Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Coordination during Takeoff and G/A

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Coordination during Takeoff and G/A

Old 15th Dec 2021, 10:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coordination during Takeoff and G/A

A friend sent me a video about an incident in Sao Paulo (SBSP) / Brazil

- Operation on a critical and congested airport
- Wet runway
- A B737-800 is cleared to takeoff
- An A320 - about 3 NM on final - begins G/A procedure because of unstable approach
- TWR ATC informs B737 crew to abort the takeoff
- RTO starts below V1 but likely above 100 kt

Question: what's the recommended (or contingency?) procedure that should be followed if both airplanes are in the air - for example, A320 goes around at short final and B737 is at VR, or due performance B737 captain decides not to follow ATC instructions?

Last edited by hamil; 15th Dec 2021 at 19:59. Reason: Typ
hamil is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2021, 18:45
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen the situation you describe in YVR a couple times. Pretty sporty but at the end of the day all ATC needs to do is keep the planes apart. Turn the high one away from the low one, stop the climb on the low one, climb the high one above the low one, whatever works. The important thing is that they don't touch.
ahramin is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2021, 11:42
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 miles out is already 900 feet above threshold. Keep the missed approach a/c climbing and stop the climb on the departing one (unless the airport is surrounded by ridiculous terrain). Avoidance turns if and when required. Chances are, if initiated at 3 miles, it should be possible to even maintain standard separation.

It gets a bit more frantic if the go around is initiated inside 2 miles...

mike current is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2021, 16:32
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I addition to the above, missed approach at 2000 fpm rate of climb would put the aircraft at 3000’ AGL in a minute.
Departing aircraft at 2000 fpm would be at 2000’ AGL in a minute giving you 1000’ separation.

Oversimplification yes.

“Aircraft One expedite climb and maintain (missed approach altitude) contact departure 126.8
Aircraft Two rate of climb 2000fpm or less maintain (minimum vectoring altitude) contact departure 126.8”

Something like that.
Easy piecy lemon squeezy
B2N2 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2021, 16:52
  #5 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be better if the go around procedure included a turn in order to segregate traffic.
Del Prado is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2021, 15:43
  #6 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VMC or IMC? If former, there are other options. Reduced Separation in the Vicinity etc. (In the video, the visibility looks poor...) It all depends on just how tight it has got and what the circumstances are. If it has got TIGHT, then the controller should have updated everyone's situational awareness and have had a plan B based on local knowledge. Are "Land after the departing" criteria permitted? An unstable approach GA might be something that could catch the ATCO out as being unexpected. (But again,. was it gusty/cross winds/windshear around etc.) Always difficult to tell from a video but might seem that in this case controller made a sound judgement call. I'd be reluctant to give a shedload of extra non-standard instructions (rate of climb/turn etc) to a crew in a high workload situation handling a go around because of an unstable approach. Lots of variables depending on conditions, local procedures, circumstances etc.
Lissart is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2021, 00:03
  #7 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where I worked, the missed approach and SID from RWY 15 were essentially the same - turn left to 030 - due terrain.
C208 airborne, SH360 missed approach from 300ft (due low cloud). The SH360, in cloud, sighted the C208 - missed by about 40ft. Dep cutoff distances were increased after that. Wasn't a good day, about an hour later a helicopter in marginal weather kept descending to maintain visual contact with the water, until he descended into the water - all survived.
topdrop is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.