Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

CRASH TOLL/Airwork Boeing 737F ZK-TLC HONIARA

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

CRASH TOLL/Airwork Boeing 737F ZK-TLC HONIARA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2014, 12:10
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,367
Received 82 Likes on 38 Posts
Most operators do not retract flaps on the runway. Maybe the should read "most operators in this region". If you were going to configure flaps for an evacuation in a pax plane you would select flaps 40 (more flaps than the typical 30, eg)

I do not know what procedures are in place for freighters in a non-normal landing. If it was me, I would select 40 in case the fwd exits were blocked and I wanted to preserve my fine pink young self with minimal souvenir scars.

That said, the aircraft is on the rwy, the crew are apparently unscathed, the world is rid of another ancient -300. What's not to like?



castigat ridendo mores
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2014, 20:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Solomon Islands
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Local media report

Solomon Star newspaper

An eye witness Joseph Abana told the Solomon Star that he was at the eastern end of the airport when the incident occurred.

Abana claimed the aircraft was hit by a strong wind to its right side when it was about to land.

“When it landed its tyres appears to have collapsed so it slides on its right side till it stops near the domestic terminal.

“Its right wing also crashed to the ground and as a result damaged its turbine engine.”

He said it took some few minutes before the fire service responded and rushed to the scene.

“Fortunately the crash did not ignite fire and none of the three crews on board were injured.”

Mr Abana also called on the aviation fire service to pull up their socks and to be on alert every time.
VolLibre is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 04:26
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Florida USA
Age: 61
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TW. Good keep the thread open. Have photos coming under the aircraft, smashed wheelwell and gear ripped out will post.
4 Holer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 04:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Straya
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bellcrank 74 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 04:49
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Straya
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[IMG][/IMG]
Bellcrank 74 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 04:51
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Straya
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[IMG][/IMG]
Bellcrank 74 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 05:08
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 797
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
If full flap (30 or 40) was selected for landing and maintained throughout the landing roll, would you expect to see any damage on the flaps and/or canoes on the far RH side as it slid down the runway?

Would the initial downward force as the gear leg snapped cause any part of the wingtip or flaps to contact the runway?

The last pic doesn't seem to show any marks or ripples at all.

I've found a video of a TNT example O/S a few years ago. Doesn't show any damage, but the nose doesn't lift after either. Big difference though is that they knew they were going in with the RH main gear up.


Last edited by Going Nowhere; 27th Jan 2014 at 05:35. Reason: video and editing
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 05:14
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Florida USA
Age: 61
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAYBE THEY WERE TRYING TO GO AROUND BEFORE GOING IN THE GRASS.

As suggested before seems its well offline to the right of runway in a straight line , scrubbed out R/H main outboard tired and blew the sidewall ( see photo close up ) trying to get back ? Does any 737 "pilot" ( not driver ) think flap were retracted for the go around before the gear came out ??

The TNT 737 had the R/H main not extend but ended up on the engine.
4 Holer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 05:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The local
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they did plan to go around they would have set flaps 15.... If I can understand what your asking correctly no they would not retract the gear before verifying 'positive rate' on the altimeter...
ChaseIt is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 05:31
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whats minimum flap for normal ldg?
waren9 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 05:35
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Florida USA
Age: 61
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes. the TE flaps look up and canoes faired except where the bent R/H T/E piece where the gear hit. Must have been selected up at some point after touchdown to capture the bent TE from the gear , but the Leading edges are extended maybe would not retract as the R/H inboard T/E flaps are chewed up and not stowed. Your right very interesting maybe the FDR will reveal all.
4 Holer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 05:35
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The local
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flaps 30 or 40 for landing or flaps 15 for One Inop
ChaseIt is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 07:01
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gate_15L
Age: 50
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
4 Holer

mate what do you have against Airwork? One of them run off with your wife or sheep?
Gate_15L is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 07:07
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The local
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the look of the photos you could say it APPEARS as a failed one Inop go around... flaps 1 and 1 thrust reverser.... Any 737 pilots agree?
ChaseIt is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 07:13
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gate_15L
Age: 50
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
ugh as a 737 driver, I reckon your talking crap.
Gate_15L is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 07:36
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Florida USA
Age: 61
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G15

Take the emotion out, you ploughed a 737 in with happy snaps everywhere. I learnt there a bitsa fleet of 7 out of a shed in Auckland based in Australia, I had some obvious questions ?? I am just interested as gears don't fall out of airplanes much where I'm from buddy and there are thousands of landings with 737s daily .
4 Holer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 07:38
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The local
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Worth a crack
ChaseIt is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 08:40
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Theville
Age: 43
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I am just interested as gears don't fall out of airplanes much where I'm from
Florida and New York are in the same United States 4-holer?

Southwest jet lands after landing gear collapses

Pull your head in d!ckhead....
Username here is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 08:56
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see why he is on such a crusade with this?

There is N registered aircraft operating around the world under the same thing.

I also don't get what the issue is with having different variants of aircraft either? Pretty much every operator around the world has multiple types of aircraft under their AOC?

There are multiple 737 accidents pretty much every year. Why the crusade on THIS one? What's your agenda?
lilflyboy262...2 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2014, 08:58
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bottom of the Harbour
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Removing all emotion....landing gear collapses are just that. The RH MLG on this aircraft has suffered a catastrophic failure, not a collapse.

There is more to this than meets the eye.
KABOY is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.