British Airways
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 42
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Co
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kot Addu
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/b...mabad-pakistan
Is this the smallest aircraft BA have used there post 707 and Vc10, did they ever fly 767s there?
Is this the smallest aircraft BA have used there post 707 and Vc10, did they ever fly 767s there?

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 65
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/b...mabad-pakistan
Is this the smallest aircraft BA have used there post 707 and Vc10, did they ever fly 767s there?
Is this the smallest aircraft BA have used there post 707 and Vc10, did they ever fly 767s there?

Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA didn't ever fly to Karachi during the 767's near three decades in the fleet - that was a service that stopped in the early 1980s if my memory serves me right, and Karachi used to be a TriStar over Dubai.
Post the VC10 era into Rawalpindi, BA had the 747s on LGW-ISB and then LGW-MAN-ISB BA2119 routing for a few years. It then went to LHR on 747 and latterly 777 before being dropped ten years ago. Unless I'm much mistaken, there was a flight ops technical reason why BA 767-300s couldn't do Islamabad - something about the RR-powered aircraft dry operating weights being heavier and a consequent problem with drift-down altitudes for those specific aircraft being below the MSA over one of the mountain ranges sticks in my mind as the reason why. One of the BA folk did explain it to me once upon a time during a discussion about BA 767s based at Manchester and why they never went east. It was certainly a convoluted problem but one which didn't affect routings going further south for the likes of HYD and BLR which - although even further - did receive BA 767 service over the years.
Happy to stand corrected if anyone can be more definitive!
Post the VC10 era into Rawalpindi, BA had the 747s on LGW-ISB and then LGW-MAN-ISB BA2119 routing for a few years. It then went to LHR on 747 and latterly 777 before being dropped ten years ago. Unless I'm much mistaken, there was a flight ops technical reason why BA 767-300s couldn't do Islamabad - something about the RR-powered aircraft dry operating weights being heavier and a consequent problem with drift-down altitudes for those specific aircraft being below the MSA over one of the mountain ranges sticks in my mind as the reason why. One of the BA folk did explain it to me once upon a time during a discussion about BA 767s based at Manchester and why they never went east. It was certainly a convoluted problem but one which didn't affect routings going further south for the likes of HYD and BLR which - although even further - did receive BA 767 service over the years.
Happy to stand corrected if anyone can be more definitive!

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kot Addu
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kot Addu
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I confirmed from a post at another forum BA did operate all variants of the Tristar to ISB at some point or as subs as mentioned above.
You are right it was changed to 767, also BA quit KHI in April 1991.
You are right it was changed to 767, also BA quit KHI in April 1991.

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kot Addu
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At the risk of making the most pedantic post of the year, I checked back in the BA timetables for 1989-1992 earlier today. Karachi was served by a TriStar routing over Kuwait (BA147/149) and stopped in Winter 1990/91 as evidently Kuwait services had stopped (not out of choice) at the same time. There was no mention of any BA 767 operation to Karachi anywhere.

I can understand why an airline might occasionally paint an aircraft in retro livery under the same name, but using the name of a predecessor company seems odd. The big corporate name and logo functions partly as an advertisement - and the old logo suggests how long established and mature a company is. Using the name of an old company loses that benefit and potentially causes confusion to people outside the airline industry
