Eastern Airways-3
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 42
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by runway30
I am just musing here but if another passenger was filmed without their permission could the airline be asked to produce a copy under a Subject Access Request which would of course be impossible?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rivet Joint
No they wouldn’t and GDPR doesn’t apply to individuals anyway. You can only make a SAR to a business.
There was a recent case where a security camera postioned on a private property took pictures of someone who wan't within the area of that property.
If someone is filmed by that camera they have all their rights under the GDPR including making a Subject Access Request. Usually a householder will be a private individual.
However in this instance, both parties will be in a private place that they have been admitted to by the airline under a contract of carriage. Does the passenger have a right to privacy and does the airline have any liability if they have given implied permission by not stopping the passenger filming?
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 42
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by runway30
I'm not trying to score points here, just trying to examine the issue, but I have to point out that you are incorrect.
There was a recent case where a security camera postioned on a private property took pictures of someone who wan't within the area of that property.
If someone is filmed by that camera they have all their rights under the GDPR including making a Subject Access Request. Usually a householder will be a private individual.
However in this instance, both parties will be in a private place that they have been admitted to by the airline under a contract of carriage. Does the passenger have a right to privacy and does the airline have any liability if they have given implied permission by not stopping the passenger filming?
There was a recent case where a security camera postioned on a private property took pictures of someone who wan't within the area of that property.
If someone is filmed by that camera they have all their rights under the GDPR including making a Subject Access Request. Usually a householder will be a private individual.
However in this instance, both parties will be in a private place that they have been admitted to by the airline under a contract of carriage. Does the passenger have a right to privacy and does the airline have any liability if they have given implied permission by not stopping the passenger filming?
Eastern could not stop a passenger from filming. They could have them removed if it’s in their T&Cs but not stop it’s use.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk, Diss, UK
Age: 49
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
E190 and ATR reportedly heading out to TAP for six months lease - with Jota gone, 2Excel will be busy on Premier League charters!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
E190 and ATR reportedly heading out to TAP for six months lease - with Jota gone, 2Excel will be busy on Premier League charters!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like the ATR and the ERJ 190 have gone to TAP after all
