1893 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 946
Originally Posted by ruprecht View Post


That would have to be some sweetener.
Another email denying VR will ever happen again on the 747
maggot is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 12:51
  #1894 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by mmmbop View Post
Sending every RAAF pilot to conduct psychometric testing without conducting a resume review first EQUALS placing all RAAF pilots at the top of the recruiting process.

No matter how much an individual tries to argue it isn't.
JFC. He made it clear that *every* pilot (RAAF, GA, Regional, hell..... even Navy) who meets the minimum criteria should proceed to psychometric testing. How that places RAAF at the top is beyond me. You can be the Wicked Witch of the West with 2000 hours on a broomstick. If that meets the minimum criteria set by the airline, you proceed to recruitment testing. End of story. How is that biased towards or against anyone?
DutchRoll is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 20:11
  #1895 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1,196
Virgin dropped their mins to pretty much nothing at the start of 2018. What surprises me is the people getting interviews still have roughly the same CV as people did before the mins drop.

1500+ hours with 500 multi crew or multi PIC still seems to be what is wanted. I don't understand what they expect to achieve by dropping the mins if their expectations haven't changed.

With Qantas it's anyone's guess what they are after. The whole industry is confused. The mins should reflect the experience needed to at least get a face to face or a psychometric assessment.
pilotchute is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 21:00
  #1896 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 786
I gather that from Sept 1 under part 61 CASA has told Qantas that the initial second officer type check will now include sequences below 20,000, one of these been the candidate must be able to land the simulator in a 20 knot xwind with an engine out. IMO this makes previous experience highly relevant and simulator check as part of the employment process very relevant.
dragon man is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 23:04
  #1897 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Originally Posted by pilotchute View Post
With Qantas it's anyone's guess what they are after. The whole industry is confused.
I did enjoy the quote from one of our newer SO's:

"I don't really like aviation, I'm just really good at it..."

That is not a joke.
ruprecht is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 23:28
  #1898 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 946
Originally Posted by DutchRoll View Post

JFC. He made it clear that *every* pilot (RAAF, GA, Regional, hell..... even Navy) who meets the minimum criteria should proceed to psychometric testing. How that places RAAF at the top is beyond me. You can be the Wicked Witch of the West with 2000 hours on a broomstick. If that meets the minimum criteria set by the airline, you proceed to recruitment testing. End of story. How is that biased towards or against anyone?
God no, not the navy
maggot is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 01:23
  #1899 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 749
I don't know what the min requirements are currently for QF, but when I was recruited they were fairly simple. You basically had the hours or you didn't. When your number came up you did psychometric testing and a quick "is there anything obviously weird about this applicant?" interview, and if you passed that you did a sim check, and if you passed that you did a final longer and more probing interview. Notwithstanding that none of these processes are perfect and it's always possible for someone to have a bad day and get knocked back, or someone else to be lucky and slip through (I know examples of both), the entire system was reasonably fair irrespective of aviation background. I've not read anything Keg has written on this thread which would deviate from that type of fairness in the recruitment system, but I have heard on the grapevine that HR people with no aviation background are making quite a hash of the system. That's the world over these days though, unfortunately.

Originally Posted by maggot View Post
God no, not the navy
Haha! Said firmly tongue in cheek of course! They were just young and foolish when they chose the wrong service!
DutchRoll is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 01:35
  #1900 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by ruprecht View Post
I did enjoy the quote from one of our newer SO's:

"I don't really like aviation, I'm just really good at it..."

That is not a joke.
Theríre probably there to balance out those of us who do like aviation but are a bit crap at it.
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.