Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QANTAS Exodus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Nov 2011, 05:36
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Qantas has advertised slots internally for 7 A330 SO's. Which is a bit strange as no one can bid for them as the rank is now the lowest for SO's.

I guess they could assign the most junior, but they are all on the A380 where they are required.

Very strange.
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 05:40
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Springfield
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick off topic Q. What routes does the 330 require SOs?
Praise Jebus is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 05:53
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Look up and wave
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Auckland LA pretty much.....
MACH082 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 05:55
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
HKG, PVG, NRT, LAX plus some SIN.
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 06:05
  #45 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Good point. Can they do a reduction in numbers off the 744 to the A330 when there are more junior people on the Dugong?
Keg is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 06:15
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Exiled in the Ukraine
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F&$k, here we go again! More shuffling of the titanic's deck chairs. How much more uncertainty do our junior crews have to put up with?????
Stalins ugly Brother is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 07:26
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sunny Coast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've operated with 2 F/Os on the A330 3 times in the last 6 weeks. Obviously S/Os are getting a bit thin on the ground.
Stanley42 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 07:29
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Next to Bay 8
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, that's what I was wondering Keg. Above and beyond that... the 744 can't really afford to lose anymore S/O's anyway... they've all been shuffled over to the A330 & A380 over the last 12 months. And as previously said, they're surely not going to move anyone off the A380 only to bring them back in 6-12 months time as more aircraft arrive?!?!

S/O 744 divisors ~ 180ish
S/O A330 divisors ~ 175ish

And F/O's operating as S/O's on numerous 330 sectors. Word is not many PVG sectors for S/O's on this roster... all going to F/O's.

I understand another S/O has left since the vacancy notice came out too... making 8 short... 7 advertised.

PS - 330 also use S/O's for MNL.
OhForSure is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 07:30
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Next to Bay 8
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stanley beat me to it.
OhForSure is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 07:37
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
I have seen Captains operating as SO's.
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 07:41
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seniority sure is a double edged bitch at times. Maybe pilots need to rethink the benefits for individuals vs all pilots industrywide equation. Maybe we need to think about just how valuable seniority really is? More mobility sure would help pilots be less captive.
Amen. Wonder which airline will be the first to successfully transition from a seniority system to something else and how much support it gets from the pilot ranks.
shon7 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 07:41
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Inside their OODA loop
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that those leaving now would be have decided to interview elsewhere due to the lead up to the August 24 D-day announcement. In other words they have been in the departure pipeline for quite some time. The October 29 act of economic vandalism (I am tempted to use a stronger word) does 2 things:
(1) Validates the decision for those who have gone. LWOP will be much more likely to stay elsewhere.
(2) Pushed those wavering to go. Many will now to decide to interview.

In all likelihood the Oct 29 event will probably not even begin to manifest itself in an exodus until February 2012 & beyond . Any current exodus is just a trickle before the flood.

Start drawing up your contingency plans.
FYSTI is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 08:04
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
S/O's will come from the A380 as they are the most junior. Funny thing is that most of the junior guys where originally to go to the 330 only to be transferred to the dugong. Will just create more churn in training.
Capt_SNAFU is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 09:59
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 20
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg, if I recall correctly in the last reduction in numbers off the 744, one of the S/Os who was assigned back to the 330 ended up displacing the most junior 380 S/O
Mafortion is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 10:10
  #55 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Fleet pay for S/Os is looking pretty good to a lot of people about now I bet! Opportunity lost on the rollover!
Keg is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 10:25
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: springfield retirement castle
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many opportunities lost on the rollover..
jaded boiler is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 22:00
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
Seniority sure is a double edged bitch at times. Maybe pilots need to rethink the benefits for individuals vs all pilots industrywide equation. Maybe we need to think about just how valuable seniority really is? More mobility sure would help pilots be less captive.
No all it will do is open the floodgates to all the expats. It would create the situation where you would have to leave the country just to get the experience to be able to be apply for a command.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 22:55
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had there been no seniority, the only expats would have been mostly F/O's anyway. Its chicken and egg stuff.

My point exactly. Could a few pilots now get over there own short term interests for the betterment of all pilots from then on?

Sounds not, and we'll all be captive forever.
waren9 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 23:19
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: TIBA
Posts: 461
Received 129 Likes on 37 Posts
...... and what's your short term interest Waren9?
CaptCloudbuster is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 23:31
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably much the same as everybody elses.

I just want it debated. There is good and bad with seniority, no disagreement there. Has the worm turned? I personally think it has.

Management and their tactics have evolved dramatically over the years. The pilots have not. How many QF pilots would prefer there was no seniority at Jetstar? Probably many (in their short term interest!) would not. There would have never have been a bull**** MOU for a start.

If you want to play the man instead of the ball Im not interested.
waren9 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.