The lowcostroutes.com website linked to above has the following details
On 2018-10-18 03:06, Flybe released the July 2019 flight schedule from London Southend to Rennes. On 2018-10-18 03:06, Flybe released the July 2019 flight schedule from London Southend to Dubrovnik. On 2018-10-18 03:06, Flybe released the March 2019 flight schedule from London Southend to Manchester. On 2018-10-18 03:06, Flybe released the June 2019 flight schedule from London Southend to Jersey. On 2018-10-18 03:06, Flybe released the September 2019 flight schedule from London Southend to Aberdeen |
Worrying times indeed. Swift action needs taken to rebuild investor confidence.
|
Swift action may mean a change of leadership to steady investor confidence and that ANY plan will have substance behind it and be achievable and deliverable for the good of the shareholders... They will be circling for casualties that they can blame for losses... it's a shi$$y world we live in but they are faceless and don't really care about personalities, they just want an ROI for the institutions they have sold the stock for and anyone's head is better than theirs!
|
NQY-SEN has been confirmed by newquay as being a STK route under the BE franchise. cs |
Does this uncertainty with regard to the future of FlyBE make pilots want to jump ship? Would FlyBE miss them as at this stage it looks like FlyBE is better off retrenching to its strongest routes? |
Originally Posted by proud_darcy
(Post 10286630)
Does this uncertainty with regard to the future of FlyBE make pilots want to jump ship?
Would FlyBE miss them as at this stage it looks like FlyBE is better off retrenching to its strongest routes? |
I wonder if flyBe can actually shrink to profitability? I don't think any airline has successfully done that in history. I agree with statements that flyBe needs to concentrate on 'core' routes - what are these though? Although markets like MAN and BHX are mentioned, are they really making money flying a 76 seat jet to MXP when easyJet are on the same route and FR are flying up to twice daily to Bergamo. It might be better to serve the smaller regional airports - if you can avoid competing with yourself.
In any case flyBe have long had a problem competing with peers. They couldn't do it at Gatwick, have had a few stabs a LCY and are also at LHR. If flyBe want to improve the per-seat costs of the Q400 fleet they could install an extra 6-8 seats, but fundamentally flyBe needs to decide what kind of airline it wants to be and to stick with it. "Faster than Road or Rail" seemed a good idea and implied that although flyBe may be more expensive than other modes, flying would be quicker - maybe. |
Originally Posted by brian_dromey
(Post 10286875)
...... It might be better to serve the smaller regional airports - if you can avoid competing with yourself......
|
"Faster than Road or Rail" seemed a good idea and implied that although flyBe may be more expensive than other modes, flying would be quicker - maybe. I long stopped using Flybe to fly MAN-EDI. & MAN-SOU purely because using MAN T3 this summer, you didn't know whether security would take 5 minutes or two hours. Added to the hassle of drop off and pick up congestion, or the use of remote drop off makes a 40 minutes flight uncompetitive to the alternatives. Now if part of T3 actually turned into a domestic terminal for quick and easy entry/exit it might make the "Faster than Road or Rail" more viable. MAN is a major hub for Flybe but the set up in T3 has done it no favours IMHO. |
Originally Posted by Mr A Tis
(Post 10286911)
They needed to get a better deal at MAN for this to happen.
I long stopped using Flybe to fly MAN-EDI. & MAN-SOU purely because using MAN T3 this summer, you didn't know whether security would take 5 minutes or two hours. Added to the hassle of drop off and pick up congestion, or the use of remote drop off makes a 40 minutes flight uncompetitive to the alternatives. |
Originally Posted by brian_dromey
(Post 10286927)
I agree, MAN T3 is a woefully over-crowded space. I'm sure that if flyBe wanted to that they could organise fast-track security for their passengers at MAN. But they don't, even for full-fare 'all in' tickets. Fast track is available at other airports for 'all in' ticket holders. Hopefully with the MAN TP some airlines will be decanted to the new T2 and/or space made available in T1.
Terminal 1 will more than likely be a Ryanair Terminal with the addition of Flybe and Loganair, it will still feel rather crowded at times but with far fewer airlines I'm sure that the experience of using the Terminal will be much better. Once Terminal 1 is demolished and with extra stands located on it's footprint I wouldn't be surprised if Terminal 3 is eventually expanded but that's if MAG has the available funds to do so, |
Summer 2019 timetable
Seems to be some odd Sachs for next summer. Looking at exeter.. It looks like one route is . Edin--exe then goes to Belfast then back to exeter. Then exe--edin....odd!?. Paris is twice dailey.winter only then back to once from summer starts.same for amsterdam.
|
Originally Posted by flybeboy
(Post 10287318)
Seems to be some odd Sachs for next summer. Looking at exeter.. It looks like one route is . Edin--exe then goes to Belfast then back to exeter. Then exe--edin....odd!?. Paris is twice dailey.winter only then back to once from summer starts.same for amsterdam.
|
Anyone think a takeover is likely? If so, who are the likely candidates? Share price continues to fall....
|
IAG. Split it off part into aer fungus regional. The rest as CityFlyer cs |
Originally Posted by cornishsimon
(Post 10287606)
IAG. Split it off part into aer fungus regional. The rest as CityFlyer cs |
I doubt there's even a single route of Flybe that would appeal to BA.
|
Originally Posted by brian_dromey
(Post 10286875)
I wonder if flyBe can actually shrink to profitability? I don't think any airline has successfully done that in history. I agree with statements that flyBe needs to concentrate on 'core' routes - what are these though? Although markets like MAN and BHX are mentioned, are they really making money flying a 76 seat jet to MXP when easyJet are on the same route and FR are flying up to twice daily to Bergamo. It might be better to serve the smaller regional airports - if you can avoid competing with yourself.
In any case flyBe have long had a problem competing with peers. They couldn't do it at Gatwick, have had a few stabs a LCY and are also at LHR. If flyBe want to improve the per-seat costs of the Q400 fleet they could install an extra 6-8 seats, but fundamentally flyBe needs to decide what kind of airline it wants to be and to stick with it. "Faster than Road or Rail" seemed a good idea and implied that although flyBe may be more expensive than other modes, flying would be quicker - maybe. |
Originally Posted by cornishsimon
(Post 10287606)
IAG. Split it off part into aer fungus regional. The rest as CityFlyer cs Is there a need to refer to Aer Lingus in this way? The airline has achieved more than most others, surviving the most stealth of competition from Ryanair, while sustainanly growing its network. Newquay has been well supported by the Aer Lingus brand, and has equally opened up North America from Newquay. EI-BUD |
Originally Posted by The96er
(Post 10287860)
I doubt there's even a single route of Flybe that would appeal to BA.
|
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
(Post 10287936)
Cornishsimon,
Is there a need to refer to Aer Lingus in this way? The airline has achieved more than most others, surviving the most stealth of competition from Ryanair, while sustainanly growing its network. Newquay has been well supported by the Aer Lingus brand, and has equally opened up North America from Newquay. EI-BUD theres no no offense meant. I refer to EI lIke this. Same as I refer to Fr as Ryanscare and BE as flymaybe EI have done good for NQY and I think there’s much more to come cs |
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
(Post 10287936)
Cornishsimon,
Is there a need to refer to Aer Lingus in this way? The airline has achieved more than most others, surviving the most stealth of competition from Ryanair, while sustainanly growing its network. Newquay has been well supported by the Aer Lingus brand, and has equally opened up North America from Newquay. EI-BUD |
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1
(Post 10288100)
You’re right, and the loss of Flybe would be far more damaging to the UK than Monarch. Flybe are pretty important for connectivity and by extension the economy of places like Exeter, Southampton. Someone like BMI Regional might offer core routes like MAN at high cost, but I doubt the range of destinations and frequency would ever be as good. |
No long haul airline will touch regional flying. It carry's way more risk and substantially higher fixed costs in support and crewing for a lot less return. Those that do still have a regional setup its run as a loss maker to get pax to the long haul hub. Most I suspect would happily get rid of it these days but the short term cost of redundancy's etc make the accountants leave it until another day.
As you state though if the lack of connectivity hits the loads for the log haul network then they might consider doing something through a separate entity. I suspect though in the UK the additional traffic from regional airports would not warrant the expense. The reason why flybe is struggling is the lack of traffic and the competition of other forms of transport. Realistically quiet a few regional airports are uneconomic and routes out of them are thin and barely cost covering. If the punters are given a choice they will save 10 quid. |
Originally Posted by canberra97
(Post 10288110)
Aer Fungus used to be a term used by spotty teenage plane spotters about 40 years ago. |
Would be interested to know their operating profit. I use Flybe every month on business and every flight is always full, predominently with business passengers. Admittedly, very few buy anything onboard. But in my case, the price of the flight is largely immaterial. I simply need to go where I need to go and the use of car will need a hotel stayover and the train will need multiple stops / time. BHD is either Flybe or boat. In the main, the latter does not work for business travel. Hence, Flybe are the only operator on the routes I fly. So they appear to have room to put up their prices in such instances to at least offset some areas of the business that are causing the losses. Like many others, I need Flybe to make a profit in order to provide a sustainable business which I depend on. |
Is the dive in share price actually cause for genuine concern or is this just a reaction to events. On the surface it would make worrying reading or are they too big to fail now and someone will bail them out. Surely the core business must be basically sound.
|
One area flybe seems to shy away from is charging for excess hand baggage. I regularly see passengers with up to four items unchallenged at the gate and once onboard the crew rarely offload bags to the boot. This seems madness as other loco airlines make millions at this. Maybe flybe fear losing passengers by being strict but considering many routes have zero competition why not make some profit? I have even heard of refunds being issued to those that have been charged when they get onboard to find the person next to them has a bigger bag than what they were charged for. Madness!
|
Nice purple roses or purple dahlias perhaps
|
RE: airsouthwest. I really don't expect her surviving,if the share price falls any further I can see that being a being a catalyst for forcing her out.
|
I hope the Board of Directors has a plan around this. Share price halving in a week is most definitely not a good thing, but there also needs to be someone who can play the role of CEO full time rather than just doing it in their spare time.
|
Whenever a new management team takes over, they usually write off lots of the capital expenditure of the previous team, so that they can make results going forward look better. It's called kitchen sinking. I wonder if there's some of this going on?
|
Originally Posted by inOban
(Post 10288746)
Whenever a new management team takes over, they usually write off lots of the capital expenditure of the previous team, so that they can make results going forward look better. It's called kitchen sinking. I wonder if there's some of this going on?
|
As I understand it from some insiders and former insiders, Saad did some good but was impossible to work with and his departure was only a matter of time.
The "new" CEO is difficult (nearly impossible) to work with and mercurial in temperament. The Director of IT has walked - only a few weeks before a major transition to Amadeus, probably the biggest IT project in the airline's history - following a row with her. There is now a complete case of "press-on-itus" - which the CRM instructors spend hours instructing Captains to avoid - from those now running the IT transition. It may work out OK, it may not. The real question is who goes first - the Chairman or the CEO? |
A really good article I thought only a couple of months ago. Gave a great insight into some of the changes gone on and I really thought they had sailed the storm that was present. https://www.aerosociety.com/news/fly...egional-roots/
|
Originally Posted by TartinTon
(Post 10288776)
Well, they brought in a new Director of IT and he signed them up to Amadeus and has already been ejected. This will have cost them in implementations fees, training and anyone who's used Amadeus previously should know that they are the masters of "nickel and diming" as the Americans call it. Unfortunately, their nickel and diming tends to start with a 5-figure number and escalate alarmingly quickly from there. No cost savings to be had there, quite the opposite.
|
Wow the share price has taken a tumble, when trading closed it was at 14.30p
|
Is the network being trimmed a little? Can’t book Liverpool - Belfast on BE after the end of the year. |
I suspect trimmed you would be better using the word pruned.
currently they have
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.