Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Air NZ may fly jets in regions

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air NZ may fly jets in regions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2008, 06:45
  #321 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The same machines they are flying now, the ATR just keeps the accountants happy and the pilots paid!
c100driver is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 02:42
  #322 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: christchurch
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As announced today by Mark Pitt (GM Mount Cook Airline)
No change in Atr Fleet for the next 5 years due to increased Fuel Costs etc.....
in paradise is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 07:52
  #323 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Zealand
Age: 49
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm picking that they're going to hold off a while and they will probably be launch customers for the proposed 90 seater ATR or Q400x in two or three years from now. They'll choose the most economical version of the above.......
ramyon is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 07:55
  #324 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NZ
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, right.
fourholes is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 08:25
  #325 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Just visiting
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once again management have let the troops downs I see. This supposed 90 seat aircraft hasn't even hit the drawing board yet, so I'd imagine it would be 5 years plus.

Very dissapointing
Hanz Blix is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 12:04
  #326 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was inevitable.

The 72-600 is hardly a big improvment on the -500 from a passenger and operator point of view.

The Q400 doesn't have enough extra seats regardless of arguments about performance, fleet commonality with Air NSN etc. Why sell your 68-seaters for 74-seaters, spending a small fortune in the process?

The 90-seaters don't even exist as a drawing yet. No point in wasting too much time on them yet.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The 72-500s make a good return on investment. Proven history in NZ, accountants dream. Why change when there's no real reason to do so?

Smart move, I say, disappointing as it may be for the troops.

Bombay
Bombay is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 20:24
  #327 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes letters

few boys on yes's now by the sounds of it - any news as to when they get the call up? will the ceasation of increasing jet services into the regions slow them down.

thoughts please
craka is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 22:17
  #328 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With keeping the 500's it sounds like they are going to sharpen up the interior, new seats etc. No doubt like the new "Elegance" cabin, get pretty much what the 600 offers for relatively small cost.

However for the pilots, no change. Bit of a let down for them after all the talk about new airplanes.
Lo-Bank is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.