Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Flybe-9

Reply

Old 8th Sep 2018, 07:41
  #481 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Durham
Age: 73
Posts: 163
Correct me if I am wrong, less paint means better fuel consumption, unless of course the repaint is taken back to the undercoat. Just a thought.
oldart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th Sep 2018, 20:47
  #482 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 49
[QUOTE=gkmeech;10243857]
I have flown many many times on Flybe over the years and have never had a seriously delay or cancellation. Have I now jinxed that?

Graham
[/QUOTE

#metoo
ZULUBOY is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 9th Sep 2018, 09:30
  #483 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: DK
Posts: 11
Any News on Stobart franchise? AGM to come.

Flybe timetable is still no longer available on their website. All Stobart operated routes from SEN are currently only bookable until the end of March 19, although their timetable previously contained several destinations after March. This could point to that soon we will see an announcement on a significant change in the relationship between the Stobart and Flybe?

Flybe's AGM will be this week. UBS has just topped up their holding by 1.5p.p. and is now almost 10%.

Any views?
limited_sight is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2018, 09:58
  #484 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 618
Received a response yesterday regarding the timetable being unavailable online since late August. Just technical - or so they say.

Dear David

Thank you for your email in regard to our timetable. I am sorry to hear you have been having difficulties with accessing this online.

I can advise that we are aware of the situation, and our IT Department is working on resolving it as soon as possible. In the meantime, you can use the 'Find flights' option to view our available flight times for a particular route and date.


We appreciate your patience and understanding in this matter. For future correspondence regarding this case, please quote the reference number and we will be glad to assist you.

Kind regards

Milena


Milena Jankovic - Customer Service Advisor
DC3 Dave is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th Sep 2018, 06:30
  #485 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: East London
Age: 35
Posts: 668
Originally Posted by mik3bravo View Post
I've heard through grapevine those E195s are sparsely seated over recent months
My flight last week was on stand 20 mins early and there were 90-ish of us. Not full, but far from empty. The DUB flight before us looked even busier.
AirportPlanner1 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th Sep 2018, 09:00
  #486 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 618
Timetable's back.
DC3 Dave is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th Sep 2018, 09:36
  #487 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: DK
Posts: 11
Thanks for your initiative.
limited_sight is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 06:11
  #488 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 477
The ATR72 600 is 10 tonnes lighter than the Dash 8 400 and obviously burns less fuel as a result. Although it is slower isn't this aircraft a better fit for Flybe in the long-term? They will surely need to start looking at replacing the Dash 8 400 in the future as the average age of the fleet is creeping up and will result in very expensive maintenance and engineering costs.
shamrock7seal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 09:55
  #489 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 341
Originally Posted by shamrock7seal View Post
The ATR72 600 is 10 tonnes lighter than the Dash 8 400 and obviously burns less fuel as a result. Although it is slower isn't this aircraft a better fit for Flybe in the long-term? They will surely need to start looking at replacing the Dash 8 400 in the future as the average age of the fleet is creeping up and will result in very expensive maintenance and engineering costs.
I was lead to believe the weight difference is closer to 4 - 5 tonne?

Flybe have recently evaluated their current and future fleet needs. For the next 3-5 years at least, the Q400s will remain the backbone of the fleet alongside the E175s. The ATR will of course have been part of the recent evaluation. However, for now, the Q400's "close to jet like speed", the efficiency within that field and its slightly higher seating capacity best suits the operation and avoids unnecessary costs right now that a new type would bring.

For much of the route network i do actually see the Q400 as the best frame for Flybe, especially when needing to be flexible with fitting in with the E-Jet schedules from time to time as well as operating on some longer sector routes. With a potential to be able to further increase the seating capacity on the Q400 aircraft, they could further improve their efficiency in this way alone and improve available seats on the network without too much significant cost.

That's not to say i dislike the ATR of course. But right now i fully understand the reasoning behind Flybes future fleet strategy evaluations and see it as the best fit for their ops for the foreseeable.
Cazza_fly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 13:58
  #490 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 314
I think, but I am prepared to be shot down in flames if I am wrong, that Flybe Q400s have drop down pax oxygen which gives them a max ceiling of 27,000 ft which in turn allows them to use upper airspace which would be very helpful on some of their routes. The ATR is limited to 25,000 ft so cannot use upper airspace.
willy wombat is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 14:58
  #491 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Willy, that's not correct. The Q400 is also capped at FL250 for the reason you state.
​​​​​Also upper airspace starts at FL245 so they do actually fly in upper airspace, albeit only in one direction.
Reversethrustset is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 15:16
  #492 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Back on The Island.
Posts: 439
Many's the time in the past, up to five years ago, Q400s requested F250 eastbound through Maastricht airspace only to descend a few minutes later, unable to maintain.
zed3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 17:01
  #493 (permalink)  
I REALLY SHOULDN'T BE HERE
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: TOD
Posts: 698
Drop down 02 is an option for the Q400 and increases the operating ceiling to FL270. The only issue is that you have to fly for quite a time at FL270 to get any real benefit of lower fuel burn since you have to carry the extra weight of the drop down O2 kit. Hence most companies don't bother as Q400s are generally used for shorter flights.

I never had any problem maintaining FL250 in the Dash in the half decade or so I flew it unless ice was accreting on the airframe and the OAT was at or below -40C. Not a performance issue - rather a minimum operating temperature for the pneumatic de-ice boots.
speedrestriction is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 18:07
  #494 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 313
Originally Posted by Cazza_fly View Post
I was lead to believe the weight difference is closer to 4 - 5 tonne?

Flybe have recently evaluated their current and future fleet needs. For the next 3-5 years at least, the Q400s will remain the backbone of the fleet alongside the E175s. The ATR will of course have been part of the recent evaluation. However, for now, the Q400's "close to jet like speed", the efficiency within that field and its slightly higher seating capacity best suits the operation and avoids unnecessary costs right now that a new type would bring.

For much of the route network i do actually see the Q400 as the best frame for Flybe, especially when needing to be flexible with fitting in with the E-Jet schedules from time to time as well as operating on some longer sector routes. With a potential to be able to further increase the seating capacity on the Q400 aircraft, they could further improve their efficiency in this way alone and improve available seats on the network without too much significant cost.

That's not to say i dislike the ATR of course. But right now i fully understand the reasoning behind Flybes future fleet strategy evaluations and see it as the best fit for their ops for the foreseeable.
In the long run if they do replace the Q400 would they actually be better off to replace them with the E175 rather than the ATR?
PDXCWL45 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th Sep 2018, 18:17
  #495 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 144
zed3 I've spent 5,000 hrs in the Q400 at FL250 and have never had to descend due to not being able to maintain.
Reversethrustset is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th Sep 2018, 17:23
  #496 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On the road
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by PDXCWL45 View Post
In the long run if they do replace the Q400 would they actually be better off to replace them with the E175 rather than the ATR?
Depends what the price difference is. The issue with the E170's was never the operating cost but the price that the frames were bought for.
TartinTon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Sep 2018, 19:30
  #497 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,064
My son was due to fly late this afternoon Bhx - Bhd. Flight cancelled due to no/not enough crew he was told. Not due to weather. They are being bussed to Man for a flight later this evening.

Wonderful.
True Blue is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Sep 2018, 19:47
  #498 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On the road
Posts: 605
There will crew/aircraft out of position all over the place in the UK tonight so while the official reason might be no crew it could well be because they are sitting on the tarmac out of position somewhere. Most airports north of central England are reporting diverts/cancellations today.
TartinTon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Sep 2018, 20:05
  #499 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,064
TartinTon

You may well be correct. That is not what he was told, but that could be poor communication, hardly surprising with airlines/handling companies. If your suspicion is right, it would have been better to tell them that, it would have been more understandable. However, airlines, still, need to treat people like fools.
True Blue is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Sep 2018, 22:42
  #500 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 341
Originally Posted by True Blue View Post
TartinTon

You may well be correct. That is not what he was told, but that could be poor communication, hardly surprising with airlines/handling companies. If your suspicion is right, it would have been better to tell them that, it would have been more understandable. However, airlines, still, need to treat people like fools.
The thing is, Flybe did their best to get the pax to their destination, even if it did mean a journey by road to an alternate departure airport first. I'm sure they would have rather operated the scheduled flight as planned.
Cazza_fly is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service