Finally, some balls - NJS Pilots take industrial action
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WOG
Wasn't talking to you in particular, rather the more strident elements that contribute here...
So answer me this. Were the Ansett NZ pilots stupid? Or the '89ers? Or maybe they were just unlucky?
If you take "industrial action", whatever form it might take, you are walking a tightrope. Good luck with that.
Most people that go on strike - oh, sorry, take "industrial action" - have absolutely no idea what effect their actions have on a business. They are truly short-term in their outlook.
Ask any British coalminer.
Fenwicksgirl
And who made you do all that? Somebody holding a gun to your head? Wake up. You chose that path, now live with it. Just because you had to study a bit, the world owes you a living? Grow up.
The miner may not have to do the checks, but he does have to work in conditions that you probably couldn't handle, taking risks that you wouldn't want to. He, too, knows what he signed up for. In many ways, he is far more deserving of his reward than feckless whingers like you.
lowerlobe
Oh yeah. Right. Of course it is that simple...
not.
Remoak, thanks for calling me mindless, appreciate that
I do know the pilot group are not stupid, so things must be grim if they are even thinking of industrial action, not strike mind you, industrial action.
If you take "industrial action", whatever form it might take, you are walking a tightrope. Good luck with that.
Most people that go on strike - oh, sorry, take "industrial action" - have absolutely no idea what effect their actions have on a business. They are truly short-term in their outlook.
Ask any British coalminer.
Fenwicksgirl
It took me 9 years of hard slogging to get to one, cost me untold amount of money and i still have to keep studying, doing checks etc etc. Show me a fu%$ing miner that has to do that you weak moron!!!
The miner may not have to do the checks, but he does have to work in conditions that you probably couldn't handle, taking risks that you wouldn't want to. He, too, knows what he signed up for. In many ways, he is far more deserving of his reward than feckless whingers like you.
lowerlobe
Tell that to the consortium that were willing to borrow billions to buy the company.If they thought it was a good thing then the margins are still OK
not.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kids are not stupid and neither are a lot of the younger pilots. The pilots kept getting the raw end of the prawn and a lot of them have headed o/s, no progression from qlink, no step up to the big birds without being current with 3 shuttle landings, 10 IR renewals and oh you have to be under 28 any number of reasons.
The kids have seen this and basically said WTF??? Go through hell, to go bush with no planned future, oh and I have to pay for it! No thanks, I can be a garbo, chippie, plumber, lawyer, banker, glassie (maybe not), earn more, be home at night…….
And they wonder why the number of CPLs issued to Australian Citizens as plummeted faster than shares in a sub-prime mortgage lender.
The kids have seen this and basically said WTF??? Go through hell, to go bush with no planned future, oh and I have to pay for it! No thanks, I can be a garbo, chippie, plumber, lawyer, banker, glassie (maybe not), earn more, be home at night…….
And they wonder why the number of CPLs issued to Australian Citizens as plummeted faster than shares in a sub-prime mortgage lender.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Age: 55
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remoak, I agree that "industrial action" is not an especially constructive way to reach agreement. My question would be what other recourse do you have when you have used all other avenues to no avail?
I wasn't around the industry in 89 and wasn't directly involved in Ansett so I can't really comment on that. What I would say though is, if you have a fair enough case there should be some sort of independent judgement who can sort this stuff before it gets destructive.
NJ pilots will do what they think is best, knowing full well the outcomes of their call. They seem like a pretty frustrated bunch and they understand the only way they'll acheive some sort of acceptable outcome is if they hang together and don't destroy the company. They like their jobs which is why they are trying to get decent conditions. It would seem dialogue would go some way in solving this, that and the doom and gloom to not be played up so much. The politics of fear raises its ugly head again.
I wasn't around the industry in 89 and wasn't directly involved in Ansett so I can't really comment on that. What I would say though is, if you have a fair enough case there should be some sort of independent judgement who can sort this stuff before it gets destructive.
NJ pilots will do what they think is best, knowing full well the outcomes of their call. They seem like a pretty frustrated bunch and they understand the only way they'll acheive some sort of acceptable outcome is if they hang together and don't destroy the company. They like their jobs which is why they are trying to get decent conditions. It would seem dialogue would go some way in solving this, that and the doom and gloom to not be played up so much. The politics of fear raises its ugly head again.
Registered User **
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
remoak...You did not answer my question.
Why would the consortium want to borrow billions to buy the company if the margins and yields were not there or decreasing?
Why did the company make a record profit and by the looks of it an even larger one next year if the margins and yields were not there?
Why would the consortium want to borrow billions to buy the company if the margins and yields were not there or decreasing?
Why did the company make a record profit and by the looks of it an even larger one next year if the margins and yields were not there?
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PAF is right - a strike will harm everybody; the company, the travelling public, and definitely the pilots (to say nothing of the engineers, cabin crew etc who will get dragged into this). If a strike was to have the same result as, say, the Ansett NZ strike, the pilots will have cost a large number of people their jobs. And no, you cannot hang everything on the management, if you decide to strike, you bear the consequences.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why oh why
Remoak.
What do you say to the miners who go on strike??? How about all those Chinese miners hey, why should they strike and whinge to their companies?? You would argue that they should be happy with their lot, because think of all those slum dwellers in India...and so on and so on. When do the workers of the world in your eyes have the right to stand up and say enough is enough. Why should the big wigs get all the profits, why should all the workers have to pay??? To stand up to these people is in your eyes whinging and that we should not put our companies out.
Are you a full paying member of the communist party, because that is what you are advocating!!
What do you say to the miners who go on strike??? How about all those Chinese miners hey, why should they strike and whinge to their companies?? You would argue that they should be happy with their lot, because think of all those slum dwellers in India...and so on and so on. When do the workers of the world in your eyes have the right to stand up and say enough is enough. Why should the big wigs get all the profits, why should all the workers have to pay??? To stand up to these people is in your eyes whinging and that we should not put our companies out.
Are you a full paying member of the communist party, because that is what you are advocating!!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: perth
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
protected action
Well the decision to apply for a secrete ballot was over whelming and rightly so ,they did not have much choice .it is the only thing left for workers to do.However there are no garantee in this business with 3rd parties being able to stick there shrek like noses in in there rights to even hold the ballot ..But the pressure is on the Bosses and the fear of the unknown, that is what the TWU has up its sleve.They are packing there bags and are meeting the TWU as early as next week to try to settle the matter or more so to prevent any kind of action and more so no more bad press .
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bravo Zulu's, Hoffer and the TWU ( your spelling still sucks 
).
After this the TWU should have an information night at a local pub, suggest a Friday night 6-7pm. Get up and tell the rest of the infidels what you are offering.
No doubt some of the staff from the "other operators" would be interested to see what you can do for them.
).After this the TWU should have an information night at a local pub, suggest a Friday night 6-7pm. Get up and tell the rest of the infidels what you are offering.
No doubt some of the staff from the "other operators" would be interested to see what you can do for them.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZ
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fenwicksgirl,
Im one of those fu%$ing miners, undeserving lowlife pricks we are who are well beneath your highness.
How DARE we get paid a decent wage for working away from our families for two thirds of the year, breathing in all that fine silica/asbestosis air particles and red dust, missing all your kids birthdays, sports carnivals, wedding anniversaries etc etc etc.
Do you get breathtested everyday?
How about drug tested regularly?
And how do you know we dont get tested on the machines?
Do you work 14 days straight 13 hours a day?
Do you think we enjoy all of the above?
I tell you something, if i had a choice between getting paid 95 000+ doing what i do now, and zooming around the skies like you do with a smile on my face ENJOYING my job getting paid 75 000+, i know what i would take.
But you know what, i CHOSE that lifestyle, just like you CHOSE yours.
So stop bitching about how hard you've had it because hey, you've always got the choice to come and join me!
Now enjoy your cocktails in Kowloon tonight while i enjoy my............
Im one of those fu%$ing miners, undeserving lowlife pricks we are who are well beneath your highness.
How DARE we get paid a decent wage for working away from our families for two thirds of the year, breathing in all that fine silica/asbestosis air particles and red dust, missing all your kids birthdays, sports carnivals, wedding anniversaries etc etc etc.
Do you get breathtested everyday?
How about drug tested regularly?
And how do you know we dont get tested on the machines?
Do you work 14 days straight 13 hours a day?
Do you think we enjoy all of the above?
I tell you something, if i had a choice between getting paid 95 000+ doing what i do now, and zooming around the skies like you do with a smile on my face ENJOYING my job getting paid 75 000+, i know what i would take.
But you know what, i CHOSE that lifestyle, just like you CHOSE yours.
So stop bitching about how hard you've had it because hey, you've always got the choice to come and join me!
Now enjoy your cocktails in Kowloon tonight while i enjoy my............
UFO
I respect the job you do, and I respect the choice you make. All your points are valid.
Unfortunate if this turns into a them and us argument. It is really about AWA v CA and poor conditions.
I feel I have to point out that we, like you spend a hell of a long time away from home.
On average I spend around 20 days per month away. i.e. 10 over nights. Leaving home at around 4.30 am and arriving home 10-10.30 pm. work weeekends. The roster I am issued at the beginning of the month rarely reflects the actual days worked. Planning for anything is almost impossible. The only safe guards we have is that we can refuse to work on a day off if they give us less than 7 days notice, even then they apply pressure to do it for them and some guys feel obliged to help out.
So the sitting up there fglying around part is OK, but the 2 weeks off you get at home would be bloody nice as well. as for
there are posts on here some where discussing the air we/you breathg in aircraft as well. Senate committee hearings and so on, its not all that good is the fact.
60 mins covered itr a month or so ago as well.
Unfortunate if this turns into a them and us argument. It is really about AWA v CA and poor conditions.
I feel I have to point out that we, like you spend a hell of a long time away from home.
On average I spend around 20 days per month away. i.e. 10 over nights. Leaving home at around 4.30 am and arriving home 10-10.30 pm. work weeekends. The roster I am issued at the beginning of the month rarely reflects the actual days worked. Planning for anything is almost impossible. The only safe guards we have is that we can refuse to work on a day off if they give us less than 7 days notice, even then they apply pressure to do it for them and some guys feel obliged to help out.
So the sitting up there fglying around part is OK, but the 2 weeks off you get at home would be bloody nice as well. as for
breathing in all that fine silica/asbestosis air particles and red dust,
60 mins covered itr a month or so ago as well.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: At a Bordello
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RRENURP,
I'm sorry you feel that way. It is tarring everyone with the same brush.
Not all RAAFies at NJS are/were "disgusting individuals".
PAF- You come from a closed system in the RAAF, and your views of post RAAF life are overly simplistic.
Some of the problems with NJS stem not from a bunch of pilots joining then saying to the company - HEY WE WANT MORE, it is the opposite. NJS is regularly REDUCING pay and working conditons for those currently employed, and doing so by illegally forcing people to sign AWAs under threat of further pay cuts.
Are you for real?
The disgusting little individuals we work from have similar back grounds to you. (Australia's finest)
Waste of tax payers money, the lot of you.
The disgusting little individuals we work from have similar back grounds to you. (Australia's finest)
Waste of tax payers money, the lot of you.
Not all RAAFies at NJS are/were "disgusting individuals".
PAF- You come from a closed system in the RAAF, and your views of post RAAF life are overly simplistic.
Some of the problems with NJS stem not from a bunch of pilots joining then saying to the company - HEY WE WANT MORE, it is the opposite. NJS is regularly REDUCING pay and working conditons for those currently employed, and doing so by illegally forcing people to sign AWAs under threat of further pay cuts.
Seasonally Adjusted
breathing in all that fine silica/asbestosis air particles and red dust,
Now enjoy your cocktails in Kowloon tonight
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Boggabilla
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UFO
zooming around the skies like you do with a smile on my face ENJOYING my job getting paid 75 000+, i know what i would take
stop bitching about how hard you've had it
Most start with an initial outlay of around $50k (try borrowing this off the bank with no job or assets). This is followed by at least 5 years of flying aircraft you would probably never set foot in. Flying in thunderstorms - no radar, 50 degree heat with no aircon, unrealistic deadlines etc. Usually in places away from family and friends for years earning jack s
t while at the same time studying for the bigger licence. Sometimes with the missus and kids in toe.The nice peice of china you see on the mantle piece was once a piece of dirt.
Think you summed us up earlier.(Dec'06)
And its the above, "look at me, look at me - I'mmmmm a P-I-L-O-T, am i not wonderful?!", attitude, the reason why everyone DOES hate your guts!
Last edited by SmokingHole; 29th Aug 2007 at 15:43.
Sorry, but strikes are sometimes necessary, as are the threat of strikes.
Yes, they are destructive to all concerned, but so what?
If two parties negotiate but cannot reach a settlement, then either the management withdraws the pay (ie fires everyone) or the workers withdraw their labor (strike or quit).
And if you think management is voluntarily going to give a larger slice of the pie to employees without some form of pressure then I have a bridge to sell you.
And for those who talk about AWA's, look up the meaning of the term "assymettry of bargaining power"
Yes, they are destructive to all concerned, but so what?
If two parties negotiate but cannot reach a settlement, then either the management withdraws the pay (ie fires everyone) or the workers withdraw their labor (strike or quit).
And if you think management is voluntarily going to give a larger slice of the pie to employees without some form of pressure then I have a bridge to sell you.
And for those who talk about AWA's, look up the meaning of the term "assymettry of bargaining power"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whiskey Oscar Golf
I agree absolutely. I gave up a chance to return to NZ when Ansett NZ pilots went on strike and the management pilots were trying to recruit 146 drivers in Europe, because I wouldn't compromise their strike action - so as you can probably tell, I am not against industrial action per se. However... the Ansett pilots were all out of work shortly afterwards. In my opinion, they were poorly advised by a union that was just itching to make a stand - but the staff paid the price in the end.
My concern is that they WON'T do what they think is best, they will allow themselves to be persuaded by a union that may not have their best interests at heart (as has happened many times before).
lowelobe
Having been there, I can tell you that there are many, many reasons, ranging from tax advantages to asset-stripping to government or local body aid to pension funds to... well hopefully you get the picture...
Fenwicksgirl
You clearly know as little about politics as you do about anything else. What YOU are suggesting is communism, what you THINK I am suggesting is the reverse. Except that you haven't even managed to figure out what I am talking about yet. I really do hope that they never let you take command of aircraft, you would obviously have trouble working out which way is up and which way is down...
And you may want to research the difference between communism and socialism.
Sunfish
You are obviously trying to wind us up, because nobody could possibly say something that stupid intentionally... 
My question would be what other recourse do you have when you have used all other avenues to no avail?
NJ pilots will do what they think is best
lowelobe
Why would the consortium want to borrow billions to buy the company if the margins and yields were not there or decreasing?
Fenwicksgirl
When do the workers of the world in your eyes have the right to stand up and say enough is enough. Why should the big wigs get all the profits, why should all the workers have to pay??? To stand up to these people is in your eyes whinging and that we should not put our companies out.
Are you a full paying member of the communist party, because that is what you are advocating!!
Are you a full paying member of the communist party, because that is what you are advocating!!
And you may want to research the difference between communism and socialism.
Sunfish
Yes, they are destructive to all concerned, but so what?
Registered User **
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remoak..You only partially answered my question and then only in an abstract way.
If the margins were not there I hardly doubt that an organisation would want to borrow around 80% of the total amount if they thought the business was not a good one or that it's potential to earn was decreasing.
Even if they had the intention of splitting the company up,they would have trouble selling parts if the margins and profits were on the downward slide.
Secondly,If the margins are decreasing then why did QF make a record profit.It also appears that next years profit will be even larger so the idea that the margins are decreasing does not seem to hold up.
If the margins were not there I hardly doubt that an organisation would want to borrow around 80% of the total amount if they thought the business was not a good one or that it's potential to earn was decreasing.
Even if they had the intention of splitting the company up,they would have trouble selling parts if the margins and profits were on the downward slide.
Secondly,If the margins are decreasing then why did QF make a record profit.It also appears that next years profit will be even larger so the idea that the margins are decreasing does not seem to hold up.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UFO there is a bit more to it than just "zooming around the skies". Just as you point out its not fair for a pilot to judge his mine employee passenger the opposite is also true.
The NJS people are trying to make a living like all of us. They are not asking for much - just for people to sit down and negotiate in a fair manner. They have been ignored and a last resort the 'S' word has come out.
Having been in the industry for a while i can also point out that they are hardly snobs getting around in flash cars. Just everyday mums and dads trying to do their best for themselves and their families.
The old "you chose your career so now you should put up with anything and everything" that has popped up on this forum about a million times is a silly and lazy answer to a debate. Infact for each and every career you could say the same. Its actually human nature to want to improve conditions and situation and any company worth their salt will work with their employees in doing so.
Then there is the 'LEAVE' if you don't like it mentality. Well do you know what? People do and their are a few employers out their that are now clutching at straws trying to stop people doing just that as their entire experience base has just disappeared. Nothing to do with young kid that would have left for a jet job anyway, I'm talking about the blokes that have been there and done that and really were not interested in starting up learning new procedures and types.
And do you know what it all came down to? Not money but RESPECT.
Rant over. Good day.
The NJS people are trying to make a living like all of us. They are not asking for much - just for people to sit down and negotiate in a fair manner. They have been ignored and a last resort the 'S' word has come out.
Having been in the industry for a while i can also point out that they are hardly snobs getting around in flash cars. Just everyday mums and dads trying to do their best for themselves and their families.
The old "you chose your career so now you should put up with anything and everything" that has popped up on this forum about a million times is a silly and lazy answer to a debate. Infact for each and every career you could say the same. Its actually human nature to want to improve conditions and situation and any company worth their salt will work with their employees in doing so.
Then there is the 'LEAVE' if you don't like it mentality. Well do you know what? People do and their are a few employers out their that are now clutching at straws trying to stop people doing just that as their entire experience base has just disappeared. Nothing to do with young kid that would have left for a jet job anyway, I'm talking about the blokes that have been there and done that and really were not interested in starting up learning new procedures and types.
And do you know what it all came down to? Not money but RESPECT.
Rant over. Good day.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tell you something, if i had a choice between getting paid 95 000+ doing what i do now, and zooming around the skies like you do with a smile on my face ENJOYING my job getting paid 75 000+, i know what i would take.
But my whole point is, if you want to zoom around the sky
with a smile on your face, you can, there is absolutely nothing stopping you ( don,t say edumucation, I scraped thru year 11 )
Oops, nearly forgot, a position with NJS, VB, Jetstar will COST you 15-35K, thats right you have to buy your way into a job.
Usually this is nearing the pinnacle of a career.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't remember whether it was the late 60's or early 70's but there was a huge strike in the mines at Mt Isa. Turns out that it would have cost management an enormous amount to stand people down while they went through an equipment upgrade. So, as the story goes, the strike was formented, no one was paid and the equipment was changed out and the workers were screwed a couple of weeks pay.
The reason I say this is that it almost appears that a strike is being encouraged at NJS.
And on a separate subject, in this case pilot seniority really works well for the managers by making it very difficult for senior crew to change jobs.
The reason I say this is that it almost appears that a strike is being encouraged at NJS.
And on a separate subject, in this case pilot seniority really works well for the managers by making it very difficult for senior crew to change jobs.