Originally Posted by cornishsimon
(Post 10673273)
When flybe were rumored to be heading down the sink recently an interesting article came out suggesting plans were in place for the network to be cut into bits and various routes taken over by other airlines.
as it was behind a paywall I don’t know how detailed the reports were, can anyone elaborate ? at this point I think a government loan isn’t going to be seen to be fair, and if it needs a loan on commercial terms why doesn’t Virgin Atlantic loan them ? surely the better outcome would of been for IAG to buy the company rather than connect last year ? cs As for the article you mentioned, it didn’t feature any concrete plans just that other airlines had discussed stepping in and taking over routes if Flybe went under. |
If Flybe can't make a route work on a 78 seat prop, how could the likes of Loganair make it work on a 50 seat jet? Granted there's one less crew member to cover the cost of, and am I right in thinking Loganair own the ER4's?
Is it down to internal overheads? Lease costs? Pricing strategy? Flybe would be better off helping Eastern in get in better shape and look to use 50 seat props to take over the marginal routes that might support higher prices and frequency for business travellers and use their bigger props on the routes with higher demand? I mean is there really demand for 3 EXT-MAN flights a day but only one EXT-EDI? And 7 BHX-EDI flights / 7 BHX-GLA? Surely chopping BHX-EDI/GLA down a bit would help the yield improve and there's still plenty of options for the frequency demands of business travellers. |
A friend of a friend who swears his best mates other best friend heard from a source close to someone who is close to a guy who says he knows a girl who was told by a family friend that BHD management have secured other operators to step in and take on the majority of BE routes if they folded. Not sure how true it is but I would say more than BHD is having informal exploratory talks with carriers and possibly even outside the UK to take on some routes.
|
Originally Posted by Alteagod
(Post 10673293)
A friend of a friend who swears his best mates other best friend heard from a source close to someone who is close to a guy who says he knows a girl who was told by a family friend that ...
|
Originally Posted by Brigantee
(Post 10673166)
https://www.ft.com/content/c87a967a-...7-eae9bd51ceba
This is why flybe needs to be in public ownership The government has deferred payments of the passenger tax which I can understand as if the airline went bust they would likely not get that money anyway. Worth pointing out that the government sees the importance of the Flybe UK connectivity yet many of those important routes are likely to be chopped anyway if there is to be any hope of saving the airline. |
Originally Posted by sinbad73
(Post 10673304)
I was lost after that much https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/confused.gif
|
Exactly my point!!
|
https://www.cityam.com/flybe-looks-f...saves-airline/
"Companies House filings show the airline has also effectively mortgaged assets such as its engines and buildings to Global Loans Agency Services (GLAS).GLAS’ previous clients include Thomas Cook, Interserve and Carillion in the weeks before they went bust." Certainly doesn't look good. They are also asking airports to delay payments for fees. |
Very well Alteagood makes the point too.
I doubt anyone here knows exactly the position with Flybe finances and if they did could not disclose the details but what seems to be abundantly clear is that the airline is losing money at a rapid rate of knots and whatever its shape in the future rearranging the deck chairs will butter no parsnips! As LTNman says if the airline had failed then the Government would not have received any outstanding fees anyway, yes, give a honeymoon on past payments, but ensure future payments are made on time. If the owners cannot transform the airline in to a sustainable business after that then the essential and PSO routes must be put to tender from other carriers and the rest will be decided by the owners. |
Originally Posted by GROUNDHOG
(Post 10673558)
Very well Alteagood makes the point too.
I doubt anyone here knows exactly the position with Flybe finances and if they did could not disclose the details but what seems to be abundantly clear is that the airline is losing money at a rapid rate of knots and whatever its shape in the future rearranging the deck chairs will butter no parsnips! As LTNman says if the airline had failed then the Government would not have received any outstanding fees anyway, yes, give a honeymoon on past payments, but ensure future payments are made on time. If the owners cannot transform the airline in to a sustainable business after that then the essential and PSO routes must be put to tender from other carriers and the rest will be decided by the owners. |
Originally Posted by GROUNDHOG
(Post 10673558)
If the owners cannot transform the airline in to a sustainable business after that then the essential and PSO routes must be put to tender from other carriers and the rest will be decided by the owners.
|
Originally Posted by ATNotts
(Post 10673471)
I think Alteagod was making the point that a lot of what is being written here, and doubtless elsewhere is pure rumour and conjecture, and largely devoid of actual fact. That's how read it anyway!
|
Originally Posted by toledoashley
(Post 10673574)
The government should be neutral and should have at least a Plan A and even a Plan B (which are in the public domain) in case flyBe in its current form can't be saved. This could be public ownership, could be expansion of PSO routes, sale of some assets to other airlines/partnership, reform of APD &/or subsidies...
|
Switching to Amadeus would have produced a large 8 digit hole in it's finances from what they were paying before. The switch to an easyjet pricing model a few years ago where their model is to maximise the load factor (and that's just not the case in regional flying) was never going to work. Just looked at a Mon-Thu peak return in March and I can do it for £120 all-in. There's just no need to price at such a stupidly low price when you know you are going to sell out. Unfortunaltely they have decided to rely on algorithmic programmes instead of getting people in who actually know what they're doing. It's a shame as there was potential there at one time.
|
It seems to me that the Flybe network has several parts:
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 10673695)
This government would never take Flybe into public ownership. We are not talking about railway franchises we are taking about a minor transport bit player when compared to the transportation giants.
|
Originally Posted by Cyrano
(Post 10673724)
It seems to me that the Flybe network has several parts:
|
Originally Posted by BA318
(Post 10673753)
The Loganair franchise went a few years back. Other than some codeshares, Loganair is independent of Flybe now. There are very few routes that Flybe operate outright which are lifeline routes now. The IOM routes have some deal to carry medical passengers to Liverpool. Newquay-LGW is a PSO route but other than that they don't provide any particular service which couldn't be replicated by someone else.
|
"with a range of things on the table if flybe isn't viable long term."
There is - it's called a car or a railway - or even a boat.................. |
If Flybe disappears, Eastern and Loganair will need to rethink their marketing and distribution, but they are already taking the commercial risk on their routes. other than that they don't provide any particular service which couldn't be replicated by someone else There is - it's called a car or a railway - or even a boat.................. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.