MANCHESTER - 9
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mahan Air have just announced 3 weekly Tehran to Gatwick using A310/A340. I wonder if Manchester would be reconsidered?
Aviator ? Aviator signs contract with Mahan Air
Aviator ? Aviator signs contract with Mahan Air
Mahan Air have just announced 3 weekly Tehran to Gatwick using A310/A340. I wonder if Manchester would be reconsidered?
My guess however is that having apparently gained usable slots at LGW, they're more likely to concentrate on the London market that move north this time. in fact reading the very short release from Aviator that would appear to be the plan; LGW with first diversion option being BHX - though why they should put this into the release seems a little strange to me - any they planning diversions?
Last edited by ATNotts; 20th Oct 2014 at 08:42. Reason: Subsequently read the Aviator news release
With the demise of Little Red, does anyone here know whether BA will be increasing MAN-LHR flights to compensate?
I just wondered if the early morning flights were carrying good loads BA may need an extra nightstopper.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just wondered if the early morning flights were carrying good loads BA may need an extra nightstopper.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assume it's the forecast strong winds that have caused BA to cancel flights.
When that wind swings round to North Westerly, I see potential big problems for MAN if gusts reach 30-45 mph for R23 even if it's dry by then.
BHX is better placed with R33, and what happens at LHR on 27s will depend on any windsheer, how strong the gusts are etc. Likely to affect rate of arrivals though I imagine.
All if the forecast proves accurate of course.
When that wind swings round to North Westerly, I see potential big problems for MAN if gusts reach 30-45 mph for R23 even if it's dry by then.
BHX is better placed with R33, and what happens at LHR on 27s will depend on any windsheer, how strong the gusts are etc. Likely to affect rate of arrivals though I imagine.
All if the forecast proves accurate of course.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 1325 and 1520 shuttles canx today following a specific request from Heathrow Airport and NATs to cancel 10% of all Heathrow flights.
Scrolling down the arrivals at LHR (as at 0800) it seems specific to BA, as the largest operator no other flights (Other than LH strike are affected).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure BMI Regional will be feeding LHR anytime soon !
http://www.incentivetravel.co.uk/new...s-bmi-regional
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and finally The China Forum presents some major opportunities for Chinese investors in Manchester !
https://bdaily.co.uk/entrepreneurshi...olio-in-china/
Fantastic BUT if it is nailed on without specifics, why not be much more positive and say
"..and soon there WILL be direct flights to Beijing as well Hong Kong "
Gavin
With reference your comments and the China Forum above, my concern is that the Manchester Forum was partially part of the driving force in terms of this agenda for amending the UK - China bi lateral, I agree "if" there is an opportunity to include STN then MAG will no doubt grasp the opportunity BUT it still introduces a degree of risk, something that would not have occurred if the MAN route was ringfenced.
So is It ?
Given the lack of announcement negotiations do indeed appear to be MAG versus X as opposed to Manchester versus X.
If the charges for MAN are "XYZ" what happens if an airline now chooses to play one off against the other?
I assume charges at MAN are set at a commercial level, is this the case at STN given it has no long haul network ?
Will charges at STN be discretionary in light of this or is the CAA ruling still in force ?
Could this not put MAG in same position as the BAA with one airport being seen to effectively cross subsidize another ?
Not sure what the position is now on this one
I sincerely hope that everytime there is a potential new entrant to Manchester or a proposed route expansion we are not going to have STN hang onto Manchester's shirt tail although I suspect we will !
Scrolling down the arrivals at LHR (as at 0800) it seems specific to BA, as the largest operator no other flights (Other than LH strike are affected).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure BMI Regional will be feeding LHR anytime soon !
http://www.incentivetravel.co.uk/new...s-bmi-regional
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and finally The China Forum presents some major opportunities for Chinese investors in Manchester !
https://bdaily.co.uk/entrepreneurshi...olio-in-china/
Fantastic BUT if it is nailed on without specifics, why not be much more positive and say
"..and soon there WILL be direct flights to Beijing as well Hong Kong "
Gavin
With reference your comments and the China Forum above, my concern is that the Manchester Forum was partially part of the driving force in terms of this agenda for amending the UK - China bi lateral, I agree "if" there is an opportunity to include STN then MAG will no doubt grasp the opportunity BUT it still introduces a degree of risk, something that would not have occurred if the MAN route was ringfenced.
So is It ?
Given the lack of announcement negotiations do indeed appear to be MAG versus X as opposed to Manchester versus X.
If the charges for MAN are "XYZ" what happens if an airline now chooses to play one off against the other?
I assume charges at MAN are set at a commercial level, is this the case at STN given it has no long haul network ?
Will charges at STN be discretionary in light of this or is the CAA ruling still in force ?
Could this not put MAG in same position as the BAA with one airport being seen to effectively cross subsidize another ?
Not sure what the position is now on this one
I sincerely hope that everytime there is a potential new entrant to Manchester or a proposed route expansion we are not going to have STN hang onto Manchester's shirt tail although I suspect we will !
Last edited by Bagso; 21st Oct 2014 at 13:56.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: manchester
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cathay pacific and Hainan
I guess the loads are brillant for cathay pacific for the first 2 months with flights coming into manchester overbooked on the first week. Let's see what cathay does now?
Also any further news on hainan to finish this jigsaw of before a announcement??. Also I inboxed them on Facebook this morning and there reply was " thank you for reaching out to us, but we do not have any further developments with the flights to manchester. We know the same as publicly known, also you will surely be one of our special inbox requesters for a direct message from us once we can start offering flights to manchester- Beijing"
Now I didn't mension beijing but ok...
Seems there's deffinetly something holding a announcement back!
Also any further news on hainan to finish this jigsaw of before a announcement??. Also I inboxed them on Facebook this morning and there reply was " thank you for reaching out to us, but we do not have any further developments with the flights to manchester. We know the same as publicly known, also you will surely be one of our special inbox requesters for a direct message from us once we can start offering flights to manchester- Beijing"
Now I didn't mension beijing but ok...
Seems there's deffinetly something holding a announcement back!
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: MAN
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bagso
Charges at STN are no longer regulated by CAA - it was removed from price control in April and is now in the same situation as MAN. So it can charge what it chooses, subject to compliance with general competition law (which obviously applies to any airport).
As for any 'cross subsidy' I really don't think this arises. Both airports are highly profitable so I don't think there can be any suggestion of cross subsidy.
Charges at STN are no longer regulated by CAA - it was removed from price control in April and is now in the same situation as MAN. So it can charge what it chooses, subject to compliance with general competition law (which obviously applies to any airport).
As for any 'cross subsidy' I really don't think this arises. Both airports are highly profitable so I don't think there can be any suggestion of cross subsidy.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure BMI Regional will be feeding LHR anytime soon !
Last edited by Fairdealfrank; 22nd Oct 2014 at 00:29.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Manchester Airport Winter 2014 summary has been released. W14 looking better than W13.
Main points:
- DL still down as 764
- Sunair increasing Gothenburg and Billund
- Some SAS decreases
- SN Brussels all A319
- Thomson - New winter to Kuusamo and general increase to most winter destinations
Most other points have been previously reported:
http://www.acl-uk.org/UserFiles/File...ason%20W14.pdf
Main points:
- DL still down as 764
- Sunair increasing Gothenburg and Billund
- Some SAS decreases
- SN Brussels all A319
- Thomson - New winter to Kuusamo and general increase to most winter destinations
Most other points have been previously reported:
http://www.acl-uk.org/UserFiles/File...ason%20W14.pdf
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: England
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flights selling well, yield is well in line with expectations, and, discussions for daily flights are already taking place, but, thus far, aircraft availability is holding that back.
Give it a rest for gods sake, you're making yourself look very silly.